BOMB IN A BOX - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

BOMB IN A BOX

Description:

The Trojan Horse of the 21st Century? Vulnerabilities. Cost to NYC from 9/11 perhaps $90 billion ... Must not delay commerce too much or add great expense ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:34
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: ValuedGate2301
Category:
Tags: bomb | box | great | horse

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: BOMB IN A BOX


1
BOMB IN A BOX
  • Shipping Containers and International Security
  • Dr. Edward M. Ifft

2
Why Shipping Containers?
  • Containers now essential to global trade and
    increasing rapidly
  • Many millions in useperhaps 10,000,000 enter the
    U.S. each year. About 90-95 of world trade moves
    via containers
  • Containers are efficient and inexpensive, though
    theft and smuggling have always been a problem
  • 2 sizes20-foot (1 teu) and 40-foot
  • Container ships can carry 8,000 teularger ships
    planned

3
Logistics
  • Key U.S. portsNY/NJ, LA/LB, SEA/TAC
  • Largest European portsRotterdam, Hamburg,
    Antwerp
  • Other major portsHong Kong, Singapore
  • Containers arrive/leave by train, truck, barge
  • Rotterdam31,000 ocean vessels, 133,000 inland
    vessels per year
  • 50 of world container trade handled by 10
    operatorsnone U.S.business very competitive

4
The Threat
  • Containers are both large and strong
  • 2 major terrorist scenarios
  • -- Container itself as a weapon to attack
    portpopulation/industrial center/oil storage
  • --Container as a vehicle to deliver weapons
    or weapons components to be used later
  • Consider also bulk cargo/cars/LNG
  • The Trojan Horse of the 21st Century?

5
Vulnerabilities
  • Cost to NYC from 9/11perhaps 90 billion
  • Cost of West Coast port strike10 days/5 billion
  • Brookings estimate of cost of closing all major
    U.S. ports after attack--1 trillion
  • Major implications for entire global trade
    system, not just the port attacked
  • Small inspected
  • Many containers are under control of a single
    truck driver for long periods

6
Technical Issues
  • Single container could hold 30,000 kg of
    conventional explosivesprobably detectable
  • CWpossible, but need large volumeperhaps
    detectable plenty of chemicals already here
  • BWhopeless to detect and no reason to use
    container anyway small quantities lethal
  • Nuclear weapon or weapon components or RDD (Dirty
    Bomb)

7
Detection of Special Nuclear Materials
  • Strongly dependent upon type and amount of
    material present, tamper, shielding, distance to
    detector, integration time, background, etc.
  • Spontaneous fissions/kg/min
  • U-235 18
  • U-238 420
  • Pu-239 600
  • Pu-240 280,000,000

8
Passive Detectors
  • Passive neutron and gamma detectors might see Pu
    weapon, probably not HEU weapon
  • Dirty bomb materials tend to be quite active and
    should be easier to detect
  • Do not confuse what can be done in the lab with
    what will work on the dock!
  • There will be false positives (ceramics)

9
Other Detectors
  • X-rays can detect dense materials, such as
    fissile material or shieldingalso gamma
    radiography
  • IR detectors can detect heat
  • Active detector methods, such as using 14-Mev
    neutrons, can activate HEU, but have health and
    safety issues
  • Swipes and air samplersuseful for conventional
    explosives, chemicals or stowaways, but not very
    practical on a large scale
  • We need a simple, reliable detector that can be
    mounted on a crane

10
What is Inspection?
  • Confusion on terminologysuggest we use three
    terms
  • --Screenexamine documentation and
    sealsidentify high-risk shipments
  • --Scan -use passive or active detectors
    from outside the container
  • --Openphysically open container and
    examine contents

11
ResponsesU.S.
  • Container Security Initiative (CSI)
  • Proliferation Security Initiative (PSI)
  • Automated Manifest System (AMS)
  • Customs Trade Partnership Against Terrorism
    (C-TPAT)
  • Megaport Initiative (DOE)
  • Operation Safe Commerce

12
Responses--International
  • No one organization in charge of entire transport
    chain
  • G-8call for common standards, etc.
  • International Maritime Organization (IMO), London
  • UN agency for improving maritime safety and
    cooperation expanded SOLAS International Ship
    and Port Security Code (ISPS)only applies to
    vessels over 500 gross tons only U.S. serious
    about enforcement?

13
Responses--International
  • Clever EU response to mad cow disease and hoof
    and mouth diseaseIDEA (Identification
    Electronique des Animaux)
  • --Installed small boluses (RFIDs) in 1,000,000
    ruminants (cows, sheep, goats, buffaloes)
  • --Big successunique identifier, reliable, read
    whether animal is still or moving, survives
    slaughter
  • --An option now in the EU on small ruminants,
    required in 2008

14
Responses--International
  • World Customs Organization (WCO), Brussels--
  • Independent intergovernmental body
  • Framework of Standards to Secure and
    Facilitate Global Tradedraft prepared by
    high-level groupnow out for comments by industry
  • International Organization for Standards (ISO),
    Genevanon-governmental body could help with
    seals, etc.

15
Recommendations
  • Must recognize this is risk management, not 100
    elimination of risk
  • Solution must be international, not just U.S.
  • Must have level playing field for industry
  • Must not delay commerce too much or add great
    expense
  • Collateral benefits reduced theft and smuggling,
    increase in taxes collected

16
Recommendations
  • Establish layered defense
  • Standardize documentation and sealsunderstand
    that this is useless if documentation is false
  • Try to develop smart containers
  • Use passive nuclear scanners on all entering
    containers
  • Use X-ray or other active devices in suspicious
    cases
  • In highest risk cases, open the container

17
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com