OASIS: After 10 years, Where are We Going? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

OASIS: After 10 years, Where are We Going?

Description:

Propose a New Definition: The architecture, systems and protocols in an ... Disinterested guidance (Business/Process experts) Broad forum (industry, users, vendors) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:14
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: robert561
Learn more at: http://www.naesb.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: OASIS: After 10 years, Where are We Going?


1
OASIS After 10 years, Where are We Going?
  • Don Watkins - BPA
  • 360-418-2344
  • dswatkins_at_bpa.gov

2
A defining moment
  • OASIS
  • Propose a New Definition The architecture,
    systems and protocols in an interconnection that
    provide electronic connectivity for all
    transmission related business and information
    that supports that business
  • Not A system provided by a transmission provider
    for pro-forma transmission products and
    supporting information.
  • (This is the first bite of the elephant. It will
    spawn much more.)

3
A Scope Picture
  • Transmission
  • Scheduling
  • Pre-schedules
  • Same day
  • Transmission
  • Rights and Market systems
  • Obtain T rights
  • Rights tracking
  • Energy
  • Buy / Sell
  • Buy
  • Sell

A continuum from cradle to grave
  • Real-Time
  • Operations
  • Manage schedules
  • DSM
  • Curtailments
  • Settlement Billing
  • Reconciliation
  • Settlements
  • Billing Accounting

Electronic Funds Transfer
4
The Value Proposition
  • Dissimilar markets require specialized interfaces
    at the seams sometimes reducing function.
  • Emergency Reliability actions across seams are
    often awkward and difficult.
  • Non-standardized interfaces result in higher
    development and maintenance costs, lower quality,
    lower efficiencies (Todays interfaces are
    largely manual or specialized.)
  • The absence of standardized electronic
    infrastructure makes implementing new
    methodologies exceptionally difficult.
  • Dont have electronic infrastructure needed to
    support future methodologies needed to manage the
    system and loads. (The train has started)
  • We substantially lag other similar needs
    industries.

5
My test of success
  • I can electronically accomplish required power
    system adjustments (the generators or loads
    respond) to return to reliable operation within
    15 minutes of initiation.
  • (I am an operator thats my driver.)

6
A Collection of Realities
  • We all need to track our internal and external
    business
  • N. America will continue to have substantial
    business seams.
  • TLRs and other congestion management methods
    across seams arent sufficient. (an 8/14/2003
    conversation)
  • We do not have the same concepts or definitions
    of actors, transactions, or terms and their
    characteristics.
  • We all have issues with migration to new systems
    from legacy systems.
  • We have the building blocks for standardized
    electronic connectivity with e-tags, CIM, CME,
    ICCP, XML, etc. (The technologies we need
    already exist.)

7
What do we need?
  • One Stop Shopping
  • Seamless cradle to grave flow of complete
    transaction information
  • Standardized electronic infrastructure with
    appropriate reference sources
  • (Effective, Flexible, Complete Electronic
    Connectivity)

8
The Mountain Ahead (or the Pebble in your shoe)
  • Legacy Integration
  • Migration
  • Terms (reference DBs)
  • Sheer magnitude

9
The Forest Management Issue
  • Its not the technology-
  • It is the business means to accomplish it.
  • (For large efforts even good things dont happen
    without a sufficient driver.)

10
The Essential Resources
  • Is this too big to hope it will happen with
    non-funded traditional coordination forums of
    volunteer resources?
  • Need
  • Disinterested guidance (Business/Process experts)
  • Broad forum (industry, users, vendors)
  • Dollars for production by experts and
    facilitators/aggregators
  • Stakeholder participation

11
OK, Wheres the Map?
  • Set up, fund and staff an effort to
  • Develop a clear charter
  • What are we trying to accomplish? Not? Who
    cares? What dependencies? Who is responsible for
    what and when?
  • Define business processes (present and likely
    future) that need to be accommodated.
  • Develop adequate, robust, ultra secure
    accommodating architecture.
  • Designate protocol environment.
  • Designate reference infrastructure and its
    operability
  • Develop migration principles and strategy
  • Ongoing OM
  • Provide for extensive development and production
    interoperability testing
  • Parallel review with NAESB standards as
    appropriate and ready
  • Integrate into specifications

12
The Elephant
  • How do you eat and elephant?

It seems that it is time to be what we need to
be, providing the infrastructure and
interoperability needed to meet ever expanding
critical needs with ever increasing difficulties
and demands in meeting them.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com