Our Group Studies Fundamental Physics through Astrophysical Techniques - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 50
About This Presentation
Title:

Our Group Studies Fundamental Physics through Astrophysical Techniques

Description:

Our Group Studies Fundamental Physics through Astrophysical Techniques – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:59
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 51
Provided by: heplHa
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Our Group Studies Fundamental Physics through Astrophysical Techniques


1
Our Group Studies Fundamental Physics through
Astrophysical Techniques
Postdocs Claire Cramer Andrea Loehr Armin
Rest Brian Stalder Michael Wood-Vasey
Grad Students Will High Gautham Narayan 2
graduated 2008James Battat Arti Garg
Undergrad Students JJ Blair Kenny Gotlieb
Engineering Staff Peter Doherty, Research
Engineer John Oliver, Senior Electrical
Engineer Nathan Felt, Electrical
Engineer Steve Sansone, Machine Shop
Supervisor Sarah Harder, Electronics
Technician
2
Why Astrophysical methods?
  • Much effort in contemporary physics goes into
    finding evidence for physics beyond the standard
    model. The most robust evidence for new physics
    (to date) comes from astrophysical observations.
    We operate where the signal is non-zero.
  • The benefit vs. cost curve in astrophysics is
    steep. Successive generations of instrumentation
    provide a major improvement in figure of merit.
  • Scale of projects remains modest, compared to
    accelerator experiments. While the size of an
    astrophysical project is growing steadily, one
    student or one postdoc can have a major impact,
    and can assume a major leadership role. Great
    training ground!

The primary objectives of the High Energy
Physics (HEP) program are to explore the
fundamental interactions of matter and energy,
including the unknown "dark" forms of matter and
energy that appear to dominate the universe to
understand the ultimate unification of
fundamental forces and particles to search for
possible new dimensions of space and to
investigate the nature of time itself.
3
Survey Figure of Merit
  • Number of objects detected per unit time, to
    given SNR

PanSTARRS
better
LSST
4
Projects
  • Studying the nature of Dark Energy with type Ia
    supernovae
  • ESSENCE project measure the value of w, the
    equation of state parameter.
  • Studying the nature of Dark Energy using the
    abundance of galaxy clusters with redshift.
  • Optical observations of candidate galaxy clusters
    detected with Sunayev-Zeldovich distortions of
    the microwave background.
  • Building a high-efficiency multiband imager for
    Magellan for this.
  • Studying the nature of the Dark Matter
  • SuperMACHO project, a search for microlensing of
    LMC stars
  • Probing the flattening of the Milky Ways dark
    matter halo with RR Lyrae stars
  • Testing the foundations of gravity on all scales
  • Tests of foundations of gravity on solar system
    and Galactic scales
  • Improving the precision of astronomical
    calibration
  • Detector-based metrology for instrumental
    sensitivity
  • Real-time measurements of atmospheric
    transmission
  • Precise determination of line-of-sight extinction
    through the Galaxy.
  • R D for next-generation systems
  • LSST Calibration schemes camera engineering
    data acquisition system detectors

5
Group Publications in Past 12 Months
  • Retrieved 20 abstracts, Total citations 418
  • 1. Observational Constraints on the Nature of
    Dark Energy First Cosmological Results from the
    ESSENCE Supernova Survey, 9/2007, Astrophysical
    Journal
  • 2. Scrutinizing Exotic Cosmological Models Using
    ESSENCE Supernova Data Combined with Other
    Cosmological Probes, 9/2007, Astrophysical
    Journal
  • 3. The ESSENCE Supernova Survey Survey
    Optimization, Observations, and Supernova
    Photometry, 9/2007, Astrophysical Journal
  • 4. Testing for Lorentz Violation Constraints on
    Standard-Model-Extension Parameters via Lunar
    Laser Ranging, 12/2007, Physical Review Letters
  • 5. Constraining Cosmic Evolution of Type Ia
    Supernovae, 10/2007, ArXiv e-prints,
  • 6. Evidence for Distinct Components of the
    Galactic Stellar Halo from 838 RR Lyrae Stars
    Discovered in the LONEOS-I Survey, 5/2008,
    Astrophysical Journal
  • 7. Linking optical and infrared observations with
    gravitational wave sources through variability,
    12/2007, ArXiv e-prints
  • 8. Toward More Precise Survey Photometry for
    PanSTARRS and LSST Measuring Directly the
    Optical Transmission Spectrum of the Atmosphere,
    10/2007, Publications of the Astronomical
    Society of the Pacific
  • 9. The Apache Point Observatory Lunar
    Laser-ranging Operation Instrument Description
    and First Detections, 1/2008, Publications of
    the Astronomical Society of the Pacific
  • 10. Calibration of LSST Instrument and Data,
    12/2007, Bulletin of the AAS
  • 11. Time Dilation in Type Ia Supernova Spectra at
    High Redshift, 8/2008, Astrophysical Journal

6
Past Years Publications, cont.
  • 12. Solar system constraints on the
    Dvali-Gabadadze-Porrati braneworld theory of
    gravity, 7/2008, Physical Review D,
  • 13. Dark-Matter-Induced Weak Equivalence
    Principle Violation, 7/2008, ArXiv e-prints
  • 14. Large Synoptic Survey Telescope From Science
    Drivers To Reference Design, 6/2008, Serbian
    Astronomical Journal
  • 15. Constraints on Lorentz Violation with
    Precision Measurements of the Lunar Orbit,
    4/2008, BAPS
  • 16. Investigating the Distinct Components of the
    Galactic Stellar Halo RR Lyrae from the LONEOS-I
    Survey, 3/2008, American Astronomical Society
    Meeting Abstracts,
  • 17. LSST Survey Strategy 12/2007, Bulletin of
    the American Astronomical Society,
  • 18. The First Lunar Ranging Constraints on
    Gravity Sector SME Parameters, 10/2007, ArXiv
    e-prints,

7
Accomplishments
  • Measured Equation of State parameter of dark
    energy,
  • W ?1.0 to 10
  • Developed technique for robust real-time
    determination of photometric redshifts of
    clusters of galaxies.
  • Completed full design of PISCO camera system, now
    in construction
  • Used precise solar system data to constrain novel
    gravity ideas and to brand new upper bounds on
    Lorentz violation
  • Devised a completely new approach to the
    calibration of astronomical apparatus

8
Joint Limits on w favor ?1
  • From Wood-Vasey et al, astro-ph/0701041
  • Combines ESSENCE and SNLS and nearby and HST
    supernovae
  • BAO limits from Eisenstein et al
  • Complementarity of techniques
  • Different systematics

(Assumes flat Universe)
9
The Calibration Challenge for Optical Astronomy.
Stubbs Tonry, ApJ, 2006
Atmospheric transmission
Instrumental Throughput
Stubbs et al, ASPC, 2007
Stubbs et al, PASP, 2007
Spectroscopy
Imaging
Lidar
Modeling
And then add ? dependent attenuation in the
Galaxy
10
Detectors are better characterized than any
celestial source!
Spectrum of Vega NIST photodiode QE
11
Atmospheric Transmission
www.cea.berkeley.edu/mlampton/
12
The Atmosphere Varies
June 1991
March 1982
Burki et al 1995
Atmospheric extinction during photometric nights
at La Silla
13
Aerosols and Water are the main concerns
  • Variation in aerosol size and shape distribution
    and density produces variation in extinction.
    This is reasonably smooth in wavelength.
  • Variation in atmospheric water content produces
    variable absorption, highly structured in
    wavelength.
  • For water, exploit the fact that stellar spectra
    are spectrally smooth in NIR.

14
Why do we care, and what really matters here?
  • Comparing SN fluxes from different redshifts
    requires knowing the relative instrumental
    response vs. wavelength, across the entire field
    of view. Next-generation projects require flux
    precision at the 1 level. Standard practice
    (SDSS) is 5.
  • Determining colors of galaxies, i.e. knowing flux
    ratios in different optical passbands at the 1
    level, is required in order to extract
    photometric redshifts for galaxies for weak
    lensing and other observational cosmology probes.
  • So we need to understand, characterize and
    correct for instrumental response effects, for
    time-varying atmospheric scattering, and for
    Galactic exinction.
  • Our goal is flux ratios at 1 or better, with an
    overall scale factor that can be at the 10 level
    or worse. We dont care about ergs/sec/nm/cm2
  • This requires 1) precise full-system calibration,
    2) real-time monitoring of atmospheric
    transmission, 3) correcting for Galactic
    extinction

15
3 talks follow
  • Claire Cramer, postdoctoral fellow, Precision
    Calibration
  • Mr. Will High, graduate student, Galaxy Cluster
    as DE Probes.
  • Mr. John Oliver. LSST electronics RD.

16
Calibration for Precision Photometry
Harvard Chris Stubbs Claire Cramer Peter
Doherty Gautham Narayan Will High
NIST Keith Lykke Steve Brown John Woodward
Allan Smith
LSST David Burke Kirk Gilmore
IFA, Hawaii John Tonry
17
Calibration Concept
  • We improve upon traditional celestial calibration
    sources by
  • Measuring a source with a known spectrum, namely,
    a narrowband tunable laser
  • Compare the system response (telescope
    throughput) to a known detector (NIST-calibrated
    photodiode)
  • In a related (but separate) effort, continuously
    monitoring the atmosphere during acquisition of
    astronomical data

18
Wavelength Calibration Procedure
  • Illuminate full telescope aperture with
    monochromatic light
  • Take a calibration flat while monitoring input
    light with calibrated photodiode
  • Normalize flat to flux seen by photodiode
  • Move to the next wavelength and repeat, until
    entire visible spectrum is spanned
  • Construct wavelength-dependent response for each
    pixel in the telescopes CCD camera
  • End result
  • measurement of relative system throughput,
    including telescope mirrors, corrector optics,
    filters, and detector

19
Proof of concept 2006 CTIO test
CTIO Blanco 4m
preamp
integrator
light projected on telescopes flat field screen
NIST photodiode
fiber link
beam launch optics
Opotek laser, tunable from 400 nm to 2 ?m
20
CTIO results
normalized data filter transmission
throughput (arb. units)
throughput (arb. units)
calibration data scaled detector QE
wavelength (nm)
wavelength (nm)
fused silica blank in filter holder, pinhole
camera imaging flat-field screen onto photodiode
R filter throughput
21
Next step
  • Develop a system for permanent installation at
    PS1,
  • which will function as a prototype for the LSST

22
Technical challenges
  • Broad wavelength coverage, 350-1100 nm
  • Illumination must be uniform to 10 over 2m
    diameter spot (8m for LSST!)
  • Screen must fit into the telescope dome!

23
An emissive screen side emitting fibers
fiber sits in milled grooves
frosted acrylic diffuser
side-emitting fiber
reflective back plate
24
A reflective scheme reverse telescope with
diffuser
tunable source
hacked DLP digital projector, optical fiber
diverging mirrors
transmissive screen
25
DLP Technology for Image Flattening
ants leg
MEMS mirror
TI digital light processing 106 micron-sized
mirrors independently addressed create grayscale
image
26
Transferring uniform radiance
reciprocal
Integrating sphere CCD
camera
Flat, by def. Non-uniform
Iteratively flattened
27
Current Status
  • Functioning prototype in the lab
  • Image flattening software complete
  • Tests with tunable light source underway
  • Full-scale test on Haleakala, Fall 2008

28
Summary and Outlook
  • In the field
  • Proof-of-principle test at CTIO in 2006
  • Full-scale test of DLP projector and reverse
    telescope at PanSTARRS by the end of 2008
  • Functioning calibration system permanently
    installed in 2009
  • In the lab
  • Flat screen prototype development and testing,
    2007-8
  • Idea factory for how best to harness DLP
    technology for the LSST
  • DLP-fed fiber bundle?
  • Engineered diffusers?
  • Collimating reflector array?
  • LSST prototyping, 2009-10

29
Galaxy clusters as dark energy probes
Virgo cluster Image credit Rainer Zmaritsch
30
Galaxy clusters as dark energy probes
(Cluster baryon fraction, Vikhlinin et al. 2003)
  • Cluster abundance cluster as a function of
    mass and redshift
  • Exponential sensitivity to dark energy
  • Highly complementary to type Ia supernovae and
    CMB tests
  • A necessary component of modern dark energy
    measurements (DETF)
  • Multi-wavelength, global effort underway

31
SZ effect The best known way to discover clusters
  • Sunyaev-Zeldovich
  • Eg, South Pole Telescope
  • Images of diffuse cluster gas
  • Signal is redshift independent at high redshift
    for clusters above a constant mass threshold
  • Corollary SZ gives no redshifts
  • Redshift follow-up needed, opticalIR
  • Precision dark energy measurement not possible
    without redshifts

(L. van Speybroeck)
32
PISCO The optimal cluster redshift follow-up
  • PISCO enables the dark energy science in the
    first place
  • Maximal cluster photons per unit time
  • 6.5 m class telescope
  • Dichroic beamsplitting without traditional glass
    filters
  • Red-sensitive CCDs with optimized AR coatings
  • Field of view matched to size of high redshift
    clusters
  • Maximal cluster redshifts per unit time
  • Fast, online calibration and analysis
  • No need for extra standard star observations
  • Adaptive exposure times, traveling salesman
    cluster list sorting
  • Minimal redshift errors (read highly
    competitive)
  • Sub-percent
  • Cluster ellipticals are incredibly abundant and
    uniform
  • Main sequence stars are incredibly abundant and
    uniform
  • Minimal cost
  • Ground-based, on existing telescope
  • Simple and innovative design using mature
    technology

33
PISCOs unique optical design
Path of Light
Magellan telescope
  • Key features
  • Four focal planes
  • Three dichroics
  • One shutter
  • No glass filters (sort of)
  • Great acronym

34
PISCOs status
  • Most glass blanks on hand
  • CCDs on hand
  • Electronics ready
  • August 20 Assembled cubes ready for testing
  • August 27 Final assembly of 3 cubes
  • August 29 Ready for pickup

35
PISCOs unique survey strategy
  • Fast, online photometric calibration without
    standard stars
  • Adaptive exposure times
  • Traveling salesman cluster list sorting

Stellar locus calibration
36
PISCOs unique survey strategyProof of concept
Abell 3675 redshift 0.1383 g 120s i 60s z 120s
  • Magellan 6.5m
  • LDSS3, griz
  • 26 known clusters
  • Wish list of new clusters

1
37
PISCOs unique survey strategyProof of concept
  • Magellan 6.5m, LDSS3
  • Data calibration in about a minute per cluster
  • Cluster detection and redshift analysis in a
    matter of seconds
  • Residual rms of
  • dz 0.01
  • dz/(1z) 0.8-0.9
  • No evidence for unknown systematics
  • Makes optimal use of telescope time well know
    whether to integrate longer or slew to next
    target.

Redshift Out
Residual
Redshift In
38
Blanco Cosmology Survey
  • Another piece of our cluster endeavor
  • Blanco 4m telescope at Cerro Tololo, Chile
  • griz, to roughly redshift 1, 1 mag deeper than
    Sloan
  • 100 deg2 planned, ½ completed in 3 yr
  • PI Joe Mohr of IUIC
  • Weak gravitational lensing by clusters
  • Full coverage by South Pole Telescope, other
    wavelengths
  • http//cosmology.uiuc.edu/BCS/

39
Cluster Cosmology Summary
  • Our cluster redshift program fits very neatly
    into the global cluster cosmology effort
  • PISCO is a key component
  • Necessary and optimal cluster redshift follow-up
  • We can follow up on cluster redshifts faster than
    anyone else
  • We can follow up on the highest-redshift clusters
  • BCS data on hand
  • SZ observations well under way
  • PISCO-prototype data from Magellan on hand
    reduced
  • PISCO construction well under way
  • Poised for new discoveries

40
LSST Camera Electronics
  • John Oliver (Camera Electronics Project Manager)
  • Nathan Felt, Sarah Harder
  • Harvard University
  • Paul OConnor, Veljko Radeka
  • Brookhaven National Laboratory
  • Mitch Newcomer, Rick Van Berg (Electronics System
    Engineer)
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Klaus Honscheid
  • Ohio State University
  • Jim Bensinger, Kevan Hashemi
  • Brandeis University
  • Mike Huffer
  • Stanford Linear Accelerator Center

Aug 2008 DOE site visit
41
Focal Plane Readout - The Challenge
  • Large (huge) focal plane ? 201 Sensors _at_ 16
    Mpixels each ? 3.2 Gpixels
  • High speed readout ? 15 sec exposures, 2 sec
    read
  • Low read noise, sky shot noise dominated gt 5 e
    rms
  • Leakage current 1 e/sec/pixel ?Sensor temp -
    100C
  • High dynamic range ? Full well 100,000 e ( gt
    16 bits)
  • High crosstalk immunity 80 db
  • Fully synchronous readout across entire focal
    plane
  • Large number of sensor pads (signals) ?
    150/sensor 30,000 pads total
  • High vacuum environment ? contamination control
  • Minimization of vacuum feedthroughs
  • Very compact packaging

Aug 2008 DOE site visit
41
42
FPA Readout Strategy
  • Fundamental tradeoff between read speed read
    noise (noise 1/SQRT(Tint) ? lt 500 kpix/sec
  • 16 Mpixels sensors with 16 segments (ports) /
    sensor ? 500 kHz readout _at_ 2 second read
  • Raft based sensor electronics package ? 9
    sensors x 16 ports 144 ports (channels) per
    raft
  • Entire electronic package located within
    cryostat to avoid 30k electrical feedthroughs
    (penetrations)
  • Electronics division
  • Front End ? Analog signal processing (cryo zone
    -100C)
  • Back End ? A/D conversion, data collection, raft
    control, io to CCS DAQ (cold zone -40C)
  • 21 rafts ? 3,200 readout CCD output ports
  • Data output on one optical fiber per raft ? 144
    Mpixels/2 sec ?1.4 Gbps on fiber
  • All raft electronics controlled by single
    Timing Control Module for focal plane
    synchronicity ? Timing/Control Module (Brandeis)

Aug 2008 DOE site visit
42
43
Camera Electronics Distribution
Cryostat
  • Timing Control Module
  • Shutter Controller
  • Filter Controller
  • Thermal Controllers
  • Electromechanical Actuator Control
  • Power Conditioning
  • Ethernet hub
  • Thermal controllers
  • Vacuum controllers

Data Fibers
Power cooling
Ethernet
43
44
Camera Overview (Drawing courtesy M. Nordby SLAC)
Utility Trunk
Cold Plates
Raft Control Crate (RCC)
Cryostat outer cylinder
Focal Plane fast actuators
Raft Tower (Raft with Sensors FEE)
L3 Lens in Cryostat front-end flange
Filter Changer rail paths
Shutter
L1/L2 Housing
Filter in stored location
L1 Lens
Camera Housing
L2 Lens
44
Filter in light path
45
Front End Functionality - ASICs
  • Dual Slope Integration for signal processing
  • Transmits signals as differential analog to Back
    End Electronics (BEE)
  • 8 channel signal processing ASICs
  • ASPIC chip ? LPNHE/IN2P3 Paris
  • Clock level translation
  • Conversion of logic level signals (LVDS) to CCD
    Clock levels (programmable)
  • 8 channel ASIC (HV CMOS process)
  • Sensor Control Chip ? ORNL/UTennesee
  • Slow controls, FPA thermal control (temp sensors
    heaters to maintain 0.1C stability)

Aug 2008 DOE site visit
45
46
Back End Functionality (Raft Control Crate)
  • Video A/D , D/A, temp sensing (processing), slow
    controls, Data Fiber Interface to DAQ
  • A/D Conversion (BEBs)
  • 18 bit commercial ADCs in chip scale ( 7mm x
    7mm) packages
  • 144 packages per raft
  • D/A conversion slow controls (BEBs)
  • Programmable CCD bias levels
  • Programmable CCD Clock Hi/Lo levels
  • Raft Control Module (RCM)
  • Detailed readout control Slave to Timing
    Control Module
  • Data fiber controller/driver (Xilinx Rocket
    i/o)
  • Engineering interface (debug port)

46
47
Packaging
Front End
Back End
Raft mount points
Sensor Packages
Back End Boards
Raft
Flex cables and Thermal Straps
FEE Boards
Raft Control Crate, Raft Control Module
FEE cage
Aug 2008 DOE site visit
47
48
Project Status
  • BEB Ver 1.0
  • Developed tested in FY 06 07
  • 1.8 ADC counts pedestal width _at_ 500 kpix/sec
  • BEB Ver 2.0
  • Full 24 channels/board (144 channels/crate)
  • Design completed
  • Fabrication Aug-Sep 08
  • Test Fall 08
  • RCM
  • Design in progress
  • Fabrication Fall 08
  • Test 4th Qtr 08
  • RCC Mechanical/Thermal design
  • Design completed, to be fabricated at Harvard
    Fall 08
  • System integration FY 09

Aug 2008 DOE site visit
48
49
BEB Ver 2.0
49
50
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com