Review - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

Review

Description:

... to those who are not fired after first period (to attract productive workers) ... Attract ... Goal 1: Attract skilled. W1 W2=2WS, Goal 2: Repel Unskilled. W1 PW2 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:44
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: Babc
Category:
Tags: attract | review

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Review


1
Review
  • Given the scenario below, the firm should hire
  • A. High school educated workers
  • B. College educated workers
  • C. A mix of both

isoquant
Qhs
isocost
Qcollege
2
Chapter 2
  • Recruitment

3
Opinion poll
  • Do applicants to highly skilled jobs tend to be
    qualified for these jobs?
  • A. Yes, almost always
  • B. No, they are often not qualified

4
Opinion poll
  • Do applicants to highly skilled jobs tend to be
    qualified for these jobs?
  • A. Yes, almost always
  • B. No, they are often not qualified
  • CNN Article Many employers consider more than
    half of all applicants to be unqualified.
  • Adverse Selection

5
Reading for next class
  • http//www.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article
    1097contextev
  • Or
  • http//www.econ.ucsb.edu/babcock/EconomitVoice.pd
    f

6
Chapter 2 Motivation and Themes
  • In the last chapter, we looked at whether firms
    should hire high or low skill workers. But
  • Say, the firm has decided it wants skilled
    workers
  • How does it go about hiring them?
  • Big problem Adverse selection

7
Hiring the Right People
  • How do you find the most able people for a given
    job?
  • High wages?
  • Suppose worker prod in all firms is equal and
    they know productivity but firms do not
  • Say firm pays the average wage
  • Will it get workers who are
  • A. Better than average
  • B. Less than average
  • C. Average

8
Adverse Selection
  • If firm offers 20/hr then only workers with
    lt20/hr productivity are apt to apply
  • This is called Adverse Selection

Distribution of Productivities
Density
W
9
Solutions
  • Pay to screen workers
  • Often impractical
  • Offer probation wages
  • Require credential

10
Probation wage
  • If you cannot observe a workers true
    productivity, then
  • Use low initial wage to keep low-productivity
    workers away.
  • Offer big raise to those who are not fired after
    first period (to attract productive workers)

11
Model of Probation Wage
  • Assume
  • 2 periods, interest rate0.
  • Unskilled wage (outside option) is WU
  • Skilled wage (outside option) is WS WU G
  • Your firm pays W1 in period 1, W2 in period 2
  • How do you choose W1 and W2?
  • Goal 1 Attract skilled
  • Must offer SUM over 2 periods that at least
    matches what skilled worker could get elsewhere
  • W1W2gt2WS
  • For simplicity set W1W22WS
  • Goal 2 Repel Unskilled
  • W1ltWU
  • For simplicity W1WU

12
Optimal Strategy
  • Goal 1 Attract skilled
  • Must offer SUM over 2 periods that at least
    matches what skilled worker could get elsewhere
  • W1W2gt2WS
  • For simplicity set W1W22WS
  • Goal 2 Repel Unskilled
  • W1ltWU
  • For simplicity W1WU
  • Just substitute in
  • W1W22WS
  • WUW22WS
  • W22Ws-Wu
  • W22(WuG) Wu
  • W2Wu2G
  • Proposition 1 As premium G earned by skilled
    workers in the general market rises, the gap
    between period 1 and period 2 wage must rise.

13
Graphical Representation
  • In practice, could offer W1WU-e, W2Wu2G e

WSG
WS
WS-G WU
Period 1
Period 2
14
Extension
  • Assume P prob unskilled worker doesnt get
    detected
  • Goal 1 Attract skilled
  • W1W22WS,
  • Goal 2 Repel Unskilled
  • W1PW2 (1-P) WUlt2WU
  • Substitute in
  • W12WS- W2
  • (2Ws-W2)PW2(1-P) WUlt2WU
  • (P-1) W2lt2WU-(1-P) WU- 2WS
  • W2gt2WU-(1-P) WU- 2WS
  • (P-1)
  • W2gtWUPWU-2WS
  • (P-1)
  • W22WS-WU-PWU
  • (1-P)
  • GW2-W1
  • GW2-(2WS- W2)
  • G2W2-2WS
  • G2 (2WS-WU-PWU) -2WS
  • (1-P)
  • G4WS-2WS(1-P)-2(1P) WU
  • (1-P)
  • G2WS2WSP-2(1P) WU
  • (1-P)
  • G2 (1P) (WS-WU)
  • (1-P)

15
Interpretation
  • G2 (1P) (WS-WU) (1-P)
  • If P goes up what happens to G?
  • A. G?
  • B. G?
  • C. Cant tell
  • P??G?

16
Punchline
  • P??G?
  • Proposition 2
  • As the probability that less productive workers
    will not be detected rises, the probationary wage
    must fall and the wage paid after the end of the
    probationary period must rise.
  • Intuition
  • If unskilled workers now have a CHANCE to get the
    W2 payoff, must reduce the wage they now would
    get for sure in period 1 and increase wage paid
    in period 2, to lower the overall expected
    payment they get. (Increase in period 2 wage is
    necessary to keep skilled workers happy).

17
Question 1
  • I am hiring workers. Im paying a probation wage
    in the first period. I want only skilled workers
    to apply, but Im still getting some unskilled
    workers.
  • Should I pay a lower probation or higher
    probation wage?
  • A. Lower
  • B. Higher

WSG
WS
WS-GWU
Period 1
Period 2
18
2) Education credential as signal
  • Mechanism
  • Find an observable trait tied to productivity,
    e.g. education
  • Credential (or signal) should be harder for
    low-productivity workers to acquire
  • If wage gap between those with and without the
    credential is small, only most able will find it
    worth the effort to obtain.

19
Hazing
  • http//www.youtube.com/watch?v2BLV1vdqzxgfeature
    related

20
Opinion Poll
  • If you had to choose, which would you rather
    have?
  • A. All the knowledge you gained in college, but
    no college degree
  • B. The college degree, but none of the knowledge
    you gained

21
Signaling
  • Assumptions for Signaling Theory of Spence
  • 2 ability types, high and low.
  • VMPhigtVMPlo
  • Asymmetric information
  • Firms dont know ability type
  • Workers do
  • More able workers have lower costs of schooling
  • Lower effort costs, enjoy school more, find it
    easier, have more time for work or other things

22
Equilibrium Notion
  • Firms best-respond to workers, workers
    best-respond to firms.
  • Both end up correct in their beliefs about what
    other will do.
  • Example Equilibrium Demonstrations in former
    Soviet Union
  • You get shot if you show up and no one else does.
  • You overthrow the government if everyone shows
    up.
  • I believe no one else will show up, so I dont
    show up.
  • Everyone else believes no one will show up
  • No one shows up.
  • Equilibrium. Beliefs are not falsified
  • Example Not an equilibrium Roommates
  • I believe you will do the dishes, so I dont do
    them
  • You believe I will do the dishes, so you dont do
    them
  • No one does the dishes
  • Not self-sustaining. Beliefs will be falsified

23
Spence Signaling Equilibrium - Graphically
  • Firm strategy
  • Pay VMPH to those who get s yrs of schooling
  • Belief these will be high types
  • Pay VMPL to those who dont
  • Belief these will be low types
  • Workers strategy
  • Get s yrs if high type
  • Get 0 yrs if low type
  • Belief firms will pay VMPH to those with s yrs,
    VMPL to others
  • CHltCL
  • VMPHProd of high types
  • VMPLProd of low types


CL
VMPH
CH
VMPL
s
24
Spence Signaling Equilibrium - Graphically
  • Is there s that makes both workers and firms
    strategies a best choice, and their beliefs
    correct?
  • CHltCL
  • VMPHProd of high types
  • VMPLProd of low types


CL
VMPH
CH
VMPL
s
s
25
Spence Signaling Equilibrium - Graphically
  • Why does s work?
  • Low types get
  • VMPL-0 if no schooling
  • VMPH-C0 if s years
  • These values are equal
  • Deters low skill types from s yrs (degree)
  • High types get
  • VMPL-0 if no schooling
  • VMPH-C1 if s years
  • VMPH-C1gtVMPL
  • So high types get s yrs
  • Firm is right. Workers are right. Beliefs not
    falsified
  • This is called a separating equilibrium.


CL
VMPH
CH
C0
VMPL
C1
s
s
26
Spence Signaling Equilibrium - Graphically
  • Not an equilibrium, because firms beliefs
    falsified
  • What if s chosen as cut-off by firms?
  • Do low types choose to get s years of schooling?
  • A. Yes
  • B. No
  • C. Cant tell
  • Yes, because get more utility than from VMPL.
  • Effort cost not high enough to deter them
  • Firm would end up paying low types VMPH
  • But their prod is VMPL
  • Firm loses money, goes out of business


CL
VMPH
CH
VMPL
s
S
27
Spence Signaling Equilibrium - Graphically
  • What if s is chosen as cut-off by firms?
  • Do low types choose to get s years of
    schooling?
  • A. Yes
  • B. No
  • C. Cant tell
  • No -- get more utility from VMPL.
  • Do high types get s years of schooling?
  • Yes -- get more utility from (VMPH-effort cost).
  • Many equilibria exist
  • S was the lowest s that still resulted in a
    separating equilibrium


CL
VMPH
CH
VMPL
s
S
28
Spence Signaling Equilibrium - Graphically
  • What if s is chosen as cut-off by firms?
  • Do low types choose to get s years of
    schooling?
  • No, because get more utility from VMPL.
  • Do high types s years of schooling?
  • A. Yes
  • B. No
  • C. Cant tell
  • No, because get more utility from VMPL.
  • Nobody gets schooling
  • Pooling Equilibrium
  • (Uninteresting case)


CL
VMPH
CH
VMPL
s
S
29
Notes - Spence Signaling Equilibrium
  • Here, schooling does not increase productivity
  • Only gives evidence of pre-existing ability
  • Schools as social evil
  • Expensive signal. Resources thrown away.
  • Is there a better way?
  • Should we outlaw discrimination on the basis of
    education?


CL
VMPH
CH
VMPL
s
s
30
Is Schooling Only a Signal?
  • Counterarguments
  • Vocational aspects of education increase
    productivity
  • Surgeon
  • Engineer.
  • Wouldnt firms/workers both be better off with
    contingent contract?
  • Worker accepts lower wage in period 1, firm
    agrees to raise wage if worker high ability
  • Cheaper for everyone than wasting 4 years in
    college!


CL
VMPH
CH
VMPL
s
s
31
Empirical Evidence
  • Goes both ways
  • Wolpin
  • Self-employed acquire just as much ed as
    employees.
  • Why, unless it increases prod?
  • Who do they impress??
  • Weiss
  • Found dropouts and high school grads equally
    productive, but lower quit rates for grads.
  • Implies signaling.


CL
VMPH
CH
VMPL
s
s
32
When is education more likely to raise prody?
  • When specific skills taught map closely and very
    directly to skills used on the job
  • Engineering
  • Law
  • Medicine
  • MBA

33
Question
  • In which setting is college degree more apt to
    capture productivity gains achieved through
    education and less apt to be purely a signal of
    pre-existing ability?
  • A. Brain surgeon
  • B. Car salesman

34
Signaling Extenions Fraternities and Hazing
  • Frats provide benefits
  • But need members to provide public goods
  • Participate enthusiastically
  • Organize parties, etc.
  • Worry about free-riders
  • Cant tell if applicants are free-riders (F) or
    committed (C)
  • Use hazing H to get applicants to reveal types
  • CFgtCC


CF
VMPC
CC
VMPF
H
H
35
Signaling Extensions - Gangsters
  • Your run a crime gang
  • Two types Mob types and FBI informants
  • Potential gangsters know their types but you do
    not
  • Cost of committing violent crime higher for FBI
    types
  • Require v violence before you will hire worker


CFBI
VMPM
CM
VMPFBI
V
V
36
How many years of schooling above should firms
require for the high wage job?
Clo

VMPhi
Chi
VMPlo
s
1
2
3
4
5
  • A. 1 B. 2 C. 3 D. 4 E. 5
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com