Applications of the 3D electromagnetic model to some challenging optical problems PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Applications of the 3D electromagnetic model to some challenging optical problems


1
Applications of the 3D electromagnetic model to
somechallenging optical problems
  • September 24, 2004
  • Xiuhong wei, Paul Urbach, Arther Wachters

Supported by the Dutch Ministry of Economic
Affairs under project TS01044
2
  • Configurations
  • 2D or 3D
  • Non-periodic structure (Isolated pit in
    multilayer)
  • Periodic in one direction (row of pits)
  • Periodic in two directions (bi-gratings)
  • Periodic in three directions (3D crystals)
  • Source
  • Unrestricted incident field (plane wave, focused
    spot)
  • Imposed current density

3
  • Materials
  • Linear.
  • In general anisotropic, (absorbing)
    dielectrics and/or conductors
  • Magnetic anisotropic materials (for
    completeness)
  • Materials could be inhomogeneous

4
  • Mathematical Model
  • Given field
    incident field

  • imposed current
  • Total field
  • Maxwell equations are equivalent to Vector
    Helmholtz Equation
  • Scattered field
  • The scattered field satisfies the Sommerfeld
    radiation condition.

5
  • Variational formulation
  • EE0Es

6
  • Calculate E0 in Multilayer
  • S-polarization, i
  • P-polarization, j
  • is the source term
  • Tangential field h(z), e(z) in basis (i,l)

7
  • Up and down recursion
  • Amplitude for planewave
  • Where are the
    tangential source term.

8
(No Transcript)
9
  • Numerical calculation
  • Construction of Matrix
  • Matrix property
  • Complex symmetric
  • indefinite

10
  • Iterative solver
  • RCM(reversing Cuthill-Mckee) reordering
  • Precondition
  • ILUTP(incomplete LU threshold pivoting)
  • to solve a problem with 300,000 unknows, a
    fill-in is needed of more than 600, which takes
    about 25hours on a Hewlett Packard machine (CPU
    107 FLOPS/sec)..
  • Compare with MRILU(Matries reordering ILU)
  • More suitable for Finite Difference Method
  • Complex problems give an extra complication
  • Krylov subspace method BICGSTAB (bi-conjugate
    gradient stabilized algorithm )

11
  • Propagation outside of computational domain
  • The field of Electric Dipole in free space
  • However we need the field of electric
  • dipole in Multilayer
  • Calculated by Fourier transformation plane wave
    expansion
  • Using recursion as for calculating E0

12
  • Stratton-Chu formula

Observation point
13
  • Results Near Field Optical Recording
  • Background
  • Geometry

In the SIL kx ? nSIL kx kx ? nSIL kx Hence,
Saptially frequences of the spot are increased ,
which means the spot became smaller ? /2 nSIL
Cross section
14
  • ? 405nm
  • NAeffective 1.9
  • Spotsize
  • ?/2NAeff106nm
  • Grooves(track)
  • Track pitch226nm

Top view
15
Top view
Energy density, wall angle 55, E // groove
Energy density , wall angle 55, E ? groove
16
Top view
Energy density, wall angle 85, E //groove
Energy density , wall angle 85, E ? groove
17
Cross section xz-plane
Energy density, wall angle 55, E//groove
Energy density , wall angle 55, E ? groove
18
Cross section yz-plane
Energy density, wall angle 55, E // groove
Energy density , wall angle 55, E ? groove
19
  • Lithography
  • Background
  • Geometry

20
  • Material Crome
  • ? 193nm
  • High NA lithography
  • nCr0.86 1.65 I
  • Perpendicular incident
  • planewave

21
Top view
Serif mask, E?
Square mask, E?
22
Top view
Square mask, E?
Square mask, E?
23
Top view
Square mask, finite conduct, E?
Square mask, Perfect conduct, E?
24
Cross section yz-plane
Square mask, finite conduct, E?
Square mask, Perfect conduct, E?
25
Far field
Square mask, E?
Square mask, E?
26
acknowledge
  • Our cluster in Philips, Paul Urbach, Arthur
    wachters, Jan Veerman
  • Delft mathematical department, Kees Vuik, Kees
    Oosterlee, Yogi Erlangga, Mari Berglund
  • Shell staffs, Rene-Edouard Plessix, Wim Mulder
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com