Jet Reconstruction Algorithms - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Jet Reconstruction Algorithms

Description:

... easy to calculate order by order in pertubation theory from partonic final-state. Have a close correspondence with the distribution of the final-state quarks and ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:24
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: evaz2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Jet Reconstruction Algorithms


1
Jet Reconstruction Algorithms
  • Eric Vazquez
  • PHENIX- Journal Club

2
Outline
  • Properties of Jets
  • Algorithms
  • Cone vs KT
  • D0 data

3
Properties of Jets
  • We want event properties that satisfy the
    following properties
  • Well-defined and easy to measure
  • Well-defined and easy to calculate order by order
    in pertubation theory from partonic final-state.
  • Have a close correspondence with the distribution
    of the final-state quarks and gluons that we are
    really interested in.

4
Cone Algorithm
  • Very simple to define
  • Direction that maximizes the energy flowing
    through a cone drawn around it.

5
Cone Algorithm
  • Advantages
  • Energy corrections are easy to make due to its
    purely geometrical properties.
  • Disadvantages
  • Problems arise when cones overlap.
  • Different definitions will give rise to different
    number of jets. (i.e. parton-level vs hadron
    level)

6
KT Algorithm
  • Begin with a list of protojets and define
  • If di is min then remove from list and add to
    list of jets else merge protojets from dij

7
KT Algorithm
8
KT Algorithm
  • Things to consider
  • Only the last protojets to be added to the list
    of jets are of interest.
  • It is crucial that the cross section be infrared
    safe (i.e. no long distance effects)

9
KT Algorithm
  • Advantages
  • No overlap region to worry about.
  • Less sensitive to pertubations from soft
    particles which results in smaller hadronization
    and detector corrections.
  • Still similar to cone algorithm except for the
    fact that radius is adjusted on an event-by-event
    basis.

10
Comparing Algorithms
  • Determine how close the kT jet come with respect
    to the matching cone-jet axis

11
Comparing Algorithms
  • Differences arise by how the two algorithms deal
    with hadronization effects.

12
Analyzing internal Jet Structure
  • In order to resolve internal jet structure, D is
    set to 0.5 in order to try and resolve any
    subjets.
  • The ratio of gluon-quark multiplicity is
    determined and then compared to Monte Carlo
    Simulation.

13
Analyzing internal Jet Structure
  • Define ratio as
  • Multiplicities

14
Gluon-jet fraction
15
Results
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com