Social Validity - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Social Validity

Description:

Agree. Strongly Agree. 2. ... Agree. Strongly Agree. 7. I believe this treatment is likely to result in permanent improvement. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:37
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: Side4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Social Validity


1
Social Validity
2
Wolf (1978)
  • JABA
  • Social Validity The Case for Subjective
    Measurement or How Behavior Analysis is Finding
    Its Heart
  • An excerpt

3
Social Validity
  • Refers to the degree that behavior-change efforts
    impact favorably upon consumers
  • Sometimes also called
  • Clinical importance, significance
  • Applied importance, significance
  • Qualitative change
  • Ecological validity
  • 3 elements of an intervention that can be
    assessed for social validity
  • GOALS
  • PROCEDURES
  • OUTCOMES
  • Carr, Austin, Britton, Kellum, and Bailey (1999)
    found that social validity measures were
  • Reported in less than 13 of articles in JABA

4
Measuring Social Validity
  • Normative comparisons
  • Observe people who are considered competent and
    identify appropriate target behaviors
  • Used for comparison after treatment
  • Consumer Evaluations
  • Ask consumers to give their opinions
  • Used to establish/evaluate important and
    acceptable
  • Goals but consider that source may not know
  • Procedures who will be implementing them in
    the natural environment? Who will have influence
    to impede them?
  • Outcomes
  • Who are the consumers?

5
Who Are the Consumers of an Intervention?
  • Direct Consumers (directly receive tx)
  • Client/Participant
  • Family
  • Teacher(s)
  • Indirect Consumers (strongly affected by tx)
  • Family
  • Teacher(s)
  • Funding source
  • Members of Immediate Community
  • Neighbors
  • Friends
  • Members of Extended Community
  • People in the community who dont know the
    participant

6
Measuring Social Validity
  • Videotape performance before and after tx to
    evaluate if clinically significant change
  • Interviews/Questionnaires/Rating Scales
  • May be helpful to have someone else assess or ask
    to mail in anonymously
  • Intervention Rating Profile
  • 15-item Likert-type scale for assessing
    acceptability of classroom interventions
  • Treatment Acceptability Rating Form
  • 20 Qs for parents to rate acceptability of txs in
    outpatient clinic
  • Treatment Evaluation Inventory (TEI)
  • Treatment Evaluation Inventory Short Form
    (TEI-SF)

7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
Please read each statement and check one box for each treatment. Please read each statement and check one box for each treatment. Please read each statement and check one box for each treatment. Please read each statement and check one box for each treatment. Please read each statement and check one box for each treatment. Please read each statement and check one box for each treatment. Please read each statement and check one box for each treatment.
             
1. I find this treatment to be an acceptable way of dealing with the child's problem behavior. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
         
             
2. I would be willing to use this procedure if I had to change the child's problem behavior. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
         
             
3. I believe that it would be acceptable to use this treatment without children's consent. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
         
             
4. I like the procedures used in this treatment. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
         
             
5. I believe this treatment is likely to be effective. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
         
             
6. I believe the child will experience discomfort during the treatment. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
         
             
7. I believe this treatment is likely to result in permanent improvement. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
         
             
8. I believe it would be acceptable to use this treatment with individuals who cannot choose treatments for themselves. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
         
             
9. Overall, I have a positive reaction to this treatment. Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
         
10
Ingersoll and Schreibman (2006)
11
Jones, Carr, and Feely (2006)
12
Issues with Subjective Evaluations
  • Subjective opinions often dont correspond with
    actual behavior
  • Dont just choose evaluators who are likely to
    approve of your goals, procedures, and outcomes
  • Identify who is in the group and why this group
    is relevant to the issue youre assessing
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com