Light Source Reviews - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Light Source Reviews

Description:

Reviewing process: A plot of the beam time allocations per year vs. the number of ... Overall availability of quality beam time to the user community. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:17
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: pedrom3
Category:
Tags: beam | light | reviews | source

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Light Source Reviews


1
BASIC ENERGY SCIENCES -- Serving the Present,
Shaping the Future
  • Light Source Reviews
  • The BES Perspective
  • July 23, 2002
  • Pedro A. Montano
  • Materials Sciences and Engineering
  • Basic Energy Sciences

2
BASIC ENERGY SCIENCES -- Serving the Present,
Shaping the Future
  • The light source reviews are performed every
    three years.
  • The BES objective is to produce the best science
    possible at our facilities.
  • The user community should have access to the
    light sources using a
  • proposal evaluation system that is fair and
    stimulate the performance of high quality
    research.
  • The resources provided to the facilities should
    be used to optimize its utilization as well as
    the development of new and better techniques for
    synchrotron radiation applications.

3
BASIC ENERGY SCIENCES -- Serving the Present,
Shaping the Future
  • Topics covered in the review
  • Facility performance (schedules, users
    participation, etc)
  • Selected presentations of the most outstanding
    research performed at the Facility during
    the last two years (by field of research)
  •   RD plans and future scientific directions
  •   Laboratory plans that may affect the Facility
  • The schedule should include time for the
    reviewers to meet individually with the facility
    scientific staff in their focus areas and
    additional areas of interest. We would like to
    have a focus session with representatives of the
    users community (i.e. User Executive Committee)
    and PRT spokespersons (not affiliated to the
    Facility), without the laboratory management
    presence. The agenda and logistics for the review
    should be coordinated with BES.

4
BASIC ENERGY SCIENCES -- Serving the Present,
Shaping the Future
  • Information Requested from the Facility 
  • 1)  Facility
  • i. Brief description of the facility ( one
    paragraph).
  • ii. Provide a breakdown of all staff (permanent
    and temporary) and their assignments (personnel
    and budget allocation to each specific
    assignment) accelerator staff, facility beamline
    scientists, facility beamline operational staff,
    technicians and operators assign to users
    support, computing, clerical and administration.
  • iii. Brief description of on going RD activities
    at the facility accelerator improvements,
    beamlines improvements, etc 
  • 2)    Beamlines
  • i. Drawing of the floor plan, with a brief
    description of each beamline.
  • ii. Describe the facility beamlines available to
    users and percentage time allocated to outside
    users.
  • iii. How many beamlines (facility, PRT) are
    operational and what percentage of operational
    time is allocated to outside users.
  • iv. Describe the communities served by each
    beamline (i.e. Biology, Materials Science, etc).
  • 3)      Support facilities- sample preparation,
    computing capabilities, etc
  • i. What is available?
  • ii. What is planned?

5
BASIC ENERGY SCIENCES -- Serving the Present,
Shaping the Future
  •  
  •      Information Requested from the Facility
    (continued) 
  • Users
  • i. How is beam time allocated to outside user?
  • ii. Reviewing process A plot of the beam time
    allocations per year vs. the number of
    groups receiving this time allotment (i.e.
    Materials Science, Biology, etc). Also user
    experiments per year, and proposals per year.
    Percentage of beam time per year allocated to
    facility scientists.
  • Impact
  • i.   List all publications in the last two years
    in refereed journals only. This list should
    separate papers according to work performed by
    outside users or facility staff. Separate out
    conference proceedings.
  • ii.    List invited lectures and major awards for
    facility staff and outside users.
  • iii.   List the twenty most important
    publications of work performed at the facility
    over the past two years, include Citation index.
  • 3)      Cost Indicator
  • i. Cost per paper (total cost of beamlines
    operation/ number of papers per year).
  • ii.   Cost per delivered beam day (delivered beam
    days/ number of papers per year).
  • 4)     

6
BASIC ENERGY SCIENCES -- Serving the Present,
Shaping the Future
  •  
  •         Future
  • i.   Describe in a brief statement the plans for
    future beamlines and facility upgrade.
  • ii.  Describe the potential impact on the
    facility of the phasing out of some or all PRTs
    due to financial or scientific difficulties,
    provide a budget estimate of what will be needed
    to keep such beam lines operating.
  • iii. Identify potential problems- such as power
    shortages, environmental contamination, etc
  • iv. Provide a budget estimate required to upgrade
    the beamlines scientific instrumentation, motor
    controls, detectors and associated electronics.
  • v.   What are the expected trends in user demand
    internal, external and scientific area they
    represent (materials, chemistry, biology etc).

7
BASIC ENERGY SCIENCES -- Serving the Present,
Shaping the Future
  •  
  •         The reviewer should provide an
    individual evaluation addressing the following
    issues
  •    Quality of the research performed at the
    facility in terms of number and impact of
    published research.
  •      Appropriateness and quality of the facility
    staff research and development (RD) program.
  •      Satisfaction of the user community with the
    facility support and staff.
  •      Overall availability of quality beam time
    to the user community.
  •      What is the user demand at the facility?
  •      Evaluate the proposal review process for
    beam time allocation, effectiveness and fairness.
  •      Evaluate the fairness in the distribution
    of beam time among users, i.e. facility staff vs.
    outside users.
  •     Evaluate the appropriateness of the beamline
    instrumentation to satisfy the present and future
    needs of the user community.
  •     Evaluate the cost effectiveness of beamline
    operation, i.e. cost of operating a specific
    beamline in relation to its demand by users.
  •    Evaluate what is an appropriate level of
    research and development funding for efforts
    related to improving operations, accelerator,
    insertion devices, advanced instrumentation, etc
  •    What will be the most effective way to
    improve the scientific productivity in number and
    quality, support for facility RD and/or direct
    support to the users?
  •    Cost effectiveness of the facility,
    publications, and scientific impact vs. cost of
    operation.
  •    How the facility sees its role in the
    synchrotron radiation community at large?
  •   What is the expected future capability of the
    facility and specifically of the PRT operational
    structure?

8
BASIC ENERGY SCIENCES -- Serving the Present,
Shaping the Future
  • The Reviews of the Four BES Synchrotron
    Radiation Facilities were completed by February
    2002.
  •  
  • Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory
    (SSRL) April 3-5, 2001
  •  
  • National Synchrotron Light Source (NSLS) July
    11-13, 2001
  •  
  • Advanced Photon Source (APS) October 16-18, 2001
  •  
  • Advanced Light Source (ALS) February 4-6, 2002
  •  

9
BASIC ENERGY SCIENCES -- Serving the Present,
Shaping the Future
  • Some Interesting Statistics for the Four
    Synchrotron Radiation Facilities in FY 2001
  •  
  • Total Number of Users 6568
  •  
  • Total Number of General Users 4412
  •  
  • Total Number of Publications 2061
  •  
  • Total Number of Beamlines 166
  •  
  •  

10
  •  

11
  •  
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com