Family Services IRIS Upgrade Training - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 41
About This Presentation
Title:

Family Services IRIS Upgrade Training

Description:

When the referrer does not consent to their identity being disclosed for ... The referrer identity cannot be disclosed outside of Child FIRST or the FS ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:17
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 42
Provided by: mmoo
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Family Services IRIS Upgrade Training


1
Family Services IRIS Upgrade Training
Family Services and Strategic Planning
Team Information and Information Management
Unit Office for Children March- April 2007
2
Objectives of IRIS Upgrade Training
  • To introduce changes to IRIS to support the
    introduction of the Children Youth and Families
    Act 2005 and the every child every chance reforms
    to Family Services
  • To ensure familiarity with how to use the new
    fields and processes in IRIS
  • To raise awareness of the importance of the data
    and how it will be used to report on client
    profiles, service operations and outcomes and for
    planning purposes

3
What must the new data support?everychildeverycha
nce
  • New legislation, CYFA 2005
  • Significant concern about wellbeing referrals
  • Entry point to integrated networks
  • Protection of referrer identity
  • Cumulative harm
  • Consultation and Reports to Child Protection
  • Prioritisation on basis of needs

4
What must the new data support?everychildeverycha
nce
  • Structural reforms to Family Services
  • Child FIRST and catchments partnerships
  • Child and Family Service Alliances planning,
    service coordination and service delivery
  • Allocation and Review meetings
  • Demand management

5
Changes to IRIS
  • To meet the reform requirements the IRIS upgrade
    introduces
  • Some new data fields and new values to existing
    fields to support legislation
  • New capacity to refer cases between agencies,
    in particular from Child FIRST to catchment
    agencies

6
Consistency in meaning
  • Alongside the upgrade, Family Services is also
    introducing a Data Dictionary to increase the
    reliability and consistency of data entered into
    IRIS

7
Walk through new data
  • The new data is described the IRIS Procedure
    Notes
  • Child FIRST case type
  • Reference code
  • Child Protection status
  • Referrer Identity
  • Intake Outcome
  • Case category and date
  • Children recorded
  • Point of closure at intake
  • Services Consult Child Protection Refer to
    Child ProtectionHolding Referral to__

8
Updating mandatory fields on existing cases
  • Workers will need to input the new mandatory data
    on all current cases prior to closure after April
    23 2007

9
Refer case Child FIRST
  • The new refer case button is located below the
    new case button (at bottom)
  • Refer case allows Child FIRST to export a case
    to a partner agency
  • IRIS does this by creating a copy of the Child
    FIRST case and sending the copy to the designated
    agency
  • The receiving agency can then continue to work on
    the copy as its own case (FS- DHS)
  • At the end of the quarter or when the case is
    closed, the agency case is returned to Child
    FIRST and the Child FIRST record is updated

10
Refer case FSIP Central Intakes
  • Family Support Innovation Project Central Intakes
    may also use the refer case function to allocate
    cases to partner agencies
  • FSIPs should not use the track progress as this
    provides a level of case overview beyond the
    scope of most FSIP intake functions
  • Any subsequent referrals to partner agencies
    within FSIPs should use the intra-catchment
    referral referral source (to avoid double
    counting and indicate integrated activity)

11
The case screen looks like this
Refer case will be described in detail in a
separate session
12
Explaining the fieldsClient identity children
and families
  • Family Services fundamental purpose is to
    support vulnerable children and families
  • Establishing accurate child and family identities
    within IRIS is critical to
  • Targeting and accessibility of services How many
    children receive service? How old are they? How
    many families receive service? What vulnerable
    characteristics do these children and families
    exhibit? How many have significant concerns about
    wellbeing?
  • Assessing cumulative harm Has this child/family
    received service before?How many times? What
    service characteristics?
  • Allocation and workload Which families are
    allocated to what workers? Does workload reflect
    a mix of complexity and family size and age
    ranges?
  • Cultural sensitivity How many Indigenous and
    CALD families receive service?

13
Client identity children and familiesRegisterin
g a client
  • IRIS is built on the basis of nominating
    (usually) one key person who is the
    representative for the family (children)
    receiving service.
  • Convention is that the representative person is
    wherever possible the mother or the primary
    caregiver. This may or may not be the presenting
    person.
  • More than one client name can be registered if
    appropriate. For example
  • First name MumDad Family name Smith/Jones OR
  • First name Mum Family Name Smith/Brown, where
    Brown is the childrens family name
  • Always include the childrens family name when
    the children are known to move between different
    carers

14
Client identity children and familiesSearching
for a client
  • For any new referral, search the client list for
    the mother, the primary caregiver, the children
    in the family (or other known client)
  • If present link the new case to this name using
    the attach client button
  • If you search with in front of the name (eg
    Brown) it will bring up any instances where that
    name has been entered along with another name as
    in the previous examples. Previous cases for the
    children with different carers may then be
    identified.

15
Client identity children and familiesRegisterin
g a client
  • Non-substantive cases can equally be linked to
    an already existing client or to a subsequent
    client for a new case
  • These steps will ensure that the full service
    history for the children in the family is linked
    to one IRIS client
  • Cumulative harm and nos. of families receiving
    service can then be more accurately tracked.

16
Client identity children and familiesMerge
client - new function
  • Located under file on the toolbar
  • Removes duplicate clients by combining under one
    client name
  • To be used when names are misspelt or different
    cases have been established under different
    client names within the same household (eg mum,
    dad or grandparent).
  • When clients are merged, all details of the
    duplicate client (name and demographics on screen
    cl02) are erased from IRIS, though the previous
    case and its details are included under the now
    single registered client.

17
Client identity children and familiesIndigenous
and CALD status
  • Fields to record Indigenous or CALD status are
    unchanged
  • Greater emphasis will be placed on reporting on
    Indigenous and CALD status in both agency reports
    and DHS quarterly reports.
  • Indigenous status is recorded for client and
    related persons
  • Multiple CALD fields exist Country of birth
    Year of arrival Migration Program Language
    spoken Ancestry (4 options) Interpreter/
    Bilingual worker
  • Ancestry (1) will be reported as the familys
    primary cultural identity in agency reports

18
Client identity children and familiesChildren
as Related Persons
  • All children must be entered in related persons,
    including ages Indigenous status
  • New mandatory field introduced to prompt
    recording children
  • Children recorded Yes/No
  • This is only a prompt, the responsibility to
    record the children remains with the worker.
  • If children are not entered, Family Services will
    not be able to account for children receiving
    service (as does Child Protection) nor plan for
    all childrens needs. Nor will consequences for
    allocation and workload be evident from agency
    IRIS reports.

19
Client identity child and familyCumulative Harm
  • The Best Interests principles in the CYFA 2005
    include consideration of the effects of
    cumulative patterns of harm on a childs safety
    and development (s10(e))
  • Indicators of cumulative harm in IRIS are
  • Presence of significant wellbeing concerns
  • Numbers of consultations with Child Protection
  • No. of previous entries and cases within Family
    Services
  • Length of time open across cases in Family
    Services
  • Accurate data as possible about these items is
    critical

20
Client identity Heightened vigilance for
children with significant concerns
  • The CYFA 2005 provides that Family Service will
    receive referrals about children (or unborn
    babies) with significant concerns about their
    wellbeing and that for these children Family
    Services may
  • Not disclose the identity of a referrer, unless
    consent is provided
  • Consult with Child Protection
  • Share information with specified parties without
    consent for the purposes of risk assessment or
    determining an appropriate service

21
Client identity Heightened vigilance for
children with significant concerns
  • These legislative powers are provided to give
    agencies more avenues to assess and engage
    families of children with significant concerns,
    even when this may not be the parents expressed
    wish.
  • Given this, the practice definition of children
    with significant concerns about wellbeing is
    Serious presenting problems that impact upon a
    child's care and development and where the parent
    is unwilling or unable to access appropriate
    supports to make positive changes

22
Client identity Heightened vigilance for
children with significant concerns
  • IRIS Implications
  • Significant Wellbeing Concerns is a serious
    decision, with legislative authority, that should
    be clearly marked on the IRIS client record.
  • This is for three reasons
  • It is a key indicator of the need for heightened
    vigilance about the child in the current case
  • It is a key indicator of cumulative harm to the
    child in the event of subsequent referrals
  • It is a key indicator to Government about the
    vulnerability of Victorian children and about the
    role of Family Services in promoting the safety
    and development of vulnerable children and
    families

23
Client identity Heightened vigilance for
children with significant concerns
  • IRIS implications
  • Significant wellbeing concerns are recorded in
    IRIS by selecting the significant wellbeing
    concerns option from the IRIS case category field
    on the Client Information screen
  • The date of the decision must also be recorded

24
Client identity Heightened vigilance for
children with significant concerns
  • Implications for Child FIRST catchments
  • Child FIRST must maintain a record of all
    decisions about children with significant
    concerns in the catchment.
  • Either Child FIRST or a catchment agency may make
    the decision about significant wellbeing concerns
    and update the IRIS case category accordingly.
  • Child FIRST will track agency decisions when the
    Child FIRST record is updated quarterly or at
    closure
  • For local agency entries that do not have a Child
    FIRST case, a Child FIRST case must be created.
  • See the Data Dictionary for more details. OfC
    will support your catchment in developing
    processes

25
Client identity Heightened vigilance for
children with significant concerns
  • Implications for non- Child FIRST catchments
  • Registered Family Services in non Child FIRST
    catchments may also make decisions about
    significant concerns about wellbeing
  • There is no expectation that an FSIP central
    intake or a non Child FIRST catchment maintain a
    catchment record of significant concern cases
  • Decisions are recorded at the agency level only

26
Client identity Heightened vigilance for
children with significant concerns
  • Changing the Significant Wellbeing Concern
    decision
  • The significant wellbeing concern decision can be
    changed if no longer currently assessed for the
    child(ren) in the family.
  • Any decision about significant concerns about
    wellbeing must be made in a supervision context
    as per agreed agency policy.
  • Because IRIS does not have an audit trail,
    changed data is deleted with no record of the
    change kept
  • Rules must therefore be established to change
    this field and preserve a record of the decision
    on IRIS
  • Different rules exist for Child FIRST catchments
    and other Family Services agencies

27
Client identity Heightened vigilance for
children with significant concerns
  • Changing the Significant Wellbeing Concern
    decision
  • Implications for Child FIRST
  • Child FIRST cannot delete the significant
    wellbeing concern decision once it is recorded
    (unless recorded in error) as this will remove
    the record from IRIS
  • A new IRIS case category, however, can be
    assigned to the case once it is allocated from
    Child FIRST to a partner agency.
  • The agency selects a different case category (and
    date) on the basis of the IRIS Issues present.
  • The case on the Child FIRST IRIS will remain
    recorded as significant wellbeing concerns

28
Client identity Heightened vigilance for
children with significant concerns
  • Changing the Significant Wellbeing Concern
    decision
  • Implications for local agencies, including Child
    FIRST catchments
  • Without audit trail capacity, there is no simple
    answer to this.
  • Yes the decision can be changed but no a record
    will not be maintained on the agency case to
    indicate this history.
  • Alternatives are
  • Do not change a decision over the life of a case.
    The date will provide advice about how recent it
    is.
  • Change the decision as required and be aware that
    the IRIS case may not reflect the SWBC history.
    Service activities of Consult Child Protection
    will provide an alternative indicator of
    significant wellbeing concern history and
    cumulative harm
  • In all instances, do not delete a significant
    wellbeing concern decision until after the
    original decision has been exported to DHS at the
    end of the quarter. This will mean that the DHS
    data provides an accurate record of the number of
    these vulnerable children in the community.

29
Client Identity children and familiesCase
Category
  • Cases that are not significant concerns about
    wellbeing are general family referrals and are
    categorised as either
  • Complex IRIS Issues
  • Other IRIS Issues
  • The category is based exclusively on what IRIS
    issues are identified it is not an assessment
  • The purpose of the case category is to be able to
    group cases for discussion about possible
    allocation priority or to enable analysis by
    agencies of cases with different client
    characteristics for planning purposes

30
Client Identity children and familiesCase
Category
  • Complex IRIS Issues are
  • Mental Health
  • Disability
  • Family Violence
  • Substance abuse
  • Child Protection involvement
  • Juvenile Justice involvement
  • Sexual assault

31
Client Identity children and familiesCase
Category
  • Other IRIS issues are all other IRIS issues. This
    includes
  • Behaviour
  • Education and school
  • Parenting
  • Relationships
  • Health
  • Housing
  • Isolation
  • Financial and Gambling etc

32
Client Identity children and familiesCase
Category
  • The case category is determined on the basis of
    the highest order factor present
  • If a case has significant wellbeing concerns it
    cannot have a case category of complex or other
    IRIS issues (though either/both of these issues
    will be present and can be separately analysed)
  • If a case is not significant wellbeing concerns
    and has at least one complex issue, it is complex
    (even if other issues are present)
  • A case is categorised as Other IRIS issues when
    neither vulnerable IRIS issues or significant
    concerns about wellbeing are present

33
Explaining the fieldsReferrer identity protected
  • CYFA 2005 s31 provides that a person who has a
    significant concern about a child may refer the
    matter to a community based child and family
    service
  • CYFA s41 provides that the identity of the person
    making the referral about significant concern,
    and any information that may disclose that
    identity, is to be protected, unless written or
    oral consent is given to do so.
  • From a practice perspective, Family Services will
    in most instances endeavour to gain this consent
    by explaining to the referrer the benefits to
    trust and engagement with the family and of any
    possible role of the referrer in the
    intervention, by having the identity disclosed.

34
Explaining the fieldsReferrer identity protected
  • IRIS implications
  • When the referrer does not consent to their
    identity being disclosed for referrals about
    significant wellbeing concerns, then IRIS must
    record that the Referrer Identity is protected.
  • The referrer identity cannot be disclosed outside
    of Child FIRST or the FS agency who received the
    referral (penalty applies).
  • If the case is referred for allocation, the
    referral source will not be disclosed and will
    read as Identity protected

35
Explaining the fieldsIntake Outcomes
  • Intake is now recognised as a discrete process
    within Family Services with specified outcomes
  • Advice to caller
  • Advice and assistance to families
  • Referral to other service
  • Family Service Allocation
  • Report to Child Protection
  • See the Data Dictionary for definitions
  • Closure fields must still be completed
  • Point of closure is At intake(new)

36
Explaining the fieldsNew Service types
  • Key new Family Service activities will be
    recorded through the Services fields. These
    are
  • Consult Child Protection
  • Report to Child Protection
  • Referral to (external agency pick list)
  • Maintenance while on waiting list active holding

37
Program requirementsService types
  • Service types will be used to report on major
    service trends
  • All intake hours are to be recorded as Referral
    and Intake activity
  • All holding hours are to be recorded as Awaiting
    allocation holding
  • In both instances direct contact can be
    distinguished from phone activity through the
    location field
  • (Exceptions are Consult and Report to CP, and
    Referrals to, that must be entered to count
    incidence (see next slide))

38
Program requirementsService types
  • Number of instances, not only hours will be of
    major interest for
  • Consult Child Protection
  • Report to Child Protection
  • Refer to__
  • Every time these activities are undertaken, the
    service type must be selected
  • When these activities are part of intake or
    holding, hours in these fields will be added to
    hours in intake and holding for a
    comprehensive estimate of time on these activities

39
Explaining the fieldsClosure
  • Closure descriptors are unchanged (with at
    intake added)
  • The Data Dictionary provides definitions though
    it is recognised that the goal ratings will
    always be subjective
  • Goals are defined as the goals as agreed with the
    family
  • You must remember to click apply to save
    closure screen and close the case

40
How will this work in reports?
  • New reports will be available to agencies that
    will compile important client, service and worker
    information to assist
  • Prioritisation
  • Allocation
  • Supervision
  • Demand Management
  • Service and catchment planning

41
It will all depend on the quality of the data
  • As well as the agency own IRIS reports, DHS will
    introduce a system of quarterly reports to
    catchments about key trends to monitor the
    reforms. This includes about
  • Targeted to vulnerable families  
  • Accessible entry to integrated services    
  • Collaboration with Child Protection and wider
    networks
  • Capacity Prioritisation of need and ongoing
    service
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com