2008 Fall Assessment Conference October 2021, 2008 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

2008 Fall Assessment Conference October 2021, 2008

Description:

... the folio (i.e. did the evidence allow you to make your ratings with confidence) ... 296-0916. Joan Houghton EdD. jhoughton_at_ksde.org. 785-296-2515 (V/TTY) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:25
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: dma136
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 2008 Fall Assessment Conference October 2021, 2008


1
2008 Fall Assessment Conference October 20-21,
2008
  • Debbie Matthews, MS Ed
  • dmatthews_at_ksde.org

2
Kansas Testing Schedules
  • Testing Schedule
  • High School Testing Schedule
  • History/Government is not assessed this year
    unless the teachers of students who take the
    alternate assessment chooses to assess for OTL.

3
What is New with the KAMM?
  • KAMM Writing Assessment
  • www.ksde.org gt Divisions gt Learning Services
    Division gt Special Education Services gt Icon on
    the right side of the page assessments gtChoose
    KAMM
  • 2 prompts
  • 2 sections divided and edited
  • Teaching the Six Traits Writing Model
  • Assessing the Six Traits Writing Model
  • Scoring Rubric
  • Q A

4
What is New with the KAA?
  • When a student enters your district after
    January 5 the student will not have to be
    assessed on the
  • Kansas Alternate Assessment.

5
What is New with the KAA/KAMM?
  • All KAA and KAMM information is now located at
    the following url www.ksde.org gt divisions gt
    special education services gt assessment gt icon on
    the right side of the page gt choose KAA or
    KAMM .

6
KAA Summer 2008Portfolio Review
  • Reviewed 291 Portfolios
  • A 5 sample across 4 content areas.
  • Rated each Portfolio on 14 questions.
  • Portfolios were scored using pre-established
    criteria.
  • Overall results revealed, Portfolios were good to
    excellent.

7
KAA Summer Portfolio Review Example
  • Assessment Performance Categories (Academic
    Warning, Approaches Standard, Meets Standard,
    Exceeds Standard, Exemplary) and the raters
    overall impression of how well the learner
    performed on the five selected indicators, and
    how the rater would judge or classify the
    learners overall performance.
  • A Exemplary 94/281
    34
  • B Exceeds Standard 93/281 33
  • C Meets Standard 60/281 21
  • D Meets Standard or above 247/281 88

8
KAA Summer Portfolio Review Example
  • How would the rater rate the overall clarity of
    the evidence samples in the folio (i.e. did the
    evidence allow you to make your ratings with
    confidence)?
  • A Exemplary 104/281 37
  • B Exceeds Standard 84/281 30
  • C Meets Standard 59/281 21
  • D Meets Standard or above
  • 247/281 88

9
KAA Summer Portfolio Review Example
  • How would the rater rate the overall
    appropriateness (fit as a measure of the
    indicator) of the assessment procedures used to
    collect data for each piece of evidence for each
    indicator?
  • A Exemplary 113/281 40
  • B Exceeds Standard 100/281 36
  • C Meets Standard 49/281 17
  • D Meets Standard or above 262/281 93

10
KAA Summer Portfolio Review Example
  • How would the rater rate the overall compliance
    with Kansas Alternate Assessment requirements, as
    evidenced by the presentation and quality of
    information in this learners folio?
  • A Exemplary 123/281 44
  • B Exceeds Standard 76/281 27
  • C Meets Standard 52/281 19
  • D Meets Standard or above 251/281 90

11
Data Folio Requirements
  • 5 indicators per content area
  • 3 evidence labels
  • 5 data points per evidence label
  • 15 data points per indicator

12
Portfolio ReviewEvidence Labels
  • Examples that illustrate how to record data on
    the Evidence Labels

13
Portfolio ReviewEvidence Labels
  • 1.All fields on the Evidence Labels must be
    completed.
  • 2. A new area on the Evidence Labels is the KEY.
  • 3. Accommodations the student uses needs to be
    completed on Evidence Labels.

14
Portfolio ReviewData
  • 4. Data need to relate to the content area
    (i.e. math should be about math etc.).
  • 5.Data need to relate to the content indicator
  • 6. Do not use percentages on work sheets use the
    scoring key.
  • 7. Not enough trial must have 5 trials

15
Resources
  • Teachers Guide www.ksde.org
  • Kansas Alternate Implementation Guide www.cete.us
    or www.ksde.org

16
KAMM and KAAFuture
  • Advisory Council KASDAC
  • Collection of Portfolios
  • Next year 2009-2010 the extended standards for
    all content areas will be revised.

17
Contacts
  • Debbie Matthews MS Ed
  • dmatthews_at_ksde.org
  • 785-296-0916
  • Joan Houghton EdD
  • jhoughton_at_ksde.org
  • 785-296-2515 (V/TTY)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com