LOCATION PATTERNS OF ISRAELI PHARMACEUTICAL AND ELRCTRONIC FIRMS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

LOCATION PATTERNS OF ISRAELI PHARMACEUTICAL AND ELRCTRONIC FIRMS

Description:

Understanding and explaining spatial organization of firms is central in ... Would find it beneficial to collocate with firms that engage in the same type of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: BbB64
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: LOCATION PATTERNS OF ISRAELI PHARMACEUTICAL AND ELRCTRONIC FIRMS


1
LOCATION PATTERNS OF ISRAELI PHARMACEUTICAL
AND ELRCTRONIC FIRMS
  • ??? ????? ????? ????
  • ??????? ?????? ?????? ??????, ???????

2
Presentation
  • Introduction
  • Agglomeration
  • Literature review
  • Hypotheses
  • Research design
  • Spatial regression model estimation
  • Results
  • Conclusions
  • Study implications

3
Introduction
  • Understanding and explaining spatial organization
    of firms is central in industrial location
    economics
  • Pharmaceutical and electronic industries are
    among the most significant and prominent branches
    of Israeli economy, understanding their location
    pattern is essential in firms location in Israel.

4
Agglomeration
  • Agglomeration Economies
  • May be defined as cost reductions that occur when
    many economic activities are carried on in one
    place (Blair, 1995).
  • May be derived from the geographical
    concentration of firms engaged in similar
    activities or within the industry, leading to
    further local clustering of related firms and
    accumulation of knowledge (Odile, 2002).
  • Agglomeration economies are cost-reducing factors
    that diminish uncertainty and increase production
    efficiencies (Shefer and Frenkel, 1999).
  • McCann and Shefer (2004) mention information
    spillovers, non-traded local inputs and skilled
    local labor pool.

5
Literature review
  • Empirical studies
  • Many innovative industries are characterized by
    the apparent tendency to cluster in particular
    locations (Shefer and Frenkel, 1999).
  • Locally captured spillovers play an important
    role in driving US pharmaceutical firms
    productivity (Chacar and Lieberman, 2003)
  • Geographical localization of spillovers of
    knowledge was established (Jaffe, 1989 Furman,
    Kyle, Cockburn, Henderson, 2004 )
  • Patent citations tend to occur more frequently
    within the state in which they were patented than
    outside of that state.
  • University research has a positive effect on the
    productivity of local firms

6
Hypotheses
  • The major question examined was does
    autoregressive spatial models provide a better
    explanation then models that disregard the
    spatial effects.
  • The models are examined on the pharmaceutical and
    electronic industries in Israel.

7
Models Examined
  • Traditional Tobit Regression
  • Models with spatial effects using LeSage Matlab
    Spatial econometric toolbox (1999)
  • SAR-Spatial Autoregressive Model
  • SDM-Spatial Autoregressive Durbin Model
  • SEM- Spatial Autoregressive Error Model

8
Hypotheses
  • Location patterns of pharmaceutical industry and
    electronics industry in Israel are similar.
  • Both industries are characterized by
    agglomerative location patterns.
  • The following would affect firms location
    decision
  • Location of a university
  • Location of a hospital, generating demand for
    drugs and enabling collaboration in research
  • Size of population is a proxy for the pool of
    workers
  • Presence of firms in other industries in the same
    region

9
Overview of Israeli Pharmaceutical industry
  • There are about 30 manufacturing companies in
    Israel that are devoted to the production of
    pharmaceutical products. They produce mainly
    human drugs, veterinary products and active
    pharmaceutical ingredients. The five leading
    companies are Teva, Agis, Dexxon, Taro and Rakah.
  • The major amount of the firms are RD
    small-middle size companies

10
  • Dependent variables
  • Number of pharmaceutical companies in each
    natural region
  • Mostly small middle sized companies with a varied
    line of activity such as RD, manufacturing,
    marketing etc that are located within Israel.
  • Joins a number of pharmaceutical related sectors
    such as biotechnological and biological companies
    that mainly involved in drug research and
    development activities and chemical companies
    that manufacture biochemical, organic and other
    chemicals

11
Phamaceutical Industry
  • The database includes about 170 companies
  • The database sources are Dun and Bradstreet guide
    and Matimop internet site (http//www2.matimop.org
    .il).
  • Besides pharmaceutical firms, firms of related
    sectors were included such as biotechnological
    and biological companies that are mainly involved
    in drug research and development activities and
    chemical companies that manufacture biochemical,
    organic and other chemicals

12
Overview of Israeli Electronic industry
  • Israel's fabless sector is third only to the USA
    and Taiwan.
  • The basis of the Israeli semiconductor industry
    are the very strong microelectronic academic
    departments in Israel since the early 60s. They
    contributed to a skilled manpower that later
    often migrated to the Silicon Valley, gained
    experience there and returned to Israel.
  • Three noticeable representatives of electronic
    industry - Motorola, Intel and Tower

13
Electronic Industry
  • Includes Semiconductors design, Semiconductor
    Manufacturing, Passive Components, Industrial
    Equipment, General Electronics Equipment and
    Electronics Assembly (EMS)
  • The database includes about 250 companies
  • The source of data is Israel Science and
    Technology website (www.science.co.il)
  • Contains firms engaged with activities such as
    RD, manufacturing and marketing

14
Independent Variables
  • Population (Pop)the number of persons
    distributed by natural regions (in thouthands).
  • Plants (Plants) the number of establishments
    with more than 5 employees distributed by natural
    regions.
  • Control variables
  • University (UNIV) Distribution of Israeli
    universities. The variable receives value 1 in
    case university is present in the region, and 0
    otherwise.
  • Hospital (HOSP) since this work focuses on
    pharma industry, hospitals represent one of the
    customers for the pharma firms and also research
    partner. The variable receives 1 in case of
    presence of hospital in a given region.

15
Traditional Regression
  • PharmaceuticalTobit Regression

16
Variable significant at plt0.05
17
.
  • Weight Matrix
  • The proximity term in this work bases on natural
    regions distribution.
  • ISR CBS (Central Bureau of Statistics) provides a
    map of Israel divided by regions, sub-regions and
    natural regions
  • Rook method was used to examine spatial
    contiguity

18
Spatial Autoregressive Durbin Model
  • SDM Tobit Pharma Regression
  • Variable significant at plt0.05
  • Variable significant at plt0.1
  • SDM Tobit Electronic Regression
  • Variable significant at plt0.05
  • Variable significant at plt0.1
  • Tobit method was used due to distribution of
    observations since this method allows dealing
    with cases where sample observations are censored
    or truncated. Given that the number of companies
    cannot be less than zero, the dependent variable
    is bounded on the lower end by zero and justifies
    the use of Tobit specifications for the models
    used.

19
Results
  • Spatial lag parameter ?
  • Pharmaceutical industry
  • Positive and significant coefficients
  • Presence of spatial agglomeration economies at
    work for the dependent variable (the number of
    companies in a certain region depends on the
    number in neighboring regions).
  • Electronic industry
  • Positive but insignificant at the 10 percent
    level
  • Suggesting that the number of electronic
    companies in one region was not influenced by
    number of companies of nearby regions.
  • .

20
Results
  • Population
  • Pharmaceutical industry
  • Negative and insignificant
  • W-population is positive and significant at 10
    level
  • Positive influence of population presence in
    nearby regions on firms decision to locate in a
    certain area
  • Electronic industry
  • Negative and insignificant

21
Results
  • University
  • Insignificant, however positive in both
    industries
  • Contradicts a common hypothesis in spatial
    literature that proximity to universities or
    research institutions is beneficial for plants
    (Jaffe, 1989, Feldman, 1994, Jaffe, Trajtenberg
    and Henderson, 1993)
  • Contradicts thesis hypothesis
  • Consistent with previous research that was
    conducted in Israel (Frenkel, 2001, Felstnstein,
    1996)

22
Results
  • Plants
  • Represents the presence of other firms in the
    area
  • Positive and significant at 5 level in both
    industries
  • Consistent with study hypothesis that presence of
    other firms in the same region will have a
    positive influence on the firm.
  • In the pharmaceutical industry WPlants is
    significant but negative, it measures the impact
    of remote plants.

23
Results
  • Hospital
  • Represents proximity to the client and also
    proximity to the source of innovation (similar to
    influence of universities).
  • Positive and significant in pharmaceutical
    industry
  • Aligned with study hypothesis of positive
    correlation between hospitals and pharmaceuticals
    firms

24
Main Conclusions
  • The presence of spatial agglomeration economies
    between the different natural regions
  • Confirmed in the pharmaceutical industry
  • Not confirmed in electronic industry

25
Conclusions cont.
  • Autoregressive models are more appropriate to
    examine agglomeration effects.
  • Though the traditional Tobit model results in the
    pharma industry in R-squared of 0.69, SDM results
    in R-squared of 0.7326. The spatial regression
    results in better goodness of fit, i.e. higher
    R-squared and in more significant results
    regarding the spatial effect.

26
Main Conclusions cont.
  • Result per industry
  • Pharmaceutical RD process may require usage of
    specific resources such as special equipment,
    clean rooms or unique skills. Significance and
    positive sign of hospital variable strengthen
    this claim, since many hospitals are engaged in
    research activities and can represent valuable
    source of resources such as specific equipment
    and access to laboratories for the firms.
  • Most of the small middle sized electronic firms
    do not have need for special resources due to the
    branch nature.

27
Plants Variable
  • The variable was significant in both industries
  • Represents an existence of industrial
    establishments in the area, indicating that firms
    prefer to locate near other firms. However the
    type of activity of those firms activity is less
    important.
  • The presence of industrial establishments in the
    area indicates existence of infrastructure such
    as communication lines, different facilities,
    roads, accessibility etc.
  • Electronic firms need access to general
    infrastructure, and they are less dependent on
    other electronic firms.

28
Population Variable
  • The population variable was insignificant in both
    industries
  • Israel is relatively a small country
  • About 40 of employees work one or more natural
    regions far from home, therefore the dependence
    on proximity to population center is limited
    (based on CBS data)
  • University variable was also insignificant in
    both branches
  • Consistent with previous research that was
    conducted in Israel (Frenkel, 2001, Felstnstein,
    1996)

29
Study implications
  • Pharmaceutical firms
  • Would find it beneficial to collocate with firms
    that engage in the same type of activity
  • Creating specialized industrial parks or centers
    would be valuable for this industry.
  • Electronics firms
  • Would not see in location with other electronic
    firms a valuable advantage
  • Existence of better infrastructure would attract
    electronic firms to the region.

30
QA
31
Agglomeration - cont.
  • Types of agglomeration economies
  • Internal agglomeration economies
  • External economies
  • Linkages between two activities
  • Vertical relationships
  • Backward linkage
  • Forward linkage
  • Complementary relationships

32
Literature review
  • Webber (1929) and Lösch (1944) models are
    cornerstone of the location theory.
  • Weber location theory (1929)
  • The model highlights the relationships between
    the input-output structure of the firms
    production function and the influence of input
    and output transportation costs on the firms
    optimum location.
  • The central place theory of Christaller (1933)
    and Lösch (1944)
  • Scale economies and transportation costs will
    lead to the creation of lattice of central
    places, each serving the surrounding area.

33
Literature review cont.
  • Location of Innovativeness
  • The Diamond of Competitive Advantage Theory
  • Porters diamond of competitive advantage
    theory identifies four major conditions that
    shape a cluster that include
  • Factor conditions such as costs, infrastructure,
    resources, and scientific and technical knowledge
    in the region
  • Demand conditions which refer to the strength of
    local and export demand Related supporting
    industries which provide local sourcing
  • Firm strategy and rivalry which refers to
    cooperative and competitive relationships among
    firms.
  • Supporting industries

34
Literature review cont.
  • Location of Innovativeness
  • The Diamond of Competitive Advantage Theory
    -cont.
  • The success of an individual firm may be
    partially traced to the size, depth, and nature
    of the cluster of related and supporting both
    public and private enterprises. Clusters provide
    constituent firms a competitive advantage not
    afforded by dispersed firms. Location advantages
    accrued from being in a cluster and provide less
    costly access to specialized inputs like
    components, machinery, business services, and
    skilled personnel in comparison to dispersed
    participants (Porter, 2000).

35
Spatial Econometrics Spatial Autoregressive
Regressions
  • The standard linier regression has the following
    form
  • y Xß e
  • e N(0,?2)
  • The most general statement of spatial auto
    regression is
  • y ?W1y Xß u
  • u ?W2ue
  • e N(0,s2In)

36
Spatial Econometrics Spatial Autoregressive
Regressions cont.
  • Model with restrictions
  • SAR Model - Spatial Autoregressive Model
  • y ?W1y Xß e
  • e N(0, s2In)
  • SEM model - Spatial Error Model
  • y Xß u
  • u ?Wue
  • e N(0,s2In).
  • SDM model - Spatial Durbin Model
  • y ?W1y Xß1 W1Xß2 e
  • e N(0, s2In)

37
Spatial Econometrics cont.Weight matrix
  • Contiguity matrix
  • NxN symmetric matrix where wij 1 when i and j
    are neighbors and 0 when they are not
  • Makes for a fairly sparse matrix
  • W matrix is usually standardized so all columns
    sum to 1
  • wsij wij / Sj wij
  • Makes operations with the W matrix as an average
    of neighboring values

38
Spatial Econometrics Weight matrix - cont.
  • Types of contiguity matrix
  • Rook contiguity - define Wij 1 for regions that
    share a common side with the region of interest.
  • Bishop contiguity - define Wij 1 for entities
    that share a common vertex with the region of
    interest.
  • Queen contiguity - for entities that share a
    common side or vertex with the region of interest
    define Wij 1.

39
The Diamond of Competitive Advantage Theory
40
Pharmaceutical Firms Data Distribution
Axis X -Range of number of companies Axis Y
-Number of natural regions
41
Electronic Firms' Data Distribution
Axis X -Range of number of companies Axis Y
-Number of natural regions
42
Population Distribution
Axis X -Range of population number (in
thousands) Axis Y -Number of natural regions
43
Plants Distribution
Axis X -Range of plants number Axis Y -Number
of natural regions
44
Maps of Israel natural region
45
Weight Matrix
46
Employed Persons by District
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com