Title: Understanding
1Understanding Using theCAH Financial
Indicators Report
- CAH Financial Indicators Report Team
- North Carolina Rural Health Research and Policy
Analysis Center - Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services
Research - 725 Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard
- Chapel Hill, NC 27514
- CAH.finance_at_schsr.unc.edu
2Agenda
- 1. The theory of financial analysis
- 2. Overview of the CAH Financial Indicators
Report - 3. Understanding and using the peer groups
- 4. Understanding and using the indicators
- 5. Understanding the limitations
- 6. Using the indicators a test
- 7. What is next?
31. The theory of financial analysis
4Purpose
- One of the most important characteristics of a
business is its financial performance and
condition - Financial analysis assesses a businesss
financial performance and condition Does it have
the financial capacity to meet its mission? - Results sometimes focus on financial strengths
and weaknesses
5Types of Financial Analyses
- Several types are used
- Financial statement analysis focuses on the
information in a businesss financial statements
with the goal of assessing financial condition - Operating indicator analysis focuses on operating
data with the goal of explaining financial
performance - EVA, MVA, Dupont, MDA, FSI
- The CAH Financial Indicators Report includes
financial statement and operating indicator
analyses
6Ratio Analysis
- Ratio analysis is a technique used in both
financial statement and operating indicator
analyses - It combines values from the financial statements
(and elsewhere) to create single numbers that - have easily interpretable financial significance
- facilitate comparisons
7Interpreting Ratios
- A single ratio value has little meaning
- One point in time that may not be representative
- Cant tell if it is better or worse than other
hospitals - Therefore, two techniques are commonly used to
help interpret the numbers - Trend (time series) analysis
- Comparative (cross-sectional) analysis
- Both techniques are used in the CAH Financial
Indicators Report
8Using Ratios
- Ratios help to identify
- Questions to ask
- Issues to address
- Problems to solve
- Ratios do not necessarily provide
- Answers
- Explanations
- Solutions
92. Overview of the CAH Financial Indicators
Report
10CAH Financial Indicators Report Team
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
- George H. Pink, PhD
- G. Mark Holmes, PhD
- Rebecca T. Slifkin, PhD
- Technical Advisory Group
- Dave Berk, Rural Health Financial Services
- Brandon Durbin, Durbin Company LLP
- Roger Thompson, Seim, Johnson, Sestak Quist
LLP - Gregory Wolf, Stroudwater Associates
11Objectives of the CAHFinancial Indicators Report
- To select and construct a set of financial
performance measures that are relevant to
Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs) - To provide comparative information that CAH
boards and managements can use to improve
financial performance - To improve the quality of Medicare Cost Report
data reported by CAHs (our goal)
12(No Transcript)
13Ratios in the CAH Financial Indicators Report
- Profitability indicators measure the ability to
generate the financial return required to replace
assets, meet increases in service demands, and
compensate investors - Total margin, cash flow margin, return on equity
- Liquidity indicators measure the ability to meet
cash obligations in a timely manner - Current ratio, days cash on hand, net days
revenue in accounts receivable
14Ratios in the CAH Financial Indicators Report
- Capital structure indicators measure the extent
of debt and equity financing - Equity financing, debt service coverage,
long-term debt to capitalization - Revenue indicators measure the amount and mix of
different sources of revenue - Outpatient revenues to total revenues, patient
deductions, Medicare inpatient payer mix,
Medicare outpatient payer mix, Medicare
outpatient cost to charge, Medicare revenue per
day
15Ratios in the CAH Financial indicators Report
- Cost indicators measure the amount and mix of
different types of costs - Salaries to total expenses, average age of plant,
FTEs per adjusted occupied bed - Utilization indicators measure the extent to
which fixed assets (beds) are fully utilized - Average daily census swing-SNF beds, average
daily census acute beds
163. Understanding and using the peer groups
17First Issue of the CAHFinancial Indicators Report
- In Summer 2004, hospital-specific reports were
sent to 853 administrators - An evaluation form was included
- Many respondents requested comparison of their
performance to similar CAHs
18Selection of CAH Peer Groups
- Suggestions from respondents
- Literature review to identify important peer
groups in other studies - Advice of Technical Advisory Group
- Potential peer groups evaluated using statistical
analysis - Selected peer groups
- Important influences on indicator values
- Could be validly defined from Cost Reports
19Creation of CAH Peer Groups
- From Medicare Cost Report data, we identified
factors important to CAH financial performance - Had lt5 million, 5-10 million, or gt10 million
in net patient revenue - Provided long-term care
- Was owned by a government entity
- Operated a Rural Health Clinic
20 of Indicators that Varied for Each Factor
- Financial performance and condition varied
significantly among the peer groups
21Creation of CAH Peer Groups
- All combinations of the four factors were used to
create 24 peer groups - Every CAH was assigned to one of the 24 peer
groups - Indicator medians were calculated for each peer
group
22Second Issue of the CAHFinancial Indicators
Report
- In Summer 2005, hospital-specific reports were
sent to 1,092 administrators - Peer group, state, and national medians
- Summary graph of performance relative to peer
group - An evaluation form was included and most
respondents affirmed the selected peer groups - Many wanted peer group comparisons for CAHs in
their state
23Peer Group Medians
24Net Patient Revenues
- Larger CAHs were more profitable and could carry
more debt, possibly because - More diagnostic and outpatient services
- Higher charges, lower costs, or both
- Lower proportion of Medicare patients
- Higher patient volume generates higher total
revenue and lower fixed costs per patient - Other reasons?
25Net Patient Revenues
- Larger CAHs also had
- Higher Medicare revenue per day (greater patient
acuity, ICU/specialty service, higher wages in
larger communities?) - Lower salaries to total expenses (more equipment,
higher drug costs?) - Newer average age of plant (greater debt
capacity?)
26Provided Long-Term Care
- CAHs that provided long-term care were less
profitable, possibly because - Higher proportion of Medicaid patients
- Medicare Cost Report accounting methods
- Lower patient volume
- Other reasons?
27Provided Long-Term Care
- CAHs that provided long-term care also had
- Lower days revenue in accounts receivable (LTC
bills submitted prior to service?) - Lower outpatient revenue to total revenue (LTC
revenue is in the denominator) - Higher salaries to total expenses (high touch /
low tech nature of long-term care?)
28Owned by Government
- CAHs that were owned by government were less
profitable but more liquid, possibly because - Higher charges, lower costs, or both
- Lower patient volume
- Other reasons?
- CAHs that were owned by government also had
- Higher current ratio (lower use of debt)
- Older average age of plant (lower use of debt?)
29Operated a RHC
- CAHs that operated a RHC were less profitable,
possibly because - Higher proportion of Medicare inpatients
- Lower patient volume
- Other reasons?
- CAHs that operated a RHC also had
- Higher salaries to total expenses (physician
compensation in numerator?)
30Conclusion
- CAHs are not all the same - significant
differences in financial performance and
condition exist among CAH peer groups - May be misleading or unfair to compare the
financial performance of a smaller CAH to a
larger CAH, a CAH that does not provide LTC to a
CAH that provides LTC, and so on - Compare CAH financial performance
- First to peer group median
- Second to state median
- Third to U.S. median
314. Understanding and using the indicators
32An ExampleOur Hospital
- Lets look at indicator values for Our Hospital
- For all of the indicators
- Our Hospital is best performer
- Peer group median is second best
- State median is third best
- U.S. median is fourth best
- All of the numbers are contrived except for the
U.S median
33ProfitabilityTotal Margin
Net income Total revenue
Definition
Interpretation
Measures the control of expenses relative to
revenues
Is a higher total margin always good?
34ProfitabilityCash Flow Margin
Net income (Contributions, investments, and
appropriations Depreciation expense Interest
expense) Net patient revenue Other income
Contributions, investments, and appropriations
Definition
Measures the ability to generate cash flow from
providing patient care services
Interpretation
Why might total margin be negative and cash flow
margin be positive?
35ProfitabilityReturn on Equity
Net income Fund balance
Definition
Measures the net income generated by equity
investment (fund balance)
Interpretation
What is fund balance?
36LiquidityCurrent Ratio
Current assets Current liabilities
Definition
Interpretation
Measures the number of times short-term
obligations can be paid using short-term assets
Is a higher current ratio always good?
37LiquidityDays Cash on Hand
Cash Marketable securities Unrestricted
investments (Total expenses Depreciation) /
Days in period
Definition
Measures the number of days an organization could
operate if no cash was collected or received
Interpretation
How would you interpret 5 days cash on hand?
38LiquidityDays Revenue in Accounts Receivable
Net patient accounts receivable (Net patient
service revenue) / Days in period
Definition
Measures the number of days that it takes an
organization to collect its receivables
Interpretation
Is a lower days revenue in accounts receivable
always good?
39Capital StructureEquity Financing
Fund balance Total assets
Definition
Interpretation
Measures the percentage of total assets financed
by equity
Is a higher equity financing always good?
40Capital StructureDebt Service Coverage
Net income Depreciation Interest
expense Current portion of long-term debt
Interest expense
Definition
Measures the ability to pay obligations related
to long-term debt, principal payments and
interest expense
Interpretation
What happens if a hospital has no debt?
41Capital StructureLong-Term Debt to
Capitalization
Long-term debt Long-term debt Fund balance
Definition
Measures the percentage of total capital that is
debt
Interpretation
Is a lower long-term debt to capitalization
always good?
42RevenueOutpatient Revenues to Total Revenues
Total outpatient revenue Total patient revenue
Definition
Measures the percentage of total revenues that
are for outpatient revenues (including, for
example, Rural Health Clinics, free-standing
clinics, and home health clinics
Interpretation
43RevenuePatient Deductions
Contractual allowances and discounts Gross total
patient revenue
Definition
Measures the allowances and discounts per dollar
of total patient revenue
Interpretation
44RevenueMedicare InpatientPayer Mix
Medicare inpatient days Total inpatient days
Nursery bed days NF Swing bed days
Definition
Measures the percentage of total inpatient days
that are provided to Medicare patients
Interpretation
45RevenueMedicare OutpatientPayer Mix
Outpatient Medicare charges Total outpatient
charges
Definition
Measures the percentage of total outpatient
charges that are for Medicare patients
Interpretation
46RevenueMedicare OutpatientCost to Charge
Outpatient Medicare costs Outpatient Medicare
charges
Definition
Measures outpatient Medicare costs per dollar of
outpatient Medicare charges
Interpretation
47RevenueMedicare Revenue per Day
Medicare revenue Medicare days SNF Swing bed
days
Definition
Measures the amount of Medicare revenue earned
per Medicare day
Interpretation
48CostSalaries to Total Expenses
Salary expense Total expenses
Definition
Measures the percentage of total expenses that
are labor costs
Interpretation
49CostAverage Age of Plant
Accumulated depreciation Depreciation expense
Definition
Measures the average accounting age in years of
the fixed assets of an organization
Interpretation
50CostFTEs per Adjusted Occupied Bed
Number of FTEs Adjusted occupied beds
Definition
Measures the number of full-time employees per
each occupied bed
Interpretation
(Inpatient days NF Swing days Nursery
days) (Total patient revenue / (Total inpatient
revenue Inpatient NF revenue Other LTC
Revenue)) / Days in period
51UtilizationAverage Daily Census Swing-SNF Beds
Inpatient swing bed SNF days Days in period
Definition
Interpretation
Measures the average number of swing-SNF beds
occupied per day
52UtilizationAverage Daily Census Acute Beds
Inpatient acute care bed days Days in period
Definition
Interpretation
Measures the average number of acute care beds
occupied per day
53Conclusion
- Higher (lower) indicator values are not always
good. Most indicators have a middle range of
good values and extremes are bad values - Each CAH has some indicators that look good and
some that look bad relative to other CAHs,
which may make overall financial position
difficult to determine - For this reason, significant judgment is required
when analyzing financial and operating performance
54Conclusion
- Investigate indicator values that are
- Far above or below peer group, state, and U.S.
medians - Trending in the wrong direction
- Highly erratic (data quality?)
- Understand the indicators as a group of measures
555. Understanding the limitations
56Report Limitations
- Changing medians due to changing number of
hospitals per year (although equilibrium is near) - Timeliness of data (although recent numbers can
be produced using the Calculator from our
website) - No consensus about good performance (although
identification of benchmarks is planned) - Explanations for differential performance are not
identified - CAH mission, service mix and operating
environment are not considered
57Examples of Data Quality Concerns
- Zero total revenues
- Negative fund balances
- Negative current assets or current liabilities
- Negative days cash on hand
- Zero total expenses
- Negative net patient accounts receivable
- Zero inpatient days
- Zero outpatient charges
586. Using the indicators - a test
59A TestTheir Hospital
- Lets look at indicator values for Their Hospital
- What do you think about the financial performance
and condition of Their Hospital?
- Profitability
- Liquidity
- Capital structure
60(No Transcript)
61Profitability Analysis
- Declined substantially over the past five years,
but still better than industry. Trend is
worrisome, but recent upturn is encouraging - Potential reasons
- Gross charges are relatively lower (less volume,
change in payer mix?) - Allowances are relatively higher (more
competition?) - Costs are relatively higher (inefficiency or new
debt?) - Nonoperating income is relatively lower (lower
interest rates?)
62Profitability Analysis
- The managers should investigate
- Actions to increase revenues (better data
capture, fewer referrals, new services, new
markets, more physicians?) - Actions to control expenses (wage rates, staffing
patterns, group purchasing, equipment
management?) - Negotiation policy with third party payers
- Investment vehicles with higher returns
63Liquidity Analysis
- Conflicting results. Current ratio declined over
the past five years, but still better than
industry. Days cash on hand declined but worse
than industry - Potential reasons
- Current assets are relatively lower (greater draw
on cash or smaller inventory?) - Current liabilities are relatively higher (longer
payment periods or new debt?) - Operating costs are relatively higher
(inefficiency or new debt?)
64Liquidity Analysis
- Days revenue in accounts receivable increasing
and worse than industry. If credit policy has not
changed, third party payers are taking longer to
pay - Potential reasons
- Change in payer mix, increasing LOS, clerical
staffing problems, a nursing strike, change in
Medicaid policies, higher denial rate?
65Liquidity Analysis
- The managers should investigate
- Reasons for the decline in cash
- Payables management to maintain good relations
with suppliers - Changes to the revenue cycle for faster
collection, lower collection expenses and fewer
denials
66Capital Structure Analysis
- Conflicting results. Equity financing increased
over the past five years and better than
industry. Long-term debt to capitalization
declined and better than industry. Debt service
coverage declined but worse than industry - Potential reasons
- Hospital may have retired debt in 2004 and 2005
- Large principal repayments temporarily reduce
debt service coverage
67Capital Structure Analysis
- The managers should investigate
- Probably nothing
- Hospital may be able to issue additional
long-term debt, if profitability turnaround
continues
68Conclusion
- Firms that have high profits, lots of cash,
little debt, and new plants have great financial
strength. Firms with losses, little cash, lots
of debt, and old physical facilities will not be
in business long. (Cleverley and Cameron)
697. What is next?
70Third Issue of the CAH Financial Indicators Report
- In August 2006, CAHs will receive a letter
telling them how to download their
hospital-specific reports from our secure website
(paper copy mailed by request only) - SFCs will receive a letter telling them how to
download reports for hospitals in their state - Also available on the website will be
- Presentation (PowerPoint)
- Calculator (Excel spreadsheet)
- State Medians (Updated every 6 months)
71(No Transcript)
72(No Transcript)
73Benchmark Questionnaire
- After downloading the third issue of the CAH
Financial Indicators Report, hospitals will be
prompted to answer a questionnaire - CAHs will be asked to provide benchmarks for
- Cash flow margin
- Days cash on hand
- Debt service coverage
- Long-term debt to capitalization
- Medicare outpatient cost to charge
74Benchmark Creation
- Mean benchmarks for each indicator from
respondent hospitals will be calculated - We will test whether benchmarks vary among peer
groups - Hospital-specific performance against benchmarks
will be reported in the fourth issue of the CAH
Financial Indicators Report to be available in
summer 2007
75Performance Against Benchmarks
76CAH-Specific Benchmarks
- Established by informed practitioners versus
academic black box or arbitrary rankings - Based on a large sample of practitioners
(hopefully) - Focus on absolute versus relative performance
- Provides CAHs with ongoing management tool