Title: MedicallyUnexplained Symptoms in CSA Survivors
1Medically-Unexplained Symptoms in CSA Survivors
- Dr Sarah Nelson
- Dr Julie Taylor
- Prof Norma Baldwin
- University of Dundee
2MUS in Sexual Abuse Survivors
- A review of the research literature on MUS in
people with sexual abuse histories and mental
health symptoms - National Programme for Improving Mental Health
and Wellbeing Small Projects Initiative 2006
3MUS in Sexual Abuse SurvivorsWider health
issues in CSA
- Injuries and infections from the assaults
themselves - Effects of pregnancy, abortions etc at early age
- Escaping abuse many risks to health on streets
- Physical health effects of psychol. effects, e.g.
eating disorders, depression, self-injury
4MUS in Sexual Abuse Survivors Wider health
issues in CSA 2
- Effects of misusing drink/drugs to cope with
trauma - Fear and avoidance of health dental checks
- Side-effects of prolonged psychiatric medication
- Survivors at higher risk for medically-explained
conditions like diabetes, heart disease
5MUS in Sexual Abuse Survivors Main types of MUS
- Irritable bowel syndrome other GI complaints
- Chronic pelvic pain/severe premenstrual pain
- Fibromyalgia other chronic pain
- Respiratory conditions, wheezing, throat problems
- Non-epileptic seizures
- Chronic fatigue
- Symptoms across several organ systems
6MUS in Sexual Abuse Survivors Aims of the study
- To find out how CSA survivors with MUS and mental
health issues have been identified and sampled
the key findings of research literature
theories used to explain inter-connections any
interventions and treatments for the CSA group
gaps in knowledge or understanding which require
further research - And to make recommendations!
7MUS in Sexual Abuse Survivors Methodology of the
review
- Electronic searches of medical, psychiatric and
social work databases from 1990 quantitative or
qualitative studies - Studies had to refer to CSA, MUS and mental
health issues - Included review and discussion papers for theory
section - Hand searches plus SNs prior knowledge of issue
- Consultation with experts
8MUS in Sexual Abuse Survivors Key review
findings
- 96 studies retrieved 27 reviews or discussion
papers overwhelmingly a medical literature - Main recruitment was from tertiary care clinics
- CSA survivors were main focus in only 9 studies
instead, people with certain symptoms were main
focus - Only three qualitative studies and three on
males only one intervention identified for this
specific group - Most researchers were medical specialists not
experts in CSA few collaborations with CSA
services or support agencies
9MUS in Sexual Abuse Survivors Key review
findings 2
- Most papers confirm people with CSA are at higher
risk for MUS, especially for GI and chronic pain - The more serious the abuse, more serious the
impact on MUS, disability, sick days and
healthcare use - Childhood physical abuse and adult physical
assaults also significant influences on MUS - Recomms. for general good practice include
detailed history-taking, respectful listening,
referral for psychol therapy.
10MUS in Sexual Abuse Survivors Theories of the
links
- Somatisation emotional stress translates into
bodily symptoms - Severe trauma causes changes in central nervous
system increasing vulnerability to pain and
infections (neurobiol. research) - Dissociative re-enactments and body memories
occur
11MUS in Sexual Abuse Survivors Theories of the
links 2
- Depression/anxiety lead people to amplify their
physical symptoms - Injury and infection through assaults directly
influence symptoms, especially chronic pain
12MUS and Sexual Abuse Survivors Problems of
existing research
-
- An overriding concern with testing which risk
factors contribute to which outcomes has produced
a repetitive (and competitive) body of case
control studies, which have failed to identify
helpful interventions for sexually abused people
with MUS
13MUS and Sexual Abuse Survivors Problems of
existing research 2
- Discrete variables used dont match survivors
experience, whose forms of abuse neglect are
often interlinked - Key concept, somatisation problematic poorly
defined - Very little collaboration with specialists in CSA
- Voices of survivors themselves rarely heard
- Lack of ethical safeguards or support for abused
people filling in intrusive questionnaires
14MUS and Sexual Abuse Survivors Problems about
somatisation
- Term is variously defined, or left undefined
- Prone to gender biases - most somatisers
(heartsink patients? ) are women - Ignores other possible explanations plus
possibility that a medical condition may be
inadequately diagnosed - No convincing proof that the process even exists!
15MUS and Sexual Abuse Survivors Recomms for
research
- CSA survivors must be primary focus of research
- Needs to be geared to exploring causes and
relieving suffering - Needs open mind, free of value judgments re.
somatisation - Medical specialists need to collaborate with CSA
specialists in design and interpretation of
studies
16MUS and Sexual Abuse Survivors Recomms for
research 2
- Need qualitative research with adult survivors
with MUS, to explore health history, abuse
history, experiences of health system, and
interconnections - Studies of male survivors with MUS
- Case histories, exploring medical records and
attitudes of clinicians
17MUS and Sexual Abuse Survivors Recomms for
research 3
- Research into direct physical effects of violence
and injury, and into body memories, including
collaboration with torture research experts - Collaborative research with vol. sector support
agencies - Prospective studies with children young people
whose abuse has been documented
18MUS and Sexual Abuse Survivors What can new
research achieve?
- Would help in design of good-practice interview
schedules for MUS patients - Would increase respect and dignity of CSA
survivors - Would inform design of therapeutic interventions
which could be piloted and evaluated - Would increase informed knowledge, understanding
of causes, and long-term research collaboration
19MUS and Sexual Abuse Survivors