R - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

R

Description:

IIT Graduate Seminar, November 9, 2005. coauthors: Vadim Ponomarenko, Trinity ... some fraction of answers to be lies (partly studied by Spencer and Winkler) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:23
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: robert943
Learn more at: http://math.iit.edu
Category:
Tags: winkler

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: R


1
Rényi-Ulam liar games with a fixed number of lies
  • Robert B. Ellis
  • Illinois Institute of Technology
  • IIT Graduate Seminar, November 9, 2005
  • coauthors
  • Vadim Ponomarenko, Trinity University
  • Catherine Yan, Texas AM

2
Two Vector Games
3
The original liar game
4
Original liar game example
5
Original liar game example
6
Original liar game history
7
A football pool
Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 4 Round 5
Bet 1 W W W W W
Bet 2 L W W W W
Bet 3 W L W W W
Bet 4 W W L L L
Bet 5 L L W L L
Bet 6 L L L W L
Bet 7 L L L L W
Payoff a bet with 1 bad
prediction Question. Min bets to guarantee a
payoff?
Ans.7
8
Pathological liar game as a football pool
Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 4 Round 5
Bet 1 W
Bet 2 W
Bet 3 W
Bet 4 L
Bet 5 L
Bet 6 L
Carole W
Payoff a bet with 1 bad
prediction Question. Min bets to guarantee a
payoff?
Ans.6
9
Pathological liar game history
Liar Games
Covering Codes
10
Optimal n for Pauls win
11
Sphere bound for both games
12
Converse to sphere bound a counterexample
Y
N
10
6
9
7
7
9
3-weight of possible next states
13
Perfect balancing is winning
16 (4-weight)
8 (3-weight)
4
2
1
14
A balancing theorem for both games
15
Lower bound for the original game
16
Upper bound for the pathological game
17
Upper bound for the pathological game
18
Summary of game bounds
19
Unified 1 lie strategy
20
Unified 1 lie strategy
21
Recall (x,q,1) game as a football pool
Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 4 Round 5
Bet 1 W W W
Bet 2 W L W W
Bet 3 W L L L L
Bet 4 L W
Bet 5 L W
Bet 6 L W
Carole W L L L W
Payoff a bet with 1 bad
prediction Question. Min bets to guarantee a
payoff?
Ans.6
22
Bets adaptive Hamming balls
A radius 1 bet with predictions on 5 rounds can
pay off in 6 ways

Root 1 1 0 1 0 All predictions correct
Child 1 0 1st prediction incorrect
Child 2 1 0 2nd prediction incorrect
Child 3 1 1 1 3rd prediction incorrect
Child 4 1 1 0 0 4th prediction incorrect
Child 5 1 1 0 1 1 5th prediction incorrect
Round 2
Round 4
Round 5
Round 3
Round 1
A fixed choice in 0,1 for each yields an
adaptive Hamming ball of radius 1.
23
Strategy tree for adaptive betting
W/1
L/0
L/0
L/0
W/1
W/1
Paths to leaves containing 1 11111 Root (0
incorrect predictions) 00101 Child 1 (1
incorrect prediction) 10101 Child 2
? 11001 Child 3 ? 11101 Child 4
? 11110 Child 5 (1 incorrect
prediction)
24
Adaptive code reformulation
25
Radius 1 packings within coverings
26
Radius 1 packings within coverings
27
Open directions
  • Asymmetric Hamming balls and structures for
    arbitrary communication channels (Spencer,
    Dumitriu for original game)
  • Questions occurring in batches (partly solved for
    original game)
  • Simultaneous packings and coverings for general k
  • Passing to kk(n), such as allowing some fraction
    of answers to be lies (partly studied by Spencer
    and Winkler)
  • Comparisons to random walks and
    discrete-balancing processes such as chip-firing
    and the Propp machine

Thank you.
rellis_at_math.iit.edu http//math.iit.edu/rellis/
vadim_at_trinity.edu http//www.trinity.edu/vadim/
cyan_at_math.tamu.edu http//www.math.tamu.edu/cyan/

(preprints)
28
Lower bound by probabilistic strategy
29
Upper bound Stage I, x! y
30
Upper bound Stages I (cont) II
31
Upper bound Stage III and conclusion
32
Exact result for k1
33
Exact result for k2
34
Linear relaxation and a random walk
If Paul is allowed to choose entries of a to be
real rather than integer, then ax/2 makes the
weight imbalance 0. Example
((n,0,0,0),q,3)-game and random walk on the
integers
35
Covering code formulation
W!1, L!0
C
Equivalent question What is the minimum number of
radius 1 Hamming balls needed to cover the
hypercube Q5?
36
Sparse history of covering code density
37
Future directions
  • Efficient Algorithmic implementations of
    encoding/decoding using adaptive covering codes
  • Generalizations of the game to k a function of n
  • Generalization to an arbitrary communication
    channel(Carole has t possible responses, and
    certain responses eliminate Pauls vector
    entirely)
  • Pullback of a directed random walk on the
    integers with weighted transition probabilities
  • Generalization of the game to a general weighted,
    directed graph
  • Comparison of game to similar processes such as
    chip-firing and the Propp machine via discrepancy
    analysis

rellis_at_math.tamu.edu http//www.math.tamu.edu/rel
lis/ vadim_at_trinity.edu http//www.trinity.edu/va
dim/ cyan_at_math.tamu.edu http//www.math.tamu.edu/
cyan/
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com