Title: Educational Benefit IEP Review Process
1Educational Benefit IEP Review Process
2Training Goals
- To define Educational Benefit
- To learn a process for reviewing your districts
IEPs
3The IEP is the Cornerstone of the Special
Education Process
Identifies how the resources of the school need
to be configured to support the students needs
Supports participation in the general education
curriculum and learning standards
Identifies how the student will be prepared for
adult living
Guides the provision of instruction designed to
meet a students needs
IEP
Provides an accountability tool
Ensures a strategic and coordinated approach to
address a students needs
4Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE)
- IDEA standard 1975
- Intent is to design individualized instruction
with sufficient supports and services to enable
the student to receive educational benefit
5Rowley (Supreme Court 1982)
- Defined a two-pronged test to determine if IEP
was appropriately developed - Does IEP meet procedural compliance?
- Was IEP reasonably calculated to enable child to
receive educational benefit? - But, what is educational benefit?
6Rowley Standard
- Defined educational benefit as if the student
derives more than minimal or trivial progress - Did not require schools to maximize a students
potential - Provided access, but did not require equal access
7Reexamining Rowley in 2007
- How does Rowley align with the standards
movement, IDEA 2004, NCLB? - Accountability /assessment of all students
- Uniform standards
- Participation in the general curriculum
- Data collection and progress monitoring
- Research-based instruction
- Inclusion
- Transition planning
8Ed Benefit Post-IDEA 2004
- IEP identifies present levels, needs related to
disability and impact on involvement/progress in
general curriculum - Measurable annual goals
- Services planned to support progress toward goals
and in general curriculum - Education in LRE, participation in
extracurricular other nonacademic activities - Transition needs are addressed (15-21)
- IEP adjusted if progress not made
9Measuring Educational Benefit
- Can be measured in a variety of ways
- Achieving passing marks
- Advancing from grade to grade
- Making progress toward meeting annual goals
- Improving scores on statewide/district wide
assessments alternate assessment measures - Graduating with a regular diploma
- Passing High School exit exams such as Regents
and RCT
10Educational Benefit Review Process
- Focus is on second part of Rowley
- Determine whether design of IEP is reasonably
calculated for student to receive educational
benefit
11Ed. Benefit Review Process
- Record IEP information for 3-years
- Analyze relationships among components
- Compare progress across consecutive IEPs
- Look for patterns and determine if IEP was
reasonably calculated to result in educational
benefit
12Step One- Chart IEP Information
- Capture phrases word-for-word from
- PLP
- Needs
- Post-secondary Goals (if applicable)
- Annual Goals
- Modifications Accommodations
- Services/Placement
- Progress
- Was IEP adjusted?
13Step One
- Copy verbatim phrases from IEP
- Abbreviations are acceptable, but do not
paraphrase or summarize - Capture progress from progress reports, test
scores, report card grades and comments - Identify sections (academic, social, physical) or
content areas (ELA, Math) for better
organization
14Example - Chris
15Step Two Analyze Relationships
- Consider each IEP (year) separately
- Determine alignment the direct relationship
between two or more components (column to
column) - Circle statements and draw arrows to related
statements in other columns - Broken chains indicate gaps
16Example - Chris
17Step Two Parking Lot
- You may identify other types of issues (not
alignment-related) - For example, a non-measurable goal
- Record these issues on the Parking lot sheet
and move on - Parking lot issues will be addressed in a later
step
18Step Three Compare to Prior Year
- Compare like items from year 1 to 2
- Rate each element on year 2 sheet
- 0 No change in complexity or rate of progress
- (look for unchanged wording)
- Increased complexity of goals, more time with
- non-disabled peers, increased rate of progress
- - Decreased complexity of goals, less time with
- non-disabled peers, slower progress or
regression
19Step Three Compare to Prior Year
- What about items that are on year 2, but not year
1? No rating. - What if an item disappears from one year to the
next? Why did it disappear? Was the goal
achieved? - Repeat rating step for year 2 to 3
20Example Chris - Year 2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Last years IEP stated WIAT Reading 4.0
GE Therefore, there was no change in reading
level. Able to write a 3 sentence
paragraph Therefore, there was an increase in
writing ability.
Last years IEP stated Struggles with grade
level vocabulary Therefore, the need remained the
same. Written work is unclear and lacks
appropriate organization of ideas Therefore, the
need remained the same.
Last years IEP stated Identify meaning for 10
new content area vocabulary words Therefore, the
goal increased the performance expectation. Fluen
tly read a 3 paragraph passage of curriculum
level text Therefore, the goal increased the
performance expectation. Independently write a 3
paragraph essay using transitions, correct word
tense and order Therefore, the goal did not
increase the performance expectation.
Last years IEP stated Consultant Teacher
Services Therefore, the service and placement
remained the same.
Last years IEP stated Progressing
Satisfactorily Therefore, the progress remained
the same. Progressing Satisfactorily Therefore,
the progress remained the same. Not
Progressing Therefore, the progress increased.
21Step 4 Patterns
- Review charts for linkages ratings
- Review Parking lot issues
- Answer first 3 Yes/No questions on Summary form
- Fill in chart of effective/ineffective practices
22Example - Chris
No
Determine Ed Benefit
23What did you Find?
- What issues do you see in this one IEP?
- When you review multiple IEPs, you will begin to
see patterns of issues - These patterns may identify
- Professional development need areas
- District policies/practices needing revision or
improvement