Electrical - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

Electrical

Description:

NMP EO-1 DELTA PRE-SHIP REVIEW. Contents. System Block Diagram. Verification Matrix ... SAS supplies reconfigured during recovery, no effect on spacecraft when SAS ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:25
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: brucezin
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Electrical


1
Section 16 Electrical
. . . Bruce Zink EO-1 Electrical Lead, Swales
Aerospace, Inc.
2
Contents
  • System Block Diagram
  • Verification Matrix
  • Failure Free Time
  • Changes since last review
  • Remaining Work to be Performed
  • Critical RFAs
  • Status of Open Actions
  • Residual Risk
  • Launch Readiness

3
System Block Diagram
4
Power System Block Diagram
5
As Run Verification Matrix
6
Projected Power On Time
7
Changes Since Red Team Review
  • WARP re-integration
  • Following WARP repair and test
  • Calorimeter integration and verification
  • ACDS removal, rework, and re-integration
  • Interpoint converter stiffener installation
  • GPS Power Converter Unit removal, rework, and
    re-integration
  • Interpoint converter stiffener installation
  • AST removal, rework, and re-integration
  • Interpoint converter stiffener installation

8
Changes Since Red Team Review (continued)
  • IRU re-integration
  • Following removal to prevent Helium exposure
  • 1773 Bus Characterization
  • Verify bus performance following breaking
    connections to ACDS, WARP, Hyperion, and AST
  • Minimum system margin gt9dB over temperature range
  • Trickle Charge Diode Installation
  • Replaced fuse with diode and tested successfully
  • S-Band Transponder Removal
  • Returned to manufacturer due to AGC oscillations
  • Integrated command uplink bypass to continue
    powered testing

9
Remaining Work To Be Completed
  • Harness Closeouts
  • Remaining work related to re-installation of
    S-Band transponder and bay closeouts for flight.
  • S-Band Transponder Repair
  • S-Band Transponder Re-Integration
  • Repeat of previous successful integration
    following repair
  • Hyperion Re-Integration
  • Repeat of previous successful integration
    following removal to allow integration of S-Band
    Transponder

10
Remaining Work To Be Completed (continued)
  • S/A Integration
  • Repeat of previous successful integration for
    Vibration Acoustic Test
  • 1773 Bus Characterization (following Hyperion
    final integration)
  • Required due to Hyperion de-mate
  • Repeat of previous successful integrations
  • Performed 7 times to date

11
Status of Open Actions
  • 1773 Bus Fault During MOC Sim (WOA 876 PR20-1,
    20-3)
  • Modification of PSE default power on
    configuration mitigated problem
  • PSE SW Build 8.1 performs load shed of all
    non-essential loads following special command
    reset
  • Solar Array Deployment Test
  • All testing to date successful
  • Planned for launch site
  • Primary side with flight fuse plug

12
Residual RiskOne Time Events (Redbook Items)
  • Chassis current Transient (WOA 770-20-3,
    PR20-3)
  • One event of 300mA, also seen on stripchart
    recorder
  • EMC testing was taking place with probes
    connected to spacecraft power bus
  • No recurrence since event on 11/22/99
  • 1390 Hours of powered testing
  • Chassis current event (WOA 572-30-10)
  • Prolonged chassis current event reaching a peak
    of 925 mA
  • Ad Hoc testing immediately following event caused
    brief recurrence of anomaly
  • Solar Array Simulator cable (EGSE) found to have
    split insulation on multiple wires within
    backshell
  • Following inspection a new Solar Array Simulator
    cable was fabricated
  • No recurrence since 8/20/99 ( with exception of
    770-20-3 which was a brief event )
  • 2370 Hours of powered testing

16 - 12
13
Residual Risk(continued)
  • 1773 Bus Fault during MOC Sim (WOA 876-20-1 and
    876-20-3, PR20-1, 20-3)
  • 1773 bus susceptible to babbling transmitter
  • Low risk of fault (TRMM and XTE heritage)
  • Change in PSE default services mitigated risk
    associated with this problem (Version 8.1)
  • Special command reset sheds all non-essential
    loads
  • Operational ability to re-set or power down all
    non-essential RTs
  • Ability to remove babbling RT, or re-set and stop
    babbling
  • Low likelihood of occurrence combined with
    operational workarounds results in low risk
    associated with this issue
  • S-Band Transponder Anomaly
  • AGC oscillations must be diagnosed and repaired
  • See Special Topic

14
Launch Readiness
  • Complete troubleshooting of S-Band Transponder
  • Locate problem
  • Fix problem
  • Integrate and Test S-Band Transponder
  • Repaired unit
  • Complete system level testing (CPT, S/A
    deployment)
  • Previous success suggests low risk
  • Complete remaining activities
  • See previous section on Remaining Work to be
    Completed
  • Low risk S/C closeouts and repeats of previous
    integrations
  • Ready for launch following previously mentioned
    activities

15
Special Topic Follow-Up Nadir Deck Heater Short
. . . Bruce Zink EO-1 Electrical Lead, Swales
Aerospace, Inc.
16
Nadir Deck Short Circuit
  • Summary of Event (WOA 676-20-8)
  • Mis-wired heaters caused high current events in
    first TVAC
  • Repair Implementation
  • Heater circuits and switched services in question
    abandoned
  • New heaters installed on nadir deck
  • Re-wiring performed to re-establish lost services
  • Test and Verification
  • Circuits tested by jumpering thermostats
  • Circuits verified in T/V II cold plateau
  • Negligible residual risk

17
Special Topic Umbilical Console Operational
Issues
. . . Bruce Zink EO-1 Electrical Lead, Swales
Aerospace, Inc.
18
Description of Problem
  • GPIB bus internal to Umbilical Console suffers
    from periodic crashes
  • Conflict on bus (cause not fully understood)
    results in loss of commanding and status
    telemetry from solar array simulators and Direct
    Power Converter supply
  • Existing configuration of supplies remains
    following a crash
  • Commanding of output relays for the solar array
    simulators and DPC is not affected by GPIB
    crash
  • Communications with ASIST is not affected by a
    crash
  • Does this situation create risk associated with
    Launch??

19
Umbilical Console Block Diagram
Ethernet ASIST Link
Switch Control
Windows NT Computer
  • ASIST used to command UC and acquire telemetry
  • GPIB Bus used to control settings on power
    supplies
  • Sorenson Bus mimics GPIB bus for remaining
    supplies
  • Output relays controlled via dedicated hardware
    not on GPIB bus

HP Solar Array Simulator
GPIB Bus
To Spacecraft
Sorenson DPC/Master
Sorenson SAS 3
Sorenson Bus
Sorenson SAS 10
20
Umbilical Command Timeline
  • Power up
  • Configure DPC to 30V
  • Close DPC output relay
  • Bring S/C Battery On-Line
  • Adjust DPC to match battery voltage
  • Send battery on pulse
  • Open DPC output relay
  • Adjust DPC voltage to 22VDC
  • Configure Solar Array Simulators
  • Adjust HP SAS and all Sorenson supplies to
    standard settings

Denotes use of GPIB Bus
21
Umbilical Command Timeline
  • Standard Spacecraft Operations
  • Cycle SAS output relays to control battery
    charging
  • Launch (T-5 minutes)
  • Open all SAS output relays to go to internal
    power
  • Scrub/Power Down Spacecraft
  • Adjust DPC to match battery voltage (iterative
    process)
  • Close DPC output relay
  • Issue battery off pulse
  • Open DPC output relay

Denotes use of GPIB Bus
22
Umbilical Recovery Procedure
  • Wait for spacecraft night
  • SAS supplies reconfigured during recovery, no
    effect on spacecraft when SAS output relays are
    open
  • Exit Umbilical SW program
  • Performed using remote administration from
    remotely located computer
  • Cycle AC power to Sorenson DPC supply
  • Performed using remote controlled power switch
  • Controlled via fiber link from remote PC
  • Re-start Umbilical SW program
  • Performed using remote administration from
    remotely located computer
  • Continue testing

23
Summary
  • Problem has seen extensive effort by a large
    group of people
  • Definitely related to Sorenson internal bus
  • Unable to precisely locate and fix problem
  • Further attempts to fix problem are
    counter-productive
  • Configuration changes this close to launch carry
    risk of other problems
  • Recovery procedure is in place, and exercised
    regularly
  • Problem cannot threaten launch
  • See command timeline, which shows no GPIB
    activity required to handle launch (following
    initial configuration)
  • Power up and SAS configuration completed gt8 hours
    prior to launch
  • Recovery time is on the order of 10 minutes
  • UC crash occurred during last Launch Sim, S/C
    launched successfully and on time!!!

24
Special Topic Solar Array Cable Damage PR
1045-40-1
. . . Bruce Zink EO-1 Electrical Lead, Swales
Aerospace, Inc.
25
Solar Array Cable Damage
  • Background
  • During final panel closeout inspections on June 6
    a hair line mark (centered around three o'clock)
    was noticed on the 86 wire bundle that comes out
    of the SADA
  • The hair line mark was further inspected and
    determined to be a cut of the insulation for
    seven wires. The geometry of the cut indicated
    damage due to a sharp object. It must be noted
    that this cut was very difficult to see due to
    fine cut. The location of the cut is
    approximately 0.75 inches off the face of the
    SADA interface which is approximately at the
    start of the bend radius for the cable bundle as
    it is folded up against the Solar Array Yoke.
    This obviously is a high stress area.
  • Under higher magnification (10 - 20x) it was
    determined that at least three wires had exposed
    copper. In addition oxidation has occurred
    indicating the damage was done some time ago.

26
Solar Array Cable Damage
  • Background (continued)
  • All seven wires were verified as follows
  • Connector Pin Description - Function
  • Cable Wrap J2 7 Inboard S/A panel structural
    ground
  • Cable Wrap J2 37 Circuit 11 (outboard panel
    fixed string)
  • Cable Wrap J2 19 Circuit 4- (Outboard panel,
    shuntable)
  • Cable Wrap J2 38 Guard (ground wire shield for
    CSS)
  • Cable Wrap J2 14 Guard
  • Cable Wrap J2 42 Guard
  • Cable Wrap J2 27 Coarse Sun Sensor 2

27
Solar Array Cable Damage
Detail View A
28
Solar Array Cable DamageClose-up
Detail View A
29
Solar Array Cable Damage
  • Probable Cause
  • It is believed that this damage occurred while in
    the 238 TV chamber in the preparation of the
    Spacecraft for TV (October 99) or while clearing
    out the GSE blankets in and around the SADA .
    This can not be verified and it is more than
    likely an accident which went unnoticed. The
    SADA and cable wrap were thoroughly inspected via
    bore scope shortly before TV and was found to be
    nominal.
  • Prior to TV 1, a through inspection was
    performed in this area without issue
  • No work has been done in this area since leaving
    TV, until recently
  • Cutting instruments are generally used in chamber
    operations (TC number cutting, GSE MLI
    clearing,etc.)
  • One TV GSE cabling was found damaged in similar
    manner following TV
  • Configuration in chamber was not conducive to
    ideal working conditions for technicians due
    to extremely tight configuration and poor
    lighting
  • QA oversight was from distance during T/V buildup
    and T/V teardown in chamber due to continuous
    monitoring of Oxygen level at chamber door due to
    concern of nitrogen Purge in closed chamber.
    Safety of personnel was first priority! Also
    there was insufficient room to have two people in
    the same physical area.
  • Other post TV activity require use of razor
    blades (Radiator tape cutting, excess adhesive
    removal/trimming, etc.) however this has been
    limited and is under constant monitoring by QA

30
Solar Array Cable Damage
  • Corrective Action
  • Based on the type of damage critical location
    it was determined by both Swales Aerospace GSFC
    Quality (M. Kelly) that this damage could not be
    repaired by splicing or any other means. The
    wires associated with pin J2-7, J2-37, J2-19,
    J2-27 would need to be replaced by swapping with
    existing spares within assembly.
  • Implementation of swap was made using a patch
    cable due to access restrictions.
  • Make use of current internal Bay 5 SADA cabling
    interface connection
  • Fabricated Connector Bracket Assembly which
    essentially swaps wires (J2-7, J2-37, J2-19
    J2-27) with the spares

31
Bay 4 View of SADA
Detail View B
32
Bay 4 View of SADA
Detail View B
33
Solar Array Cable Damage
  • Corrective Action (continued)
  • In addition to the fabrication of Connector
    Bracket Assembly the following other actions
    were taken
  • Millohm insulation resistance (cross pin)
    testing of entire cable to verify all wires prior
    to initiating of change rework of damaged
    cables
  • Although J 2-7, J2-37, J2-19, J2-27 wires were
    abandoned, exposed copper insulation wiring was
    covered. Guard wires were also reworked.
  • Millohm HiPot entire cable following rework.
    (Connector Bracket Assembly testing which also
    includes HiPot testing performed prior to
    delivery to Spacecraft)
  • Integrated Connector Bracket Assembly with Cable
    Wrap Assembly
  • Verified all SADA signals with Connector Bracket
    Assembly installed
  • Followed by full SADA functional
  • Following completion of S/C bay closure a S/C
    Aliveness Test was performed

34
Solar Array Cable Damage
  • Corrective Action (continued)
  • Other Global actions taken
  • Inspected all external cabling prior to blanket
    installation.
  • Fabricated Red Tag Item to cover critical area of
    Solar Array cable. It will be removed prior to
    Solar Array installation.
  • Rework of cable harness will have no effect to
    overall deployment of Solar Array
  • Deployment Hinge has gt4x Torque margin for worst
    case environmental effects

35
Connector Bracket Assembly Fitcheck on
SpacecraftMonday 6/12/00 - 1400
36
Summary
  • All repairs and preventative measures implemented
    successfully
  • All changes documented in appropriate drawings
  • Extensive spacecraft testing has taken place
    since repair, including a full TVAC test with no
    anomalies related to the cable wrap assembly
  • Negligible residual risk
  • Ready to fly
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com