Atrial Fibrillation revisited by PACE - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Atrial Fibrillation revisited by PACE

Description:

Prevalence doubles with each advancing decade. 0.5% at age 50-59 to ... 0.9% absolute risk increase of major haemorrhage with Warfarin. Risk assessment tools ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:24
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: OEM5152
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Atrial Fibrillation revisited by PACE


1
Atrial Fibrillation revisited by
PACE
  • Primary Care Management

2
Why do women have two hands?
3
(No Transcript)
4
And why do men have two hands?
5
(No Transcript)
6
Whats coming up?
  • Some facts about Atrial Fibrillation
  • Classification
  • Treatment Strategies
  • Thromboprophlaxis
  • When to refer
  • Screening
  • Summary

7
Prevalence
  • Commonest sustained cardiac arrhythmia
  • Prevalence doubles with each advancing decade
  • 0.5 at age 50-59 to almost 9 at age 80-90
  • More common in older males
  • Aging population increases disease burden

8
Causes of Atrial Fibrillation
  • Hypertension
  • Myocardial infarction
  • Heart failure
  • Valve disease
  • Congenital heart disease
  • Cardiomyopathies / Pericardial disease
  • Pre-excitation syndromes
  • Lone AF
  • Respiratory illnesses
  • Diabetes
  • Thyroid disease
  • Acute infections / sepsis
  • Electrolyte depletion
  • Drugs/Alcohol
  • Postoperative
  • Familial AF

9
(No Transcript)
10
Complications and Prognosis
  • 5-fold increase in risk of stroke and
    thromboembolism
  • Strokes associated with AF are more severe
  • Death OR 1.5 1.9
  • AF worsens diagnosis in CHD and HF
  • Impairment in cognitive function
  • Reduced exercise tolerance

11
Investigations
  • ECG is mandatory
  • Serum urea and electrolytes and thyroid function
  • ECHO?
  • Ambulatory rhythm monitoring

12
Echocardiography
  • 1.1.3.1 In patients with AF, transthoracic
    echocardiography (TTE) should be performed in
  • those in whom a baseline echocardiogram is
    important for long-term management, such as
    younger patients D(GPP)
  • those being considered for a rhythm control
    strategy including cardioversion (electrical or
    pharmacological) C
  • those in whom there is a high risk or a
    suspicion of underlying structural/functional
    heart disease (such as heart failure, heart
    murmur) that influences their subsequent
    management (such as choice of antiarrhythmic
    drug) D(GPP)
  • those in whom refinement of clinical risk
    stratification for antithrombotic therapy is
    needed (see section 1.8.6). C
  • 1.1.3.2 In patients with AF in whom the need to
    initiate anticoagulation therapy has already been
    agreed on appropriate clinical criteria (see
    section 1.8.6) transthoracic echocardiography
    should not be routinely performed solely for the
    purpose of further stroke risk stratification.

13
Classification of Atrial fibrillation
14
(No Transcript)
15
Rate vs Rhythm control
  • None of the six RCTs found rate control inferior
    in terms of mortality or quality of life
  • One study showed rate control reduced the
    mortality in patients without HF, in over 65s and
    in patients with CHD
  • Reduced rates of hospitalisation and adverse
    events with rate control
  • No difference in the rate of thromboembolic or
    haemorrhagic events
  • Rate control is more cost effective.

16
For rate control For rhythm control
  • Patients over 65
  • Patients with coronary heart disease
  • Patients unsuitable for cardioversion
  • Patients with contraindications to antiarrhythmic
    drugs
  • Presenting for the first time with lone AF
  • Younger patients
  • Patients with Congestive heart failure
  • Symptomatic patients
  • Patients with AF secondary to a treated/corrected
    precipitant

17
How to achieve rate control?
18
Rhythm control for paroxysmal AF
  • Remove precipitant
  • Do nothing
  • Beta-blocker
  • Refer
  • Pill-in-pocket

19
Rhythm control strategy for persistent AF
  • 1. Cardioversion
  • 2. Beta-blocker
  • 3. Treatment failure reconsider treatment
    strategy
  • 4. Class Ic or III antiarrhythmic drugs

20
(No Transcript)
21
Thromboembolic prophylaxis
  • Thromboembolic events do not just just occur in
    permanent AF
  • Consider treatment for all patients with AF
  • Clustering of events at the time of onset
  • 62 RR reduction with adjusted dose Warfarin
  • 22 RR reduction with Aspirin
  • 0.9 absolute risk increase of major haemorrhage
    with Warfarin

22
Risk assessment tools
  • Do not apply to valvular heart disease
  • Risk of thromboembolism depends on other risk
    factors in patients with AF
  • Various risk assessment tools available
  • There are differences between CHAD2 and the tool
    favoured in the NICE guidelines

23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
When to refer?
  • Patient aged below 30
  • AF resistant to usual drugs for rate control
  • Patient suitable for rhythm control requiring
    cardioversion
  • Uncontrolled paroxysmal AF on usual medication
  • Syncope related to AF
  • Patient with moderate-severe HF
  • murmur in a patient with AF
  • AF with broad ventricular complexes

27
Key messages
  • All patients with AF need thromboembolic risk
    assessment
  • Rate control will benefit most of your patients
  • Digoxin is not first line drug for rate control
  • Beta-blocker is first line drug for rhythm
    control
  • Manual pulse palpation is an effective screening
    tool.

28
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com