China telecom Next Carrier Network(CN2) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

China telecom Next Carrier Network(CN2)

Description:

Total voice traffic and revenue decreases by the end of 2005. ... Adoption of the SIP-based soft-switch technology. The impending releases of 3G license ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:204
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: emplo7
Category:
Tags: carrier | china | cn2 | network | next | sip | switch | telecom

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: China telecom Next Carrier Network(CN2)


1
??????????? China telecom Next Carrier
Network(CN2)
??? Wei Leping
China Telecom Corporation http//www.chinateleco
m.com.cn
2
Background
  • Challenges
  • Total voice traffic and revenue decreases by the
    end of 2005. The mobile phone and IP phone calls
    have cannibalized part of the voice traffic
    businesses
  • Traditional communication network is unable to
    support China Telecoms strategy to become a
    Integrated Information Service Provider. This is
    due to its lack of capability in offering
    value-added service.
  • High OPEX (Operating Expenses) is required for
    traditional hetergeneous/multiple networks
  • Existing ChinaNet is not a profit generating
    business
  • Opportunities
  • Acceleration of the Information and
    Communications Technology (ICT) adoption in
    government and enterprises would drives the
    demand for telecom services
  • Adoption of the SIP-based soft-switch technology
  • The impending releases of 3G license
  • Rapid development of the broadband service

3
solutions
  • Migration of voice service from PSTN to
    soft-switch-based VoIP technology
  • Preparation for 3G-based mobile services
  • Accelerate the development and application of the
    broadband services base on xDSL access technology
  • Drive managed service and system integration
    service
  • Built an Integated IP/MPLS-based multi-service
    platform CN2

4
Philosophy of Building CN2
  • CN2 strength
  • network topology
  • Scalable routing architecture
  • Highest level of redundancy
  • Highest level of security
  • Different class service
  • All services have edge functionality
  • End to end control and managment

5
CN2 Strength
  • Homogeneous Global Architecture
  • Single Global ASN(AS4809)
  • IP Layer Redundancy Drives Accountability
  • ISIS level2-only with sub-second convergence
  • Diffserv-based QOS enabled network
  • MPLS and multicast enabled network
  • MPLS FRR with sub-50ms reroute
  • Robust Architecture Allows for Unsurpassed
    Stability
  • Offer Layer-2/3 over IP or MPLS
  • Leading SLAs via Zero Loss Speed of Light
    Delays
  • 6PE-based IPV6 ready
  • Offer Layer-2/3 over IP or MPLS
  • Leading SLAs via Zero Loss Speed of Light
    Delays
  • End to end service provision and fault management

6
Simple Network Topology
  • CN2 comprises of two functional planes and four
    structural layers to offer a seamless
    connectivity for customers. CN2????2????????4?????
    ??,?????????????
  • The two functional planes are high speed data
    forwarding plane and service provisioning plane
  • 2???????????????????
  • The four structural layers are core layer,
    aggregation layer, edge layer and services
    connecting layer
  • 4???????????????????????
  • The high speed data forwarding plane and service
    offering plane is supported by 4 and 1 vendors
    respectively. This is to ensure minimum service
    disruption and better edge services control.
  • ???????4?????,?????1????????????,??????,???????

SR/PE
Service
Edge
Aggregation
SR/PE
Core
?????
?????
SR/PE
7
Simple Network Topology(cont)
  • IP/MPLS Network
  • All-Optical,Dense Wave Division Multiplexing
    (DWDM)
  • SONET/SDH framing
  • Per flow load-sharing and fail-over load-sharing
    with ISIS
  • MPLS is enabled with traffic to the PE Loopback
    is tagged. Hence, only VPN traffic is
    encapsulated in MPLS, all others is transported
    native IP

IP
MPLS
IP
SONET FRAMING
DWDM
8
Scalable route architecture
  • To ensure networks scalability and security,
    only infrastructure address blocks are
    redistributed into the IS-IS (IGP) routing table.
    Non-infrastructure addresses are redistributed
    in BGP. Keeping the IS-IS routing table to a
    minimum would greatly enhance the network
    stability.
  • ???????????????ISIS,??????BGP,??IGP??????,????????
    ???????.
  • Single Global ASN (AS4809),
  • CN2 have two type Route reflector
  • VPN RR for RFC2547-based VPN service,(VRR)
  • Global RR for internet service(GRR)
  • VPN RR is independent of global RR, both use one
    level Route Reflector(RR) (VRR?GRR??????,?????)
  • BGP Communities are deployed for routes control
    and netflow-based traffic monitor
  • Global iBGP Scaling the Global Internet Routing
    Table involve the increase in the number of GRR
    group.
  • ???????GRR??????public ????,??????????.
  • VPN iBGP Likewise, scaling the VPN routing Table
    involve the increase of VRR group. Example,
    VPN1-500 is handled by VRR-G1 while VPN501-1000
    can be handled by VRR-G2
  • ???????VRR??????VPN??????,??VPN1-500?????G1??,VPN5
    01-1000??G2??.
  • ???????????????????.

9
Scalable route architecture (Cont)
  • iBGP architecture for global routes

Group 1 for part1 routes
Group 2 for Part2 routes
Full mesh Peers
Full mesh Peers
GRR1
GRR2
GRR3
GRR4
Client
Client
EBGP
EBGP
Client
Client
Internet
Internet
10
Scalable route architecture (Cont)
  • iBGP architecture for VPN routes

Group 1 for VPN 1-500 routes
Group 2 for VPN 501-1000 routes
Full mesh Peers
Full mesh Peers
VRR1
VRR2
VRR3
VRR4
Client
Client
Client
Client
PE
PE
PE
PE
11
Highest Level of redundancy
  • All network links are deployed in pairs over
    diverse facilities
  • Only POS interface are used on backbone
    interconnection to facilitate faster failures
    detection
  • All network links are active (NOT working and
    protect)
  • Each PoPs router pair is connected by multiple
    routers. Link failure protection is the function
    of IS-IS (layer 3 control) and would not be
    carried out on transport layer (layer 2 control)
    (???SDH??DWDm??????)
  • IS-IS routing protocol
  • Per flow load sharing between dual pairs
  • Fail-over load sharing
  • Sub-second fast convergence for gold service
  • Three priority LSP flooding and FIB update
  • MPLS FRR
  • 11 mode FRR is deployed in core layer for 50
    links
  • Sub-50ms reroute time
  • Built to maintain utilization not to exceed 50
    during normal running
  • As a congestion-free network, CN2 ensures premium
    priority for delivery of all packets in the core

12
Higher Level of security
  • Strict uRPF is deployed on all customer access
    interfaces
  • Loose uRPF is deployed on interconnected
    interface
  • ??????
  • Infrastructure ACLs (iACL) deny external traffic
    to ALL routers interfaces address. iACL are
    deployed on edges and borders of the network.
  • ?Cn2????????????????ACL,???????Ip???CN2??,????????
    ??????Cn2??.
  • Infrastructure routes are distribted to internet
    or customer
  • ??????,????????????CN2???????
  • All router access control is manage by AAA
    servers and syslog
  • (????????AAA?syslog)
  • QOS technology would be deployed accordingly to
    reduce the impact of an attack or worm traffic.
  • ??QOS??????????????????,??QOS?????????

13
Different class service capability
  • CN2???QOS?????
  • QOS??????????????????,?????????,?????IP???????????
    ????????3G,????MPLS VPN?ATM????????,????IP/MPLS???
    ?????,??????????,??QOS??????????????CN2?????3G????
    ?????50????,Vnet??????????????15?
  • QOS??????????????,???????????,?????????????????,??
    ?QOS????????????????
  • QOS?????????????????????IP?????????,??????????????
    ??,????????????????????????50???,??????????????20
    ,???30???Vnet????????

14
Different class service capability
  • CN2 QOS positioning
  • QOS is a technique use to allocate limited
    network resources to different services. Unlike
    traditional networks of ATM, Frame Relay, and
    lease circuit services, CN2 provides an overlay
    network for all these services. To differentiate
    the services base on the class of importance or
    contract, QOS is the mechanism in place to
    segregate and allocate network resources to
    different class of services.
  • Example of a QOS policy 3G and soft-switch
    traffic can be allocated with at least 50 of the
    available bandwidth while Vnet can only consumed
    a maximum of 15 of the total bandwidth
  • QOS are also positioned for traffic congestion
    management. Under the unfortunate circumstances
    of equipment or circuit failures, QOS helps to
    manage the limited usable network resources to
    different classes of services.
  • Better resource utilization is expected from
    deploying QOS. Having elastic policy to
    re-allocate the under utilized resources results
    in efficient resources utilization.

15
Different class service capability
  • CN2 QOS????
  • CN2????DiffServ???QOS????,??IP Precedence?MPLS
    EXP???????8????????
  • CN2????????5?????,??1???????????,1?????????????,??
    ??3???????
  • ???????????????classification ?marking and
    remarking?shaping???
  • ??????????????????
  • ?????,??12???,
  • ?????11.5???,
  • ?????11????
  • ???????????,?????????????????????????????????,????
    ??????
  • ??????????????,CN2???3???????????????,?????????,??
    ??????,???????

16
Different class service capability (Cont)
  • QOS design philosophy
  • CN2 adhere to DiffServ framework base on IP
    precedence and MPLS EXP Bit classification. Thus
    offering 8 ??? classes of service
  • Initial CN2 service classification is base on 5
    basic classes of services.
  • 1 class for network control traffic
  • 1 class for network maintenances and operations
  • 3 classes for service offering
  • All services are classified, remarked, shaped and
    rate-limited on the edge of the network to ensure
    a consistent QOS policy enforcement within the
    CN2 network
  • Service resource allocation is base on class of
    service. GOLD class of service would be allocated
    with 2 times more redundant resources then BRONZE
    class of service
  • Convergence of prefix varies on the traffic
    class. Prefixes of a GOLD class of traffic would
    convergence faster then prefixes of BRONZE class
    of traffic

17
Different class service capability
  • ?CN2???????????CN2?????????

QOS?? ???() MTU(byte) ????(ms) ????(ms) ??(ms)
??? 5 0.05 1500 30 45 lt2
??? 3 0.1 1500 35 60 lt5
??? 2 1 1500 40 75 lt10
  • ??CN2???????????CN2??????????

????????(s) ????????(s) ?????(??/?) ????(??/?) ????(?/?) ????()
??? lt3 lt8 5 lt5 lt1 99.99
??? lt15 lt20 10 lt5 lt2 99.98
??? lt25 lt45 15 lt5 lt3 99.95
18
All services are Edge Functions
  • Services are enforced and policed on the edges of
    the network via the SR/PE device. Service
    comprises of soft-switch, video conference, VPN.
    Internet, ATM/FR/DDN etc.
  • ?????????,?????????(SR/PE)??,???????????VPN???????
    ??ATM/FR/DDN???????
  • To ensure core networks stability and security,
    service provisioning, new service deployment and
    security control are performed on the edge of the
    network..
  • ???????????????????????????,??????????
  • The SOLE responsibility of the Core Network is
    packet switching and forwarding
  • ???????????,??????????????????,????????IDC??

19
Network Capacity and Coverage
  • Network Capacity and Coverage (by the end of
    2005)
  • CN2 will provide coverage for 199 cities
    including Hong Kong, Tokyo, Singapore, London,
    New York, San Jose, Washington etc. with service
    offering MPLS/VPN and Internet Services.
  • Cn2??????199???,?????????????????????????????????9
    ?????,????VPN?Internet?????????
  • 653 routers in total,including 417 P routers,202
    PE/SR routers,12 Public RR,and 12 VPN RR
  • 1267 relay links with a total link bandwidth of
    4.231T
  • (??????)
  • Over 800 external interlinkage bandwidth(??????)wi
    th 2.8T
  • (???????,???????????)
  • A total customer access link bandwidth of
    (????????)650.62G
  • (???????3G???? )

20
CN2 VPN capability
  • Support MPLS layer 2/3VPN,
  • RFC2547-based L3 VPN
  • Draft-martini based Ethernet point to point
    service
  • Ethernet multi point service (Vkompella VPLS)
  • ATM/FR over MPLS(????????,???????)
  • Support 3 classes of service. GOLD, SILVER and
    BRONZE.
  • ?????????????
  • Support N2M?N64K?Ethernet/VLAN?L2TPv3,
    pseudo-wired
  • Support network wide multicats of 600 multicast
    groups,1.2Gbps end to end multicast traffic
  • VPN coverage(by end 2005)
  • 202 PE routers in 199 cities
  • 2 X ISR in GuangZhou, Beijing and Shanghai. The
    ISR can be deployed as VPN InterAS ASBR.
  • 18 PE routes in 9 POPs located in Hong Kong,
    Tokyp, Singapore, London, Frankfurt, New York,
    Washington, San Jose and Los Angeles.
  • By Mid 2006, the number of PE is expected to
    increase from 202 to 418 to facilitate intra-POP
    layer redundancy.

21
CN2 VPN capablity
  • VPN network capacity
  • CN2 uses Cisco 12416 as PE routers with a total
    traffic handling capacity of 140G (unilateral
    direction)
  • ??????/PE(2???)
  • D???210?SDH/DDN/FR??????,??42M SDH??/??500?
    VLAN????????(??5M/??),??????200M/VLAN???
  • E???210?SDH/DDN/FR??????,??42M SDH??/??500?
    VLAN????????(??5M/??),??????200M/VLAN???
  • ?????????????????????????
  • ???VPN
  • VPN????/PE???????500?
  • ?????/PEVPN??????????15??,??????30????(VPN??????
    ?????????41??)
  • ????/VPN2?
  • ????/RR50?
  • ??????VPN
  • ??4000 ??????VPN,500/???(??E3??)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com