TRIP: Recent Changes and Open Issues - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

TRIP: Recent Changes and Open Issues

Description:

TRIP: Recent Changes and Open Issues. Jonathan Rosenberg, Hussein Salama, Matt Squire ... Current capabilities: Route Types Supported and Send Receive ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:235
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: hussein9
Category:
Tags: trip | changes | issues | open | recent | squire

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: TRIP: Recent Changes and Open Issues


1
TRIP Recent Changes and Open Issues
  • Jonathan Rosenberg, Hussein Salama, Matt Squire
  • Pittsburgh IETF
  • August 3, 2000

2
Next Hop Server Format
  • Host domain name or IP address in DNS format
    Server host port (RFC 1123)
  • proxy.ietf.org
  • 172.21.127.671725
  • Open Issue UDP/ TCP
  • proxy.ietf.orgtransporttcp
  • Open Issue IPv6

3
Capabilities
  • Current capabilities Route Types Supported and
    Send Receive Capability
  • IANA considerations
  • Reserved capability code 0
  • Capability codes 32768 to 65535 for
    vendor-specific capabilities
  • Open Issue making Route Types Supported
    mandatory
  • Open Issue adding Capability Mismatch error code

4
Communities Membership Capability
  • Permits an LS to announce to its peer the
    communities it is interested in.
  • The peer then only advertises to the LS routes of
    these communities.

5
Attribute Type Codes
  • Assigned type codes to all attributes
  • IANA considerations
  • Reserved type codes 224 to 255

6
Application Protocols
  • Added two new application protocols RAS and Annex
    G.
  • IANA considerations

7
Address Families
  • Had to deviate from IANAs standard set of
    address families
  • POTS Numbers private, local, national, and
    international
  • Alphabet 0-9
  • Routing Numbers mainly for European LNP
  • Alphabet 0-9,A-F
  • IANA considerations

8
ITAD Numbers
  • Reserved ITAD numbers 0 and 65535
  • ITAD numbers 64512 to 65534 are for private use
  • IANA considerations
  • Proposal use domain names instead of ITAD
    numbers
  • Issues
  • No need for IANA registration
  • ITAD topology restrictions
  • Effect on AdvertisementPath and RoutedPath
    attributes

9
MED and Tie Breaking Rules
  • MED usage consistent. Higher MED is preferable
  • Changed tie breaking rules to favor internal
    routes over external routes

10
Security Considerations
  • Protection of peer sessions using IPSec
  • Transparent mode security association
  • Either AH or ESP
  • Use IKE for key exchange
  • RSA signatures and RSA public key encryption

11
Security Considerations
  • Sign a selected set of attributes, always
    including ReachableRoutes
  • Include list of signatures in Authentication
    attribute
  • Open Issue What signature mechanisms to use?

12
UPDATE Rate Limiting
  • Recommendation Follow the same rules as in ISIS

13
Application Protocol Manipulation
  • - Example an LS receives receives a route with
    application
  • protocol SIP, changes it to Q.931, and
    advertises the route to
  • an external peer.
  • - Example an LS receives a SIP route and
    advertises two routes to
  • its external peer, a SIP route and a Q.931
    route
  • - Advantage provides for more flexible routing,
    but
  • - Requires manipulating the ReachableRoutes
    attribute (previously
  • Aggregation was the only possible manipulation
    of
  • ReachableRoutes

14
Multiple TRIP IDs per LS
  • An LS MUST use the same TRIP ID with all internal
    peers.
  • Question whats the significance of TRIP ID
    between external peers?

15
ITAD Boundaries
  • On the link between two LSs
  • On the LS itself. Splits the LS box into two (or
    more Virtual LSs. Permits route summarization of
    TRIP-Lite routes.

LS2
16
ITAD Boundaries
LS2
GW1
LS1
I-TRIP
TRIP-Lite
I-TRIP
TRIP-Lite
LS3
GW2
TRIP-Lite
I-TRIP
ITAD A
ITAD B
GW3
Aggregation
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com