Title: Market Friction and Product Diversity
1Market Friction and Product Diversity
August 2004 Sung Hyun Kim Ewha Womans University
2Summary
- Ingredients
- Horizontal differentiation (Hotellings linear
city model) - Welfare effects of introducing a new product
- Market structure monopoly versus duopoly
- Friction positive cost of purchasing a new
product - Results
- - Frictionless Too much diversity both for
monopoly and duopoly - Friction Optimum diversity with duopoly
- Some implications
- - Online versus offline commerce
32.1 Basic setup
- Consumers populated on 0, 1, unit demand,
transportation cost t per distance, gross surplus
of s from consumption - Assumption 1. s gt 2t
- Seller located at point 0, MC 0
- Profit-maximization of monopolist p s t
- (extraction of surplus of marginal consumer)
4Consumer 0 (if p p) s p s s/2 s/2
s/2
t
Assumption 1. s gt 2t
Consumer y s p ty 0
By monopolists actual choice p s - t
y
1
0
marginal
52.2 A second product by monopolist
- New product at point 1 (identical s)
- Fixed cost of developing the new product f
- Profit-max of 2-product monopolist
- p s t/2 (extraction of surplus of marginal
consumer at point 1/2) - Can charge a higher price than before
- (Better fit with consumers tastes)
6Surplus for consumers
t
1-product monopoly
(-)
t/2
t/2
2-product monopoly
()
1/2
1
0
marginal
72.2 (continued)
- Assumption 2. t/4 lt f lt t/2
- Profit change t/2 f gt 0
- Welfare change t/4 f lt 0
- Consumers lose more than monopolists gain
- (Less travel, higher price fixed cost)
- Diversity offered, socially not desirable
82.3 A second product by entrant
- Back to basic setup, an entrant at point 1
- After entry, Cournot competition in price
- Cournot-Nash equilibrium
- prices (incumbent, entrant) (t , t)
- Two firms divide the market equally
9s t
Surplus for consumers
t
duopoly
s t/2
t/2
t/2
1-product monopoly
2-product monopoly
1/2
1
0
marginal
102.3 A second product by entrant
- Proposition 1. Under Assumptions 1 2
- overprovision Socially optimal number of
product is 1, but 2 products are offered, either
by monopolist or an entrant - consumers prefer duopoly Consumer surplus is
ordered - Duopoly gt one-product monopoly gt two-product
monopoly
112.4 Digression incumbents reaction
Proposition 2. If allowed, the incumbent will buy
out the entrant, and become a two product
monopoly buyout price is between (t/2 f) and
t/2 hence, consumers are probably worse off
123 Market friction
- Nature of friction
- Search cost? (Kim 01, Bakos 97, Harrington 02)
- Switching cost?
- Inertia?
- Any cost that a buyer faces in purchasing a newly
introduced product - Buyers surplus
- existing product s p ty
- new product s p ty c
133.1 Friction and 2-product monopoly
- Location of marginal consumer
- s p0 tym s p1 t(1 ym) c
- Profit function p0ym p1(1 ym)
- Profit-max prices
- p0 s t/2 c/4 p1 s t/2 3c/4
- subsidy for
friction cost - Consumer price including friction
- p0 s t/2 c/4 p1 s t/2 c/4
143.2 Friction and entry
- Cournot-Nash equilibrium prices
- (incumbent, entrant) (t c/3, t c/3)
- Location of marginal consumer (lt 1)
- (entry game) ½ c/6t
- (2-product monopoly) ½ c/4t
- diversity offer depends on c
- condition on c differs between monopoly and
duopoly
15- Proposition 3. With friction,
- diversity offered when costs are low If c and f
are sufficiently low, second product is offered
either by monopolist or entrant - with friction, f has to be lower the upper
bound on f for which second product offered is
lower than t/2 with friction - entrant is more aggressive entrant may enter
when monopolist would not offer a second product
16- Proposition 4. When a second product is offered
with friction - overprovision by incumbent When the incumbent
offers it, welfare always decreases - optimal provision by entrant When the entrant
offers it, welfare increases - Remark Friction improves situation even with
monopoly when f is high, monopoly does not
offer second product
17Some concluding thoughts
- Elimination of friction may lead to too much
diversity (over-customization) - Does e-commerce eliminate friction? (e.g. reduce
buyers search cost)