Satellite Networking - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

Satellite Networking

Description:

High-velocity mobile users. Frequency Bands. C band: 4-8 GHz. Ku band: 10-18 GHz ... GSO Geostationary Orbit. Revolution: synchronized with Earth's rotation. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:50
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: ck799
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Satellite Networking


1
Satellite Networking
  • Cheryl-Annette Kincaid

2
Why satellites?
  • Global coverage
  • Remote locations
  • High-velocity mobile users

3
Frequency Bands
  • C band 4-8 GHz
  • Ku band 10-18 GHz
  • Ka band 18-31 GHz

4
Space Segment
  • Orbits
  • GSO Geostationary Orbit
  • Revolution synchronized with Earths rotation.
  • Altitude 35,786 km above equator
  • Coverage approx. 1/3 of Earths surface
  • Propagation Delay 250-280 ms
  • Real estate limited

5
Space Segment
  • Orbits
  • NGSO Nongeostationary Orbit
  • MEO Medium Earth Orbit
  • Altitude 3000 km GEO altitude
  • Propagation Delay Typically 110-130 ms
  • LEO Low Earth Orbit
  • Altitude 200 3000 km
  • Propagation Delay Typically 20-25 ms

6
Ground Segment
  • GS - Gateway stations
  • NCC - Network control center
  • OCC - Operation control center

7
Architectural options
  • Bent-pipe architecture

8
Architectural options
  • OBP and ISL architecture

9
Architectural options
  • DBS Direct broadcast satellite

10
Challenge Traffic Management
  • Many user terminals are located within a single
    satellites footprint. These terminals must
    contend with each other for the uplink channel.

11
Challenge Traffic Management
  • Objectives
  • Fairness
  • Efficient Resource Utilization
  • Bounded Queuing Delay
  • Stability
  • Fast Transient Response
  • Scalability

12
Challenge Traffic Management
  • Medium Access Control schemes
  • Fixed Assignment
  • FDMA
  • TDMA
  • CDMA
  • Random Access
  • ALOHA and variants
  • Demand Assignment
  • DAMA

13
Challenge Traffic Management
  • Medium Access Control schemes
  • Fixed Assignment
  • FDMA TDMA
  • Contention free channels
  • Some QoS guarantees
  • Inefficient resource utilization
  • Best suited for small-scale networks with stable
    traffic patterns
  • CDMA
  • Efficient resource utilization
  • Flexible for system expansion

14
Challenge Traffic Management
  • Medium Access Control schemes
  • Random Access
  • ALOHA and variants
  • Accommodates bursty traffic
  • Low throughput when congested

15
Challenge Traffic Management
  • Medium Access Control schemes
  • Demand Assignment
  • DAMA Demand Assignment Multiple Access
  • Dynamically allocates bandwidth in response to
    user requests
  • Explicit or implicit requests

16
Challenge Traffic Management
  • Medium Access Control schemes
  • Demand Assignment
  • DAMA Variants
  • Reservation ALOHA
  • PODA Priority-Oriented Demand Assignment
  • FODA FIFO Ordered Demand Assignment
  • CFDAMA Combind Free/Demand Assignment Multiple
    Access
  • CRRMA Combined Random Access and
    TDMA-reservation Multiple Access
  • RRR Round-Robin Reservation

17
Challenge Routing
  • Dynamic Topology
  • LEO satellites have a very short visible period
    to motionless users. Efficient methods of
    handling intersatillite handover are needed.
    Frequent interbeam handover also occurs within a
    satellites visible period.

18
Challenge Routing
  • Dynamic Topology
  • DT-DVTR Discrete-time Dynamic Virtual
    Topology Routing
  • Takes advantage of periodic nature of orbits
  • Works completely offline
  • Divides system period into intervals
  • Changes in topology only occur at the beginning
    of an interval
  • Stores each interval as a static routing table

19
Challenge Routing
  • Dynamic Topology
  • VN Virtual Node
  • Hides topology changes from routing protocols
  • Sets up a virtual topology that does not change
    with satellite movement
  • Stores routing tables and user information as
    state information in the virtual nodes
  • Transfers the assignment of VNs to new satellites
    as needed

20
Challenge Routing
  • External Routing Issues
  • Details of heterogeneous internal routing schemes
    should remain hidden from the terrestrial
    Internet.
  • Isolation is achieved by means of autonomous
    systems.

21
Challenge Routing
  • External Routing Issues

22
Challenge Routing
  • Unidirectional Routing
  • With unidirectional routing, such as is used in
    DBS, direct reverse links do not exist. Three
    solutions to this problem are
  • Routing Protocol Modification
  • Tunneling
  • Static routing

23
Challenge Routing
  • Unidirectional Routing
  • Routing Protocol Modification
  • Feeder
  • Receiver
  • As the receiver obtains routing updates, it
    identifies potential feeders and stores useful
    information about the topology. Periodically,
    the receiver sends a routing update via the
    terrestrial reverse channel.

24
Challenge Routing
  • Unidirectional Routing
  • Tunneling
  • Link layer approach to hide network asymmetry
    from routing process
  • Packets from the user are encapsulated and sent
    along a virtual link by means of the reverse
    channel
  • Packets are decapsulated at the satellite and
    forwarded to the routing protocol
  • Path appears to be bidirectional to protocol

25
Challenge Quality of Service
  • Issues
  • Latency
  • Scintillation
  • Fade
  • Geomagnetic Storms
  • Throughput
  • Security

26
Challenge Quality of Service
  • Layered view

27
Other Challenges
  • TCP Performance
  • Cross Layer Protocol Design
  • Interworking
  • Standards

28
Future - HAP
  • High Altitude Platforms

29
Future Global heterogeneous
30
Conclusion
  • Satellite networking provides global coverage and
    enables remote regions to connect with the rest
    of the global network.
  • Satellite technologies are beginning to offer
    more real-time, high bandwidth services to more
    users.
  • Satellites have several unique attributes that
    lead to many challenges. These must be overcome
    before satellite networking can become a reliable
    backbone in the next generation of global
    communication.

31
Sources
  • J.P. Conti, Hot spots on rails, Communications
    Engineer, vol. 3, no. 5, Oct.-Nov. 2005, pp.
    18-21.
  • Y. Hu, and V.O.K. Li, Satellite-Based Internet
    A Tutorial, IEEE Communications Magazine, Mar.
    2001, pp. 154-162.
  • S. Karapantazi, and F. Pavlidou, The Role of
    High Altitude Platforms in Beyond 3G Networks,
    IEEE Wireless Communications, Dec. 2005, pp.
    33-41.
  • S.L. Kota, Broadband Satellite Networks Trends
    and Challenges, IEEE Communications Society /
    WCNC 2005, vol. 3, 13-17 Mar. 2005, pp.
    1472-1478.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com