Title: Global Flood and Drought Prediction
1Global Flood and Drought Prediction
- European Geosciences UnionGeneral Assembly
2006Vienna, Austria, 2006 April 4th - Nathalie Voisin, Dennis P. Lettenmaier
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
- University of Washington
- Seattle, USA
Credit Philip Wijmans/ACT-LWF Trevo, Mozambique,
February 2000 , http//gbgm-umc.org/umcor/00/mozph
otos.stm
2Outline
- Background and Objective
- Data and models
- Toward developing global hydrology forecast
capability - Approach
- Data Processing bias correction and downscaling
of the forecasts - Preliminary results forecast issued on Feb 4th
2000 - Future work
3-1-Background
4Need for flood prediction globally?
www.dartmouth.edu/floods, Dartmouth Flood
Observatory
5Global Floods and Droughts
- Floods
- 50-60 billion USD /year, worldwide ( United
Nations University) - 520 million people impacted per year worldwide
- Estimates of up to 25,000 annual deaths
- Mostly in developing countries Mozambique in
2000 and 2001, Vietnam and others (Mekong) in
2000. - Droughts
- 1988 US Drought 40 billion (1988 drought NCDC
) - Famine in many countries 200,000 people killed
in Ethiopia in 1973-74
Source United Nations University,
http//update.unu.edu/archive/issue32_2.htm http/
/www.unu.edu/env/govern/ElNIno/CountryReports/insi
de/ethopia/Executive20Summary/Executive20Summary
-txt.html 1988 drought NCDC http//lwf.ncdc.noa
a.gov/oa/reports/billionz.html
6Objective
- Predict streamflow and associated hydrologic ,
soil moisture, runoff, evaporation and snow water
equivalent - 1. At a global scale
- Spatial consistency
- To cover ungauged or poorly gauged basins
- 2. Time scales
- Short term for floods
- Seasonal (or longer) for drought
-
- 3. Freely disseminate information for
agriculture, energy, food security ,and
protection of life and property
7-2-Data and models
8Meteorological Data
- - Surface observations
- Uneven global coverage
- Various attempts to grid globally
- We use Adam et al. (2006) 1979-1999 (0.5 degrees)
and ERA-40 - - Precipitation derived from satellite
- Various products available, mostly either passive
microwave and/or infra-red - Issue with climatology and consistency (
especially important for seasonal prediction) - - Climate Models ECMWF and NCEP
- Re-analysis products, for at least 25 years
- Ensemble forecast products
- Quasi all or all required input data for our
hydrologic model available
9The Hydrologic Model VIC
- - Already calibrated and validated at 2 degree
resolution on over 26 basins worldwide(Nijjsen
et al. 2001) - Calibrated and validated at 0.5 degree over the
Arctic domain - Ongoing with UW and Princeton globally at 0.5
degree resolution
10Real time forecasting using VIC
- The Seasonal Westwide Forecastoperational over
the entire western US - seasonal forecast of streamflow
- The Surface Water Monitor
- operational over the entire western US daily
analysis of soil moisture
11-3-Toward developing global hydrology forecast
capability
12Forecast System Schematic
soil moisture snowpack
streamflow, soil moisture, snow water
equivalent, runoff
local scale (1/2 degree) weather inputs
Hydrologic forecast simulation
Hydrologic model spin up
Ensemble Reforecasts NCEP Reforecasts (Hamill
2006), bias corrected and downscaled ( NCEP
GFS, ECMWF ESP)
ECMWF ERA40 (or Analysis)
Downscaling using observations (Adam et al 2006)
Later on CMORPH, MODIS, AMSR-E, others
SNOTEL Update
NOWCASTS
SEASONAL FORECASTS (drought)
Several years back
Month 0
SHORT TERM FORECASTS (flood)
Similar experimental procedure as used by Wood
et al (2005) West-wide seasonal hydrologic
forecast system
13Spin Up
- ECMWF ERA40 reanalysis for retrospective
forecasting - Assume ERA40 is the truth
- Later use ERA40 analysis field, bias corrected to
match ERA40 characteristics
14The Meteorological Forecasts
- Retrospective forecasting Reforecasts
- Tom Hamill (2006) NOAA
- NCEP-MRF, 1998 version
- 1979-present
- 15-day forecasts issued daily
- 15 member ensemble forecast
- 2.5 degree resolution
- Real Time forecasting ECMWF and/or NCEP (future)
15Data processing
- The climatology statistics to be conserved in the
forecasts are - - the frequency of occurrence of rain- the
peaks - accumulated amounts (mean) - Using quantile-quantile mapping technique
16Data processing Bias Correction
- Non-exceedance probability plots (MRF in green,
ERA40 in black ) - Systematic Bias Occurrence of
Precipitation
17Data processing Downscaling
- Inverse square distance interpolation from 2.5
down to 0.5 degree resolution - Integration of observation based spatial
variability at 0.5 degree - Use observations based Adam et al. (2006) global
dataset (0.5 degree resolution) - Shifting
- makes the Adam et al. average temperature field
at 2.5 degree match ERA40, - Derive the temperature range for each 0.5 degree
cell within the 2.5 degree cell - Scaling of the precipitation and the wind field
so that the ratio Value(0.5)/Value(2.5) is
conserved
18Preliminary results
- February 2000 floods in the Northern Part of
South Africa - Tropical depression moving southward from Beira,
then continuing west into Zimbabwe, Botswana and
South Africa - Sustained rain during the period 4 to about 14
February
Tropical depression Boloetse track (pink) and
forecasted direction (red)
http//gisdata.usgs.net/sa_floods/
19Preliminary results 2000 Feb 4th
- 5 day acc. PRECIPITATION
- ERA 40 GFS
reforecast 15 ensembles avg
LEAD 1
LEAD 1
LEAD 2
LEAD 2
20Preliminary results 2000 Feb 4th
- 5 day acc. RUNOFF
- ERA 40 GFS
reforecast 15 ensembles avg
LEAD 1
LEAD 1
LEAD 2
LEAD 2
21Preliminary results 2000 Feb 4th
Basin Avg Hydrologic Variables Prediction (ERA40
in red, GFS in black ) Zambeze Basin, Africa
NO BIAS CORRECTION BIAS CORRECTION
22Preliminary results 2000 Feb 4th
Basin Avg Hydrologic Variables Prediction (ERA40
in red, GFS in black ) Limpopo Basin, Africa
NO BIAS CORRECTION BIAS CORRECTION
23Preliminary results 2000 Feb 4th
Basin Avg Hydrologic Variables Prediction (ERA40
in red, GFS in black ) Colorado Basin, North
America NO BIAS CORRECTION BIAS
CORRECTION
24Preliminary results 2000 Feb 4th
Basin Avg Hydrologic Variables Prediction (ERA40
in red, GFS in black ) Ganges Basin, Asia NO
BIAS CORRECTION BIAS CORRECTION
25Preliminary results 2000 Feb 4th
Basin Avg Hydrologic Variables Prediction (ERA40
in red, GFS in black ) Elbe Basin, Europe NO
BIAS CORRECTION BIAS CORRECTION
26Preliminary results 2000 Feb 4th
- The bias correction
- beneficial for ALL input variables (P, Tavg,Wind)
- does not substitute for missed precipitation/tempe
rature peaks/lows BUT the correction for the
occurrence of rain correction should help - brings consistency between the control run (
model or observations, or both) and the forecasts
27-4-Future Work
28Future Work
- Retrospective forecasting
- Finish up the small scale variability
implementation in the code - Refined precipitation occurrence correction
- Further evaluation of the retrospective
forecasts - using GFS reforecasts
- and eventually archived ECMWF 10 day, monthly and
seasonal forecasts - Predictions in forms of percentile and anomalies
with respect to the climatology
29Future Work
- Operational real time forecasting
- Once a week
- Use several climate model forecasts
- ECMWF 10 day forecast
- ECMWF monthly forecast
- ECMWF seasonal forecast
- GFS 6-10 day forecast
- Improvement of the initial conditions e.g.
assimilation of satellite soil moisture snow
30Thank You!
Credit Philip Wijmans/ACT-LWF Trevo, Mozambique,
February 2000 , http//gbgm-umc.org/umcor/00/mozph
otos.stm
31Preliminary results 2000 Feb 4th
- Snapshots Hydrologic Variables Prediction (ERA
40) - 5 day acc. PRECIPITATION 5 day acc.
RUNOFF
32Preliminary results 2000 Feb 4th
- Snapshots Hydrologic Variables Prediction (ERA
40) - 5 day avg. SOIL MOISTURE 5 day avg.
SWE
33Preliminary results 2000 Feb 4th
- 5 day acc. PRECIPITATION
- ERA 40 GFS
reforecast ensemble 14
34Preliminary results 2000 Feb 4th
- 5 day acc. RUNOFF
- ERA 40 GFS
reforecast ensemble 14