Title: Matching of Fixed Order and Resummed Calculation in pQCD
1Matching of Fixed Order and Resummed Calculation
in pQCD
- Doktorandenseminar
- ETHZ/UZH
- Gionata Luisoni
- 13.09.2007
2Outline
- Motivation The example of 3-jet observable in
ee- annihilation. - Two complementary ways to compute cross
sections - Fixed order calculations,
- Resummed calculations.
- Matching
- R-matching scheme,
- Log(R)-matching scheme,
- Modifications of the matching schemes.
- Conclusions and Outlook.
3Motivation The example of 3-Jet Observables in
ee- Annihilation
- Phenomenologically very important
- Three-jet events at PETRA first evidence for
gluon - Determination of the QCD coupling constant
- Measured very precisely at LEP
- Error in the determination of ?S comes mainly
from theoretical uncertainty. - NLO calculation Ellis, Ross, Terrano, Kunszt,
Nason, Giele, Glover, Catani, Seymour - NLL resummation Catani, Turnock, Webber,
Trentadue
Up to now
43-Jet Observable in ee- Annihilation
- First NNLO results are becoming available
Gehrmann-De Ridder, Gehrmann, Glover,
Heinrich arXiv0707.1285v1 hep-ph
arXiv0709.1608v1hep-ph
5Two ways for computing cross sections
Why?
To understand this we consider first fixed order
calculations.
6Fixed Order Calculation
- Fundamental assumption in pQCD the strong
coupling ?S is small enough to permit to compute
things as a perturbation expansion in it
- Cross sections computed by making an expansion in
the strong coupling
7Fixed Order Calculation
- Each coefficient function contains powers of
- Cross section computed by making an expansion in
the strong coupling
8Fixed Order Calculation
- Cross section computed by making an expansion in
the strong coupling
Contribution becomes smaller
- If L is not large sum line by line!
9Fixed Order Calculation
- But
- In region where y ! 0
- For IR-safe observables the limit is finite,
nevertheless the coefficient functions becomes
large, spoiling the convergence of the series
expansion.
Need to find another way to compute things in
this region
10Example Thrust
- Fixed order coefficients
- LO known analytically
- NLO NNLO known numerically
11Fixed Order Calculation
- Consider cumulative cross section
- then
- and
12Resummed Calculation
- In region where y ! 0 main contribution comes
from highest powers of logarithms. - Need to find a way to consider the different
contributions in order of numerical magnitude.
13Resummed Calculation
- Resum highest powers of the logarithms to all
orders in perturbation theory
Leading logarithms LL
Next-to-Leading logarithms NLL
14Resummed Calculation
- For suitable observables the sum over LL and NLL,
leads to exponentiation
Logarithmic part
Remainder function as
15Resummed Calculation
- For suitable observables the sum over LL and NLL,
leads to exponentiation - The functions in the exponent can be expanded
16Two complementary ways for computing cross
sections
Need to match them!
17Matching
- Different possibilities
- The naïve way
- R-Matching Scheme
- Log(R)-Matching Scheme
18Matching the naïve way
- Choose function
- then
- Uncertainty due to the choice of function makes
this procedure unreliable.
19Matching R- Matching Scheme
- In region where L is small, reexpand resummed
result - The coefficient (Ri(y)di(y)) have to be equal to
the fixed order expansion
20Matching R- Matching Scheme
- At NNLO/NNLL, matched result can then be written
as - For y ! ymax fixed order result is dominant.
- For y ! 0 resummed result is dominant.
- Disadvantage
- Need to know the coefficients G31, C2 and C3
which cannot be determined analytically.
as
21Matching Log(R)-Matching Scheme
- Consider again
- Taking the logarithm on both sides and expanding
22- Comparison of the matching schemes at NLO/NLL
Example Thrust
Log(R)-matching
R-matching
Resummed result
23Modifications of the Matching Schemes
- Modifications in region
- As in fixed order results
-
- Renormalization scale dependence
- Up to now we have not considered the dependence
on the renormalization scheme - Dependence on the resummed logarithm
- Choice of the logarithms to be resummed is
arbitrary.
R.W.L.Jones, M.Ford, G.P.Salam, H.Stenzel,
D.Wicke
24- Comparison of the matching schemes at NLO/NLL
Example Thrust
Modified Log(R)-matching
Modified R-matching
Unmodified Log(R)-matching
25Conclusions and Outlook
Resummed calculations
- Matching two schemes
- R-matching scheme
- Log(R)-matching scheme
- Precise determination of NNLO resummed
coefficient, - Matching of NNLO and NLL calculation,
- NNLO/NLL matching for improving the determination
of ?S (in collaboration with G. Dissertori , H.
Stenzel and ALEPH).
26Backup Slides
27Thrust
28Thrust
29Thrust
- Exponentiated functions
- where
30Thrust
- Expanding them in the coefficients one
finds
31Matching R- Matching Scheme
- This leads to the following equality between
fixed order and resummed calculation - Can find unknown coefficient by fitting numerical
result
32- Modification in region
- Cross section has to vanish in the multijet
region in perturbative calculations only a
finite number (very few) of final state particles
is considered. - This means putting the following conditions
- Log(R)-matching scheme
- R-matching scheme
33- Renormalization scale dependence
- In pQCD coupling runs
- Cross section can not depend on renormalization
scale ? up to higher orders in perturbation
theory. - Thus, every second or higher order coefficient
acquires an explicit dependence on ?.
34- Renormalization scale dependence
- Fixed order coefficient functions
- Resummation coefficient
35- Renormalization scale dependence
- Exponentiated functions
36- Dependence on the resummed logarithm
- It is not clear whether powers of ?Slog(1/y) or
powers of ?Slog(2/y) have to be resummed. - Can express arbitrariness by introducing a
constant xL which rescales the resummed logs - This leads to further redefinitions of the
resummation coefficients Gij and Ci, and the
exponentiated functions gi(?SL).
37- Dependence on the resummed logarithm
- Resummation coefficients Gij
- Exponentiated functions
38- Dependence on the resummed logarithm
- Resummation coefficients Ci
39- Renormalization scale dependence
Example Thrust
Modified Log(R)-matching
NLO fixed order
Comparison between Log(R)-matching scheme
prediction for ?0.211 GeV and ?QMZ0 and NLO
fixed order prediction for ?0.100 GeV and
?20.0012 Q2 (QMZ0).
40- Resummed logarithms dependence
Example Thrust
Modified Log(R)-matching xL1
Modified Log(R)-matching xL2
Thrust distribution in the Log(R)-matching
scheme. The solid curve shows the prediction for
xL2, the dotted curve the prediction for xL1.
41- Modification in region
- For Log(R)-matching scheme constraints are
fulfilled by substituting - For R-matching scheme a further substitution is
needed