Money and Banking PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 23
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Money and Banking


1
Money and Banking
  • Spring 2007
  • Martin Andreas Wurm
  • University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee

2
Financial Repression
  • Recommended Reading Beim, David / Calomiris,
    Charles, Emerging Financial Markets, pp. 47 - 59

3
Financial Repression
  • 1. Overview
  • We have seen before that governments tend to
    regulate financial corporations and in particular
    commercial banks in their ordinary operations.
  • The fundamental justification why these
    regulations exist is the presence of asymmetric
    information in borrowing and lending and the
    arising need for monitoring and screening of
    borrowers and banks in financial markets.

4
Financial Repression
  • 1. Overview
  • While some of these regulations such as a certain
    standard of disclosure or accounting standards
    are without doubt improving the quality and
    efficiency of these markets, other instruments
    such as deposit insurance or restrictions of bank
    interest rates on say deposits are more
    questionable.
  • The reason for this is that governments always
    (to different extents) have interfered with
    financial markets to generate revenue and to
    direct the allocation of credit in their interest.

5
Financial Repression
  • 1. Overview
  • The reason why financial markets are interesting
    for governments is that significant revenue can
    be created - largely without the notice of the
    public. We have already seen one similar example
    in the case of seignorage gains. By inflating the
    government exchanges interest bearing debt
    against non-interest bearing money creating a
    (largely unnoticed) inflation tax.
  • Most people, hence, are not aware that
    governments historically have oppressed their
    financial systems for these purposes.

6
Financial Repression
  • 2. A simple model of bank lending
  • To analyze the impact of financial market
    regulation on bank lending lets work with a
    simple version of the loanable funds model.
  • Lets assume that all loans are bank loans, such
    that the supply of loanable funds is provided by
    savers exclusively through banks.
  • As always both the supply and demand of loanable
    funds is a function of the (real interest) rate.

7
Financial Repression
  • 2. A simple model of bank lending
  • In a world, where banking is costless, the
    interest rate at which depositors provide their
    funds (the deposit interest rate), should equal
    the interest rate that lenders receive on their
    loans (the lending interest rate).
  • Since the operation of banks requires the input
    of productive factors, banks need to operate on
    profits, such that the lending rate in reality
    exceeds the deposit rate.

8
Financial Repression
  • 2. A simple model of bank lending

LS - Supply of Loans (through deposits) by
Depositors
rL Lending rate
Interest rate spread
re Fricitionless equilibrium rate
rD Deposit rate
LS Demand for Loans
L1
L2
9
Financial Repression
  • 2. A simple model of bank lending
  • The graph above illustrates this situation. If
    banking was costly a frictionless equilibrium
    rate re would be provided to both depositors as
    well as lenders, at an equilibrium level of
    credit of L1.
  • Banks in reality, however, charge a larger
    lending rate rL than the deposit rate rD they pay
    out, such that the actual amount of credit
    provided is only equal to L2.
  • The difference between rD and rL is known as the
    interest rate spread.

10
Financial Repression
  • 3. The Impact of Financial Regulation on Bank
    Lending
  • Banks have been subject to regulation in a
    variety of ways (as discussed above). In the
    following we focus on
  • Interest rate ceilings on bank deposits
  • High reserve requirements
  • Any restrictions of bank competition (such as
    directing bank credit, public ownership,
    micromanagement of banks, entry restrictions
    (especially to foreigners), restriction of
    capital flows, etc.)

11
Financial Repression
  • 3. The Impact of Financial Regulation on Bank
    Lending
  • 1. Interest rate ceilings on bank deposits
  • Upper boundaries on interest rates banks can pay
    on their deposits are common (in the U.S. 1930
    1970, Regulation Q).
  • The justification is usually the prevention of
    excessive competition between banks.

12
Financial Repression
  • 3. The Impact of Financial Regulation on Bank
    Lending
  • 1. Interest rate ceilings on bank deposits
  • How do interest rate ceilings affect bank
    lending? Instead of charging the deposit rate a
    bank would normally pay (rD), banks now are
    forced to pay a lower deposit rate (rDc) on their
    deposits, reducing the amount of funds supplied
    by depositors.
  • To offset this decrease in bank funds, banks will
    increase the lending rate accordingly from rL to
    rLc.

13
Financial Repression
  • 3. The Impact of Financial Regulation on Bank
    Lending

LS - Supply of Loans (through deposits) by
Depositors
rLc
rL
re
rD
Interest rate ceiling
rDc
LS Demand for Loans
L1
L2
L3
14
Financial Repression
  • 3. The Impact of Financial Regulation on Bank
    Lending
  • 1. Interest rate ceilings on bank deposits
  • This has two effects
  • First, it reduces the amount of loans banks are
    actually offering from L2 to L3.
  • Second, it creates rents for banks, since the
    interest rate spread increases from (rD rL) to
    (rDc rLc).

15
Financial Repression
  • 3. The Impact of Financial Regulation on Bank
    Lending
  • 1. Interest rate ceilings on bank deposits
  • How can a government benefit from this? Often
    governments force banks to provide subsidized
    loans to government-favored borrowers to extract
    some of these rents.
  • These rents are paid by private borrowers and
    lenders and tend to victimize small scale savers
    in particular in high-inflation economies, where
    real interest rates tend to become negative
    quickly if deposit interest rate ceilings exits.
  • Note that this type of policy can only work if no
    market alternative such as a working bonds market
    exists.

16
Financial Repression
  • 3. The Impact of Financial Regulation on Bank
    Lending
  • 2. High Bank Reserve Requirements
  • Within certain limits there is a clear-cut
    justification for why reserve requirements held
    by banks reduce the inherent liquidity problems
    in banking (as seen before).
  • In most countries these reserve requirements are
    held with a central bank type institution which
    commonly does not pay any interest on these
    reserve requirements.

17
Financial Repression
  • 3. The Impact of Financial Regulation on Bank
    Lending
  • 2. High Bank Reserve Requirements
  • Reserve requirements force banks to deposit hold
    monetary funds with the central bank which in
    turn allow the government to issue less interest
    rate bearing debt (this again, is a result of
    seignorage).
  • How does this impact bank lending? Since banks
    have to hold unproductive reserves, for each
    level of loans the issue, they have to charge a
    higher lending rate rL2. In other words at any
    given lending rate they will supply less loans
    and the supply of loans will shift to the left.

18
Financial Repression
  • 2. A simple model of bank lending

LS1
LS2
rL2
rL1
re
rD1
rD2
LS Demand for Loans
L1
L2
L3
19
Financial Repression
  • 3. The Impact of Financial Regulation on Bank
    Lending
  • 2. High Bank Reserve Requirements
  • The impact of this tax on banking is similar to
    the case above. The lending rate increases,
    consequentially the deposit rate decreases,
    making private lenders and borrowers worse off.
  • Finally the amount of loans provided by banks
    decreases as well.

20
Financial Repression
  • 3. The Impact of Financial Regulation on Bank
    Lending
  • 2. High Bank Reserve Requirements
  • The impact of this tax on banking is similar to
    the case above. The lending rate increases,
    consequentially the deposit rate decreases,
    making private lenders and borrowers worse off.
  • Finally the amount of loans provided by banks
    decreases as well. Without going into details,
    note that this effect is typically elevated by
    the fact that seignorage creates inflation which
    should further requires bank to charge higher
    nominal lending rates and provide lower nominal
    deposit rates.

21
Financial Repression
  • 3. The Impact of Financial Regulation on Bank
    Lending
  • 3. Restrictions on competition
  • The ways in which governments regulate bank
    competition are numerous and range from attempts
    to direct bank credit in government favored
    investments over the nationalization of banks to
    closing financial markets to foreign
    participation (which is often less susceptible to
    government intervention).
  • All of these interventions have ultimately the
    same impact They decrease the supply of bank
    loans to the private sector, causing the interest
    rate spread to decrease. The resulting rents are
    typically split up between banks, the government
    and government favored borrowers.

22
Financial Repression
  • 4. Financial Regulation Final Remarks
  • While certain types of financial regulation
    clearly have their benefits (e.g. provision of
    information to borrowers through accounting
    standards), financial regulation does not come
    without a cost.
  • 1. Deposit insurance removes private incentives
    of monitoring, therefore, causing a need for
    (costly) public supervision and monitoring of
    financial intermediaries
  • 2. Restrictions of bank operations act as taxes
    on private savers and borrowers causing rents for
    governments and government-favored borrowers.

23
Financial Repression
  • 4. Financial Regulation Final Remarks
  • This type of rent-seeking is particularly
    convenient for governments since it remains
    largely undetected by the public.
  • If one has reason to believe that governments
    typically do a worse job at allocating capital
    efficiently (such a reason may be the fact that a
    government as opposed to a private saver does not
    run on profit, i.e. positive returns from
    investment), government regulation of financial
    markets can make markets less efficient often
    at the cost of small scale savers and investors.
  • In the developed and emerging markets, the past
    30 20 years have, hence, seen an increased
    tendency to deregulate financial markets not
    rarely associated with bad experiences made with
    government control.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com