JINST Journal of Instrumentation Status Report - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

JINST Journal of Instrumentation Status Report

Description:

A. Breskin, CERN Feb 2-3 06. JINST Editors meeting ... Meetings with JINST Editors, CERN, Feb. 2-3, 2006 (updated March 21 2006) ... Technical reports: IDEM. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:98
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: weizm9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: JINST Journal of Instrumentation Status Report


1
JINST Journal of InstrumentationStatus Report
Amos Breskin Meetings with JINST Editors, CERN,
Feb. 2-3, 2006 (updated March 21 2006)
2
Why JINST?
High-quality fast economic new features
Main Competitors
  • Elsevier Nuclear Instruments Methods in
    Physics Research (NIM A)
  • 2004 impact factor 1.35
  • IEEE IEEE Transactions in Nuclear Science,
    Plasma, medical
  • imaging
  • 2004 Impact factor 1.7
  • AIP Review of Scientific Instruments
  • 2004 Impact factor 1.23
  • All 3 publish Scientific articles
    Conference proceedings
  • Generally good Journals
  • Printed electronic
  • Slow though submission is electronic (recently
    also for NIM A)
  • All 3 have long publishing delay
  • Expensive (particularly NIM A)

3
How can we become competitive?
  • Good editorial advisory boards
  • Good editorial office (SISSA) publisher (IOP)
    support
  • Friendly submission (flexible format)
  • Strict review policy ? quality
  • Attractive features for authors video clips,
    database links,
  • links to citations, free color figures etc
    important IOP has
  • excellent search engine
  • Attractive Journal content
  • Low prices? recruit also industries,
    consultants, etc
  • (ongoing discussions on Open Access)
  • Fast publication
  • Liberal copy-right policy (articles on arXiv,
    private web,
  • reuse material in other places)

Advertising JINST comme il faut ? by the
publisher (IOP) by us, within our communities!
4
Editorial Board
Advisory Board
Charpak, Lederman, Willis, Skrinsky, Policarpo,
Walenta, Radeka, Nygren
  • High-quality, large Editorial Board
  • Presently 44 autonomous Editors covering most
    fields of Radiation Instrumentation
  • ? broad scientific competence
  • broad knowledge of the field/potential referees
  • efficient editor matching to keywords
  • ? rapidity of review
  • ? quality of review
  • ? rapidity of publication

5
JINST PRESENT SCOPE
6
EDITOR SELECTION
  • Editors are selected by the software system
    according to keywords provided by the author.
  • There are at least 2 Editors for each keyword on
    our list.
  • Though we have 44 Editors, it could happen that
    an Editor is not properly assigned, exactly in
    his field.
  • In such cases
  • - either suggest to the Editorial Office an
    alternative
  • Editor out of JINST list
  • - or, if you cannot locate a suitable Editor
    inform the Editorial Office

7
JINST content
  • Regular articles
  • Invited Reviews (can start any time!)
  • Technical reports
  • Instrumentation Theses (in preparation April 06)
  • Calendar links to Instrumentation events
  • (on home page)
  • Useful links (search engines, science,
    databases, etc
  • (on home page)
  • Links to Instrumentation groups (in preparation
    April 06)
  • Job offers requests (in preparation April-May
    06)
  • Interactive readers Forum questions/answers
    panel
  • (in preparation April 06)

8
PUBLICATIONS IN JINST
  • Regular articles submitted to editors according
    to keywords.
  • Technical reports IDEM.
  • Regular articles may be degraded into technical
    reports by referees/editors, according to the
    general instructions to reviewers.
  • Invited Reviews Reviews of general interest.
    Invited by Editors and members of the SAB.
  • Instrumentation theses submitted to JINST
    Scientific Director, generally by the students
    supervisor, after being accepted by the
    University. Only genuine Instrumentation theses
    will be published after evaluation. They will
    be classified in sections similar to the
    articles sections.

9
REVIEW POLICY
  • Invited Review articles will be refereed by the
    inviting person (incl. SAB member). Allocated
    time 6 months for submission 8 weeks for the
    referee 8 weeks for authors revision.
  • Articles Technical reports 1 week for
    accept/decline by editor/referee 3 weeks for
    the editor/referee 1/3 weeks for authors
    minor/major revision
  • Theses No review - just general evaluation of
    quality and relevance. 4 weeks for accepting.

10
REVIEW CRITERIA(following questions of some
Editors)
  • We aim QUALITY RELEVANCE
  • The review criteria can be
  • - Novelty
  • - Originality
  • - Scientific value
  • - Technical value (mainly for Technical
    Reports
  • - Language and technical issues
  • - Referencing
  • - NEWLY DEVELOPING COUNTRY criteria (add a
    correction coefficient to support work done in
    such countries, but insist on relevance to JINST
    language corrections in the revision phase)
  • In the revision process you have an OPTION of
    applying virtual or real scores, e.g.
  • - Accepted Papers 8-10
  • - Accepted Technical Reports 6-7
  • - Rejection Below these scores

11
ADVERTISING JINST
  • A broad database of instrumentation-oriented
    scientists exists and is constantly updated.
  • Sources Conferences, Associations, large
    experiments, Institutions etc. (some do not
    provide access to mailing-lists but diffuse our
    advertising material)
  • e-advertisements sent to gt 4000 persons
  • Printed leaflets of JINST distributed _at_ IEEE05
    will be distributed in bags of most
    instrumentation conferences. Editors will get
    soon leaflets for personal distributions.
  • Sort article in CERN courier (1-2/06) note on
    CERN library web future advertisements in other
    press, institutional brochures, web sites etc.
    incl. arXiv.
  • Posters in preparation
  • We dig out daily relevant papers deposited in
    arXiv and suggest authors to submit to JINST
    present and future papers.

12
SUBMISSIONS STATUS March 20, 06
  • 27 papers submitted since Jan 9 JINST launch
  • 6 accepted
  • 6 rejected
  • 5 not suitable
  • 3 withdrawn following suggestion to author
  • 7 in review process
  • Promised in preparation for submission to JINST
    by colleagues approached by me/others
  • Many promised articles by potential authors who
    responded to the e-advertisement or to the note
    sent after their submissions to arXiv.

13
EDITORS URGENT TASKS
  • Pls help advertising, by all possible means.
  • Pls help providing mailing lists, suggest
    contacts (institutional journals, experiments,
    conferences etc), or diffuse our standard
    letter among mailing listsother ideas.
  • We are missing so far mailing lists in
    accelerators, medical instrumentation, plasma,
    synchrotron radiation, astronomy and
    astrophysics, etc. Pls help approaching these
    communities
  • Pls submit papers to JINST asap
  • Pls suggest others to submit to JINST
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com