Social Security - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 8
About This Presentation
Title:

Social Security

Description:

risk transfers from the state & employers to beneficiaries ... crashes in industry pensions have spurred concerns about the GOVERNANCE of pension funds ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:225
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: matthe250
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Social Security


1
Regulators
  • Social Security?
  • As defined contribution PAYG occupational pension
    funds have come to occupy a central place in
    Social Security
  • risk transfers from the state employers to
    beneficiaries
  • risk caught more and more in hedge funds
    equities

Spectacular crashes in industry pensions have
spurred concerns about the GOVERNANCE of pension
funds Urge pension funds to monitor
governance of COMPANIES and, almost as an
afterthought, SOCIAL ISSUES Market
competition, networks rewards based on
commercial contracts
Mechanism
Environment
2
Pressure for socially responsive investment
  • UNITED STATES
  • Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
  • Interpretive bulletin 29 CFR 2509.94-2 relating
    to written statements of investment policy,
    including proxy voting policy
  • INTERNATIONAL
  • Principles of Responsible Investment, UN
    Environment Programme Financial Sector Initiative
  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and
    Development Guidelines for Pension Fund
    Governance
  • Social Dialogue Pension Reform, International
    Labor Organization
  • EUROPEAN UNION
  • Directive 2003/41/EC of the European Parliament
    on the activities and supervision of institutions
    for occupational retirement provision
  • Committee of Wise Men, The Lamfalussy Report,
    The Regulation of European Securities Markets
  • Communication, Financial services Building a
    framework for action
  • Financial Services Policy 2005-2010

3
Pressure for socially responsive investment
  • UNITED KINGDOM
  • A review of pensions institutions 2007, HM
    Stationery Office
  • Myners principles for institutional investment
    decision-making, Review of progress 2004
    (original review 2001)
  • Combined Code on Corporate Governance 2003
  • Statutory Instrument No. 1849 The Occupational
    Pension Schemes (Investment and Assignment,
    Forfeiture, Bankruptcy etc.) Amendment
    Regulations 1999
  • Response from industry, Institutional
    Shareholders Committee ABI/NAPF/CBI
  • Framework on voting disclosure
  • The responsibilities of institutional
    shareholders and agentsstatement of principles
  • Model statement of investment principles and
    implementation policyresponsible investment

4
Pressure for socially responsive investment
  • NETHERLANDS
  • Pension fund governance code for Dutch pension
    funds rules for the management, control,
    accountability and supervision of pension funds
  • The Dutch corporate governance code 2nd review of
    progress 2006
  • Peters report and recommendations, Corporate
    governance in the Netherlands

AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND Corporations Act,
Commonwealth of Australia Note, employer
contribution rates RI are mandated in
Australia New Zealand Superannuation and
Retirement Income Act
5
Research question moves to governance
Old Question Not so much the integrity of CSR as
reflected in portfolios Paul Bridgen Traute
Meyer RI no longer screens good companies in,
bad out FTSE4GOOD FTSE, SRI is a defunct
term Current methods Collective pressure groups,
which target institutional networks RI units
inside investors, which target investment
opportunities New Questions System capacity to
provide distribute benefits (BM) Implications
for regulators welfare systems subject to
increasing volatilities Implications for
governors involvement level
6
Rit Rft ?i ßi(Rmt Rft) eit
Social responsibility at large investors
  • Asset managers focus on alpha i.e.
    Outperformance
  • Formerly, RI units managed ßeta i.e. volatility
  • Change of tactics, collective attempt to
    influence Rmt i.e. overall return

Rit is the return on fund i in month t Rft is the
return on a 90 day bank bill in month t Rmt is
the return on the market index in month t e is
the error term
7
Snapshot
8
Implications for governors of pensions
What level of involvement? When regulators,
institutional linkages investment sectors are
lobbied outside
Implications for regulators
  • Regulatory attention on influential networks
    rather than reporting e.g. mortgage-backed
    securities owned by SPEs charities escape
    accountability distrust credit squeeze
    rescue buyouts beneficiaries public interest
    not served well
  • Hand over to quasi-governmental bodies? E.g.
    United Nations Environmental Programme Finance
    Initiative
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com