Router Configuration Why we need to verify routerconfiguration PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 31
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Router Configuration Why we need to verify routerconfiguration


1
Router Configuration--Why we need to verify
routerconfiguration
  • Prof. Gao
  • ECE697J Spring 2005
  • Advanced Computer Networks

2
Why verify router configuration?
  • Router Configuration
  • Typically done manually (prone to error)
  • Many parameters
  • Low level command language
  • Case Studies
  • BGP configuration for edge networks
  • BGP configuration for ISPs left for imagination

3
Dynamically Learned Defaults
  • RTA originates a default route 0.0.0.0/0 toward
    RTC only.
  • RTF will not get the default.

AS3
iBGP
172.16.20.2
172.16.1.1
RTA
RTF
provider
AS1
RTC
172.16.20.1
customer
4
Set default configuration
  • At Router A,
  • Router bgp 3
  • no synchronization
  • network 172.16.1.0 mask 255.255.255.0
  • neighbor 172.16.20.1 remote-as 1
  • neighbor 172.16.20.1 default-originate
  • (send default to RTC)
  • no auto-summary
  • The default-originate option of the neighbor
    router subcommand will cause 0/0 to be sent
    toward RTC.

5
Single homing
  • Customer connects to the Internet via a single
    connection to an ISP
  • Not necessary to run BGP
  • Customer usually can be served by pointing
    defaults towards the provider
  • Provider can install static route to reach the
    customer

Outgoing traffic
ISP
Customer
Incoming traffic
6
Single homing
  • Advantage
  • Least expensive and more effective
  • Reduce memory usage and processing overhead
  • Static default configuration
  • Disadvantage
  • Poor reliability

7
Multi-homing
  • Multi-homing Definition
  • More than one link external to the local network
  • Multi-homing Scenarios
  • Multi-homing to a single provider
  • Multi-homing to different providers
  • Customers of the same provider with a backup link
  • Customers of different providers with a backup
    link

8
Multi-homing to a single provider
  • Definition Two or more links to the same ISP
  • Case
  • Default only, one primary, and one backup

9
Example Default only, one primary, and one
backup (single provider)
  • AS1 provider
  • AS3 customer multi-homed to AS1
  • RTA running default toward AS1
  • NY link is primary
  • SF link is a backup if NY link fails

10
Routing Policies at RTA (AS3)
  • Outbound traffic
  • Use NY link unless it fails
  • Configuring two static routes in RTA pointing the
    defaults toward AS 1
  • Loc Pref of NY link is higher
  • Inbound traffic
  • Use NY link unless it fails
  • Send MED toward AS1 on both links with a lower
    metric on the NY link.
  • Prevent any BGP updates from coming into AS3
  • Configuring a route map or prefix list

11
RTA configuration
  • router bgp 3
  • network 172.16.220. 0 mask 255.255.255.0
  • neighbor 172.16.20.1 remote-as 1
  • neighbor 172.16.20.1 route-map BLOCK in
  • neighbor 172.16.20.1 route-map SETMETRIC1
    out (RTC)
  • neighbor 192.68.9.2 remote-as 1
  • neighbor 172.68.9.2 route-map BLOCK in
  • neighbor 172.68.9.2 route-map SETMETRIC2 out
    (RTD)
  • no auto-summary
  • ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.16.20.1 50
    (RTC SF backup)
  • ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.68.9.2 (RTD
    NY primary)
  • (NY link has higher preference, default 100)
  • route-map SETMETRIC1 permit 10 (RTC)
  • set metric 100
  • route-map SETMETRIC2 permit 10 (RTD)
  • set metric 50
  • ( routes sent to RTD with lower MED)
  • route-map BLOCK deny 10 (incoming BGP updates)

12
Multi-homing To Different ISP Providers
  • Definition Two or more links to different ISPs
  • Cases
  • Default, primary, and backup, plus full and
    partial routing

13
Default, primary and backup, Full/Partial Routing
  • AS 3 uses SF link to AS 1s local or customers
  • AS 3 use NY as primary link
  • AS 3 use SF as backup
  • Traffic to RTA goes through SF link
  • All others go through NY link

Internet
RTD
RTC
AS1
AS2
172.16.20.1
192.68.5.2
NY
SF
192.68.5.1
172.16.20.2
BGP
RTA
RTF
172.16.1.1
172.16.1.2
172.16.10.1
172.16.220.1
AS3
14
Routing Policies of AS 3
  • RTA
  • For outbound traffic, accepts
  • Routes originated from AS 1 or its customers
  • Default-route from AS 1
  • For inbound traffic,
  • Announces IP address block in RTF with AS prepend
  • RTF
  • For outbound traffic, accepts
  • All routes via NY link
  • For inbound traffic
  • Announces IP address block in RTA with AS prepend
  • AS3 cannot be a transit network from AS1 and AS2

15
RTA configuration (1)
  • router bgp 3
  • no synchronization
  • network 172.16.1.0 mask 255.255.255.0
  • network 172.16.10.0 mask 255.255.255.0
  • network 172.16.220.0 mask 255.255.255.0
  • neighbor 172.16.1.2 remote-as 3
  • neighbor 172.16.1.2 update-source Loopback0
  • neighbor 172.16.1.2 next-hop-self
  • neighbor 172.16.20.1 remote-as 1
  • neighbor 172.16.20.1 route-map ACCEPT_LOCAL in
  • neighbor 172.16.20.1 route-map PREPEND_PATH out
  • no auto-summary

16
RTA configuration (2)
  • ip as-path access-list 1 permit 1 ?0-9
  • ip as-path access-list 2 permit
  • (define routes originated from AS 1 and its
    customers)
  • access-list 1 permit 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
  • (define routes from RTF)
  • route-map PREPEND_PATH permit 10
  • match ip address 1
  • set as-path prepend 3
  • (AS prepend with routes from RTF, 3 is AS number)
  • route-map PREPEND_PATH permit 20
  • match as-path 2
  • route-map ACCEPT_LOCAL permit 10
  • match as-path 1
  • (Accept the routes of AS 1s local and its
    customers)

17
RTF configuration (1)
  • router bgp 3
  • no synchronization
  • network 172.16.1.0 mask 255.255.255.0
  • network 172.16.10.0 mask 255.255.255.0
  • network 172.16.220.0 mask 255.255.255.0
  • neighbor 172.16.1.1 remote-as 3
  • neighbor 172.16.1.1 next-hop-self
  • neighbor 192.68.5.2 remote-as 2
  • neighbor 192.68.5.2 route-map PREPEND_PATH out
  • no auto-summary

18
RTF configuration (2)
  • ip as-path access-list 2 permit
  • (routes originated from AS 3)
  • access-list 1 permit 172.16.220.0 0.0.0.255
  • (routes originated from RTA)
  • route-map PREPEND_PATH permit 10
  • match ip address 1
  • set as-path prepend 3
  • (AS prepend with routes from RTA, 3 is AS
    number)
  • route-map PREPEND_PATH permit 20
  • match as-path 2
  • (advertised as usual)

19
Customers of the same provider with a backup link
  • The private link can be used as a backup link
    when an Internet link fails
  • AS 3 is provider of AS 1 and AS 2
  • AS1 and AS 2 have a private link as backup

20
Backup Configuration
21
Routing Policies on RTC (AS 1)
  • AS3 offers services to AS1 and AS2
  • AS1 and AS2 have a private link as backup
  • For outbound, accepts
  • All routes from AS 3
  • All routes from AS 2, but less preferred
  • For inbound
  • Handle by default BGP behavior, shortest AS path

22
RTC configuration (customers of the same provider)
  • router bgp 1
  • network 192.68.11.0
  • neighbor 172.16.20.2 remote-as 3
  • neighbor 172.16.20.2 route-map PREF_FROM_AS3 in
  • neighbor 192.68.6.1 remote-as 2
  • neighbor 192.68.6.1 route-map PREF_FROM_AS2 in
  • no auto-summary

23
RTC configuration
  • ip as-path access-list 1 permit _2_
  • route-map PREF_FROM_AS3 permit 10
  • match as-path 1
  • set local-preference 100
  • (routes received from AS3, which match _2_,
  • have lowest loc_pref)
  • route-map PREF_FROM_AS3 permit 20
  • set local-preference 300 (all other updates)
  • (all other routes received from AS3 have highest
    loc_pref)
  • route-map PREF_FROM_AS2 permit 10
  • set local-preference 200
  • (routes from AS2 have loc_pref 200)

24
Customers of different providers with a backup
link
  • AS 1 and AS 2 have private link
  • AS 4 is provider of AS 1, AS 3 is provider of AS
    2
  • AS 3 connects to AS 4
  • AS 1 and AS 2 use providers as backup
  • The community approach
  • Dealing with adding and removing customers with
    dynamically setting the customers policies
  • The AS path manipulation approach
  • An alternative to the community approach

25
Example community approach (Customers of
different providers)
26
Routing Policies at RTC (AS 1)
  • For outbound traffic
  • Use loc pref
  • For inbound traffic
  • For those routes which pass via AS 2, set
    community to 440
  • Not announce routes originated from AS 3 to AS 4
  • Only announce routes originated from AS 1 and AS
    2
  • Definition on the usage of community at AS 4
  • 440 ---- set loc_pref to 40
  • Default ---- set loc_pref to 100

27
RTC configuration (AS 1)
  • router bgp 1
  • network 192.68.11.0 mask 255.255.255.0
  • neighbor 172.16.20.2 remote-as 4
  • neighbor 172.16.20.2 send-community
  • neighbor 172.16.20.2 route-map setcommunity out
  • neighbor 172.16.20.2 filter-list 10 out
  • neighbor 192.68.6.1 remote-as 2
  • no auto-summary

28
RTC configuration
  • ip as-path access-list 2 permit _2_
  • ip as-path access-list 10 permit
  • ip as-path access-list 10 permit 2
  • (Not announce routes originated from AS 3 to AS
    4)
  • route-map setcommunity permit 10
  • match as-path 2
  • setcommunity 440
  • (via AS2 match_2_, set community 40)
  • Route-map setcommunity permit 20 (do not have
    community set)

29
Router Configuration Commands
  • Syntax is vendor dependent
  • So far, all Cisco syntax,
  • Only a tip of iceberg
  • More details on Cisco command, see
  • http//www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/so
    ftware/ios121/121cgcr/ip_c/ipcprt2/1cdbgp.htm

30
Summary
  • Configure for one router or peering session
  • More session for each router
  • Typically a large text file for each router
  • All for edge ASs so far
  • More complex for tier-1 providers
  • OSPF and BGP (iBGP and eBGP)
  • Each router has a long configuration (1000 lines)
    file!
  • Typically 100s of routers in an ISP
  • Routing policies can be complex
  • Assembly language like configuration language
  • High-level language is needed

31
Research Issues
  • Need of high-level language
  • Network-wide view (e.g., RPSL)
  • Reverse Engineering network-wide view
  • Construction from configuration files
  • Verification of static configuration
  • Correctness
  • Reachability
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com