Microsoft Clip Gallery - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 54
About This Presentation
Title:

Microsoft Clip Gallery

Description:

INCREASE AWARENESS OF AND INTEREST IN THE FUTURE. IMPROVE COMMUNICATION SKILLS (BOTH VERBAL AND WRITTEN) ... THE WILDER THE IDEAS, THE BETTER. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:68
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 55
Provided by: edWr
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Microsoft Clip Gallery


1
(No Transcript)
2
FUTURE PROBLEM SOLVING
  • LEARNING
  • THINKING
  • COMMUNICATING

3
  • INTERSCHOLASTIC
  • ACADEMIC
  • COMPETITION

4
GOALS OF THE FUTURE PROBLEM SOLVING PROGRAM
  • DEVELOP CREATIVE THINKING
  • INCREASE AWARENESS OF AND INTEREST IN THE FUTURE
  • IMPROVE COMMUNICATION SKILLS (BOTH VERBAL AND
    WRITTEN)

5
GOALS OF THE FUTURE PROBLEM SOLVING PROGRAM
(CONTD)
  • LEARN AND UTILIZE PROBLEM SOLVING STRATEGIES
  • DEVELOP TEAMWORK SKILLS
  • DEVELOP AND IMPROVE RESEARCH TECHNIQUES
  • EXERCISE CRITICAL AND ANALYTICAL THOUGHT

6
PROCESS SKILLS
  • ANALYZING COMPOSING
  • APPLYING COMPREHENDING
  • ASSUMING CONDENSING
  • BUDGETING TIME CONCLUDING
  • CLARIFYING COOPERATING
  • CLASSIFYING CREATING
  • COMPARING DECIDING

7
PROCESS SKILLS (CONTD)
  • DISCOVERING EXTRAPOLATING
  • DISCUSSING IDENTIFYING
  • DIVERGING INTERPRETING
  • ELABORATING LISTENING
  • EVALUATING OBSERVING
  • EXPERIMENTING ORGANIZING

8
PROCESS SKILLS (CONTD)
  • PERFORMING SELECTING
  • READING SOLVING
  • RECALLING SPEAKING
  • RESEARCHING SYNTHESIZING
  • RESTRUCTURING UNIFYING
  • SCHEDULING WRITING

9
U.S. PARTICIPATION IN FPS
10
WORLD PARTICIPATION IN FPS
  • COUNTRIES PARTICIPATING IN FPS
  • AFRICA AUSTRALIA
  • NIGERIA NEW SOUTH WALES
  • ASIA SOUTH AUSTRALIA
  • HONG KONG NEW ZEALAND
  • INDIA EUROPE
  • PHILIPPINES BELGIUM
  • SAUDI ARABIA ENGLAND
  • PAKISTAN HOLLAND

11
WORLD PARTICIPATION IN FPS (CONTD)
  • COUNTRIES PARTICIPATING IN FPS
  • EUROPE NORTH AMERICA
  • NORWAY PUERTO RICO
  • SPAIN UNITED STATES
  • SWITZERLAND SOUTH AMERICA
  • WEST GERMANY BOLIVIA
  • NORTH AMERICA CHILE
  • CANADA PERU
  • MEXICO

12
THE PROCESS AN OVERVIEW
  • FUTURE PROBLEM SOLVING TEAM
  • COACH
  • 4 STUDENTS

13
BLOOMS TAXONOMY
EVALUATION
  • APPRAISE, CONCLUDE CRITICIZE,
    SUPPORT
  • CREATE, COMBINE ORGANIZE,
    HYPOTHESIZE
  • SEPARATE, CONTRAST SUMMARIZE,
    COMPUTE
  • ORGANIZE CLASSIFY
  • EXPLAIN EXTEND, SHOW
  • DEFINE, DESCRIBE,
  • LIST LABEL

SYNTHESIS
ANALYSIS
APPLICATION
COMPREHENSION
KNOWLEDGE
14
BLOOMS TAXONOMY
  • DESCRIBE BEST SOLUTION, SELECT
    CRITERIACRITERIA
  • BRAINSTORM SOLUTIONS, DESCRIBE BEST
    SOLUTION
  • BRAINSTORM PROBLEMS, BRAINSTORM
    SOLUTIONS
  • IDENTIFY UL PROBLEM

EVALUATION
SYNTHESIS
ANALYSIS
APPLICATION
COMPREHENSION
KNOWLEDGE
15
FPS TOPICS 1996-97
  • 1. HOMES OF THE FUTURE COLUMBUS (11/9/97)
  • 2. EXTRATERRESTRIAL LIFE HOME (1/1-1/15/97)
  • 3. CASHLESS SOCIETY COLUMBUS (3/8 3/9/97)
  • 4. COMPETITION SOLON (4/12/97)
  • --------------------------------------------------
    ---------
  • INTERNATIONAL INCREASING LIFE SPAN

16
TOPICS FOR FPS
  • SHRINKING TROPICAL FORESTS WATER
  • THE ARMS RACE ILLITERACY
  • POVERTY DRUNK DRIVING
  • MEDICAL ADVANCES NUCLEAR WAR
  • SPACE TRAVEL EDUCATION
  • ACID RAIN GREENHOUSE EFFECT
  • IMMIGRATION ELECTRONIC GAMES
  • THE ELDERLY PRISONS
  • GARBAGE LASERS
  • CHANGING FAMILY STRUCTURES NUCLEAR WASTE

17
PRACTICE PROBLEM
  • A. RESEARCH TOPIC AREA (LEARNING)
  • B. TEACH STUDENTS FPS PROCESS (THINKING)
  • C. COMPLETE A PRACTICE PROBLEM BOOKLET
    (COMMUNICATING)
  • D. BOOKLET RETURNED WITH FEEDBACK FROM EVALUATOR

18
RESEARCH
  • A. RESOURCE MANUAL (AVAILABLE FROM FPSP NATIONAL
    OFFICE
  • B. NEWSWEEKLIES (TIME, NEWSWEEK, U.S. NEWS
    WORLD REPORT, ETC.)
  • C. FUTURISTIC PERIODICALS (OMNI, THE FUTURIST,
    DISCOVER, ETC.)
  • D. READERS GUIDE
  • E. LOCAL EXPERTS
  • F. FIELD TRIPS
  • G. ???

19
CREATIVE THINKING
  • FLUENCY GENERATE A LARGE NUMBER OF RELEVANT
    IDEAS
  • FLEXIBILITY THINK OF A VARIETY OF IDEAS
  • ORIGINALITY PRODUCE NOVEL OR UNIQUE IDEAS
  • ELABORATION EXPAND OR ADD DETAIL

20
  • FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT, AGE 9

21
(No Transcript)
22
FUTURE PROBLEM SOLVING THE 6 STEP PROCESS
  • RESEARCH TOPIC
  • (FUZZY SITUATION -- FUTURISTIC SCENARIO
    DESCRIBING TOPIC)
  • I. BRAINSTORM PROBLEMS
  • II. IDENTIFY AN UNDERLYING PROBLEM
  • III. BRAINSTORM SOLUTIONS
  • IV. SELECT CRITERIA TO EVALUATE SOLUTIONS
  • V. EVALUATE SOLUTIONS
  • VI. DESCRIBE BEST SOLUTION

23
STEP I BRAINSTORMING SUBPROBLEMS
  • BRAINSTORM
  • WRITE 20 SUBPROBLEMS
  • USE COMPLETE SENTENCES
  • USE TERMS OF POSSIBILITY (MAY, MIGHT)
  • DESCRIBE WHAT THE PROBLEM IS AND WHY IT IS A
    PROBLEM

24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
HIGH SCHOOL DROPOUT PROBLEMS
  • DEFENSE BECAUSE THE U.S. ARMED FORCES NEED A
    HIGHLY TRAINED WORKFORCE, H.S. DROPOUTS MAY NOT
    BE DESIRABLE RECRUITS.
  • LAW JUSTICE RESEARCH INDICATES THAT 25 OF
    H.S. STUDENTS MAY DROP OUT. SOME OF THESE
    STUDENTS MAY TURN TO DRUG USE. THIS MAY RESULT
    IN INCREASED CRIME.
  • SOCIAL RELATIONSHIPS ACCORDING TO THE C.B.S.
    SPECIAL, AMERICAS TOUGHEST ASSIGNMENT," SOME
    HIGH SCHOOLS ARE LARGE AND IMPERSONAL. THIS
    IMPERSONAL HIGH SCHOOL MAY CONTRIBUTE TO
    ALIENATION WHICH MAY RESULT IN DROPPING OUT.

27
STEP II. IDENTIFY AN UNDERLYING PROBLEM
  • A. CATEGORIZE STEP 1 PROBLEMS
  • B. SELECT ONE PROBLEM CATEGORY
  • C. WRITE UNDERLYING PROBLEM USING 4 ELEMENTS
    LISTED ON THE NEXT SLIDE...

28
STEP II. IDENTIFY AN UNDERLYING PROBLEM (CONTD)
  • STEM(S)
  • HOW MIGHT WE OR
  • IN WHAT WAYS MIGHT WE
  • KEY VERB PHRASE (KVP) ONE KEY VERB IN A PHRASE
    THAT MANDATES WHAT YOU MUST DO IN STEP 3 TO SOLVE
    YOUR PROBLEM
  • PURPOSE (P) THE PURPOSE DESCRIBES THE GOAL
    TOWARD WHICH YOU WILL CARRY OUT THE MANDATE OF
    THE KEY VERB PHRASE
  • FUZZY SITUATION PARAMETERS (FSP) CONDITIONS
    THAT PLACE YOUR UNDERLYING PROBLEM WITHIN THE
    PARAMETERS OF THE FUZZY SITUATION -- TIME, PLACE,
    AND TOPIC

29
  • STEM I W W M W
  • KVP ASSIST THE SARINO TASK FORCE IN PROVIDING A
    BETTER TECHNOLOGICAL EDUCATION FOR YOUNGER
    STUDENTS
  • PUR SO THAT THESE STUDENTS WILL CONTINUE THEIR
    EDUCATION TO RECEIVE A TECHNO-CERTIFICATE
  • FSP IN SARINO IN 2020

30
STEP III. BRAINSTORM ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS
  • A. BRAINSTORM
  • B. WRITE YOUR 20 BEST SOLUTIONS IN COMPLETE
    SENTENCES. DESCRIBE
  • WHO WILL DO THE SOLUTION
  • WHAT WILL BE DONE
  • HOW IT WILL WORK
  • WHY IT IS BEING DONE

31
  • SOLUTIONS IN ORDER TO ASSIST THE SARINO TASK
    FORCE IN PROVIDING A BETTER TECHNOLOGICAL
    EDUCATION FOR YOUNGER CHILDREN,
  • SOCIAL RELATIONSHIPS THE SARINO SCHOOL BOARD
    WILL RESTRUCTURE ALL SCHOOLS INTO SMALLER UNITS.
    TEACHERS AND STUDENTS WILL FORM A COMMUNITY.
    POSITIVE PEER GROUP WORK WILL BE ENCOURAGED.
  • BUSINESS THE SARINO BRANCH OF I.B.M. WILL
    SUPPLY PERSONNEL TO ASSIST ELEMENTARY STUDENTS
    INTO COMPUTER INSTRUCTION FOR A 9 WEEK PERIOD.
    THIS WILL RESULT IN BETTER SELF-CONFIDENCE AND
    WILL REDUCE THE DROPOUT RATE.
  • DEFENSE THE U.S. ARMY WILL PROVIDE A 2 WEEK
    UNIT ON TECHNOLOGICAL NEEDS AT THE FOURTH GRADE
    LEVEL. STUDENTS WILL REALIZE THE RELATIONSHIP
    BETWEEN WORK IN THE ARMED FORCES AND THE PRIVATE
    SECTOR. THESE UNITS WILL REDUCE THE D.O. RATE.

32
STEP IV. SELECT CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING SOLUTIONS
  • 1. WHICH SOLUTION WILL BE THE EASIEST TO
    IMPLEMENT?
  • 2. WHICH SOLUTION WILL BEST DEVELOP STUDENTS
    INTO WELL-ADJUSTED CITIZENS?
  • 3. WHICH SOLUTION WILL HAVE THE FEWEST ADVERSE
    SIDE EFFECTS FOR CHILDREN?
  • 4. WHICH SOLUTION WILL CREATE THE GREATEST
    AMOUNT OF SOCIALIZATION FROM PEERS?
  • 5. WHICH SOLUTION WILL OFFER THE MOST
    SOCIALIZATION FROM ADULTS?

33
STEP IV. SELECT CRITERIA TO EVALUATE SOLUTIONS
  • A. BRAINSTORM 5 CRITERIA TO EVALUATE YOUR
    SOLUTIONS
  • 1. STOCK CRITERIA COST, PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE,
    IMPLEMENTATION TIME, ETC.
  • 2. TARGET CRITERIA KEY VERB PHRASE AND/OR
    PURPOSE

34
STEP IV. SELECT CRITERIA TO EVALUATE SOLUTIONS
(CONTD)
  • B. WRITE CRITERIA
  • 1. SINGLE DIMENSION (E.G., WHICH SOLUTION
    WILL BE THE MOST EFFECTIVE?)
  • 2. RANKABLE (E.G., WHICH SOLUTION WILL BE THE
    LEAST COSTLY TO IMPLEMENT?)
  • 3. DESIRED DIRECTION (E.G., WHICH SOLUTION
    WILL BE THE MOST ACCEPTABLE TO THE PUBLIC?)

35
STEP V. EVALUATING SOLUTIONS
  • 10 SOLUTIONS INTO GRID
  • RANK EACH CRITERION 1-10
  • ADD ROWS ACROSS
  • HIGHEST TOTAL IS BEST SOLUTION

36
(No Transcript)
37
(No Transcript)
38
STEP VI. DESCRIBE THE BEST SOLUTION
  • A. SELECT YOUR BEST SOLUTION BASED ON THE
    HIGHEST SCORING SOLUTION IN THE GRID
  • B. WRITE YOUR BEST SOLUTION AS A PROPOSAL FOR
    SOLVING YOUR UNDERLYING PROBLEM. DESCRIBE
  • WHO
  • WHAT
  • WHEN
  • WHERE
  • WHY
  • HOW, HOW, AND HOW

39
CLASSROOM ENVIRONMENT
  • GOES BEYOND THE CLASSROOM
  • PROVIDES OPEN ENVIRONMENT
  • ACCEPTS UNUSUAL IDEAS
  • REQUIRES ORIGINAL THINKING
  • PROVIDES OPPORTUNITY TO FORM HYPOTHESES
  • ACCEPTS A VARIETY OF RESPONSES
  • PROVIDES OPPORTUNITY FOR DISCOVERY,
    EXPERIMENTING, QUESTIONING, EXPLORING, AND
    RISK-TAKING

40
(No Transcript)
41
(No Transcript)
42
SCENARIO WRITING
  • INDIVIDUAL STUDENTS DEVELOP SCENARIOS OF LIFE AS
    THEY SEE IT 20 YEARS INTO THE FUTURE (GRADES 4
    THROUGH 12)

THE YEAR WAS 2019...
43
FUTURE PROBLEM SOLVING TOPICS (1990-1991)
  • 1 HIGH SCHOOL DROPOUTS
  • 2 OZONE DEPLETION
  • 3 TRANSPORTATION
  • (QUALIFYING PROBLEM)
  • STATE CENSORSHIP
  • INTERNATIONAL CORRUPTION IN GOVERNMENT

44
FUTURE PROBLEM SOLVING TOPICS (1991-1992)
  • NOVEMBER 6, 1991 SPACE
  • DECEMBER 18, 1991 LEGAL EPIDEMIC
  • FEBRUARY 1, 1992 SCENARIO
  • MARCH 4, 1992 SPORTS ETHICS
  • STATE BOWL (BOWLING GREEN, OH)
  • MAY 2, 1992 LAND USE
  • INTERNATIONAL BOWL (MADISON, WI)
  • JUNE 12-15, 1992 ADVERTISING

45
FUTURE PROBLEM SOLVING TOPICS (1993-1994)
  • 1 ROBOTICS
  • 2 ANTARCTICA
  • 3 EXTINCTION OF ANIMALS
  • (QUALIFYING PROBLEM)
  • STATE BOWL SPACE LAW
  • INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE CONTROL OF DISEASE

46
FUTURE PROBLEM SOLVING TOPICS (1994-1995)
  • 1 CITIES
  • 2 HOMELESSNESS
  • 3 KIDS AND VIOLENCE
  • (QUALIFYING PROBLEM)
  • STATE BOWL PREJUDICE
  • INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE PRIVACY

47
FUTURE PROBLEM SOLVING TOPICS (1995-1996)
  • 1 WEAPONS CONTROL
  • 2 MENTAL HEALTH
  • 3 21ST CENTURY MARKETS
  • (QUALIFYING PROBLEM)
  • STATE BOWL CYBERNETICS
  • INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE UNITED NATIONS

48
RULES FOR BRAINSTORMING
  • 1. CRITICISM...IS RULED OUT.
    CRITICISM
  • 2. FREE-WHEELING IS WELCOMED. THE WILDER THE
    IDEAS, THE BETTER. OFFBEAT AND SILLY IDEAS MAY
    TRIGGER PRACTICAL BREAKTHROUGHS THAT MIGHT NOT
    OTHERWISE OCCUR.

49
RULES FOR BRAINSTORMING (CONTD)
  • 3. COMBINATION AND IMPROVEMENT ARE SOUGHT.
    GROUP MEMBERS ARE ENCOURAGED TO COMBINE AND
    HITCHHIKE IDEAS.
  • 4. QUANTITY IS WANTED. THE LARGE THE NUMBER OF
    IDEAS, THE GREATER THE CHANCE OF REACHING THE
    BEST SOLUTIONS.

50
MATHEMATICAL FORMULA FOR FPS EVALUATION
  • SUBJECTIVE MATERIAL (BOOKLET)
  • SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION STANDARDS (FPS CRITERIA)
  • SUBJECTIVE EVALUATORS (HUMANS)
  • SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION

51
CRITICISM SANDWICH
GOOD FLEXIBILITY!
  • TRY TO RELATE YOUR PROBLEMS
  • BACK TO THE FUZZY

TRY TO RELATE YOUR PROBLEMS BACK TO THE FUZZY
EXCELLENT RESEARCH ON THIS PROBLEM!
52
FORMULA FOR FEEDBACK
  • SOMETHING YOU DID REALLY WELL
  • SOMETHING YOU COULD IMPROVE UPON
  • A WAY TO IMPROVE IT
  • SOMETHING YOU DID REALLY WELL

53
(No Transcript)
54
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com