Title: Integrating Research into Practice Through the LAC Assessment and Action Record
1Integrating Research into Practice Through the
LAC Assessment and Action Record
- Bob Flynn (rflynn_at_uottawa.ca)
- Centre for Research on Community Services
- University of Ottawa (Canada)
- Looking After Children Symposium
- ACWA Conference, Sydney, August 16, 2006
2For more detailed information on the topic of
this presentation, please see the following
references
- Flynn, R. J., Dudding, P. M., Barber, J. G.
(Eds.) (2006). Promoting resilience in child
welfare. Ottawa, ON University of Ottawa Press.
(http//www.utppublishing.com/pubstore/merchant.ih
tml?pid8652step4) - Flynn, R. J., Byrne, B. (2005). Overview and
findings to date of research in the Ontario
Looking after Children project. OACAS Journal,
vol. 49, no. 1 (April), pp. 12-21.
(http//www.oacas.org/resources/OACASJournals/2005
April/overview.pdf) - Flynn, R. J., Ghazal, H., Legault, L.,
Vandermeulen, G., Petrick, S. (2004). Using
general-population measures and norms to identify
resilient outcomes among young people in care.
Child and Family Social Work, 9, 65-79.
(http//www.blackwell-synergy.com/toc/cfs/9/1)
3Two broad definitions
- Research systematic inquiry, including
- Basic research
- Applied research
- Evaluation, including outcome monitoring
- Practice service-related action, including
- Individual or clinical level action
- Organization or program level action
- System or policy level action
4Outline 4 questions
- Q1 In general, how can we integrate research
into practice? - Q2 What was original intent of LAC in this
regard? - Q3 To what extent has this intent been realized?
- Q4 How can we improve integration of research
into practice? - 16 lessons from Ontario LAC (OnLAC)project
-
5Q1 In general, how can research be integrated
into practice?
- Implement evidence-based practices (e.g.,
SAMSHAs National Registry of Evidence-Based
Programs and Practices google NREPP) - Draw upon relevant theory (e.g., competent- child
theory resilience theory) - Base practice approach on research findings from
many fields (e.g., education health parenting) - Incorporate research/evaluation findings on own
outcomes into own practice/policy
6Q2 What was original intent of LAC re.
integration of research into practice?
- Strong integration intended, as shown by
- LAC reader
- Titles content of basic LAC books
- Parker, R., et al. (1991) Looking After
Children Assessing outcomes in child care (HMSO) - Ward, H. (1995) Looking After Children Research
into practice (HMSO)
7Q3 To what extent has integration intended by
LAC been realized?
- My own impression is the following
- Internationally, LAC seems to have had, to date
- Much impact on practice, but
- With some exceptions, relatively little impact on
outcome research within LAC users own
organizations or jurisdictions - Thus little integration of users own LAC
research into practice - If this is roughly accurate, why?
- Partly because few jurisdictions using LAC have
- Implemented AAR fully and also
- Constructed AAR data bases, to enable systematic
monitoring, analysis, improvement of outcomes
8Q4 How can we improve integration of research
into practice? 16 lessons from Ontario LAC
(OnLAC) project
- Background Purposes of OnLAC project
(2000-present) - Evaluation of implementation of LAC in 53 local
CASs - Evaluation/monitoring of outcomes associated with
LAC - Evaluation of costs of foster care
- (For overview of OnLAC research on
implementation, outcomes, and costs please see
my PowerPoint presentation of August 14 at the
ACWA2006 conference)
9Milestones in implementing LAC in Ontario
(2000-2006 beyond)
- 2000 OnLAC project begins creation of AAR-C2
- 2001 LAC training use of AAR-C2 begin
- 2002 First outcome reports AAR-C2 revisions
- 2003 First review of provincial AAR-C2 data
- 2004 OACAS adopts LAC as official priority
establishes OnLAC Council - 2005 LAC made one of six priorities of Ontario
CW Transformation - 2006 Definitive AAR-C2 version disseminated for
use by all 53 CASs - 2007 Plans of care (12,000 children) to be based
on AAR-C2 - 2008 AAR-C2 to be part of new Single Information
System - 2009 Next revision of AAR-C2 planned
-
10Lessons from Ontario LAC project for integrating
research into practice
- Phase 1 Preparing favourable integration
context - Lesson 1 Form durable partnership between
community university (and, if possible, include
government) - Lesson 2 Rally broad support, based on LACs
attractive emphasis on child development
resilience - Lesson 3 Secure ongoing LAC research funds (if
possible, with contribution from government) - Lesson 4 Seize policy reform initiatives as
windows of opportunity
11Lessons from OnLAC project (continued)
- Phase 2 Refining AARs relevance for practice
- Lesson 5 Focus on AAR as key to shifting focus
of practice research from process to outcome - Lesson 6 Adapt AAR as needed implement fully
as key instrument for outcome monitoring - Lesson 7 Construct AAR data base, for analyses
of outcomes, processes, trajectories - Lesson 8 Use data base to examine enhance AAR
psychometrics (reliability validity)
12Lessons from OnLAC project (continued)
- Phase 3 Using AAR data to improve practice
- Lesson 9 Produce annual confidential reports for
local child welfare practitioners managers - Lesson 10 Train local analysts to analyze the
AAR data from their own organizations - Lesson 11 Produce annual public reports for
voluntary government organizations - Lesson 12 Review jurisdiction-wide data to
establish key priorities for action in coming year
13Lessons from OnLAC project (continued)
- Phase 4 Diffusing impact of AAR data on
practice - Lesson 13 Compare outcomes in AAR and general
population, to examine resilience - Lesson 14 Seize opportunities to present outcome
data to voluntary-sector government-sector
organizations - Lesson 15 Have AAR embedded, if possible, within
government data-collection systems - Lesson 16 Disseminate AAR-based papers at
conferences in journal articles books -
- data