Demand Response A Resource Alternative - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Demand Response A Resource Alternative

Description:

2,500 MW of generation. Serve nearly 2/3rd of the geographical area of MN ... 38% commercial & industrial, agriculture. GRE's daily peaks for an ... shave ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:18
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: marketd
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Demand Response A Resource Alternative


1
Demand Response A Resource Alternative
  • Greg Padden
  • Great River Energy

2
Great River Energy
  • 4th largest GT in nation
  • 28 member cooperatives
  • 725 employees
  • 2,500 MW of generation
  • Serve nearly 2/3rd of the geographical area of MN
  • 615,000 members
  • Energy Sales
  • 62 residential
  • 38 commercial industrial, agriculture

3
GREs daily peaks for an entire year
1200 MW
1200 MW
June - August
4
GRE's challenges
  • Rapid load growth
  • Summer demand has grown 1,000 MW during last 10
    years
  • Future load growth is 110 MW and 15,000 MWh per
    year
  • Energy sales far exceed GREs base load
    generation many hours
  • Cost of supplying the load growth is tremendous
  • GRE will need 1,000 MW of new generation over
    next 10 years
  • Regional needs for additional transmission (gt
    6,000 MW)
  • MISO
  • Dynamic and complex energy market
  • Regulatory, environmental, and technological
    uncertainty

5
How can demand-side solutions help?
  • Demand-side solutions can provide flexible supply
    alternatives in an ever more complex world
  • Demand response
  • Primary goal is to save capacity (kW)
  • Cost is often less expensive than new peaking
    generation
  • Becoming a very effective tool for avoiding
    high-cost energy purchases in the wholesale
    market
  • Energy efficiency
  • Primary goal is to save energy (kWh)
  • Less expensive than building new base load
    generation or purchasing energy in the wholesale
    market
  • Becoming more cost effective as incremental
    load-serving costs rise
  • Rate design
  • Potential to change load requirements using price
    signals

6
Demand response in action
11 Hours
255 MW
2168 MW
AC PSWH 1100
ETS Restore 2300
CI 1300
Irr. 1600
7
What is GRE doing to change the future?
  • Aggressive promotion of demand response programs
    that reduce summer peaks
  • Cycled air conditioning
  • Controlled irrigation
  • Commercial industrial interruptible programs
  • Peak shave water heating
  • Building support for energy efficiency programs
    that encourage the saving of kilowatt-hours
  • Air conditioning quality installation
  • Compact fluorescent lighting
  • Revising wholesale rate structure
  • Encourage behavior changes in demand energy
    usage
  • Time of use energy rates - on-peak, off-peak
    critical peak
  • Seasonal demand rates

8
How is GRE doing?
  • Demand response
  • Over 270,000 loads are under centralized load
    control
  • 335 MW or 12 of summer peak can be interrupted
  • 260 MW or 13 of winter peak can be interrupted
  • Energy efficiency
  • Each year, GRE saves 35,000 MWh or .3 of energy
    sales
  • These savings accrue at this level for 10 -15
    years
  • Since 2001, GRE has issued over 16M in energy
    efficiency rebates
  • In 2007, GREs rebate budget is 4.5M
  • Rate design
  • New cost of service methodology and rate design
    to begin in 2008

9
Future of demand response at GRE
  • Continue support for demand response and energy
    efficiency programs that are proven least-cost
    resources
  • Monitor and evaluate costs of existing demand
    response programs
  • Target use of demand response to reduce peak
    demand and high-cost energy needs
  • Deploy cost effective energy efficiency programs
    to help meet some portion of expected future
    growth
  • Continue long-term commitment to implementing
    cost- effective demand response and energy
    efficiency efforts
  • Provide sufficient, timely, and stable funding of
    programs
  • Continue to communicate the benefits and
    opportunities for demand response and energy
    efficiency
  • Work with members to maintain balance between
    customer satisfaction and program optimization

10
Conclusions
  • "Real" integrated resource planning must include
    both supply-side and demand-side options
  • Time-based scarcity is a reality
  • Better understanding of energy use and costs will
    be critical
  • Demand response, energy efficiency and rate
    design can provide strategic and competitive
    advantages by
  • Providing appropriate incentives for changing
    energy use
  • Reducing the need for new supply resources
  • Reducing overall power supply costs
  • Demand-side supply options are a key component of
    GREs triple bottom line
  • Reliable service
  • Competitive rates
  • Environmental stewardship
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com