David M. Shlaes Anti-infectives Consulting, LLC Stonington, CT - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 6
About This Presentation
Title:

David M. Shlaes Anti-infectives Consulting, LLC Stonington, CT

Description:

In the consideration of risk-benefit for antibacterials, the agency could ... generics) based on efficacy data which, in retrospect, are questionable. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:46
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 7
Provided by: davids227
Learn more at: http://www.fda.gov
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: David M. Shlaes Anti-infectives Consulting, LLC Stonington, CT


1
David M. ShlaesAnti-infectives Consulting,
LLCStonington, CT
  • Participation sponsored by
  • Nabriva, Vienna, AU
  • Novexel, Romainville, FR
  • Consulting relationships with a number of
    biotechnology companies or investment firms
    working in the area of antiinfective discovery
    and development.

2
PERSPECTIVES
  • In the consideration of risk-benefit for
    antibacterials, the agency could reflect on drugs
    approved previously (including generics) based on
    efficacy data which, in retrospect, are
    questionable.
  • Antibiotics with relatively low risk, but for
    which the prescription volume is high (esp.
    generics) may be associated with higher absolute
    risk.
  • Severe hepatotoxicity is not the only potentially
    life threatening adverse effect in the antibiotic
    world.

3
The Dilemma for Physicians and Patients
  • Essentially no antibiotic has been developed
    based on placebo-controlled trials with
    bacteriology for ABS including the 1st choice
    Augmentin or Amoxicillin.
  • 2nd line antibiotics have issues.
  • Macrolides resistance which leads to clinical
    failure.
  • Tetracyclines widespread resistance.
  • SXT common allergic reactions.
  • (Fluoroquinolones, others?)
  • Do we no longer need more options?

4
The Numbers Ketek vs. Drug of 1st Choice in ABS
  • 10 million prescriptions for Ketek were surveyed
    in response to reports of serious but rare liver
    toxicity and death.
  • The FDA has identified 12 cases of acute liver
    failure among the10 million courses of therapy
    (including 4 deaths).
  • Based on the rate of fatal anaphylaxis for
    penicillin, among the 10 million courses of
    therapy as surveyed for Ketek we could expect 100
    to 285 deaths from acute anaphylaxis if the
    prescriptions had been for a penicillin.
  • Even if we reduce the anaphylaxis numbers by 10X
    to account for poor reporting the event is
    still more common than fatal hepatoxicity due to
    Ketek.

5
US Prescription Data 2005
Antibiotic US Prescriptions (MM) US Prescriptions (MM)
Pen-VK 10.3
Azi 39.2
Ery 7.8
Clari 6.9
Ketek 3.4
6
Logical Conclusions
  • FDA Should Withdraw the Penicillins as therapy
    for ABS (and AECB).
  • Congress should inquire as to why the FDA did not
    act more expeditiously against the penicillins.
  • The problem with argumentum ad absurdum is that
    sometimes one finds the absurdity valid.
  • If we want efficacious new antibiotics for
    infections caused by resistant bacteria, we must
    be realistic (and consistent!) about the risks we
    are willing to take and the standards we impose.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com