Luminous and Dark Matter in Nearby Spiral Galaxies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Luminous and Dark Matter in Nearby Spiral Galaxies

Description:

Luminous and Dark Matter in Nearby Spiral Galaxies – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:57
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: roelofs
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Luminous and Dark Matter in Nearby Spiral Galaxies


1
Luminous and Dark Matterin Nearby Spiral Galaxies
Roelof S. de Jong (STScI)
Susan Kassin (OSU) Eric Bell (MPIA) Stephane
Courteau (UBC)
2
Overview
  • Mass-to-light ratios of stellar populations
  • Comparing dynamical and stellar population masses
  • Rotation curve models
  • Angular momentum

3
Galaxy evolution models
Bell de Jong 2001
Closed box model
Mass dependent formation epoch model
Mass dependent formation epoch model with star
bursts
Even in K mass-to-light ratio varies by factor of
2
4
Color-ML for hierarchical galaxy model
  • Most galaxy formation models show a strong
    correlation between color and M/L
  • Dust reddening has similar effect on M/L as
    populations

Cole et al. (2000) models
An optical color of a stellar population is a
good M/L indicator
5
Different Initial Mass Functions
  • The slope of the color-M/L relation is
    independent of models and IMFs used
  • The normalization of the relation depends on the
    IMF used, i.e. the amount of low mass stars

6
Maximum disk constraints
  • The color-M/L relation must be normalized below
    all maximum disk values
  • Salpeter IMF
  • A Salpeter IMF is too massive

Salpeter light
  • Bell de Jong (2001) adopt Salpeter 0.15 dex
    lower

data Verheijen (1997)
7
Comparing dynamical and stellar pop M/L
  • Constrain color-M/L relation offset relative to
    maximum disk normailzation Bell de Jong (2001)
  • Assumptions made
  • IMFs are universal
  • Stellar population models accurate in relative
    sense
  • HST Key project distance scale
  • No selective loss of stellar populations
  • Simple dust corrections

8
Galactic Globular Clusters King model M/L
  • King core M/L very low for SSP models
  • Mass segregation (and Dark Matter?) cause radial
    M/L gradient

McLaughlin (2000)
9
Galactic Globular Clusters Virial model M/L
  • Virial (global) mass estimates agree better, but
    large scatter

Pryor Meylan (1993)
10
Extra-Galactic Globular Clusters
  • Errors on extra-galactic clusters even larger
  • M33 cluster especially low

Martini Ho (2002)
11
Elliptical Galaxies
  • Stellar population modeling of line indices
  • Schwarzschild kinematic modeling
  • Slow rotators may have 30 dark matter within
    Reff (or different IMF)

Cappellari et al. (2005)
12
Velocity dispersion disk galaxies
  • Edge-on galaxies dynamical mass modeling from
    velocity dispersions

Bell de Jong (2001)
Baryonic TF from dynamical modeling
Kregel, van der Kruit Freeman (2005)
13
Minimum Disk Rotation Curves
0.0 dex
-0.1 dex
-0.3 dex
Kassin de Jong (2005)
  • Declining rotation curves of early type disk
    galaxies require concentrated mass
  • Hard to interpret errorbars for tight constraint

14
Bar Streaming Motions
  • Gas shock across bar depends critically on M/L

Salpeter
Bell de Jong
Bell de Jong 0.1 dex
Weiner et al. (2003)
15
Summary M/L comparisons
  • Distance uncertainties still critical
  • Especially for methods based on a few galaxies

16
Rotation Curve Samples
  • Broad range in properties
  • Multi-band surface photometry
  • Verheijen (1999) Ursa Major (BVRK, HI)
  • Courteau sample (BVRH, Ha)
  • OSU sample (BVRJHK, Ha, HI)
  • Sloan DR1 (ugriz, Ha)
  • Classical RC galaxies (UBVRJK, HI, Ha)
  • More than 100 good RC galaxies

17
Broad Range in Properties
18
Rotation Curve Decompositions
  • Use colors to derive M/L profile
  • Calculate stellar mass profile
  • Add the contribution from the gas
  • Calculate rotation curves

B-K
  • Subtraction gives dark matter rotation curve

I-K
B-R
Main advantage M/L scaling law between galaxies
19
Average Dark Matter Rotation Curves
20
Characteristic baryonic/dark profile
21
Baryon/total mass
  • ?(r) V 2 (r )/Vtot 2( r )
  • ?1 gt rotation accounted for by baryons alone
  • ?0 gt rotation accounted for by dark matter
    alone
  • ?0.5 gt equal contribution from baryons and dark
    matter
  • V,max gt 250 km/s thin solid line
  • 201 lt V,max 250 dotted line
  • 120 lt V,max 201 dashed line
  • V,max 120 thick solid line

22
Fitting NFW Dark Matter Halos
  • Adiabatic contraction using known baryon
    distribution
  • Central rotation curve in general over-predicted

23
NFW Parameters and Expectations
24
Conclusions
  • There are measurable constraints on stellar M/L
    ratios
  • The color-M/L relation should probably be
    normalized 0.1 dex lower than Bell de Jong
    (2001)
  • Adiabatic contracted NFW profiles also
    over-predict rotation curves in HSB galaxies

25
Minimum Disk Rotation Curves
  • UGC9133

UGC9133
26
Average Dark Matter Rotation Curves
27
NFW Parameters Poorly Constrained
28
The HI-Dark Matter Connection
  • HI cannot consistently be scaled to produce dark
    matter

29
Specific Angular Momentum Predictions
Models Bullock et al. (2001)
  • Baryons are often assumed to keep specific
    angular momentum distribution during collapse

30
Specific Angular Momentum
Models Bullock et al. (2001)
Similar results as Van den Bosch et al. (2001)
had for dwarfs
31
Todo List
  • Constrain zeropoint color-M/L relation
  • Get Ha velocity fields for sizeable sample
  • Complete the classical rotation curve sample
  • Explore adiabatic contraction on small scales

32
Future work Stellar Velocity Dispersions
  • An isothermal disk yields

33
Todo List
  • Constrain zeropoint color-M/L relation
  • Get Ha velocity fields for sizeable sample
  • Complete the classical rotation curve sample
  • Explore adiabatic contraction on small scales
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com