Title: Future of Fibre Optics in the oil and gas Industry
1Future of Fibre Optics in the oil and gas
Industry
- Kjetil Johannessen StatoilHydro
2Subsea data managementintegrated fiber optic
subsea system
Riserless light well intervention
Permanent ocean bottom seismic
Monobore drilling
Environmental monitoring
Integrated fiber optic System
Subsea compression and seperation
Integrated subsea control modules
Subsea injection of raw sea water
Downhole monitoring and control
Multi lateral wells
3New generation control system
Traditional control system
4Tradeoffs a different world Exemplified
umbilical vs. telecom cables
- Complex vs. simpler cable connections
- Cost flexibility of installation subsea is the
determining factor - Additional cost of crossing a pipeline is roughly
1 M - Repair dominated by mobilization of vessel
5Development of new regions
- New regions may offer new options and challenges
- Tieback subsea to beach is a new trend/option
particularly for gas fields. - Long tieback can favor alternatives to
traditional hydraulic systems. - New opportunities for instrumentation can provide
much more data during the drilling and workover
phase or during seismic surveys that can benefit
from streaming large amounts of high bandwidth
data back to operations support. - Umbilicals generally have very long lead time and
the installation of umbilicals can set a slow
pace for communication infrastructure in an area
with limited. - Particularly if no fixed installation with a
stable high bandwith communication can be reached
with a temporal radio link (up to roughly 30 km)
and in areas with limited satellite coverage the
value of having the communication infrastructure
in place early can be substantial.
6Reliability todays situation
Failures in subsea systems
OREDA Database 2002, Statoil ASA
Use fiber to combat the rest !
7Needs for instrumentation and control
- Reliability!!! field proven and systematic
approach to new unproven devices - Always fail safe backup (if failure how to
utilize the well and particularly not causing
safety hazard or damaging the well) - Reduced time, complexity and risk during
installation and completions phase - Reduce problems at tubing hanger and any
connector/connection - Reliable splice and on rig floor adaptations
(e.g. length of particular zones) - Many problems have been related to electric power
supplies, with longer tiebacks problems and
disadvantages with hydraulics increase.
Introduction of fiber must reduce overall risk
(and probably complexity). - Replace not add
failing components.
8Making the most of a main bore at Troll Oil
9StatoilHydro specific challenges
- More fields in the 125 to 175 C range than most
other operators. - New developments heavily dominated by sub-sea
developments ? ultra deep water. - Also, high pressure (not necessarily so warm,
GoM) - More problems with flow assurance (subsea) than
average - Exposed in areas with difficult weather
(Norwegian sea particularly, but also North
Atlantic, GoM in hurricane season) - High cost for development per well -gt maximize
the use of each well head - High cost of intervention -gt minimize need for
intervention and if required allow for light well
intervention only (ship with wireline, subsidiary
coiled tubing)
10Building blocks that are not readily available
- Optical and fiber components that have a long
track record subsea (to validate reliability
relative to traditional solutions) - Marinized optical interrogators
- Low loss wet mate connectors and jumpers (also a
cost issue) - Optical wellhead penetrations (including multiple
fiber systems) - Downhole connection systems for multilateral
wells in particular - Reconfiguration of fiber infrastructure without
the use of ROV (Switches, routing that can be
deployed and trusted subsea)?? - Sensor needs (not necessarily fiber) local water
cut and gas fraction, flow through screens,
sensors probing out of the completions into the
reservoir - Integration of fiber with pipelines and infield
flowlines - Some of these aspects are addressed by Seafom
others not