The 10 mM Debate - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 6
About This Presentation
Title:

The 10 mM Debate

Description:

Ethyl acrylate ve in MLA at 20 g/ml (0.2 mM) Eugenol ... 2-ethyl-1,3-hexanediol ve in CA at 4000 g/ml (27.4 mM) Ethionamide ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:11
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 7
Provided by: iae6
Category:
Tags: debate | ethyl

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The 10 mM Debate


1
The 10 mM Debate
  • Prof. David Kirkland
  • Kirkland Consulting

2
Why are we debating this issue?
  • For many, the frequency of misleading positive
    results in vitro is unacceptable
  • Where follow-up testing in vivo is not permitted
    (e.g. cosmetics ingredients in EU) new products
    may be abandoned and businesses suffer
  • For other chemicals in vivo follow-up may be
    triggered by in vitro ve when not otherwise
    required
  • Low tonnage industrial chemicals
  • Food flavours and additives
  • In such cases, unnecessary animal use occurs

3
Why this debate?
  • ECVAM workshop (Kirkland et al, 2007) identified
    several design issues of mammalian cell tests
    thought to contribute to high level of misleading
    positives including top conc. extent
    measures of cytotoxicity
  • Others will be discussed in Stefan Pfuhlers
    group
  • Proposed revisions to ICH S2 guideline for
    pharmaceuticals suggested lowering top conc. for
    non-toxic drugs to 1 mM (Lutz Müller will
    present)
  • So are there data to suggest a reduction in the
    top conc. for non-pharmaceutical chemicals can
    also be considered?

4
Review of published data
  • ECVAM commissioned Jim and Liz Parry to review
    published literature
  • At what concs. do carcinogens that are ve in
    Ames test give detectable ve responses in
    mammalian cells?
  • Raffaella Corvi will discuss this review
  • I will discuss some of the key chemicals from
    this review
  • From the 19 chemicals identified (Kirkland et al,
    2008) as giving misleading ve results in
    mammalian cells, 12 are only ve above 1 mM, and
    11 are only ve above 2 mM
  • These would be avoided if lower top conc.

5
7/19 Misleading positives at lt1 mM
Chemical Lowest ve concs.
Tert-butylhydroquinone Lowest ve conc. in CA test not identified, but lt100 µg/ml, i.e. lt1 mM
1,3-dihydroxybenzene ve in CA test 20-80 µg/ml, i.e. from 0.18 mM upwards
Curcumin ve for MN at 10 µM
Propyl gallate ve in MLA at 1 µg/ml and in CA at 16 µg/ml, i.e. at 0.005-0.075 mM
Ethyl acrylate ve in MLA at 20 µg/ml (0.2 mM)
Eugenol ve in MLA at 120 nl/ml (approx. 0.73 mM) although only ve for CA at 300 µg/ml (1.83 mM)
2,4-dichlorophenol ve in MLA at 40 µg/ml (0.25 mM) and in CA at 0.6 mM
ve MLA gtGEF ve CA gt5 cells with abs
6
12/19 Misleading positives at gt1 mM
Chemical Lowest ve concs.
D,L-menthol ve in CA at 1.6-1.9 mM
Phthallic anyhydride ve in CA at 10 mM
o-Anthranilic acid ve in MLA at 886 µg/ml (6.47 mM)
2-ethyl-1,3-hexanediol ve in CA at 4000 µg/ml (27.4 mM)
Ethionamide ve in MLA at 500 µg/ml (3 mM) and in CA at 5-8 mM
Benzyl alcohol ve in MLA and CA at 30-40 mM
Urea ve in CA at gt10 mM
Sodium saccharin ve in CA at 8000 µg/ml (33.2 mM)
p-Nitrophenol ve in CA at 1500 µg/ml (10.8 mM)
Sodium xylene sulfonate Equivocal in MLA at 4000 µg/ml (19.1 mM)
Isobutyraldehyde ve in MLA at 250 µg/ml (3.47 mM) and in CA at 500 µg/ml (6.94 mM)
Sulfisoxazole Weak ve in MLA at 1000 µg/ml (3.75 mM)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com