WJTSC 082 Master Issue Deck

1
WJTSC 08-2Master Issue Deck
Pre Conference as of 2 Sep 08
2
Note

• To streamline review, discussion, and resolution
  of issues, all open issues have been binned to
  one of five categories
• 1. Exercise issues
• 2. Joint Training Requirements issues
• 3. Joint Individual and Staff Training issues
• 4. Joint Training Assessment and Readiness
  issues
• 5. Interagency issues
• While not all issues are a perfect fit, issues
  were placed in the bin that represented the best
  fit as of the close of the previous WJTSC.
  Issues may be re-binned by the Council of
  Colonels as appropriate.

2
3
Exercise Related

• DOD Participation Challenges in the NEP
• Training and Exercising Combatant Command
  Pandemic Influenza (PI) Plans
• Use of Joint Live Virtual Constructive (JLVC)
  Federation
• Missile Warning / Defense Systems Training
  Capability
• Experimentation Testing (ET) in Joint
  Training
• NUWAX Scheduling and Management
• Scheduling and OPSTEMPO
• National Training Transition Plan
• Prioritization and Deconfliction of Combatant
  Command Exercises

3
4
DOD Participation Challenges in the National
Exercise Program

• Issue 08-003 DOD Participation Challenges in the
  National Exercise Program (NEP)
• Discussion
• a. Combatant command NEP participation
  challenges Combatant command objectives often
  cant be met or are compromised (in Tier I, CJCS
  will provide his objectives and the recommended
  level of combatant command play) lack of
  synchronization across federal spectrum no
  formal DoD process for combatant commands to
  nominate command exercises for the 5-year NEP
  exercise schedule (To be published in the revised
  CEP CJCSI). JS will provide combatant commands
  results of sub-PCC meetings (DONE).
• b. 5-Year scheduling challenges in the NEP No
  fidelity in future years for Tier I, II, or III
  exercises info on state(s) and dates prohibits
  future planning for required funding, resources
  and forces (Jan 31, 2008 NEX scheduling
  conference provided Tier I, II calendar for the
  next two years, but lack specific dates) (Request
  made to DHS for schedule fidelity. Request was
  favorably received)
• Endstate Improved joint training effectiveness
  and efficiency as directed by Chairmans Joint
  Training Guidance. Supported / supporting roles
  IAW Plans / UCP. Staffs build relationships,
  conduct realistic rehearsal with actual
  counterparts.
• POAM
• - Use WJTSC, deconfliction and combatant command
  annual exercise conferences to link multiple
  exercises, taking advantage of NEP to link
  exercises / integrate mission areas to ensure
  regional / mission area coverage (Formal DOD
  exercise calendar input will be outlined in the
  revised CSEP CJCSI)
• - Support the development of a formal process
  within DoD for combatant commands and Services to
  nominate exercises (completeto be discussed at
  Sep WJTSC) for inclusion in 5-year NEP Calendar
  for Tier II and III exercises and determine level
  of participation in NEP Tier I Exercises (will be
  addressed in CSEP CJCS I)
• OPR JS J7 JETD OCRs DHS, USNORTHCOM

SEP 08 JUN 09
MAR 08
APR 08
SEP 08
SEP 08
DOD Process Completed/Approved
Combatant commands involved In 5-yr NEP calendar
NLE TIER I Details approved FY09-13
Brief Issue WJTSC 08-01
NEXS Conf and 5-year schedule to DC and approved
4
5
Training and Exercising Combatant Command
Pandemic Influenza (PI) Plans

• Issue 07- 002 No synchronization of effort
  among Combatant Commands in developing PI
  training/exercises
• Discussion CONPLAN 3551 reflects biennial
  (every two years) training for Combatant
  Commands, Services, and the NGB. DOD Agencies
  should develop their own PI exercise schedule.
  
• Planning Endstate Combatant Command, Military
  Service and DOD Agency plans are synchronized
  with the Global CONPLAN.
• POAM
• Cross-Combatant Command exercise after plans
  developed to work plans/seams in order to synch
  efforts
• Share Combatant Commands PI experience send
  observers to other Combatant Commands planning
  conferences and exercise executions
• Suspense for PI Plans
• 15 Jan 08 GCCs (Completed)
• 15 Apr 08 FCCs (Completed)
• 15 Apr 08 Services (Completed)
• NOTE USAFRICOM and USSOCOM exempt
• OPR USNORTHCOM OCR JS J7 JETD

. . .
DEC 06
AUG 07
SEP 07
MAR 07
MAR 08
AUG 06
FY 2011
USNORTHCOM Supported Command for DOD Global
Synchronization for PI
Began development of Global Synchronization PI
CONPLAN
Briefed Issue at WJTSC 07-1
Global Sync PI CONPLAN published with exercise
guidance
NEP Tier II PI Exercise
WJTSC 07-2 Global PI Update
Tri-National Conf 15-16 Jul 08 _at_ USNORTHCOM
6
Use of Joint Live Virtual Constructive (JLVC)
Federation

• Issue 07-014 The Joint Live Virtual Constructive
  (JLVC) Federation provides the most realistic
  environment to align joint training with
  combatant commander assigned missions,
  requirements and constraints. The JLVC federation
  is comprised of both Joint and Service
  simulations and tools.
• Discussion Current funding provides Joint
  Theater Level Simulation (JTLS) as the standard
  suite to support the Combatant Command Joint
  Exercise Program (JEP), however, JTLS lacks the
  capability to model high fidelity strategic to
  tactical operations. This training shortfall was
  noted in the Joint Staffs Training Capabilities
  Analysis of Alternatives (TC AoA) Gaps 1-22.
  JLVC addresses these gaps. Using the JLVC
  federation is an option contingent upon
  additional Combatant Commander funding for event
  integration (CE2) as well as additional USJFCOM
  Training Transformation (T2) funding for JLVC
  development. Recent cuts to T2 RDTE need to be
  addressed to provide sustained integration and
  development funding streams.
• Endstate Tailored / packaged use of JLVC in
  combatant command exercises to meet specific
  training objectives.
• POAM Combatant Commands provide details on
  which exercise(s) are most enhanced with the use
  of JLVC. CE2 SLT allocates funding for JWFC
  support (including JLVC) in accordance with CE2
  business rules/processes. CE2 addresses only JLVC
  integration/support for combatant command events
  but not development of JLVC technical
  enhancements in demand by combatant command
  stakeholders.
• OPRs JS J7 JETD, USJFCOM OCRs Combatant
  Commands

SEP 07
MAR 08
APR 08
NOV 07
SEP 08
CE2 SLT discuss requirement
USTRANSCOM FY09/10 CE2 PRD emphasizes requirement.
FY09 PEP Finalized
JLVC reqts discussed at WJTSC working groups
CE2 FY09 PBRs submitted, adjudicated
6
Update at WJTSC 08-2
7
Missile Warning / Defense Systems Training
Capability
Issue 07-017 Combatant commanders require a
distributed, integrated, synthetic Missile
Warning (MW) and Missile Defense (BMD) training
and exercise system using real world system
capabilities, scenarios and players. Discussion
a. Independent simulated MW and BMD training
architectural development between the United
States Joint Forces Command (USJFCOM), Joint
National Training Capability (JNTC), Missile
Defense Agencies (MDA) Distributed Multi-Echelon
Training System (DMETS), and the MW community has
resulted in duplication of synthetic missile
exercise and training requirements for Combatant
Commands, Components, and Services. b. Currently
the synthetic MW/BMD training environment does
not integrate or support multi-tiered mission
sets involving elements/units operating at all
tiers within the training architecture. c.
There is a need for a comprehensive combined MW
and BMD training system architecture that can
provide effective and efficient training for all
Tiers during unit or joint training exercises.  
Endstate A combined MW and BMD modeling and
simulation training architecture that provides
a "plug and play" capability facilitating growth
and dynamic equipment reconfigurations to
simulate any/all elements, reduces stand alone
training systems / artificial work-arounds, decrea
ses costs associated with employing and
sustaining multiple training platforms, and
presents an accurate combined MW/MD operational
picture on the operational systems.  POAM
USJFCOM, in partnership with USSTRATCOM develop
MW/BMD Joint Training and align Service enabled
development of training with combatant command
mission training and exercise support
requirements. Concurrently, USJFCOM in close
coordination with USSTRATCOM, MDA and the
Combatant Commands, develop a requirements based
integrated and federated MW/BMD synthetic
training environment interoperable at all tiers.
OPR USSTRATCOM (training) USJFCOM
(simulations) OCRs MDA, Combatant Commands
DEC 07
MAR 08
OCT 07
APR 08
SEP 08
7
Integrated Trng WG meets _at_Offutt AFB
USSTRATCOM provide update at WJTSC 08-1
BMD WF Conf and JFCOM Conf
ITWG meets _at_CO Springs
Update at WJTSC 08-2
8
Experimentation Testing (ET) in Joint Training
Issue 04-003 Lack of common DoD-wide process for
incorporation of ET into joint training.
Discussion DOTE engages multiple combatant
commands to search for venues. Short-notice
insertions disruptive to exercise planning. OSD
seeking to more effectively enable test activity
with joint context and reduce possible impact to
training audience. USJFCOM requires training
environment to assess capabilities such as DJC2,
SJFHQ. Joint context and resource limitations
require test and prototyping activity in
training. USJFCOM developed a manual for
integrating ET into USJFCOM sponsored and
supported training. Endstate Common policy and
supporting tools for incorporating ET activity
in training POAM Initial effort to develop
CJCSM 3500-series publication put on hold pending
OSD(PR) analysis of need to develop as a DoD
publication. OPRs OSD (PR) and USJFCOM J7
OCRs OSD (DOTE, ATL), JS J7 JETCD, JS J7 JETD,
USJFCOM J9, Combatant Commands, CSAs, Services
TBD
SEP 08
OCT 06
MAR 08
MAR 07
SEP 07
JUL 07
JAN 07
Technical interchange JETCD, JEXD, JTD, JFCOM J9
Combatant command feedback provided (JSAP
00377-06)
PAT informal feedback on draft CJCSM adjudicated
OSD update at WJTSC 08-2
JETA process briefed to Exercise Synch WG _at_WJTSC
07-1
PAT update at WJTSC 07-2
PAT review of proposed DoD-wide process.
8
9
Nuclear Weapons Accident Incident Exercise
(NUWAIX) Scheduling Management
Issue 08- 002 Control of NUWAIX Joint Event Life
Cycle and exercise budget should go to the
responsible Combatant Commander Discussion IAW
DOD Directive 3150.8, DOD Response to
Radiological Accidents, dated 13 Jun 1996,
Geographical Combatant Commanders (GCCs) shall
plan for, establish, maintain, and exercise
Response Task Forces (RTFs) to manage actions
required to respond to a radiological accident.
Furthermore, each responsible GCC shall conduct
an RTF exercise at least once each year. The
scope and duration of the exercise will be
determined by the sponsoring command. Currently,
the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Nuclear,
Chemical and Biological Defense Programs
(ASD(NCB)) conducts oversight of DODs response
capabilities by managing DODs national-level
exercise program the Defense Threat Reduction
Agency (DTRA) serves as the DOD lead for
coordinating DOD radiological accident response
planning, training and national-level exercises
with other Federal agencies and the Services
train and equip RTF forces to respond to
radiological accidents. CDR USNORTHCOM position
is that NUWAIXs need to be recognized as part of
the National Exercise Program (NEP) to ensure
full Interagency integration, and intends for
USNORTHCOM to be the lead in the planning and
execution of all NUWAIXs conducted in his
AOR. Endstate Policy is developed by ASD(NCB),
DTRA provides the responsible GCC technical
assistance with exercise design and control, and
the Services continue to train, equip and
exercise RTFs once per year as prescribed. The
responsible GCC has overall lead for the
scheduling, design and control of NUWAIXs in the
respective AOR. POAM USNORTHCOM receives an
appropriate portion of annual DOD NUWAIX budget
Services properly POM for their Title 10
responsibilities DTRA retains funding for NUWAIX
technical aspects in support of GCC exercise
requirements. DODI is being rewritten and OSD has
decided the funding will not transfer. OPR
USD(ATL) OCRs JS J7, USNORTHCOM
OCT 08
AUG 08
DEC 08
NOV 09
JAN 09 OCT 09
Approve Concept
Transfer Funds from DTRA to USNORTHCOM for
Vigilant Shield 10 NUWAIX
Vigilant Shield 10 Concept Work Group
Vigilant Shield 10 JELC with NUWAIX planning
embedded
Vigilant Shield 10 with NUWAIX (Naval Region
Southeast)
9
10
Exercise Scheduling and OPSTEMPO
Issue 08-007 Scheduling resources to support
combatant command events is challenging given
daily OPSTEMPO, personnel, fiscal, and time
constraints and multiple events executing during
the same period. Discussion Individual combatant
command exercises are planned and scheduled
without fully understanding the impact on
required supporting capabilities (i.e. airlift
assets, M S supporting systems, direct
personnel augmentation, JWFC support, etc).
Additionally, there is neither a mechanism to
deconflict between competing combatant
command/Service exercises, nor one to deconflict
with known operational surge periods that further
tax the same resources. No single scheduling
authority exists and individual exercises are
planned presuming they will be supported. USJFCOM
will have challenges supporting combatant
commands with appropriate resources to the level
required unless combatant commands are able to
move events or de-conflict requirements.
Endstate Exercise scheduling is synchronized
between Combatant Commanders taking into account
real-world constraints and demands/costs of
supporting JEP events. Combatant Commanders
Exercise Engagement (CE2) forum recognizes and
forwards solution for a deconfliction authority
with informed visibility of real-world operations
as well as joint and service exercise
requirements. This deconfliction authority will
be empowered to enforce calendar synchronization
across the joint training enterprise. USJFCOM
will provide best possible support based on
requirements and priorities. POAM Combatant
Commands review schedules and discuss with their
leadership and advise USJFCOM on their desires by
30 April 08 for FY09 issues and next WJTSC for
FY10 issues and CE2 Stakeholder Leadership Team
(SLT) should determine the proper course of
action for implementation of a coordinating
authority for resource deconfliction. OPRs
Combatant commands OCRs USJFCOM, USTRANSCOM
APR 08
SEP 08
MAR 08
Reviewed at WTJSC 08-1
Combatant Command input to USJFCOM
Update at WTJSC 08-2
10
11
National Transition Training Plan
Submitted by USNORTHCOM
Issue 08- 011 The National Exercise Program
(NEP) establishes a Transition Training Program
which implements key elements in the Federal
Interagency Heightened Alert Concept Plan
associated with a Period of Heightened Alert
(POHA) Discussion The Transition Training
Program is a quadrennial Presidential election
year cycle of NEP events designed to introduce
new and transitioning Principals of departments
and agencies and other key officials to existing
policies, plans, and capabilities, as well as
possible to identify potential shortfalls, based
on strategic estimates of threat and risk. It is
a series of briefings, seminars and exercises for
transitioning senior officials on USG policies
plans and capabilities for incident management
and crisis coordination. One goal of the
Transition Training Program is to motivate
intense, early interaction between principals of
departments and agencies and their emergency
program staffs (i.e. Ops Centers) that provide
them support within their organizations. The
Federal Interagency POHA Concept Plan is in final
coordination and represents a Federal Strategic
Plan for maintaining operational continuity
during the upcoming 2008-2009 Transition period.
The NEP Transition Training Program supports this
Concept Plan. No additional funding requirements
are expected other than those associated with
CEP/JEP exercises Endstate The culmination of
the NEP Transition Training Program is a capstone
NEP Tier I Exercise in July 2009 which will serve
as an immersive experience for the senior
officials. An expected outcome of the program is
senior-level questioning of both internal and
interagency processes. POAM As outlined
below. Status New Issue. OPRs
DHS-FEMA-National Exercise Division Federal
Departments Agencies JS/J7
NOV JUN 08
APR - JUN 09
AUG 08
JAN 09
AUG 08
JUL 09
DRG Publish Strategic Exercise Guidance POHA
Begins
DHS-FEMA-NED National Level Exercise (NLE 09)
Concept Objectives Conference
D/A ensures training on Roles Responsibilities
Key Decision Criteria
Inauguration New Administration Nominations
Principal Level Exercises (PLEs)
POHA Ends NLE 09 Execution
11
12
Prioritization and De-confliction Of Combatant
Command Exercises
Submitted by USAF
Issue 08-014 No overall Synchronizing
authority to prioritize and re-conflict combatant
command Exercises Discussion Limited Service
resources (forces, funding, exercise support)
preclude the ability to support all combatant
command exercises, particularly JCS-sponsored.
Authority must be given to an agency that can
synchronize all combatant command exercises into
one prioritized list that the Services can use to
guide resource allocation. Without a list, the
Services will simply rack and stack based on
their own priorities. De-confliction of
exercises is linked to this as well. In the
past, major combatant command exercises (ex.
Terminal Fury, Foal Eagle, Austere Challenge)
have occurred back to back, limiting the
services ability to support. In the future,
exercises must be spaced further apart, moved, or
cancelled. De-confliction decisions of this
nature should be based on guidance. The
prioritized list of exercises can serve as that
guidance. And decisions based on that guidance
executed by the appointed synchronizing
authority. Recommend OSD/JS set the policy and
USJFCOM as the Joint Trainer be appointed
synchronizing authority. Endstate. OSD/JS
appoints USJFCOM as synchronizer of
JCS-sponsored combatant command exercises with a
charter to vet and produce a prioritized list of
JCS-sponsored combatant command exercises and a
fully de-conflicted JCS-sponsored combatant
command exercise schedule. OSD/JS publishes a
prioritized list of JCS-sponsored combatant
command exercises in the Programs Goals and
Objectives guidance as well as the Program
Execution Plan each fiscal year. POAM CE2 SLT
conduct review at WJTSC 08-2 and provide initial
recommendations to Tri-chair during WJTSC 08-2.
Status New Issue. OPR HQ USAF/A3O-AT OCRs
Combatant Commands, Services, OSD(PR)
SEP 08
CE2 SLT review and provide initial recommendation
to Tri-chair
12
13
Joint Training Requirements

• USJFCOM Development of JTF Training Programs,
  Standards, and JMETL
• Combatant Commander Requires Joint Evaluation
  Team
• Joint National Training Capability Governance
• Joint Training Enterprise RTDE Cuts
• GEF Driven Analysis of CE2 Requirements
• Bronze Arrow Funding

13
14
USJFCOM Development of JTF HQ Training Programs,
Standards, and JMETL
Issue 07-016 Update on status and milestones
for USJFCOM efforts to lead the collaborative
efforts for developing JTF HQ training programs /
standards and JMETL conditions and
standards. Discussion CJCSI 3500.1E, Joint
Staff Joint Training Policy and Guidance (JTPG),
dated 31 May 2008 tasks USJFCOM to lead
collaborative development of joint training
programs, processes, and standards and baseline
JMETL conditions and standards for JTF HQ.
(CJCSI 3500.1E ENCL E, para 6.j) Endstate
USJFCOM provide update of progress to date and
future milestones. POAM USJFCOM provide
update of progress to date and future milestones.
OPR/OCR USJFCOM
TBD 08
JTF HQ CONOPS published. Currently pending
adjudication of critical comments
14
14
15
CCDR Requires Joint Evaluation Team

• Issue 07-015 Combatant Commander requires a
  joint evaluation team that can measure Joint Task
  Force (JTF) performance to standard
• Discussion
• Combatant Commanders (CCDRs) are responsible
  for certifying the readiness of HQ staffs to
  serve as JTF-capable HQ. A key element of this
  task is to measure the capability of the HQ staff
  (during a culminating exercise) relative to
  standards. The culminating exercise comes at the
  conclusion of a detailed joint and multinational
  training regimen for the JTF.
• USPACOM requires a qualified team to observe
  and evaluate to standard, provide feedback both
  to the JTF Commander and CCDR, and to provide
  documentation on JTF performance to assist
  individual JTF and theater program improvements.
• Joint Training System (JTS) philosophy and
  execution have matured to where training
  audiences need critical insight and clearly
  documented feedback of what they did right and
  what areas require improvement.
• USJFCOM JWFC DTT states these requirements are
  outside their charter.
• Endstate Qualified joint evaluation team
  available to assist in JTF Certification.
• POAM
• Adjust JWFC DTT support to better address CCDR
  requirements for evaluating JTF HQ performance to
  standard in support of JTF certification or
• Provide CCDRs with the resources to establish
  and maintain this evaluation capability within
  theater.
• OPR USPACOM OCR USJFCOM

SEP 07
APR 08
SEP 08
CE2 SLT discussed requirement
Review issue after PACOM certification event
Review with respect to CE2 PDM III Certification
funding allocations
15
16
Joint National Training Capability (JNTC)
Governance
Issue 08-006 Combatant commands have very
limited means to influence decision making within
the JNTC Governance Model Discussion OSD, RTPP
is leading a review to discuss business rules for
CE2T2. Endstate OSD RTPP will distribute
business rules. POAM OSD, RTPP will take the
lead in publishing CE2T2 business rules. OPR
OSD, RTPP OCRs Combatant commands, Joint
Staff J7, and the Services
SEP 08
OCT 08
FY09
OSD, RTPP Distributes business rules
OSD, RTPP conducts review
16
17
Joint Training EnterpriseRDTE Cuts
Submitted by USJFCOM

• Issue 08-013 The Joint Training Enterprise must
  cut 11.8M from specific FY08 programs to meet
  approved POM 10 funding levels.
• Discussion The directed 31 cut in RDTE
  (11.8M) from FY08 to FY10 will have a major
  impact on the Joint Training Enterprise
  Increased costs to Services and combatant
  commands to execute training Reduction in
  critical capability to support Irregular Warfare
  research and development and, Reduction in
  training capability.
• Endstate Training risk to the Force minimized,
  no mission essential tasks eliminated, schedule
  flexibility optimized, and cost/benefit to the
  Joint Training Enterprise evaluated.
• POAM Combatant Commands evaluate impact and
  develop contingency plans, as required.
• Status New Issue.
• OPRs OSD, USJFCOM OCRs Combatant Commands

15/16 APR 08
24 APR 08
28 APR 08
JAN 08
APR 08
5 JUN 08
SEP 08
SAG Recommended POM 10 Funding Released
JNTC POM 10 Development
OSD RDTE POM 10 Brief
RDTE Budget Cut Impact Brief to MG Kamiya, J7
USJFCOM
J7 USJFCOM Briefs OSD on RDTE Funding Importance
RDTE Budget Cut Impact Brief to WJTSC 08-2
17
18
GEF-Driven Analysis of CE2 Requirements
Submitted by JSJ7
Issue 08-015 GEF-Driven (CCDR Theater Campaign
Plan) Analysis of CE2 Funding Requirements Discuss
ion The "buying power" of CE2T2 POM funding is
eroding based on prevailing economic trends for
the costs of fuel, directly influencing strategic
lift (air, sea, surface) and commercial
ticketing. With OSD guidance to stay within
CE2T2 and not seek additional resources, the POM
forecast presents a relatively "flat" picture
considering the stand-up of USAFRICOM only
provided an additional 4.5M/year to CE2
(combatant command HQ support). Guided by the
GEF, CCDRs must determine what is the baseline
level of performance against their Theater
Campaign/Engagement Plans as reflected in their
Joint Training Plans and overall exercise and
training programs. CE2T2 funds are allocated
based on historical funding rates, versus a
bottom-up review of baseline requirements. Under
zero-growth, stakeholders are reluctant to
prioritize their requirements across the
enterprise (all stakeholders), as any increase
will result in another command's
decrease. Endstate Enterprise bottom-up review
of combatant command baseline requirements for
JETP, SIF, combatant command HQ Support, JWFC
Support, and JTF/FC HQ Certification, resulting
in a more accurate assessment of CCDRs' ability
to execute their programs. Results of analysis
could be used to rebalance CE2 allocations in
accordance with the GEF. POAM CE2 SLT conduct
baseline review and develop recommendations to
the T2 SAG. Status New Issue. OPR JS J-7
JETD OCRs Combatant Commands, Services,
OSD(PR)
MAR-MAY 09
SEP 08
DEC 08
TBD 09
AUG 08
Joint Training Plans reflect GEF/TCP priorities
by exercise/activity
Issue presented at WJTSC 08-2
IPR at CE2 SLT quarterly meeting
Issue and data call initiated
Present results and recommendations to T2 SAG
18
19
BRONZE ARROW Funding
Submitted by JSJ7
Issue 08-016 Distribution of BRONZE ARROW
funding within the Joint Exercise Transportation
Program (JETP) budget Discussion In FY08 funds
were removed from three dedicated sub-programs
within JETP Bronze Arrow (BA), Strategic Airdrop
(SAD), Maritime Prepositioning Forces (MPF) and
integrated into combatant command strategic lift
budgets. The Mar 2004 version of CJCSI 3511.01
dedicated funds for these programs, but the Oct
2007 revision removed specific funding amounts
but kept the sub-program descriptions. FY08 and
beyond has no money set aside for these
programscombatant commands have the full amount
of the JETP budget. combatant commands are in
agreement to fund SOF movement and participation
within theater, but cannot afford to fund the
long haul into theater. In order to re-establish
sub-program funding, combatant command budgets
must be reduced and funds fenced for SOCOM.
Initial discussion by the SLT at WJTSC 07-2
indicated overwhelming agreement to maintain the
current funding plan. USSOCOM J-33 re-addressed
the issue with JS DJ7. A temporary solution was
reached for an individual exercise in FY08. FY09
combatant command stratlift allocations remain
unresolved. Endstate Resolution of JETP
allocations to combatant commands. Three issues
must be resolved 1. whether to reinstate funding
for special sub-programs, 2. determine method for
reduction of JETP budgets (from the top line or
targeted by combatant command use), 3. identify
the appropriate amount (full requirement or
historical funding levels) POAM CE2 SLT will
discuss during WJTSC 08-2 quarterly SLT meeting
and develop recommendation for the Tri-chair to
be presented at the next Senior Advisory Group
(SAG). Status New Issue. OPR JS J-7 JETD
OCRs Combatant Commands, OSD(PR)
SEP 07
SEP 08
Aug 08
TBD
Issue presented at WJTSC 07-2
VTC with SLT
Present to SAG
Discuss at WJTSC 08-2
20
Joint Individual and Staff Training

• TCAoA Alternative 5
• Immersive Learning Environments (ILES)
• EJPME Cornerstone
• JC2 Management

20
21
TC AoA Alternative 5
Issue 06-004 Combatant commands lack support to
adequately meet individuals / staffs and JTF and
functional component HQ staff joint training
requirements. Discussion Combatant commands
identified requirement to source an organic
training and exercise capability in order to
conduct and manage combatant command specific
training, identify combatant command
individual/collective training requirements and
track and manage individual/staff joint training
and readiness. Joint Training Facilitator
Specialist (JTFS) support provided via TC AoA Alt
5 to the combatant commands (one each initially).
Council of Colonels (COC) unanimous decision to
provide additional contracted support (total of 3
JTFS) to each combatant command, except USJFCOM.
Combatant commands use JTFS to refine JKDDC
development and USJFCOM development of innovative
lightweight simulations and immersive story
driven training to resolve TC AOA gaps in JTP
identified training requirements and existing
collective and individual capabilities.
Centralized development of combatant command
specific modules at USJFCOM can adequately
capture unique requirements that support a formal
individual training program. Combatant Command
submissions to JKDDC should address joint billet
specific individual AO training as well as joint
education. Endstate Combatant commands fully
resourced (personnel and tools) to support
individual/staff training. POAM JS J7 support
combatant command JTFS requirements. USJFCOM
deliver initial use cases for Alt 5 tools. OPRs
USJFCOM, OSD(PR) OCR JS J-7 JETD
AUG 07
SEP 06
FY 08
DEC 06
SEP 07
USJFCOM solicit combatant command input on Alt 5
tool use cases At Individual Trng WG _at_WJTSC 07-2
USJFCOM executes Alt 5 tool use cases
FY06 funded Addl Positions (1 per combatant
command)
Delivery Order Issued for addl JTFS
positions. Total 24.
FY07 funding for addl Positions MIPRd to JS J7
21
22
Immersive Learning Environments (ILES)

• Issue 06-021 Requirement for Large Scale Use of
  Online and On Demand Individual and Group
  Training, Mission Planning and Rehearsal
  Capabilities.
• DiscussionILES (OSD funded) meets this shortfall
  by providing an education, training, and mission
  rehearsal capability that supports both DOD and
  Interagency partners in meeting our homeland
  defense requirements. ILES is a flexible,
  on-line, and distributed training and mission
  rehearsal capability that covers the training
  life cycle from beginning to end. USJFCOM and
  USNORTHCOM conducted tests showing ILES can
  significantly shorten the JELC while improving
  knowledge/capability. NORAD and USNORTHCOM and
  JFCOM are hosting the development of an ILES
  prototype this ILES system evolution facilitates
  Joint and Interagency training, mission planning,
  rehearsal, and COA analysis.
• Endstate ILES established as a Joint Program of
  Record (POR) to achieve unity of effort in
  individual/small group training across combatant
  commands, Services, Combat Support Agencies and
  Interagency partners. JKDDC leverages training
  transformation funds to provide a centrally
  managed/decentralized and interdependent executed
  ILES capability, in which ILES may be configured
  by the combatant commands to meet their training
  needs. This approach enables content sharing
  across organizational boundaries and rapidly
  supports and optimizes evolving changes to
  organizational structures, people, processes and
  technologies. JKDDC JMO takes responsibility for
  the JKO web enabled ILES capability, providing
  integration with the JKO Portal to provide a
  generalized small group training capability.
• POAM OSD contract ends Jun 08. JKDDC JMO takes
  responsibility for the JKO web enabled ILES
  capability. Potential ILES introduction to the
  Functional Capabilities Board (FCB) to move it
  forward as a Joint or Service POR.
• OPR USJFCOM OCRs JS J7 USNORTHCOM

SEPT 07 JUN 08
JUN 08
FEB 07
MAY 07
NOV 06
AUG 07
OCT 08
JAN 08
JAN 07
FEB 08
Web enabled ILES supports USNORTHCOMs Ardent
Sentry 09
Testing of ILES in USJFCOM IA Training
Web enabled ILEs contract awarded
N-NC NIPRNet Install
N-NC Spiral 67 Exercises Train the Trainer
Program USJFCOM Spiral 67 Exercises
Functional Testing of ILES in USJFCOM IA Training
ILES Phase IV PMP Approved
N-NC SIPRNet Install
N-NC Spiral 5 Exercise Validation
Functional Testing of ILES in N-NC CMD CTR
Training
22
22
23
Enlisted Joint Professional Military Education
(EJPME) CornerStone

• Issue 08-001 NORAD and USNORTHCOM Enlisted Joint
  Professional Military Education (EJPME) Program.
• Discussion NORAD and USNORTHCOM have continued
  implementation of the EJPME program for all
  enlisted personnel assigned to the Headquarters.
  Program consists of two phases Cornerstone
  (First year - Monthly Assignments and Mentor
  Groups) and Joint Enrichment (Remainder of tour -
  Quarterly Assignments and Mentor Groups). In
  February the program was launched for the nearly
  300 assigned enlisted. Personnel were formed
  into Mentor Groups each led by two Mentors (E7
  and Above). The program is organized by
  Seminars. Seminar 08-1 began in February and has
  completed half of Phase 1. Major enhancements
  since March
• Establishment of External Portal site -
  https//operations.noradnorthcom.mil/sites/nncj7/n
  ncj72/NNCEJPME/default.aspx
• Formalization of Program Curriculum
• Utilization of Learning Management System (LMS)
  to track requirements
• Endstate Better educated NORAD and USNORTHCOM
  enlisted personnel from a program that enables
  college credit and Joint credit to be formally
  documented in service records.
• POAM Implement 1st Year of the program and
  evaluate.
• OPR NORAD and USNORTHCOM OCR TBD

JUL DEC 07
15 FEB 08
20 FEB 08
15 JAN 08
JAN 09
JUL 08
OCT 08
Cornerstone Recognition Ceremony
First Mentor Training
Program Development
Program Briefing to CDR
Class 08-3
Class 08-2
Program Kickoff
Class 08-1 Began
23
24
Joint Command and Control Training Management
Issue 08-005 Effective and efficient Combatant
Commander, Joint Task Force, and Component staff
individual functional and operational training.
No joint organization assigned responsibility for
managing Net-enabled Command Capability (NECC)
training provided by NECC material developers
beyond initial fielding of new capabilities.
Related issue 06-001, Joint Staff Officer
Training. Discussion Transition from GCCS-J and
Family of Systems to NECC offers opportunity for
effective and efficient training delivery to
individual warfighters worldwide and enforcement
of a joint standards-based foundation to service
and joint school house curricula. NECC provides a
single, joint architecture to establish a common
environment for warfighters at all levels of C2
in which both systems and functional training
curricula can be re-used and tailored to
JS/CC/S/A needs. NECC material developers will
provide appropriate, SCORM-conformant individual
functional training packages for each NECC
capability module produced. Current GCCS-J
Single Service Training Manager model doesnt
provide authority and resources to ensure
NECC-related training packages are effective,
standardized, entered into extant joint
curricula, and distributed to Services and
Agencies for re-use. Endstate A joint command
and control training management organization with
the necessary authority and resources codified by
a CJCSI, in-place and functioning. POAM
Standup a stakeholders forum to research and
assess need, responsibility, authorities, and
resourcing. Provide a POAM. Revise CJCSI
6721.02B for staffing. Lead warfighter engagement
at Global Command and Control (GCC) Training
Working Group (TWG) quarterly meetings. OPR
USJFCOM J8 OCRs JS J7, JS J3
AUG 08
JUL 08
JUN 08
JAN 09
Informal CJCSI staffing process begun
IPR- POAM
IPR-Draft CJCSI
Brief GCC TWG
TM Org established
25
Joint Training Assessment and Readiness

• Monthly Training Assessment Update Requirement
• Joint Training Trends and Assessment
• JTIMS Force Requests Units and Individuals
• GFMB Process for Joint Exercises
• Joint Lessons Learned Information System (JLLIS)
  
• Joint Training Program Assessments

25
26
Monthly Training Assessment Update Requirement
Issue 07-019 Inconsistent updates of training
assessments in the Joint Training Information
Management System (JTIMS) Discussion JTIMS is
an integral part of a larger system, including
DRRS, that will identify readiness deficiencies
and help develop solutions. Yet JTIMS data update
requirements do not support timely identification
of deficiencies and issues. Joint training
readiness has been identified as a priority
issue by T2 leadership, and use of JTIMS is being
reviewed as part of the 2007 T2 Block Assessment.
Policy (JTM) states the commanders assessment
will be published as part of the annual JTP. A
recent review indicated that 60 of combatant
command JMET assessments are not published in
JTIMS. Policy also states it is critical to
have a linkage between Joint readiness and
training. Part of the T2 Block Assessment is
examining the linkage between DRRS and JTIMS.
DRRS requires assessments every 30 days whereas
JTIMS doesnt have the same rigor. Therefore it
appears there is a disconnect between training
and overall readiness assessments. The linkage
that will send TPAs and MTAs from JTIMS to DRRS
is the technical part of the solution. WJTSC
08-1 Update JTIMS currently provides the
capabilities to enter and approve assessments.
DRRS currently displays TPAs and will, in the
future, display MTAs. No additional requirements
identified for JTIMS. Endstate JTIMS
assessments will be synchronized with DRRS
requirements to provide a reliable, timely, and
consistent element of the system. CJCS policy
requiring periodic update of JTIMS assessment
data. POAM DRRS currently pulls TPAs from
JTIMS and displays the training assessment data
in the Training Tab of DRRS (Mission Assessment
Module). JS/J-7 revise policy language to
require monthly training assessment updates in
JTIMS. Monitor compliance with monthly
assessment requirement by Combatant
Commands. OPR Joint Staff J7 JETD OCR OSD
(Readiness and Training) / RTPP
FEB - MAR 08
APR 07
APR 08
MAY 08
SEP 08
NOV 07
Adjudicate JSAP Comments
JS/J-7 provided proposed policy update to JTIMS
UAG for review
JS/J-7 staffs Policy change Via JSAP
JTPG Updated
Update at WJTSC 08-2
DRRS displays JTIMS TPA
26
27
Joint Training Trends and Assessment

• Issue 06-007 Consensus has not been achieved in
  the joint training community regarding how joint
  training trends and joint training assessment
  taskers will be achieved.
• Discussion. The JTPG (CJCSI 3500.01C) stated
  USJFCOM is responsible for annually assessing
  the effectiveness of joint training, to include
  describing emerging training trends in the joint
  community briefing training trends at the
  September WJTSC and reporting results of the
  training assessment to the Chairman. Combatant
  Commands/CSAs will annually provide USJFCOM with
  their joint training trends by 30 June for
  integration into USJFCOMs annual training trends
  brief presented at the September WJTSC.
• Endstate Joint training trends are identified
  and briefed annually.
• POAM JTIMS v2.3 will provide initial Training
  Trends reporting capabilities. Additional
  Training Trend reports capabilities have been
  scoped for JTIMS v2.4. Reassess enhanced
  reporting capabilities during the WJTSC 08-1
  conference. JTIMS v2.4 currently provides
  Training Trends Reporting Capabilities and this
  requirement will be analyzed and reviewed for
  additional enhancements semi-annually. JS J-7
  to brief first Trend Analysis reports during
  WJTSC 08-2.
• OPR JS J-7 JETD

SEP 08
APR 08
MAR 08
OCT 06
JUL 06
MAR 07
OCT 07
MAY 07
MAY 08
Discuss/resolve way ahead at WJTSC 06-2
Feasibility Studies forwarded to DRRS JTIM
PMs for action
Deploy JTIMS v2.4
CJCSI 3500.01E Published with monthly update
requirement
First trend brief at WJTSC 08-2 issues linked to
JLLIS/CAP/JTFCB
Brief v2.4 enhanced Trend Report mockups at WJTSC
08-1
JTIMS Spiral 5 provides TPA archiving.
JTIMS v2.3 upgrade includes Training Trend
capability. Mockups briefed at WJTSC 07-2
Training Trend changes published in JTPG
version 3500.01D
JTIMS Spiral 4 provides TPO/TPE archiving.
Update brief at WJTSC 07-1
27
28
JTIMS Force Requests Units and Individuals
Issue 07-013 A business rule (process) is
needed to enable sourcing of all exercise force
requirements via Joint Training Information
Management System (JTIMS). Discussion USJFCOM
J3 receives and processes force requirements that
sponsoring GCCs are unable to source. Presently,
only units may be inserted and resourced via
JTIMS. Many exercises require specialty skills
(or partial staffs) that cannot be defined as a
unit. These will be referred to as Below UIC
(BUIC) level requirements. Though the current JTM
states that these requirements should be filled
via Service channels, a change has been submitted
to reflect that USJFCOM J3 will assist in
sourcing BUICs. As articulated in the Joint
Training, Policy and Guidance (CJCSI 3500.01D),
Joint Training Manual (CJCSM 3500.03B) and on JS
J7 issue slide 07-006, JTIMS is the system of
record for requesting forces. Multiple GCCs
believe that a business rule (process) should be
established to avoid using disparate systems when
JTIMS can and should serve as the single system
of record for force requests. Endstate
USJFCOM J3 work with stakeholders to establish
straight-forward business rules (process) that
enables all force requirements (unit and BUIC)
via JTIMS. Additionally, USJFCOM J3 develop
JTIMS enhancements to support new process. POAM
Near term Create/address BUIC Business Rules
and capture JTIMS requirements (request combatant
command input). Brief business rules, and scope
any future JTIMS requirements, during the WJTSC
08 conferences. Long term Update 3500.01D and
3500.03B to reflect new Below UIC level (BUIC)
training requirements and established business
rules. JTIMS currently provides the capability to
identify Individual Augmentee Requirements. JTIMS
v3.0 (FY09, Q1) deployment will provide enhanced
IA Force Request/Sourcing capabilities. Issue
remains open until enhanced capabilities are
designed, developed, and deployed. Brief design
concepts during WJTSC 08-2. OPRs JS J7 JETD,
USJFCOM J3.
MAR 08
DEC 07
SEP 08
Brief update to JTIMS UAG during WJTSC 08-1.
Discuss future JTIMS requirements / business rules
JFCOM Submitted change to Joint Training Manual
that enables JTIMS users to request below UIC
support via JTIMS
Brief update to JTIMS UAG during WJTSC 08-2.
Finalize/submit JTIMS requirements / business
rules
28
28
29
Global Force Management Board (GFMB) Process for
Joint Exercises
Submitted by USNORTHCOM

• Issue 08-012 Out-year fidelity of GFMB exercise
  data exported from JTIMS is less than GFMB tool
  calls for.
• Discussion The GFMB process specifies that force
  management data for joint exercises be entered in
  JTIMS and then migrated to the GFMB tool until
  database sharing is functional. However, the
  out-year information available for exercises
  beyond the current Fiscal/Calendar year is, at
  best, only a rough order of magnitude
  representation of what will be needed/deployed
  for a given long-range exercise.
• Planning Endstate GFMB process accounts for
  normal uncertainty in long-range exercise
  calendars.
• POAM
• combatant commands ensure JTIMS is as fully
  populated as practicable to match the GFMB
  planning horizon
• Exercise data is migrated from JTIMS to GFMB tool
• GFMB processes are applied to combatant command
  Joint exercise data
• JTIMS-to-GFMB-tool export capability is
  functional
• GFMB steady-state planning cycle supports force
  management requirements for joint exercises
• Status New Issue.
• OPR JS GFMB OCR JS J7 JETD

. . .
JUN 08
TBD
TBD
SEP 08
TBD
APR 08
TBD
combatant command GFMB Training
JTIMS populated with Joint Exercise data
Brief Issue at WJTSC 08-2
JTIMS data migrated to GFMB tool
Steady State GFMB Exercise process
GFMB Cycle
JTIMS database auto-feeds GFMB tool
29
30
Joint Training Program Assessments
Issue 08-010 Currently no means to inform
CE2T2 leadership of training program impacts and
trends. Discussion Past Block Assessments with
data and analysis by JAEC provided limited
feedback to T2 leadership (snapshot every two
years). Guidance following the 2007 assessment is
to conduct quarterly output assessments at by
combatant commanders and Services, with an annual
enterprise level assessment of outcomes by JAEC.
Leverage available resources, including a process
for collecting data, and many data elements in
JTIMS. Emerging concerns include revising
metrics optimizing data collection including
using existing data sources to supplement JTIMS
including CSAs in assessment. The assessment will
be codified in policy as appropriate. Current
quarterly data submissions continue until new
plan is approved and implemented. Endstate An
enterprise-wide system (tools and processes) that
supports CE2T2 assessment at the strategic level
and the stakeholder level, and is more
transparent. POAM JAEC hosted a workshop 27-28
March 2008, briefed leadership on proposed way
ahead in April. Additional activities are
required. OPR OSD(RT) OCRs JS J-7,
Combatant Command J-7s, Service Trainers, CSAs
MAR 08
SEP 08
APR 08
MAY 08
AUG 08
OCT 08
JUN-JUL 08
Workshop at JAEC
Update at WJTSC 08-2
Present draft assessment concept to leadership
Refine asmt concept
JAEC commence quarterly reporting interim
analysis, progress, trends
Coordinate with Services and combatant commanders
Brief leadership update JSAP guidance (until
policy is published)
31
Joint Lessons Learned Information System (JLLIS)

• Issue 06-010 The Joint community lacks a single
  automated support system to discover, apply,
  share and research joint lessons.
• Discussion The DoD Lessons Learned Community
  lacks a repository capability as well as the
  input support tools vital to effective knowledge
  management. Funding projected to support these
  requirements is inadequate.
• JS alternate funding obtained 4QFY07 there has
  been no funding in FY08.
• Approved POM for FY09-FY13 POM funding is
  inadequate to support further development and
  sustainment costs.
• OSD and / or JS J-5 take lead for Foreign
  Disclosure policy which is unclear and lacks
  standardized implementation across DoD. Varied
  interpretation of current guidance by both the
  combatant commands and Services is a barrier to
  sharing of lessons learned across DoD, the
  Interagency and with Foreign Nationals. This is
  not only a JLLIS issue.
• JLLIS baseline implementation started in Aug 07.
• The following have the JLLIS combatant commands
  All Services to include the NGB but not the USCG
  most of the CSAs and the DOS, USAID and USDA
  and others like the JPME community are TBD.
• CJCSN 3150.25, 22 Jan 08 codified JLLIS as the
  DoD System of Record for the Joint Lessons
  Learned Program.
• Endstate Enterprise, web based, Global
  Information Grid (GIG) compliant JLLIS with input
  and management tool, with a federated/distributed
  database for all JLLIS stakeholders.
• POAM JLLIS capability using an open
  architecture is being fielded to Combatant
  Commands and requesting Services, CSAs,
  Interagency, and other organizations JLLIS is
  GIG-compliant, net-centric, web-services enabled
  and will be linked to other DOD systems as JTIMS,
  JDEIS, and DRRS.
• OPRs JS J-7 JETD, JS J-5, OSD Policy, MCCLL
  OCR USJFCOM/JCOA

APR 07
SEP 09
MAY 09
OCT 08
AUG 07
SEP 07
MAR 08
SEP 08
JAN 08
MAR 09
Pending OSD FD policy document, determine JLLIS
way ahead
CRB
MOA JS/J7 MCLL JCOA
POM funding begins FY09
FY07 CCIF funding approved
CRB
JLLIS IOC
DoD System of Record
CRB
JLLIS FOC
CRB
32
Interagency

• Integration of Interagency Partners
• Integrated Operations Training
• Integrated Operations Education

32
33
Integration of Interagency Partners
Issue 07-001 Inadequate unified action partner
representation/environmental emulation in
Combatant Command and Service training,
education, exercises, and experimentation (TEEE)
degrades the quality of these events. Discussion
DoD recognizes the value of role players, senior
mentors, and/or simulation cells to provide
authoritative and realistic interagency input and
support to DoD TEEE events. Other agencies often
cannot afford the level of seniority/experience
and commitment that DoD desires for event design,
execution, and assessment. Endstate DOD events
are conducted in a whole of government context
and a realistic environment that accurately
reflects the complexity of integrated planning
and operations. POAM To enhance TEEE 1.
OSD/PR develops a strategy and process for
resourcing, prioritizing, requesting, and
scheduling interagency integration into Combatant
Command and Service TEEE at the front end of the
planning cycle. 2. Analyze mitigation to gaps
in DOD IA process, including consideration of a
simcell-like capability. 3. OSD PR implement
mechanisms to source vetted and validated agency
personnel or contractors for DOD TEEE. 4.
Explore expansion of solutions for IA support to
the larger integrated operations
requirement. OPRs OSD/PR, OSD/HD, JS J-7 JETD
OCRs Combatant Commands, Services, CSAs, and
NGB
SEP 09/10
AUG 08
APR 07
MAR 08
NOV 07
OCT 07
FY 09
SEP 08
DUSD(R) designated J-7 as Interagency RS
Coordinator
RS training strategy DoD Training
Coordinator identified.
Implementation and interagency partner
integration process briefed at WJTSC 08-1
SLRT Memo signed by Tri-Chairs
Implement the process for FY 10/11
Business rules approved by VCJCS
Implementation interagency integration process
codified at WJTSC 08-2
Year end assessment
33
34
Unified Action Training
Issue 06-002 Individuals assigned to combatant
command staffs are not formally trained on
doctrinal interagency coordination tasks and
continue to execute unified actions in an ad hoc
fashion. Discussion National strategic guidance
requires USG personnel to plan, coordinate and
implement unified actions. There is a need to
develop and implement an integrated DOD-wide
interagency training program, to provide
personnel unified action training to accomplish
missions. Endstate An integrated DoD-wide
interagency coordination training program
supports combatant command unified actions
requirements and incorporates both content as
well as throughput requirements and tracking for
personnel. Deployment systems ensure personnel
deployment/assignment orders contain
assignment-appropriate pre-deployment training
for unified actions and provide adequate lead
time to accomplish such training. OSD and JS
provide combatant commands with trained senior
leadership and staff officers prepared to
accomplish interagency coordination. POAM
OSD/PR develop a long-term unified action
training strategy, building on its short-term PRT
work. JKDDC enterprise portal services and
courses available for stakeholder requirements.
JS J7 operationalizes the Learning Continuum with
JKDDC support. JTFS leverage existing and
emerging training resources, e.g. JKO, Consortium
for Complex Operations, and National Security
Professional Development Program. OPRs JS J7
JETD, OSD (PR) OCRs Combatant commands, JS
J1, Services
JAN/FEB 08
MAR 07
SEP 07
JAN 07
APR 07
MAR 08
SEP 08
FY08
JKDDC update course development plans. LMS
Implementation update.
Combatant commands provided feedback to JSAP
00329-06.
OSD Strategy Concept brief to SLRT.
JKDDC deploys interagency training via LMS
NSPD I-Plan tasks USG agencies to develop 101
courses
Joint staff officer task analysis (phase 2 survey)
Additional IO courseware developed and fielded
CCO study complete
34
35
Unified Action Education

• Issue 06-003 Personnel assigned to combatant
  commands not formally educated or trained to
  accomplish doctrinal interagency coordination
  tasks staffs execute unified actions ad hoc.
• Discussion National strategic guidance requires
  USG personnel to plan, coordinate and implement
  interagency operations. There is a need to
  develop and implement an integrated DOD-wide
  interagency learning program, to provide
  personnel doctrinal orientation to accomplish
  missions.
• Endstate An integrated DoD-wide learning program
  based on doctrinal guidance in JP3-08 supports
  combatant command interagency coordination
  requirements and incorporates both content as
  well as throughput requirements and tracking of
  personnel. Deployment systems ensure personnel
  deployment/assignment orders contain
  assignmentappropriate pre-deployment learning
  for unified actions and provide adequate lead
  time to accomplish such learning prior to
  arrival at joint assignments. JS and combatant
  commands staffed with trained and educated senior
  leaders and staff officers who can accomplish
  interagency coordination/unified action.
• POAM
• Service/Joint JPME schools continue to support
  doctrine-based learning in Unified Action.
• USD/PR and JS J1 develop personnel management
  processes that support enhanced throughput,
  assignment, tracking, incentives, and appropriate
  learning prior to arrival to any joint
  assignment.
• JKDDC expand, in near-term, Interagency 101
  (Interagency Cultural Differences and Awareness)
  courseware modules in development as part of NSPD
  44 mandate for training and education in support
  of reconstruction and stabilization operations.
  Far-term, modify existing JKDDC interagency
  courses (Interagency process, JIACG et al) based
  on JS guidance from the mandated USG-wide
  Interagency Management System (IMS) and JP 3-08
  doctrinal revision process
• OPRs USD(PR), USD(P), JS J1 OCRs Combatant
  commands, Services, JS J7

FEB-SEP 08
NOV 06
DEC 06
MAR 07
JUL 07
JAN 07
OCT 07
AUG 08
JAN 09
JKDDC develop NSPD 44-directed interagency
training and education modules Interagency
Cultural Differences
Commence JKDDC Course Mods for Interagency
Courses based on JP 3-08 Revision Guidance
JSJ7 JSAP 00329-06 for inputs
Suspense for inputs
MECC
MECC Working Group
JQS DoDI and CJCSI final staffing
JFEC / SAE introduced.
JP 3-08 and IMS Training via JKO
35