Ed Nilson' Manager Banking Systems' SHOPRITE CHECKERS' - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Ed Nilson' Manager Banking Systems' SHOPRITE CHECKERS'

Description:

Submission to the Competitions Control Board in respect of the Feasibility ... system engenders the practice of overcharging by the banks, that has little to ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:77
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: jenny52
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ed Nilson' Manager Banking Systems' SHOPRITE CHECKERS'


1
Ed Nilson.Manager Banking
Systems.SHOPRITE CHECKERS.

2
Shoprite Checkers
  • Submission to the Competitions Control Board in
    respect of the Feasibility Report on charges in
    the Banking Industry.

3
NUMBERS..
  • 9,000 checkouts.
  • R32 BILLION Sales.
  • 44 million card transactions per annum.

4
Subjects covered in submission
  • Changes in Tenders.
  • Sorting at source.
  • Interchange fees.
  • Low cost banking products.
  • Ad valorum charges on debit cards.
  • Hidden fees.
  • EMV Experience.
  • Cash handling fees.

5
Changes in turnover value split by tenders
  • In the period 2002 to 2006
  • Cash -11.89
  • Cheques - 2.44
  • Credit cards 3.21
  • Debit Card 11.12

6
Sorting at Source
  • S.A. Reserve Bank declared sorting at source not
    clearing, therefore not illegal (January 2006).
  • Our requirements for sorting at source based on
    risk element.

7
Single acquirer scenario
8
Multiple acquiring scenario

9
Sorting at source
  • Using the single acquirer principle, our business
    is at risk.
  • Should our single acquirer fail, all transactions
    requiring an authorisation would not be
    processed.
  • Should Bankserv fail, we would only be able to
    process our single acquirers card transactions.
  • The banks maintain that the cost of going to
    direct to issuers would be more expensive for
    themselves, so the larger merchants would not
    receive reduced fees.
  • This is based on traditional processing systems
    and financial structures.
  • The payments industry is not what it was 5 years
    ago, so the same rules can no longer be applied.

10
Interchange Fees
  • Banks decide on the interchange fees for credit
    and debit cards.
  • Public not allowed to know details of the make up
    of the fee. The Edgar Dunn report never released
    to the public.
  • When interchange was reduced, merchants were not
    given full benefit of the reduction.
  • Smaller merchants would not be wise to reductions
    in fees in the industry.

11
Low cost banking products.
  • Capitec Bank cheaper than Mzanzi.
  • In conjunction with Capitec, Shoprite introduced
    a low cost Money Transfer product for R9,99
    regardless of value.
  • The volumes done by Shoprite this year probably
    exceed those done by all banks on Mzanzi. Over
    50,000 transactions value R20 million.
  • Postbank wanted R17,99 plus an ad valorum.

12
Debit card Merchant Fees
  • Debit card transaction is PIN based, on line,
    guaranteed, pre funded, minimum fraud element.
  • No justification for an ad valorum fee on debit.
  • Customer pays, merchant pays.
  • Fee is based on old thinking, equated to charging
    an ad valorum on credit. Previously, merchants
    were paid by the banks.
  • Fee should be based on transaction processing
    cost.
  • e.g. Australia is 6 cents.
  • Small merchants are in some cases charged the
    same rates for debit and credit transactions.

13
Double or hidden costs
  • Banks have bi laterals for the processing of some
    card transactions. Details not made public.
  • E.g. Amex, Diners and buy aid cards.
  • Some cardholders are charged 2 fees on a single
    transaction where goods and cash are involved.
    But only one slip is signed for. They perceive
    the retailer to be the recipient of the fees.
  • For franchised ATM services, cardholders are
    charged an additional fee over and above the
    normal costs.

14
Experience
  • Shoprite spent millions on becoming EMV (Chip)
    compliant.
  • No benefit to the merchant.
  • No contribution from the banks. U.K. banks
    assisted merchants.
  • No reduction in merchant fees, although the fraud
    element is supposed to reduce dramatically.
  • Initiative driven by Master Card and Visa.

15
Cash Handling Fees
  • The volumes of cash handled by Shoprite are
    massive.
  • Cash handling fees when added to all related fees
    e.g. cash in transit costs, insurance, staff
    requirements etc., are excessive.
  • Shoprite has requested that Resbank makes
    allowances for large retailers to process cash
    directly to themselves.

16
Conclusion
  • The fees charged to merchants and customers are
    not attributable to the cost of a transaction,
    and more likely due to the fact, that the present
    system engenders the practice of overcharging by
    the banks, that has little to do with the
    activities and operations of the National
    Payments System.

17
  • F i n i s
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com