Title: Aspects of Conditional Simulation and estimation of hydraulic conductivity in coastal aquifers" Luit Jan Slooten
1Aspects of Conditional Simulation and estimation
of hydraulic conductivity in coastal aquifers"
Luit Jan Slooten
2Contents
- Introduction
- Review of Inverse problem
- Review of conditional simulation
- A method to perform conditional simulation for
saltwater intrusions - Use of tidal wave data
- Incorporation of tidal wave data into
conditioning of saltwater intrusion data
3Saltwater intrusion
4Saltwater intrusion in heterogeneous media
- Small and medim scale
- heterogeneity effective
- equations/parameters
- Large scale heterogeneity inverse problem
From E. Abarca
5Inverse problem (I)
- Find parameters that produce best model fit
- Model fit expressed in objective function
weighted squared residual norm with
regularization term
- Model performance can be judged in terms of
weighted residual bias and variance ideally,
bias is zero and variance is small
6Inverse problem (II)
- Methods of minimizing F with respect to p
- Global search simulated annealing, swarm
methods, monte carlo - extensive sampling of parameter space
- Attempt to find global minimum
- Feasibly only for small amount of parameters to
estimate - Local search steepest gradient,
Marquardt-Levenberg - Need far less objective function evaluations
- Need gradient of objective function and sometimes
approximation of second derivatives - Attempt to find local minimum ? result depends
on starting parameters - Can deal withlarge numbers of parameters
7Derivatives of objective function
Solve each timestep n1 times
8Derivatives of objective function
For each timestep, solve nonlinear problem, and
as many linear systems as there are parameters
9Parameterization methods
- Express discrete model parameter vector in
function of estimable parameters
Example Zones of constant parameter value
10Conditional Estimation
- Prior information in pilot points is obtained by
kriging from observations - Covariance matrix of parameters is estimation
covariance of this kriging system (as such it is
conditional to observations)
11Conditional Simulation
- Simulated K is random but respects measurements
- Prior information in pilot points is value of
simulation field value obtained by kriging from
observations - Covariance matrix is 2 times the covariance
computed from the kriging from the observations
12Comparison of methods
Conditional Estimation
Conditional simulation
TRUE
(64 pilot points, 10 observations of log10K k,
160 of hydraulic head)
13Conditional Estimation and Simulation
- Initially, field is conditioned to parameter
measurements - Using an inverse problem approach the pilot
points are estimated to condition the resulting
fields to observations of state variables. - Simulation represents local heterogeneity better
but requieres many realizations of drift field - Both work best with large number of pilot points
(regularization term stabilises to allow this)
14Inverse problem for saltwater intrusion
- Simplifications are common to reduce running time
- Constant density model
- Homogeneous model or zones
15Inverse problem for saltwater intrusion
- Approach using steady state approximation of
system dynamics - For SWI, steady state is computed by a long
transient simulation with constant boundary
conditions.
16Derivatives of objective function
17Derivatives of objective function
18Computation time
Solving variable density flow and transport
problem at a mesh of 861 nodes. Estimating 16
parameters. Transient simulation simulates
36000s divided over 492 timesteps
Time for 1 inverse problem iteration Derive transient Derive steady state only
Parameter perturbation 34 min 2min 50 s
Automatic derivation 15 min 2 min 10 s
19Test
- Generated random field
- Extracted observations and prior information (172
hydraulic head, 172 concentration, 10 log K) - Added gaussian noise
- Used this dataset to optimize 64 pilot points
20Test case
21Example result
22Tidal wave propagation
Propagation inland in homogeneous confined
aquifer perpendicular to coastline produces
DAMPING and PHASE SHIFT
23Tidal wave propagation (homogeneous case,
constant denstity)
S 0.01 m-1 K 1.58 m/d
24Effect of tidal wave on velocity(homogeneous
confined aquifer)
Difference between steady state velocity and
25Do we need density dependent flow to model tidal
wave propagation?
26Heterogeneous case
27Effect of tidal wave on velocity(heterogeneous
confined aquifer)
28Tidal wave propagation (heterogeneous case)
29Modeling tidal wave propagation amplitude
- Only flow is sufficient
- Mesh must be sufficiently long
- Mesh may be coarser than the one needed for
correct simulation of saltwater intrusion - Problem is linear
30Compute transient simulation until reaching
steady state (NO derivatives)
Compute steady state simulation using transient
solution as initial guess, and derivatives
simultaneously
Solve tidal fluctuation amplitude using much
larger and coarser mesh, ONLY Flow, Transient,
and compute derivatives simultaneously
Compute new parameter set
Converged?
31Use of tidal wave propagation for aquifer
characterization
- Carr and Van Der Kamp (1969) Determining
Aquifer Characteristics by the Tidal Method - 80s , 90s many analytical solutions for
different aquifer geometries - Alcolea et al Inverse Modeling of Coastal
Aquifers Using Tidal Response and Hydraulic
Tests (uses constant density model for
horizontal 2d plane)
32To do
- Evaluate whether weighted resiudal variance and
bias is reduced if transmissivity fields are
conditioned not only to head and concentration,
but also to tidal wave amplitude date
33Conclusions
- A method was presented to perform conditional
simulation and estimation of saltwater intrusions
in steady state in an efficient way - It was shown that tidal wave amplitude data can
be modeled with the flow equation only - An algorithm was presented to condition random
fields to tidal wave data, head and concentration
without loosing the steady state approximation of
the coupled problem.