Representations of Mathematics Teacher Quality in a National Program - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Representations of Mathematics Teacher Quality in a National Program

Description:

Representations of Mathematics Teacher Quality in a National Program ... 1997a, 1997b, 2000; Hawk, Coble, & Swanson, 1985; Rowan, Correnti, & Miller, 2002) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:23
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: ValuedGate2244
Learn more at: http://mason.gmu.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Representations of Mathematics Teacher Quality in a National Program


1
Representations of Mathematics Teacher Quality in
a National Program
  • Patricia S. Moyer-Packenham, Johnna J. Bolyard,
  • Hana Oh, Patricia Kridler, Gwenanne Salkind
  • George Mason University
  • November 10th, 2006
  • 28th Annual Meeting of PME-NA
  • Mérida, Yucatán, Mexico

2
Goals of the Presentation
  • NSF Authorization Act of 2002 (PL107-368)
    includes enhancing teacher quality, quantity, and
    diversity as key goals of the Math and Science
    Partnership (MSP) program.
  • Identify representations of mathematics teacher
    quality in a nationally funded program
  • Discuss conditions implemented to influence
    mathematics teacher quality in the program

3
Review of Research on Teacher Quality
Characteristics
  • General Ability, including verbal ability
    (Ehrenberg Brewer, 1994, 1995 Ferguson, 1991
    Ferguson Ladd, 1996)
  • (2) Experience (Fetler, 1999 Ferguson, 1991
    Ferguson Ladd, 1996 Goldhaber Brewer, 1997b
    Hawkins, Stancavage, Dossy, 1998 Rivkin,
    Hanushek, Kain, 2005 Rowan, Correnti,
    Miller, 2002)
  • (3) Pedagogical Knowledge (Adams Krockover,
    1997 Darling-Hammond, 2000 Darling-Hammond,
    Berry Thoreson, 2001 Gess-Newsome Lederman,
    1993 Hawkins, Stancavage, Dossey, 1998 Valli
    Agostinelli, 1993 )

4
Review of Research (cont.)
  • (4) Subject Matter Knowledge (Chaney, 1995
    Goldhaber Brewer, 1997a, 1997b, 2000 Hawkins,
    Stancavage, Dossey, 1983 Monk, 1994 Monk
    King, 1994 Rowan, Chiang, Miller, 1997 Rowan,
    Correnti, Miller, 2002)
  • (5) Certification Status (Darling-Hammond, 2000
    Fetler, 1999 Goldhaber Brewer, 1997a, 1997b,
    2000 Hawk, Coble, Swanson, 1985 Rowan,
    Correnti, Miller, 2002)
  • (6) Teacher Behaviors, Practices and Beliefs
    (Guarino, Hamilton, Lockwood, Rathbun, 2006
    Staub Stern, 2002 Weiss Pasley, 2004 Weiss,
    Pasley, Smith, Banilower, Heck, 2003).

5
Research Questions
  • What characteristics do MSPs use to define
    mathematics teacher quality?
  • What conditions do MSPs implement in their work
    to improve mathematics teacher quality?

6
Data Sources
  • 123 Annual and Evaluation reports from 48 Math
    and Science Partnerships
  • 48 project websites
  • Presentation and publication documents available
    publicly

7
Methods
  • Document Analysis (Best Kahn, 1998 Patton,
    1990) Official/External Documents produced by
    the MSPs (Bogdan Biklen, 1998) Interpretation
    of data contained in the documents (McMillan
    Wergin, 2002).
  • Content Analysis Analysis of the written
    content of a document inductively establish a
    categorical system for organizing the information
    (Fraenkel Wallen, 1993).
  • Concept Analysis Conducted to understand the
    meaning and usage of educational concepts (e.g.,
    teacher quality) (McMillan Wergin, 2002).

8
Results
  • Representations of mathematics teacher quality
  • Conditions influencing teacher quality
    characteristics

9
Major Themes of Teacher Quality (reported by 48
MSPs)
  • REPRESENTATIONS
  • of Teacher Quality
  • Individual Characteristics Population
    Characteristics
  • Subject Knowledge Quantity
  • Pedagogical Knowledge Diversity
  • Behaviors/Practices/Beliefs
  • CONDITIONS
  • Influencing Teacher Quality Characteristics
  • Professional Development Stipends/Compensation
  • Teacher Leadership Retention
  • Recruiting Linking Teachers with STEM Faculty
  • Preservice Training Induction
  • Certification/Degrees

10
Representations of Individual TQ Characteristics
  • Subject Teachers test scores
  • Knowledge Improved student achievement
  • Teachers subject preparation
  • Pedagogical Responses on surveys
  • Knowledge Observations of teaching
  • Improved student achievement
  • Practices Responses on surveys
  • Beliefs Observations of teaching
  • Responses to interview questions

11
Conditions Influencing Individual TQ
Characteristics
  • Conditions Illustrative Examples
  • Professional Development Courses, workshops,
    institutes
  • Teacher Leadership Formal and informal roles
  • Preservice Training New course and program
    development
  • Certification/Degrees Program revision and
    development
  • Linking STEM Faculty With Teachers Teach courses
    Provide expertise

12
Key Findings and Implications
  • Significant emphasis on subject knowledge for
    teachers at all grade levels K-12.
  • Design of professional development is based on
    research findings.
  • Emphasis on subject knowledge is aligned with
    policy and professional organization statements.
  • Teacher quality is described as the intersection
    of content and pedagogy.
  • MSPs knowledgeable of current research and best
    practices.

13
Key Findings and Implications (cont.)
  • New collaborations between STEM Faculty and
    education faculty to improve K-12 mathematics
    education.
  • The important role of Teacher Leaders in
    knowledge development, connecting people, and
    institutional change.
  • Interrelated challenges facing STEM and education
    faculty.
  • MSPs in a position to contribute to research on
    teacher leadership.

14
Further Inquiry
  • What other inquiries about the work of the Math
    and Science Partnership Program are of interest
    to those in the mathematics education community?
  • What teacher quality characteristics are not
    addressed in these findings?
  • What conditions might influence teacher quality
    that are not addressed in these findings?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com