Measurement and Scaling - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 49
About This Presentation
Title:

Measurement and Scaling

Description:

Jennings Ch 5 pp. 149-59; Ch 8 pp. 247-252; Ch 11 pp 353-56. Reading 7.1 and 7.2 ... a scale is negatively worded, then recode prior to creating the index (refer to ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:286
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 50
Provided by: michaelg6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Measurement and Scaling


1
Measurement and Scaling
  • Week 7

2
Study Materials for Module 7
  • Cavana - Ch 8 9 pp. 360-62
  • Jennings Ch 5 pp. 149-59
  • Ch 8 pp. 247-252
  • Ch 11 pp 353-56
  • Reading 7.1 and 7.2
  • Coakes and Steed Ch 3 normality, recoding
    missing values

3
Lecture overview
  • Nature of measurement
  • Scaling
  • Measurement scaling
  • Measurement scales
  • Parametric versus non - parametric statistics
  • Methods of scaling
  • Scale decisions
  • Criteria for goodness of measure
  • Ethics
  • Report writing
  • Summary
  • Tutorial

4
Nature of measurement
  • Measurement in research consists of assigning
    numbers or symbols to characteristics of objects
    according to set of predetermined rules
  • To do this we need to answer the question What
    is to be measured?
  • Based on the research problem identify the
    relevant concepts/constructs ie brand loyalty
    service quality trust value of an attraction
  • Conceptual definition define/ gives meaning to
    the concept in the context of the study.
    Specifies what the concept is and what it is not.
  • Operational definitions an explanation that
    gives meaning to a concept by specifying the
    dimensions, activities, factors etc necessary to
    measure it.

5
Example
  • Concept - value consciousness
  • Concept definition - the concern a consumer has
    for paying low prices contingent on some product
    quality expectation.
  • Operational Statements (answer on 7 point likert
    scale)
  • When grocery shopping, I compare the prices of
    different brands to be sure I get the best value
    for money.
  • When I shop, I usually compare the price per
    gram information for brands I normally buy.
  • When purchasing a product, I always try to
    maximise the quality I get for the money I spend
  • etc. further statements would be developed

6
Recap - What is measured?
  • Variables studied in research are classified as
    objects or as properties.
  • Objects i.e. people, books, cars
  • Properties characteristics of the object i.e.
    persons physical properties height, age,
    posture psychological properties attitudes,
    intelligence social properties status,
    leadership abilities
  • As researchers we do not measure objects or
    properties but indicators they are the
    operational measures

7
Scaling
  • Scaling an extension of measurement.
  • involves creating a continuum upon which measured
    objects are located
  • Example scale for locating consumers according
    to the characteristic attitude towards theme
    parks unfavourable 1 neutral 2 favourable
    3
  • Measurement is the assignment of 1,2 or 3 to
    each respondent
  • Scaling is the process by which respondents would
    be classified as having unfavourable, neutral or
    favourable attitude towards theme parks

8
Measurement and Scaling
  • Why do we need to understand Measurement and
    Scaling?
  • As researchers we need to compare and contrast
    issues of concern.
  • Measurement and scale provides us with the tools
    to make sense of the issues of concern in some
    structured and logical manner.

9
Measurement and Scaling
  • When choosing a measurement we must consider
  • measurement scales (levels of measurement)
  • Response scales
  • criteria for good measurement
  • Note there are also many other factors to
    consider when designing a questionnaire

10
Measurement scales
  • Nominal Scale
  • numbers assigned to the object serve as labels
    for identification i.e. gender (male, female)
    store type accommodation type
  • (mode, frequency, percentage)
  • Ordinal Scale
  • a scale that arranges objects or alternatives
    according to their magnitude in an ordered
    relationship i.e. preference ranking for a
    product social class
  • (median, semi-interquartile range)

11
Measurement scales
  • Interval Scale
  • a scale that both arranges objects according to
    their magnitude and also distinguishes this
    ordered arrangements in units of equal intervals
    i.e. attitudes, opinions (5 point likert scale)
  • (mean, standard deviation, variance, range)
  • Ratio Scale
  • a scale that has absolute rather than relative
    quantities i.e. income, sales, costs, market
    share
  • possess an absolute zero point and interval
    properties
  • (mean, standard deviation, variance all lower
    level descriptive statistics)
  • IMPORTANT SELECTED READING 7.1

12
Parametric versus non - parametric statistics
  • Statistical techniques can be classified as -
  • Parametric statistics
  • the use is based on the assumption that the
    population from which the sample is drawn is
    normally distributed and data are collected on an
    interval or ratio scale.
  • Non-Parametric statistics
  • makes no explicit assumptions regarding the
    normality of distribution in the population (less
    stringent requirements) and are used when the
    data are collected on a nominal or ordinal scale.
  • (Refer to Appendix 1, Cavana et al p. 402)

13
Methods of scaling
  • Response scales
  • rating scales estimates magnitude of a
    characteristic
  • ranking scale rank order preference
  • sorting scales arrange or classify concepts
  • choice scales selection of preferred
    alternative

14
Rating scale
  • Rating tasks ask the respondent to estimate the
    magnitude of a characteristic, or quality, that
    an object possesses. The respondents position
    on a scale(s) is where he or she would rate an
    object.

15
Ranking scale
  • Ranking tasks require that the respondent rank
    order a small number of objects in overall
    performance on the basis of some characteristic
    or stimulus.

16
Other scales
  • Sorting might present the respondent with several
    concepts typed on cards and require that the
    respondent arrange the cards into a number of
    piles or otherwise classify the concepts.
  • Choice between two or more alternatives is
    another type of measurement - it is assumed that
    the chosen object is preferred over the other.

17
Rating scales
  • category scale
  • Likert scale
  • semantic differential
  • numerical scale
  • staple scale
  • itemised rating scale
  • constant sum rating scale
  • graphic rating scale

18
Category Scale
  • a category scale is a more sensitive measure than
    a scale having only two response categories - it
    provides more information.
  • Nominal or ordinal (example is ordinal)
  • if interval between each category is regarded as
    equal interval
  • dichotomous scale - 2 response categories (yes
    or no agree or disagree) nominal

19
EXAMPLE OF CATEGORY SCALE
  • How important were the following in your decision
    to visit Sydney (tick one response for each item)
  • VERY SOMEWHAT NOT TOO
  • IMPORTANT IMPORTANT IMPORTANT
  • CLIMATE ___________ ___________ ___________
  • COST OF TRAVEL ___________ ___________ ___________
  • FAMILY ORIENTED ___________ ___________ __________
    _
  • EDUCATIONAL
  • /HISTORICAL ASPECTS _________ ___________ ________
    ___
  • FAMILIARITY WITH
  • AREA ___________ ___________ ___________

20
The Likert Scale
  • An extremely popular means for measuring
    attitudes. Respondents indicate their own
    attitudes by checking how strongly they agree or
    disagree with statements.
  • response alternatives strongly agree,
    agree, uncertain, disagree, and strongly
    disagree.
  • generally 5 points but can vary
  • not all 5 point scales are Likert scale
  • debate as to the level of measurement of this
    scale (interval)
  • If several scale item are used to measure a
    variable, then an index may be formed by adding
    the responses to each scale item together.
  • If a scale is negatively worded, then recode
    prior to creating the index (refer to Coakes
    Steed p. 40)

21
LIKERT SCALE FOR MEASURING ATTITUDES TOWARD TENNIS
  • It is more fun to play a tough, competitive
    tennis match than to play an easy one.
  • ___Strongly Agree
  • ___Agree
  • ___Neither agree nor disagree
  • ___Disagree
  • ___Strongly Disagree

22
Semantic Differential
  • Bipolar adjectives to anchor each end of scale
    (seven point scale) eg
  • good ______________ bad
  • sweet ______________ sour
  • hot ______________ cold
  • Rotation required to avoid halo effect ???
  • Image profile - graphic representation for
    competing brands, services to highlight
    comparison (based on mean or median)

23
Numerical Scale
  • Numerical scales have numbers as response
    options, rather than semantic space or verbal
    descriptions, to identify categories (response
    positions).
  • Similar to semantic differential bipolar
    adjectives on a 5 - point or 7 - point scale
  • How satisfied are you with your new computer?
  • Extremely satisfied 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
    Extremely dissatisfied

24
Stapel Scales
  • measures both direction intensity of an
    attitude towards an object
  • up to a 10 point scale 5 to -5
  • presented vertically
  • considered interval

25
A Stapel Scale for Measuring a Stores Image
  • Department
  • Store Name
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
  • Wide Selection
  • -1
  • -2
  • -3
  • Select a positive or negative number that you
    think describe the store accurately for each
    descriptive word.

26
Itemised rating scale
  • Similar to category scale
  • 5 or more point scale
  • Each point is numbered and labelled
  • 1 Very unlikely 2 Unlikely 3 neither
    unlikely nor likely 4 Likely 5 Very likely
  • A number of statements are rated using scale
  • Interval scale

27
Constant sum rating scale
  • Respondent is asked to distribute a given number
    of points across various items (attributes) of a
    product to indicate the importance to each
    attribute.
  • Example distribute 100 point among the
    following attributes to indicate the importance
    of each for the product - soap.
  • fragrance size shape texture colour

28
Graphic Rating Scale Stressing Pictorial Visual
Communications
29
Ranking Scales
  • Paired comparison helps to identify preferences
  • Forced choice rank a set of objects (eg.
    destinations) from preferred to least preferred
  • Comparative scale - use a benchmark to compare
    another product with.
  • Ranking scales provide ordinal data

30
Other response sets
  • Scenarios then provide a set of possible
    responses to select from
  • Open-ended questions

31
Scale decisions
  • type of response scale
  • number of scale categories
  • balanced versus unbalanced
  • even/odd number of categories
  • forced versus non-forced scales
  • nature degree of verbal description
  • physical form of the scale

32
Type of response scale
  • depends on research problem and objectives
  • depends on the statistical analysis techniques
    that may be used for both descriptive and
    inferential statistics

33
Number of categories
  • greater the option, greater the sensitivity
  • most respondent can only handle 5 to 9
  • options increase as object knowledge increases.
  • nature of object
  • mode of data collection
  • analysis of the data - correlation coefficient
    decreases with the reduction of categories

34
Balanced versus unbalanced
  • balanced equal no. of favourable unfavourable
    categories
  • to obtain objective data need balanced scale
  • if you know the response will be skewed use an
    unbalance scale in-line with the skewness
  • unbalanced scale has data analysis implications

35
Even/odd number of categories
  • depends on the need for a central or neutral
    position odd number of categories results in a
    neutral point
  • example Likert scale is a balanced rating with
    an odd number of categories i.e. 5 or 7
  • even scales will force respondent to a position
    either positive or negative.
  • if a neutral or indifferent response is possible
    from some respondents odd number of categories
    should be used

36
Forced versus non-forced scales
  • forced scale - the respondent is forced to give
    an answer
  • forced scale omits no opinion or no knowledge
    option
  • forced scale can distort the response thus the
    measures of central tendency variance
  • offering a no opinion can allow respondents to
    be lazy and not respond

37
Nature degree of verbal description
  • degree of verbal description associated with the
    scale can influence the response
  • categorising helps the respondent understand the
    scale
  • recommend that all or most scale points need
    categorising/ description
  • strength of adjectives to anchor scale generally
    agree vs strongly agree

38
Physical form of the scale
  • presentation of scale can be in many formats
  • in selecting a scale format - consider the
    audience and the format likely to receive the
    highest response rate

39
Selecting an appropriate scale
  • no one is best - decision is situational
  • want maximum information
  • nature of item being measured
  • ease of use of technique by respondent
  • analysis required
  • method of communication

40
Criteria for goodness of measure
  • 3 major criteria for evaluating good measurement
    are
  • reliability
  • validity
  • sensitivity
  • Other factors to consider are
  • relevant
  • versatile
  • ease of response

41
Reliability
  • refers to the extent to which a scale (number of
    items) produces consistent results if repeated
    measurements are made
  • degree to which the scale is free from random
    error and yields consistent results
  • Is the scale a stable measure of the concept? and
    how well do the items in a scale hold together?
  • main methods test-retest inter-item
    consistency reliability
  • reliability is a necessary but insufficient
    condition of the test of goodness of a measure

42
Validity
  • ability of a scale to measure the intended
    concept and not some other concept
  • content validity measure includes an adequate
    representative set of items that tap the concept
  • literature
  • qualitative research
  • judgement of a panel of experts
  • Note other forms of validity

43
Reliability and validity on target
Old Rifle New Rifle New Rifle
Sunglare Neither reliability nor High
reliability Reliable but not valid valid
(Target A) validity(Target B) (Target C)
44
Sensitivity
  • sensitivity of a scale is important when
    investigating changes in attitudes
  • a measurement instruments ability to accurately
    measure variability in responses
  • avoid 2 or 3 point scales use 5 or 7 point
    scales to increase the scales sensitivity
  • avoid basing a scale on one item or one question
    use multiple items and create an index measure

45
Ethics
  • researches are obligated to use the best scale
    for the given objectives
  • researchers must ensure the correct scale is used
    to allow the analysis design to be effective

46
Report writing
  • Researchers need to disclose any scales that is
    unique to the study. They need to identify the
    process used to test the adopted scale.
  • Presentation techniques refer to study book
    text reading

47
Next topic
  • Questionnaire and form design

48
Summary
  • nature of measurement scaling
  • conceptual operational definitions
  • measurement scales
  • nominal
  • ordinal
  • interval
  • ratio
  • parametric versus non-parametric statistical
    techniques
  • methods of scaling rating, ranking, sorting,
    choice
  • scaling decisions type, odd/even,
    balanced/unbalanced, forced/non-forced, no. of
    scale categories, etc
  • criteria for goodness of measure reliability,
    validity, sensitivity

49
Tutorial
  • Presentation
  • Assignments returned feedback
  • Measurement scaling exercises - bring study
    materials
  • SPSS Ch 3 normality recoding missing
    variables
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com