Ethical Concerns in Research - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Ethical Concerns in Research

Description:

Nuremberg Code basic principles to govern research involving human subjects ... IRBs have authority to approve, require modifications, or disapprove research ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:38
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: LarryH93
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ethical Concerns in Research


1
Chapter 5
  • Ethical Concerns in Research

2
Historical Perspective on Ethics
  • Nazi Experimentation in WWII
  • medical experiments
  • Nuremberg War Crime Trials
  • Nuremberg Code basic principles to govern
    research involving human subjects
  • Tuskegee Syphilis Study
  • PHS project related to untreated syphilis
  • Highlights deception and informed consent
  • Human radiation experiments

3
Ethical Standards for the Protection of Research
Participants
  • Nuremberg Code (1947) first set of guidelines
  • Helsinki Declaration (1964) medical research
  • Belmont Report (1979) fundamental document for
    current federal regulations in US
  • Common Rule (1991) 45 C.F.R. 46
  • Federal rules that govern research involving
    human participants in the US
  • Institutional Review Boards (IRB)

4
Basic Principles of Belmont Report
  • Respect for persons
  • Proclaims individuals capable of
    self-determination thus voluntary consent is
    essential
  • Beneficence
  • Obligates researchers to maximize potential
    benefits and minimize possible harm
  • Justice
  • Requires the benefits and burdens of research be
    fairly distributed

5
Informed Consent
  • Arguably the most important ethical standard
  • Refers to telling research participants about all
    aspects of the research that might reasonably
    influence their decision to participate
  • Four important elements
  • Subjects are fully aware of nature and purpose of
    research project
  • Consent is voluntarily given
  • Person has legal capacity to give consent
  • Responsibility for obtaining consent rests with
    researcher

6
Protecting Vulnerable Subjects
  • Particular precautions must be taken to protect
    the welfare of subjects that might be considered
    especially vulnerable or at risk for some reason
  • The following types of subjects might be
    considered to be vulnerable children,
    handicapped, cardiac rehab patients, welfare
    recipients, prisoners, pregnant women, patients
    in a mental hospital, etc.

7
Privacy Confidentiality
  • Privacy refers to the capacity of individuals
    to control when and under what conditions others
    have access to their behaviors, beliefs, and
    values
  • Confidentiality refers to treating subject
    information or responses in a manner so that it
    is not linked to any specific individual who
    participated in a study
  • single-subject research requires particular
    caution
  • Normally addressed through informed consent

8
Institutional Review Boards
  • IRBs established by federal mandate to assure
    compliance with governmental regulations
  • IRBs have authority to approve, require
    modifications, or disapprove research
  • IRB approval required before any aspect of the
    research involving human subjects may commence

9
Categories of IRB Review
  • Exempt from review
  • Expedited review
  • Full review
  • Dependent upon amount of risk present

10
Criteria for IRB Approval
  • Risks to subjects are minimized
  • Risks to subjects are reasonable in relation to
    anticipated benefits
  • Selection of subjects is equitable in relation to
    the purpose of the research and its setting
  • Informed consent will be sought from each
    prospective subject or their legal representative
  • Informed consent will be appropriately documented
  • Provisions for monitoring data collected to
    ensure safety of subjects
  • Provisions to protect privacy of subjects and to
    maintain confidentiality of data

11
Disclosure of Results
  • Research investigations normally result in some
    disclosure of the results of the study (e.g.,
    paper, published article, presentation)
  • The preeminent ethical obligation in this regard
    is not to disclose inaccurate, deceptive, or
    fraudulent research results
  • To do so undermines the very nature of the
    scientific process!
  • Proper establishment of authorship.

12
Scientific Misconduct
  • According to the U.S. Public Health Service . . .
  • Misconduct means fabrication, falsification,
    plagiarism, or other practices that seriously
    deviate from those that are commonly accepted
    within the scientific community for proposing,
    conducting, or reporting research

13
Ethical Obligations in Research
  • Researcher is responsible for his/her subjects
  • Researcher is responsible for his/her own actions
    and those of any research aides
  • Subjects must provide informed consent
  • Researcher protects subjects from harm, danger,
    and discomfort
  • Maintain anonymity and confidentiality
  • Subjects should not be coerced
  • Researcher has responsibility after the
    investigation is complete to safeguard subject
    data
  • Honest disclosure of results
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com