Title: Warwickshire County Council Mystery Shopping Overall vs' Chief Execs December 2005
1Warwickshire County Council Mystery
ShoppingOverall vs. Chief Execs December 2005
Warwickshire County CouncilSynovate 952594 Decem
ber 2005
2Contents
- Background Methodology
- Results
- Calls
- Visits
- Emails
- Conclusions
3Background
- WCC is committed to continual appraisal of its
strategy and to improve services provided to the
public, especially by front line staff - Standards for service are set out in the WCC
Customer Charter - Synovate has been conducting Mystery Shopping
Checks since 2000 to examine service delivery
4Research Objectives
- To measure service delivery across all key
departments in line with Charter levels - To monitor the service over time
- Additionally, from time to time, any additional
areas of interest are included - for instance
focussed the research on ethnic callers in one
wave and on redirected enquiries in another - Autumn 2005 intended as cut down wave of research
to focus on issues from Spring wave (so some
sample sizes are small)
5Methodology
- Mystery shopping contacts are made by visits,
calls, letters and emails to front-line
departments
6Contacts by Department
7Details of Methodology
- Enquiries made over a 4 week period allowing 10
working days for any replies to be received - All contacts made by local evaluators to ensure
realistic contacts - Appropriate scenarios used for each department
- Originally repeated measures quarterly now
bi-annually - Results are aggregated across scenarios
8Calls
9 Getting Through On First Attempt
Getting Through
Average No. Of Rings Before Answer
Base All answering Overall (36), Chief Execs
(10)
Base All answering Overall (32), Chief Execs
(9)
- Chief Execs outperforming the average in terms of
getting through on the first attempt and within 4
rings.
10Call Handling
Transfer Process
Call Handler
(8)
(2)
(1)
(2)
(0)
(4)
Base All who spoke to a call handler (Overall
32, Chief Execs 9)
Base All who were transferred (Overall 2, Chief
Execs 0)
- Standards Charter states that call handlers
should give their name
11 Answered Query Correctly
Enquiry Handler
Checking Satisfaction/Understanding
Base All answering Overall (34), Chief Execs
(9)
Base All answering Overall (34), Chief Execs
(9)
- Correctly answered queries given by Chief Execs
dept is the same as the overall result
12Leaflets Website
Sent Leaflets/literature
Directed to Website
N/A
N/A
Base All expecting leaflet/literature Overall
(34), Chief Execs (0)
Base All expecting to be directed to website
Overall (34), Chief Execs (0)
- Charts show percentages of those expecting to
receive some form of literature or directions to
the WCC website based on their scenario.
13Staff Ratings
Overall
Base All answeringOverall (34), Chief Execs (9)
Chief Execs
- Call handlers in the Chief Execs dept rated
slightly higher than overall, except in their
Efficient, Warm and Friendly and Interested where
the ratings are the same.
14Overall Satisfaction With Enquiry
Handling
Base Overall (36), Chief Execs (10)
- 3 in 5 Chief Exec enquiries was handled to a very
satisfied level
15Summary - Calls
- Number of callers getting through on their first
attempt was better than overall - On average calls answered well within 5 rings
- Call handlers greet more than other depts
overall, improvements could be made in providing
their department, their name, council name and
service name to callers. - Encouragingly all enquiries were answered by the
original call handler - 8 out of 10 queries answered correctly
- Staff ratings are the same or better than those
for all departments overall
16Visits
17Reception
Being Seen Immediately
Verbally Greeted by Receptionist
Base All answering Overall (25), Chief Execs
(9)
Base All answering Overall (25), Chief Execs
(9)
- Good results for initial Chief Execs reception
contact
18Reception
Passed to Another Member of Staff
Wore Name Tag/plaque on Desk
Base All answering Overall (25), Chief Execs
(9)
Base All answering Overall (25), Chief Execs
(9)
- Standards Charter states that staff should wear
an identity badge
19Visit Experiences
Passed to other staff member
Initial Contact
(2)
(9)
(2)
(3)
(9)
(2)
(4)
Base All who visited reception (Overall 25,
Chief Execs 9)
Base All who were transferred to another person
(Overall 3, Chief Execs 2)
Caution low base
- The Chief Execs reception offered complete
acknowledgement and greeting.
20Ratings Of Place Visited
Overall
Chief Execs
Base All answering Overall (25), Chief Execs (9)
- Chief Execs reception was rated highly across all
aspects
21 Answered Query Correctly
Enquiry Handler
Checking Satisfaction/Understanding
Base All answering Overall (25) Chief Execs (9)
Base All answering Overall (25), Chief Execs
(9)
- All Chief Execs enquiries were answered correctly
with a good level of checking for satisfaction
and understanding
22Leaflets Website
Given Leaflets/literature
Directed to Website
Base All expecting leaflet/literature Overall
(25), Chief Execs (5)
Base All expecting to be directed to website
Overall (25), Chief Execs (2)
- Charts show percentages of those expecting to
receive some form of literature or directions to
the WCC website based on their scenario.
23Staff Ratings
Overall
Chief Execs
Base All answering Overall (25), Chief Execs
(9)
- Chief Execs ratings outperform the average
across all categories
24Overall Satisfaction With Enquiry
Handling
Base Overall (25), Chief Execs (9)
- All Chief Exec enquirers are very satisfied
25Summary - Visits
- Good results for initial Chief Exec reception
contacts - Very good acknowledgement and verbal greeting by
staff - Chief Exec obtained high rating for reception
environment - Enquiry handling and staff ratings very good
- Staff members could be more proactive in
providing directions to appropriate WCC websites
and in providing appropriate literature
26Emails
27Replies Received To Email Enquiry
Email Contacts
Receiving No Reply To Email
Base All receiving reply - Overall (45) Chief
Execs (10) All receiving acknowledgment - Overall
(6) Chief Execs (2) All Receiving full reply -
Overall (28) Chief Execs (8)
Base All answering Overall (45) Chief Execs
(10)
- Email contacts received a reply within a short
period of time
28 Answered Query Correctly
Enquiry Handler
Reply Easy To Understand
Base All answering Overall (28) Chief Execs (8)
Base All answering Overall (28),Chief Execs (8)
- 3 out of 5 enquiries were answered correctly and
were easy to understand in line with overall
email contacts
29Leaflets Website
Given leaflets/literature
Directed to website
All expecting leaflet/literature Overall (28),
Chief Execs (1)
Base All expecting to be directed to website
Overall (28), Chief Execs (1)
- Charts show percentages of those expecting to
receive some form of literature or directions to
the WCC website based on their scenario.
30Staff Ratings
Overall
Chief Execs
Base All answering Overall (28), Chief Execs
(8)
- Chief Exec emails received high ratings for staff
with the highest being professionalism
31Overall Satisfaction With Enquiry
Handling
Base Overall (45), Chief Execs (10)
- 7 in 10 Chief Execs email enquiries were very
satisfied with the way their enquiry was handled
32Summary - Emails
- The level of response to emails was satisfactory,
although still room for improvement - On average a full email response was given in
just over a day - 6 out of 10 responses were answered correctly
with all responses easy to understand but the
level of correct answers should be improved - Particularly high ratings were achieved for
politeness, knowledgeable and professionalism of
emails
33Conclusions
- Overall enquiry handling for the Chief Execs was
rated highly, particularly for visits - Visits to the Chief Execs reception area revealed
staff and environment to be performing very well - Acknowledgements and full responses to e-mail
enquiries made to Chief Execs dept took shorter
than the average - Level of response for e-mail enquiries answered
satisfactory, but there is no room for
complacency similarly the level of correct
answers provided
34(No Transcript)