Please

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

Please

Description:

Tying unreasonably foreclosed or restrained competition ... impermissible only if its effect is to restrain competition in a relevant market. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:26
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Please


1
Please
Silence cell phones and pagers during presentation
s
2
Good Morning
Ken Skala NPK Construction Equipment
3
Please
Silence cell phones and pagers during presentation
s
4
Dealer-Manufacturer LegislationWarranty
Termination and E-Signatures
Bob Wolin 713-646-1327
5
U.S. Congress - 2007
  • Substantive Acts
  • Congressional ethics and Congressional Page
    allocations
  • Several temporary extension and appropriation
    bills
  • Homeland Security and foreign relations
  • Appropriations
  • Transfer of funds from the Senate gift shop to
    the child care facility
  • Several public health and animal fighting bills
  • NATO and Red Cross modernization
  • Minneapolis bridge funds
  • SCHIP
  • 83 Laws Passed in 110th Congress thus far!
  • 42 of the laws passed named or renamed Federal
    buildings and post offices

6
State Legislation
  • General Context
  • Dealer Laws
  • North Carolina H.B. 1353 - 300 fee per heavy
    truck sold in North Carolina other than through a
    dealer, warranty proof and dealership sales
    (Signed By Governor 8/30/2007)
  • Oklahoma proposed - Fair Practices of Equipment
    Manufacturers, Distributors, Wholesalers and
    Dealers Act (Conferees unable to agree)
  • Texas Warranty processing time limits (did not
    pass)

7
State Legislation
  • Tort Reform considered in 20 states this year
    in some form
  • Lemon Law
  • Arkansas - bill died
  • Maryland Commercial truck lemon law enacted
  • Pollution Control
  • California
  • Illinois

8
State Legislation
  • Sales Tax exemptions for environmentally
    friendly technology
  • General sales and use tax exemptions
  • Equipment
  • Manufacturing, and construction, modernization,
    and expansion
  • Sales tax imposition on equipment rentals
  • Ad valorem tax breaks for manufacturing
    facilities and equipment, particularly
    agricultural

9
State Legislation
  • Safety Issues
  • Windshield wipers turn on with lights
  • Reflectors on the back of tractors
  • Backup sensor
  • Maximum length / width / weight
  • Noise Limitations
  • Hawaii 120dB between 7 p.m. and 7 a.m.

10
State Legislation
  • Mechanics Lien Act.
  • Illinois Lessor of construction equipment
    granted a lien for the rental equipment
  • Manufacturer chargeback limitations
  • Indiana on road motor vehicles
  • Lifecycle cost for public entity purchases
  • Fuel requirements
  • Ultra- low sulfur diesel fuel
  • Bio-diesel

11
Non-OEM parts - Void a warranty?
Acme Parts, Inc.
Bob Wolin 713-646-1327
12
Magnuson Moss
  • Generally applicable to consumer goods
  • Prohibits mandatory tie-in sales provisions,
    except in clearly limited circumstances where a
    product wont work properly without a specified
    item or service.
  • Manufacturers generally cannot require consumers
    to purchase OEM items or services to maintain the
    validity of their warranty on consumer products.
    15 U.S.C. 2302(c).

13
Clean Air Act
  • Federal Clean Air Act requires manufacturers to
    provide a production warranty and a performance
    warranty.
  • Production warranty - the vehicle or non-road
    engine is designed, built and equipped to
    conform with emissions requirements at the time
    of sale.
  • Performance warranty - the vehicle or non-road
    engine will comply with applicable emissions
    requirements as tested under state vehicle
    emissions inspection programs for the warranty
    periods specified in the law, conditioned on the
    vehicle being properly maintained and operated.

42 U.S.C. 7541 (C) (3) (B) and 40 C.F.R.
89.1007 (a)
14
Clean Air Act
  • Manufacturers may not refuse warranty repairs
    under the Clean Air Act merely because
    aftermarket parts have been installed.
  • The only circumstance under which the
    manufacturer can void the emissions warranties is
    if an aftermarket part is responsible for
    (causes) the warranty claim.

42 U.S.C. 7541 (C) (3) (B) and 40 C.F.R.
89.1003 (a)(4)(iv)
15
Clean Air Act
  • A manufacturer of a vehicle or new non-road
    engine or vehicle is generally prohibited from
    directly or indirectly requiring in any
    communication to the ultimate purchaser or a
    subsequent purchaser that the coverage of an
    emissions related warranty is conditioned upon
    use of a part, component, or system manufactured
    by the manufacturer or a person acting for the
    manufacturer or under its control, or conditioned
    upon service performed by such persons.

42 U.S.C. 7541 (C) (3) (B) and 40 C.F.R.
89.1003 (a)(4)(iv)
16
Non-Consumer Markets
  • In non-consumer markets, attempts to require the
    use of OEM products and accessories to maintain a
    warranty may violate
  • - Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act
    (15 U.S.C. 1 and 2)
  • Section 5 of the FTC Act (15 U.S.C. 45) as an
    unfair method of competition
  • Section 3 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. 14)

17
Non-Consumer Markets
  • The essential characteristic of an invalid tying
    arrangement lies in the seller's exploitation of
    its control over the tying product here, the
    machinery to force the buyer into the purchase
    of a tied product e.g. blades and other
    accessories that the buyer either did not want
    at all, or might have preferred to purchase
    elsewhere on different terms. Illinois Tool Works
    v. Independent Ink, 126 S.Ct. 1281 (2006).
  • The Supreme Courts historic strong disapproval
    of tying arrangements has substantially
    diminished. Id.

18
Non-Consumer Markets
  • Improper Tying Arrangement Factors
  • 2 Separate and distinct markets
  • Linkage or tying of the markets
  • Significant market power
  • Use of market power to force a customer to accept
    the tying
  • Tying unreasonably foreclosed or restrained
    competition
  • Patent no longer gives rise to per se assumption
    of market power Illinois Tool Works

19
Non-Consumer Markets
  • Kodak sold photocopiers and other equipment in a
    competitive market. After ISOs entered the
    market, Kodak limited their access to OEM parts.
    As a result, ISOs could not obtain parts. Many
    were forced out of business.
  • The ISOs sued Kodak under 1 for tying the sale
    of service to the sale of replacement parts and
    under Section 2 for unlawfully monopolizing the
    market for the sale of service for the Kodak
    machines. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical
    Services. Inc., 504 U.S. 451 (1992).

20
Non-Consumer Markets
  • The jury awarded ten plaintiffs 23,948,300,
    which was trebled under antitrust law to
    71,844,900. The Ninth Circuit, affirmed as to
    all liability issues, affirmed services damages
    awarded to nine of the ten ISO's. The issues
    were subsequently settled.

21
Void Warranty Cases
  • Marts v. Xerox
  • Lasertech claimed Xerox improperly tied warranty
    coverage to the purchase of Xerox supplies
  • The Court held / found
  • That the price of the warranty was included in
    the sale price of the purchased product.
    However, the court had trouble determining which
    product was the tying product.
  • That the warranty was only one of several ways to
    obtain service
  • An illegal tying arrangement will exist only if
    purchasing the two items together is the only
    viable economic option. No proof was presented
    on this issue (e.g. cost and frequency of
    required repairs).

77 F.3d 1109 (8th Cir. 1996)
22
Void Warranty Cases
  • Virginia Panel Corp. v. Mac Panel Co.
  • VP notified its customers that warranty service
    would not be provided for VP products used with
    non-VP components
  • The Court held
  • Threats to cut off warranty service do not
    constitute tying because the purchaser is not
    deciding whether to buy a product as to existing
    products and as to future sales that it would be
    a matter of contract law between a buyer and a
    seller
  • If the warranty termination resulted from the
    legitimate business purpose of protecting the
    integrity of a product, where it would be
    impossible to determine the cause of damage, then
    the warranty termination would pass a rule of
    reason test (A practice is impermissible only if
    its effect is to restrain competition in a
    relevant market.)

133 F.3d 860 (Fed. Cir. 1997)
23
Clayton Act 3
  • Clayton act is generally inapplicable to warranty
    service
  • Clayton Act generally applies when tying and tied
    goods are products rather than services
  • It is unlawful for any person engaged in commerce
    ... to lease or make a sale or contract for sale
    of goods, wares, merchandise, machinery,
    supplies, or other commodities, for use,
    consumption, or resale on the condition,
    agreement, or understanding that the lessee or
    purchaser thereof shall not use or deal in the
    goods, supplies, or other commodities of a
    competitor , where the effect may be to
    substantially lessen competition or tend to
    create a monopoly in any line of commerce.

24
Rule of Thumb
  • The general rule is that in order for a warranty
    claim to be in jeopardy, the items installed must
    actually pose a clear threat to the product or
    its systems or have done actual damage to it.

25
Permissible Provisions
  • A warranty need not cover use of replacement
    parts, repairs, or maintenance that are
    inappropriate for a product.
  • For example While necessary maintenance or
    repairs on your Acme Excavator can be performed
    by any company, we recommend that you use only
    authorized Acme dealers. Improper or incorrectly
    performed maintenance or repair voids this
    warranty.

26
Deceptive Use of Non-OEM Parts
  • Typical fact pattern A dealer finds the source
    of a problem and informs the customer that he or
    she must replace a part which would have been
    covered under the products warranty, but because
    the part had been replaced with a non-OEM part it
    will not be covered under that warranty.
  • Result If the use of the non-OEM product was not
    made with the purchasers knowledge, courts often
    award damages against the installer for the
    replacement of the non-OEM part.
  • Consider subrogation if making a customer
    accommodation
  • Some exceptions for repairs made under insurance
    coverage

27
Deceptive Use of Non-OEM Parts
  • In some states the repair invoice must indicate
    the OEM status of parts used

28
Gray / Grey Market Parts
  • Gray Market parts - a trademarked product
    originally designed and manufactured for use in a
    foreign market that is imported for resale in the
    United States without the consent of the owner of
    the trademark

29
Gray / Grey Market
  • Some state laws require sellers of grey market
    goods to post a conspicuous sign at the product's
    point of display and affix to the product or its
    package a conspicuous ticket, label, or tag
    disclosing certain information. The information
    required to be disclosed, if applicable,
    includes
  • 1. The item is not covered by a manufacturer's
    express written warranty valid in the United
    States (however, any implied warranty provided by
    law still exists).
  • 2. The item is not compatible with United States
    electrical currents.
  • Exceptions, however, apply if the reseller
    provides a warranty that meets certain conditions
  • See e.g. Conn. Gen. Stat. 42-210 Cal. Civil
    Code 1797.81.

30
Gray / Grey market Warranty Obligation
  • Rife v. Hitachi Construction Machinery Co., Ltd.,
    et. al - Court Of Appeals of South Carolina held
    no breach of warranty obligation for a Hitachi
    machine designed and manufactured solely for sale
    and use in Japan. Gray market importation was an
    intervening force that could not have been
    reasonably foreseen or anticipated. The gray
    market importation was a superseding cause of
    injuries that relieved HCM from liability.

609 S.E.2d 565 (S.C. Ct. App. 2005)
31
Electronic Signatures
  • Electronic Signatures in Global and National
    Commerce Act ("E-SIGN") (15 U.S.C. 7001 et.
    seq.)
  • Eliminates legal barriers to the use of
    electronic technology to form and sign contracts,
    collect and store documents, and send and receive
    notices and disclosures
  • However, no one can be required to use electronic
    records, signatures, or contracts

32
Electronic Signatures
  • An Electronic signature under E-sign and UETA is
    an electronic sound, symbol or process, attached
    to or logically associated with a contract or
    other record and executed or adopted by a person
    or entity with the intent to sign the record.
  • Legal equivalent of pen and ink signature
  • No contract, signature or record shall be denied
    legal effect solely because it is in electronic
    form
  • Specify choice of law and place of acceptance -
    UETA Acts often have deemed location of execution
    and receipt provisions
  • Place of business, if none then residence
    location
  • Closest connection with the transaction

33
Electronic Signatures
  • Laws that require paper disclosures are largely
    superseded by E-sign
  • EXCEPTIONS INCLUDE PRODUCT RECALLS / material
    failures AND REPOSSESSIONS and foreclosures
  • UCC transactions except sales and leases
  • Certain state Uniform Electronic Transactions Acts

34
Electronic Signatures
  • Consent to conduct an electronic transaction is
    generally required and can be inferred from the
    context and circumstances, including the parties
    conduct
  • CONSUMER CONSENT to E-transactions is generally
    required!! In addition, disclosures must be made
    to consumers
  • Consumer transactions are personal, family and
    household in nature
  • Documents can be electronically notarized
  • IDENTITY THEFT STATUTES!!!
  • Security standards
  • Breach of security notifications
  • Penalties
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)