Title: Accounting for Loan Commitments
1Accounting for Loan Commitments
- MBA Presentation to the
- Financial Accounting Standards Board
- December 3, 2003
2Topics to be Discussed
- Single-Family Residential Loan Commitment Process
- Characteristics of Single-Family Residential
Interest Rate Lock Commitments (IRLCs) - Valuation of Single-Family Residential IRLCs
- Commercial/Multifamily Mortgage Commitments
3Single-Family Loan Commitment Process
- Topics
- Steps in Commitment Process
- Relevance of FAS 133 Model
4Single-Family LoanCommitment Process
- Steps in Commitment Process
- Borrower completes loan application
- Mortgage banker evaluates application based on
underwriting requirements - Mortgage banker approves/denies application
- If approved, mortgage banker issues commitment
letter specifying loan amount, term, interest
rate, fees, points and qualifying conditions
5Single-Family Loan Commitment Process
- Steps in Commitment Process
- Upon commitment, mortgage banker has entered into
an interest rate lock commitment (IRLC) - Commitment period generally extends from 30-60
days - The IRLC exposes mortgage banker to interest rate
risk if the lender intends to sell the loan upon
origination - Consequently, mortgage banker typically hedges
this interest rate risk using derivatives
6Single-Family Loan Commitment Process
- Relevance of FAS 133 Model
- Under FAS 133, as amended by FAS 149, the IRLC is
required to be accounted for as a derivative - FAS 133 appropriately provides for offsetting
changes in the values of the IRLCs and related
hedge instruments to be recognized in earnings in
the same period to avoid misleading recognition
of only half of a paired transaction - FAS 133 model is critical to the accurate
portrayal of the economics of mortgage banking
companies operations due to the magnitude of
their loan production hedging activities
7Characteristics of Single-Family Residential IRLCs
- Topics
- Similarities of IRLCs and Written Options
- Dissimilarities of IRLCs and Written Options
- Implications of Written Option Treatment
8Characteristics of Single-Family Residential IRLCs
- Similarities of IRLCs and Written Options
- Mortgage banker is obligated to perform if
borrower meets qualifying conditions - Business practice permits nonperformance by
borrower
9Characteristics of Single-Family Residential IRLCs
- Dissimilarities of IRLCs and Written Options
- Borrower does not pay a premium at inception of
commitment - Borrowers evaluation of option value takes into
account factors beyond the financial terms of the
commitment itself - Potential for loss of appraisal, credit report,
other qualifying costs - Risk of not meeting terms of home purchase
contract - Borrowers therefore exercise out-of-the-money
options all the time - The optionality risk in an IRLC is embedded in
the loan pricing which is established by the
lender
10Characteristics of Single-Family Residential IRLCs
- Implications of Written Option Treatment
- Mortgage banking companies are in the business of
making money which conflicts with written option
treatment - Mortgage banking companies routinely value IRLCs
when acquiring production franchises - Option treatment would significantly misrepresent
the economics of mortgage banking companies
IRLCs and related hedging activities
11Valuation of Single-FamilyResidential IRLCs
- Topics
- Definition of Fair Value in FAS 133
- Applicability of Fair Value definition to IRLCs
- Valuation techniques for IRLCs at inception
- Valuation techniques for IRLCs subsequent to
inception - Diversity in Practice
12Valuation of Single-FamilyResidential IRLCs
- Definition of Fair Value
- SFAS 133 defines Fair Value as follows
- ..the amount at which an asset (liability) could
be bought (incurred) or sold (settled) in a
current transaction between willing parties, that
is, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. - Quoted market prices in active markets are the
best evidence of fair value and should be used,
if available. - If quoted market prices are not available, the
estimate of fair value should be based on the
best information available in the circumstances. - Examples of valuation techniques include the
present value of estimated expected future cash
flows using discount rates commensurate with the
risks involved - Those techniques should incorporate assumptions
that market participants would use in their
estimates of values, future revenues, future
expenses, including assumptions about interest
rates, default, prepayment and volatility.
13Valuation of Single-FamilyResidential IRLCs
- Applicability to IRLCs
- Quoted market prices for IRLCs are not available
- Occasionally, through company acquisitions,
market prices for IRLCs can be observed - In general, valuation techniques are utilized to
value IRLCs by estimating the expected future
cash flows
14Valuation of Single-FamilyResidential IRLCs
- Valuation Techniques at Inception
- Consider the cash flows that a third party would
include in bidding on an IRLC or commitments - Those cash flows would include the cash inflows
and outflows that the third party would
anticipate receiving/paying related to the
commitment, including secondary market
gains/losses on the sales of the loan, as well as
FAS 91 costs and fees, adjusted for the portion
expected to close - A third party would discount the future cash
flows to - compensate for estimation errors predominantly
around closing ratios and loan quality/characteris
tics that could affect value, and - to ensure that a sufficient return would be
earned on their investment
15Valuation of Single-FamilyResidential IRLCs
- Valuation Techniques at Inception
- Specifically, the following cash flows would be
taken into account when estimating the future
cash flows expected to be received/paid - Expected gain/loss on sale of the loan, which
would include - a direct valuation of the entire interest rate on
the underlying loan - the total coupon can be valued as the sale of the
entire note rate on the loan or as the sale of
the majority of the interest strip, with a
retained servicing right - any origination fees to be collected
- any discount/premiums on the underlying loan
- any costs expected to be incurred in originating
and selling the loan - These cash flows would then be directly adjusted
for the expected close ratio and then
risk-adjusted to compensate for estimation errors
predominantly around closing ratios and loan
quality/characteristics that could affect value
16Valuation of Single-FamilyResidential IRLCs
- Valuation Techniques at Inception
- These cash flows can be benchmarked to observable
market evidence - quoted prices for MBS securities (the likely
outlet for the loans once funded) - service release premiums paid through the
correspondent channels of production - Other evidence, such as historical fallout
ratios, can also be observed - Ultimately, variances between assumptions
utilized in the valuation techniques and the
realized cash flows can be observed within a
short time period (45-60 days) as the loans move
through the origination and sale processes - This ongoing comparison ensures that the
valuation techniques are consistent with the
realized cash flows
17Valuation of Single-FamilyResidential IRLCs
- Valuation Techniques Subsequent to Inception
- Subsequent to inception, mortgage market rates
are likely to change, such that the value of the
IRLC will also change as this will impact the
ultimate secondary marketing gains/losses
expected to be realized upon loan sale - In addition, as the IRLC moves through the
origination process and is closer to being
funded, this valuation approach would likely
result in an increasing value as the risk
associated with pipeline management diminishes
18Valuation of Single-FamilyResidential IRLCs
- Diversity in Practice
- Similar to other financial instruments, diversity
in practice can exist due to some of the
judgement involved in the valuation techniques
for IRLCs - Increased disclosure around valuation techniques
and accounting policies could enhance financial
reporting and investor understanding
19Valuation of Single-FamilyResidential IRLCs
20Commercial/Multifamily Mortgage Commitments
- Topic
- Major differences between Commercial/Multifamily
and Single-Family Residential Mortgage Loan
Commitments
21Commercial/Multifamily Mortgage Commitments
- Differences
- Borrower has a short timeframe (usually days or
weeks) to accept the commitment - Borrower must pay a commitment fee upon
acceptance of the commitment. - At that time, the commitment is a legally binding
contract between mortgage banker and borrower. - This is the primary reason why a very high
percentage of commercial/multifamily commitments
are closed.
22Commercial/Multifamily Mortgage Commitments
- Differences
- Many commercial/multifamily commitments,
particularly those that are underwritten for
government agencies, like FHA and Fannie Mae, are
subject to the mortgage banker finding a
purchaser of the loan. In this case, the
mortgage banker is not subject to interest rate
risk.