Heavy Flavor Physics at Tevatron Run II - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

Heavy Flavor Physics at Tevatron Run II

Description:

Heavy Flavor Physics at Tevatron Run II – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:19
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: Kin60
Category:
Tags: flavor | heavy | physics | rik | rink | run | tevatron

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Heavy Flavor Physics at Tevatron Run II


1
Heavy Flavor Physics at Tevatron Run II
Kin Yip
  • Introduction (Collider and Detector Upgrade)
  • Detector Performance
  • First results (lifetimes, masses, )
  • Summary
  • First International Workshop on Frontier Science
    Charm, Beauty and CP
  • Frascati, Oct. 10th, 2002

2
Fermilab
DØ
Chicago ?
CDF
Booster
p
Tevatron
?p
Main Injector Recycler
Run IIa
3
Integrated Luminosities
  • Tevatron Center of Mass Energy 1.96 TeV
  • Expect 2 fb?1 by end of 2004 (Run IIa),
    15 fb?1 by
    2008 (Run IIb)

CDF
4
Hadron colliders challenge
  • Large production cross section
  • Even larger inelastic cross section
  • (S/B?10-3) ? specialized triggers
  • Single lepton triggers
  • Dilepton triggers such as
  • J/ ? ? ? ? -
  • Track triggers moved to L1 (RunII)
  • In Run II, L2 trigger on displaced tracks
    using SVX will allow CDF to trigger purely
    hadronic B decays and study such as
  • B0 ????, Bs ?Ds?? ...
  • Precise 2nd vertex reconstruction

at 2 TeV
at Z0
at ?(4S)

5
CDF Detector Run II Upgrades
All critical components are working well
132 ns front end COT tracks _at_L1 SVX tracks
_at_L2 40000/300/70 Hz no dead time
7-8 silicon layers rf, rz, stereo views z0max45,
?max2 2ltRlt30cm
2 bs or not 2 bs? Double tags essential for
Mtop, H?bb
TOF (100ps_at_150cm)
30240 chnl, 96 layer drift chamber s(1/pT)
0.1/GeV s(hit) 150mm
? coverage extended to ?1.5
Tile/fiber endcap calorimeter (faster, larger
Fsamp, no gap)
6
The Upgraded D? Detector
  • Added PreShower detectors, Central (CPS) and
    Forward (FPS)
  • Significantly improved Muon System
  • New forward proton spectrometer (FPD)
  • Entirely new Trigger System and DAQ to handle
    higher event rate
  • New tracking devices, Silicon (SMT) and Fiber
    Tracker (CFT), placed in 2 T magnetic field
  • Upgraded Calorimeter electronics readout and
    trigger

7
CDF and DØ in Run II
  • Stable physics running established in early 2002
  • CDF
  • Silicon coverage, trigger came together quickly
  • CDF L1/L2/L3 trigger 6400/145/25Hz _at_2?1031, ?1
    deadtime
  • (BW 40K/300/70)
  • 140 trigger algorithms increased rapidly in
    sophistication now quite stable
  • DØ
  • New detectors such as Silicon and Fiber Trackers
    have worked well
  • ? 95 of the SMT and ? 98 CFT channels are
    available for readout
  • Triggers have come together gradually L1/L2/L3
    trigger 400/150/50Hz _at_2?1031
  • Results shown here are from data recorded
    January-early summer 2002
  • Mostly using data of 10.0 pb?1 ( passing some
    stringent good run criteria ) for both
    experiments
  • Especially for CDF, already in the mode of very
    stable operation and collecting
    publication-quality data

8
Tracking (SMT/CFT) Performance
y
Impact Parameter (DCA) Resolution
  • Almost on target with
  • no CFT alignment
  • 1st pass SMT alignment

DCA
Secondary Vertices
DØ Run 2 Preliminary
KS ? ??-
width 36 ?m ?(beam) 30 ?m ? ? 20 ?m
mass ??-
Improvement expected from alignment with data in
near future
9
Muon System Performance
10
Hadronic B trigger (revolutionary!)
150 VME boards find fit silicon tracks, with
offline accuracy, in a 15 ms pipeline
Online track impact param.
s48 mm includes 33 mm beamspot
The wisest are the most annoyed by the loss of
time. -Dante
  • CDF Secondary Vertex L2 Trigger
  • Impact Parameter resolution as planned
  • 48 mm (33 mm beam spot transverse size)
  • Rf only ? need beamline silicon
  • D? is implementing the displaced track L2 trigger
    and should be online in the New Year

gt90
Efficiency
soon
80
11
B Physics Cross-sections
  • New tracking in 2 Tesla field
  • Muon triggers up to ?lt 2
  • J/? Cross Section Measurement
  • Luminosity 5 pb-1
  • First measurement in this rapidity region and ECM

??jet
  • b-quark Production Cross Section
  • New ECM
  • Luminosity 5 pb-1
  • Jet ? lt 0.6
  • muon tag only, b-content from pTrel fits

12
B hadron lifetimes
  • Inclusive B lifetime with J/ys
  • Fit pseudo-ct LxyyFMCMy/pTy ct45810stat.
    11syst. mm
  • (PDG 4694 mm)
  • Exclusive B?J/yK lifetime
  • ct446 43stat. 13syst. mm
  • (PDG 5025 mm)

J/y from B 17
B? 154
13
B Lifetime Measurement
  • B lifetime measurement from inclusive J/?
  • 416 30 signal events
  • 2184 47 prompt J/?s
  • ?(B) 492 37 ?m (stat. error)
  • (PDG ?(B) 469 ?m)
  • Exclusive B reconstruction
  • B?J/? K
  • First time in DØ
  • Expect more soon!

5 pb-1
pT(B)gt10 GeV/c
14
SVT selects huge charm signals!
  • L2 trigger on 2 tracks
  • pt gt 2 GeV
  • D gt 100 mm (2 body)
  • D gt 120 mm (multibody)
  • Whopping charm samples!
  • Will have O( 107 ) fully reconstructed decays
    in 2/fb data set
  • FOCUS todays standard for huge 139K D0?K-p,
    110K D?K-pp
  • A substantial fraction comes from b decays

56320 D0
25570 D
15
Meson mass measurements
  • B masses
  • y(2S)?J/y pp- (control)
  • Bu? J/y K
  • Bd? J/y K0 (K0?Kp-)
  • Bs? J/y f (f?KK-)

18.4/pb
Bs?J/yf
More mass plots
CDF 2002 DPDG/s y(2S) 3686.43 0.54
0.9 Bu 5280.6 1.7 1.1 0.8 Bd 5279.8 1.9
1.4 0.2 Bs 5360.3 3.8 -2.1
B??J/yK?
18.4/pb
Bu
2.1 2.9
16
Measure Ds, D mass difference
11.6 pb-1
  • Ds - D mass difference
  • Both D ? fp (f?KK)
  • Dm99.280.430.27 MeV
  • PDG 99.20.5 MeV
  • (CLEO2, E691)
  • Systematics dominated by background modeling

2400 events
1400 events
Brand new CDF capability
17
Measure Cabibbo-suppressed decay rates
  • G(D?KK)/G(D?Kp) (11.170.480.98) (PDG
    10.830.27)
  • Main systematic (8) background subtraction
    (E687, E791, CLEO2)
  • G(D?pp)/G(D?Kp) (3.370.200.16) (PDG
    3.760.17)
  • several 2 systematics
  • This measurement has pushed the state of the art
    on modeling SVT sculpting--essential simulation
    tools for both B physics program and e.g. high-pT
    b-jet triggers

Future? - CP violation - mixing - rare decays
Monster Kp reflection here ...
18
Toward Bs mixing!
??KK-
B 5612
B ? D0 p
  • We observe hadronic B decays!
  • Next steps
  • Reconstruct Bs? Dsp, Ds ?fp
  • Flavor tagging algorithms
  • Exploit ? ?2 SVX acceptance, SVT efficiency
    improvements
  • Next step
  • reconstruct Ds???candidates in lepton events
  • Find B0s candidates and measure the proper decay
    time
  • Limited proper time resolution due to neutrino

19
Flavor Oscillations ( BS ) in Run II
  • Expected signal 20,000 Bs?Ds?p , Ds?ppp? with
    Ds? ?f p?, KK ?
  • Flavor tag effitiveness ?D2 11 (with Time of
    Flight)
  • Proper time resolution st 0.045 ps ? t
    sPT/PT ( SVXII with L00 )
  • Average Significance (how many ss)
  • Sensitive to xslt63 if S/B2/1
  • Sensitive to xslt56 if S/B1/2
  • ( using Layer 00 TOF in CDF )
  • SM Global fit
  • 20 lt xslt 30.8 _at_96 C.L.

20
2-body hadronic B decays observed!!
sum Bd?Kp Bs?KK Bd?pp Bs?Kp
CDF II simulation
Width 45MeV
B 339
B ? h h-
  • Yield lower than expected (now improved) S/N
    better than expected
  • With 2 fb?1 sample, measuring g to 10º may be
    feasible, using Fleischers method of relating
    Bs?KK and Bd?pp, and using b as input

21
?0b Lifetime
  • Theoretical expectation is
  • Measurement is
  • Previous measurements used semileptonic modes to
    achieve statistical precision
  • Disadvantage is that neutrino is lost, carrying
    with it momentum information
  • Fully hadronic mode ?0b?J/? ?0
  • BR(?0b?J/? ?0)5x10-4
  • Trigger on J/?? ? ? - events, reconstruct ?0?p?
  • Expect 15 000 events
  • No need to rely on Monte Carlo for momentum
    correction

From B Lifetime Working Group
22
?0b Lifetime
  • ?0? p?
  • Highest pT track assigned the proton mass
  • Veto events where M(? ?) consistent with Ks0 mass
  • Next step search for ?0? p? candidates in J/????
    events

?0?p?
23
Measurement of sin(2?) in Run I
  • The minimization of the likelihood function
    yields
  • sin2?0.79?0.39(stat)?0.16(syst) Statistical
    error gtsystematics.
  • Time integrated measurement
  • sin2?0.71?0.63 (stat ? sys)
  • Using Feldman and Cousing frequentist approach
  • 0ltsin2?lt1 _at_93C.L.


24

25
Sin(2b) Expectations for 2 fb?1
(from the report B Physics at the Tevatron Run
II and Beyond) For a time dependent analysis
  • D?
  • (S/B 0.75)
  • e D2 9.8
  • Time resolution
  • st 100 fs
  • assuming luminosity 2 fb?1
  • D? and CDF have similar precisions

26
Summary
  • Excellent heavy flavor physics prospects for Run
    II at Tevatron
  • Both experiments have come together finally
  • Heavy flavor physics is probably the least
    affected by the luminosity at Tevatron and the
    broad range of B physics programs include
  • Charm Physics (largest sample !)
  • flavor oscillations (?mS)
  • CP violation sin(2b) in B ? J/? KS
  • ?0b lifetime, sin(2a), observing decay modes
    related to ?,
  • measuring CP violation in
    oscillation,

perhaps currently unique to Hadron Machine
27
How many Bd may we get ?
28
Muon Triggers
PT(B)gt 4 GeV and ? lt 3
DØ GEANT/Trig. Sim.
max level 2 rate for all DØ triggers is 1000 Hz
29
Sin(2b) via B ? J/? KS
  • full reconstruction of final state
  • two Vs
  • soft pions
  • measure decay length
  • tag flavor at production
  • same side flavor tag
  • pion charge
  • opposite side flavor tags
  • lepton charge
  • jet charge

Efficiency (e) and dilution factor (D) D 2 P
- 1 P is the correct tag probability eD2 is the
tags effectiveness
30
Flavor Tagging
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com