NO REFLOW: A Prospective Randomized Trial of Intracoronary vs' Guiding Catheter Infusion of Nitrates - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

NO REFLOW: A Prospective Randomized Trial of Intracoronary vs' Guiding Catheter Infusion of Nitrates

Description:

... 2Huigen Jin, 1Jianying Ma, 2Zongjun Liu, 1Feng Zhang, 1Xiangfei Wang, 1Lei Ge ... I DO NOT have a financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with one or more ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:315
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: jzu98
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: NO REFLOW: A Prospective Randomized Trial of Intracoronary vs' Guiding Catheter Infusion of Nitrates


1
NO REFLOW A Prospective Randomized Trial of
Intracoronary vs. Guiding Catheter Infusion of
Nitrates vs. Calcium Channel Blockers in Patients
with No Reflow after Primary PCI in STEMI
1Junbo Ge, 1Dong Huang, 1Juying Qian, 2Huigen
Jin, 1Jianying Ma, 2Zongjun Liu, 1Feng Zhang,
1Xiangfei Wang, 1Lei Ge
1Department of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital,
Fudan University, Shanghai, China 2Department of
Cardiology, Putuo District Center Hospital,
Shanghai, China
2
Disclosure Statement of Financial Interest
  • I DO NOT have a financial interest/arrangement or
    affiliation with one or more organizations that
    could be perceived as a real or apparent conflict
    of interest in the context of the subject of this
    presentation.

3
Background
  • No-reflow is a frequent phenomenon during primary
    PCI for AMI and associated with a poor clinical
    outcome.
  • The present pharmacological management involves
    the use of different vasodilators including
    nitrates, verapamil, adenosine and nicorandil.
  • No randomized trial has been conducted to compare
    head-to-head any of these agents, or to determine
    the appropriate dosage.

4
Objective
  • The prospective, randomized, multi-center study
    was designed to compare angiographic and clinical
    outcomes in AMI patients undergoing primary PCI
    with no-reflow phenomenon using three different
    vasodilators diltiazem, verapamil and
    nitroglycerin.

5
Trial Design
STE-AMI
primary PCI
TIMI grade lt3
Randomized 111
Diltiazem (4002000µg)
Verapamil (2001000µg)
Nitroglycerin (2001000µg)
  • Primary endpoint Angiographic coronary flow
    after drugs were given post-PCI.
  • Secondary endpoint (1) LVEF, NT-proBNP at 1 and
    30 days post-PCI (2) Incidence of MACE (death,
    MI and target vessel revascularization) at 30
    days post-PCI.

6
Methods
  • In a consecutive series of 608 primary PCI for
    AMI, no-reflow phenomenon (TIMI flow gradelt3) was
    observed in 102 patients (17). All lesions in
    the infarction-related-coronary (IRC) were
    treated by stents.
  • The 102 patients were randomised to one of three
    investigational vasodilators groups
    intracoronary infusion of diltiazem (n34),
    verapamil (n34) and nitroglycerin (n34). The
    drugs were given via guiding-catheter (GC group,
    n24) or an infusion microcatheter distal to the
    angioplasty site (MC group, n78).

7
Methods
  • Angiographic IRC flow outcome measured by blinded
    angiographic readers included
  • TIMI flow grade TFG (TIMI study group, NEJM
    1985)
  • Corrected TIMI frame count CTFC (Gibson,
    Circulation 1996)
  • LVEF assessed by echocardiography and NT-proBNP
    levels were measured at 1 and 30 days post-PCI.

8
Results
  • There were no statistically significant
    differences in demographic data of patients,
    procedural characteristics and the baseline IRC
    flow post-stenting in the three groups
  • The average intracoronary infusion drug dose was
    diltiazem 1.0mg, verapamil 0.4mg and
    nitroglycerin 0.4mg

9
Baseline Characteristics (1)
10
Baseline Characteristics (2)
11
Procedural Characteristics (1)
12
Procedural Characteristics (2)
13
Results--TIMI flow grade in MC group
Plt0.05
(TFG)
Plt0.05
Plt0.05
Plt0.05
Plt0.05
2.9
3.0
2.5
1.5
1.6
1.5
14
Results--CTFC in MC group
Plt0.05
(Frames)
Plt0.05
Plt0.05
Plt0.05
Plt0.05
72
69
68
39
26
26
15
Results--TIMI flow grade in GC group
Plt0.05
(TFG)
Plt0.05
Plt0.05
Plt0.05
Pgt0.05
2.5
2.3
1.8
1.1
1.3
1.5
16
Results--CTFC in GC group
Plt0.05
(Frames)
Plt0.05
Plt0.05
Plt0.05
Pgt0.05
69
68
71
37
41
53
17
Flow improvement in MC vs. GC group
18
Safety
()
Plt0.05
Plt0.05
19
Follow up--LVEF
()
Pgt0.05
Pgt0.05
Pgt0.05
20
Follow up--NT-proBNP
(pg/ml)
Plt0.05
Plt0.05
21
Follow up--MACE
()
Pgt0.05
22
Conclusions
  • The intracoronary infusion of diltiazem or
    verapamil can reverse no-reflow phenomenon more
    effectively than infusion of nitroglycerin during
    primary PCI for STEAMI.
  • Administration of the vasodilators
    superselectively via microcatheter to the related
    territory is more effective than via
    guiding-catheter.
  • The efficacy of diltiazem and verapamil is
    similar but diltiazem seems to be safer.

23
Thank you
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com