Recent Status of NEMS/NMMB-AQ Development - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Recent Status of NEMS/NMMB-AQ Development

Description:

Recent Status of NEMSNMMBAQ Development – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:32
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: yta91
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Recent Status of NEMS/NMMB-AQ Development


1
Recent Status of NEMS/NMMB-AQ Development
  • Youhua Tang1, Jeffery T. McQueen2, Sarah Lu1,
  • Thomas L. Black2, Zavisa Janjic2, Mark D.
    Iredell2,
  • Carlos PĂ©rez GarcĂ­a-Pando3, Oriol Jorba
    Casellas3,
  • Pius Lee4, Daewon Byun4, Paula M. Davidson5, and
    Ivanka Stajner6
  • 1. Scientific Applications International
    Corporation
  • 2. NOAA/NCEP/EMC
  • 3. Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Edificio
    Nexus II c/ Jordi Girona 29,
  • Barcelona, Spain
  • 4. NOAA Air Resource Laboratory
  • 5. Office of Science and Technology,NOAA/National
    Weather Service
  • 6. Noblis Inc, Falls Church, VA

2
Advantages of the ESMF Framework for Air Quality
Application
  • An inline model allows frequent interaction
    between meteorological and air quality processes.
  • - Especially important for non-hydrostatic
    scales when meteorological features have fine
    temporal and spatial scales.
  • This air quality model can be driven by different
    meteorological models (which can be on different
    grids, e.g. for quick testing)
  • A common framework allows varying degrees of
    coupling and flexibility.

3
Pros and Cons of the Inline Model
  • Immediate and fast data access to the
    corresponding meteorological model.
  • Overall efficiency by reducing the intermediate
    I/O files
  • Can provide in-situ feedback to the met model
  • Depends more on the met model than the offline
    version.
  • Could slow down the meteorological forecast when
    running in the same domain

4
NOAA Environmental Modeling System (NEMS)(uses
standard ESMF compliant software)
Application Driver
ESMF Superstructure (component definitions, mpi
communications, etc)
Analysis -------------- Ocean ------------- Wind
Waves -------------- LSM -------------- Ens.
Gen. -------------- Other
Atmospheric Model
Physics (1,2,3)
Coupler1 Coupler2 Coupler3 Coupler4 Coupler5 Coupl
er6 Etc.
Dynamics (1,2)
Chemistry
1-1 1-2 1-3 2-1 2-2 2-3
Multi-component ensemble Stochastic forcing
Bias Corrector Post processor Product
Generator Verification Resolution change
ESMF Utilities (clock, error handling, etc)
Earth System Modeling Framework (NCAR/CISL,
NASA/GMAO, Navy (NRL), NCEP/EMC), NOAA/GFDL
2, 3 etc NCEP supported thru NUOPC, NASA, NCAR
or NOAA institutional commitments Components are
Dynamics (spectral, FV, NMM, FIM, ARW, FISL,
COAMPS)/Physics (GFS, NRL, NCAR, GMAO, ESRL)
5
NEMS Atmosphere
Component class
Color Key
Coupler class
Atmospheric Model
Completed Instance
Under Development
unified atmosphere including digital filter
Future Development
Dynamics
Physics and Chemistry
Dyn-Phy Coupler
NMM-B
NAM Phy
ARW
CMAQ Chemistry
Simple
Spectral
GFS Phy
FVCORE
Regrid, Redist, Chgvar, Avg, etc
GOCART Aerosol model
FIM
NOGAPS
WRF Phy
FISL
Navy Phy
COAMPS
Simple Chemistry
FVCORE Finite-Volume Dynamical Core NOGAPS
Navy's Operational Global Atmospheric Prediction
System COAMPS Coupled Ocean/Atmosphere Mesoscale
Prediction System
NMM-B Nonhydrostatic Multiscale Model on B grid
FIM Flow-following finite-volume Icosahedral
Model FISL Fully-Implicit Semi-Lagrangian
6
Two Inline Methods
A)
Air Quality Model Dynamics Physics Chemistry
Meteorological Model Dynamics Physics
Exchange data via the memory with specified time
frequency
Meteorological I/O
AQ I/O
B)
Meteorological Model/Air Quality Model
Dynamics with passive tracers
Physics with AQ species

Chemistry
Unified I/O
7
Pros and Cons of the two Methodsin NEMS
  • Method A Allows flexibility and can be made
    consistent
  • Can keep most of the original AQM
    architecture with minimal changes.
  • Different components can run on different grids
    supported by ESMF
  • Inconsistencies may exist between
    meteorological and air quality models
  • Overhead due to different dynamics/physics and
    diagnostic variables
  • Method B Focuses on efficiency and is
    inherently consistent
  • All computation uses common native grid and
    dynamics
  • High efficiency
  • Low flexibility. Introduces dependency on
    certain meteorological dynamics or physics
    components
  • Require positive-definite mass-consistent
    advection scheme and inclusion of AQ
  • processes in the meteorological modules

8
MAIN Program
Framework of NEMS/NMMB-AQ
Import State Export State
Method B
MAIN Gridded Component INIT-RUN-FINALIZE
Import State Export State
Dyn-Phys COUPLER Component INIT-RUN-FINALIZE
Import State Export State
Import State Export State
General Output Gridded Component INIT-RUN-FINALIZE
General Output Gridded Component INIT-RUN-FINALIZE
9
NMM-B Dynamical Core
  • Coordinate System and Grid
  • Global lat-lon, regular grid
  • Regional rotated lat-lon, more uniform grid size
  • Arakawa B grid (in contrast to the WRF-NMM E
    grid)
  • Pressure-sigma hybrid (Sangster 1960 Arakawa and
    Lamb 1977 Simmons and Burridge 1981)
  • Flat coordinate surfaces at high altitudes where
    sigma problems worst (e.g. Simmons and Burridge,
    1981)
  • Higher vertical resolution over elevated terrain
  • No discontinuities and internal boundary
    conditions
  • Lorenz vertical grid
  • NMM-B Advection Scheme for Passive Tracers
  • Conservation through flux cancelations, not
    forced a posteriori
  • Quadratic conservative advection scheme coupled
    with continuity equation
  • Crank-Nicholson for vertical advection

10
The NMM-Bs new scheme is shown to be mass
conservative
11
Courtesy Barcelona Supercomputing Center
(BSC) Designated center within WMO Sand and Dust
Storm Warning Advisory and Assessment System
(SDS-WAS), NMM/BSC-DUST model
12
CMAQ WRF-CHEM NMMB-AQ
Model Framework CMAQ WRF NEMS/ESMF
Input Meteorology Offline, recalculate some variables, like w and PBL heights Inline Inline
Input frequency hourly Every advection time Step Every advection time Step
Advection scheme piecewise parabolic method WRF-ARW, WRF-NMM NMM-B
PBL Mixing ACM2 (derived from input meteorology) Kz (calculated from YSU, MYJ etc) Inline MYJ
Convective Mixing ACM (derived) Grell (derived) BMJ adjustment or Grell (derived)
Gaseous Mechanism CB04, CB05, SAPRC RADM2, CBMZ, CB05, RACM CB05
Photolysis Look-up-table, Simplified TUV Fast-J, Fast-TUV TUV, Fast-TUV
13
NMMB Dry Run ONLY without convective mixing or
wet scavenging
14
Solutions to avoid slowing down the Met forecast
  • Run AQM on sub-domains
  • Run AQM as a separate cycle from the operational
    Met model

15
Summary
  • The development of NEMS/NMMB inline air quality
    model has started using ESMF framework
  • Most of related chemical/physical modules are
    zero-dimensional or one dimensional, which can be
    placed into this system directly, either as
    normal subroutines or as an ESMF gridded
    component. We will use CMAQ existing chemical
    modules in this system.
  • The new mass-conservative NMM-B advection scheme
    can support air quality applications.

16
Next steps for NEMS/NMMB-AQ development
  • Add convective mixing for passive tracers
  • Add in-cloud and under-cloud chemical scavenging.
  • Replace interpolated emissions with native- grid
    emissions (CMAQ SMOKE package)
  • Biogenic emission and Dry deposition inline
  • Alternative more flexible coupling approach
    through a separate chemistry grid component
    (method A) will be explored
  • Feedback case testing leverage NEMS radiative
    interactions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com