Title: The Cost of Storage about 1K$/TB
1The Cost of Storage about 1K/TB
2Disk Evolution
Kilo Mega Giga Tera Peta Exa Zetta Yotta
- Capacity100x in 10 years 1 TB 3.5 drive in
2005 20 TB? in 2012?! - System on a chip
- High-speed SAN
- Disk replacing tape
- Disk is super computer!
3Disks are becoming computers
- Smart drives
- Camera with micro-drive
- Replay / Tivo / Ultimate TV
- Phone with micro-drive
- MP3 players
- Tablet
- Xbox
- Many more
ApplicationsWeb, DBMS, Files OS
Disk Ctlr 1Ghz cpu 1GB RAM
Comm Infiniband, Ethernet, radio
4Intermediate Step Shared Logic
Snap 1TB 12x80GB NAS
- Brick with 8-12 disk drives
- 200 mips/arm (or more)
- 2xGbpsEthernet
- General purpose OS
- 10k/TB to 100k/TB
- Shared
- Sheet metal
- Power
- Support/Config
- Security
- Network ports
- These bricks could run applications (e.g. SQL or
Mail or..)
NetApp .5TB 8x70GB NAS
Maxstor 2TB 12x160GB NAS
IBM TotalStorage 360GB 10x36GB NAS
5Hardware
- Homogenous machines leads to quick response
through reallocation - HP desktop machines, 320MB RAM, 3u high, 4 100GB
IDE Drives - 4k/TB (street), 2.5processors/TB, 1GB RAM/TB
- 3 weeks from ordering to operational
Slide courtesy of Brewster Kahle, _at_ Archive.org
6Disk as Tape
- Tape is unreliable, specialized, slow, low
density, not improving fast, and expensive - Using removable hard drives to replace tapes
function has been successful - When a tape is needed, the drive is put in a
machine and it is online. No need to copy from
tape before it is used. - Portable, durable, fast, media cost raw tapes,
dense. Unknown longevity suspected good. -
Slide courtesy of Brewster Kahle, _at_ Archive.org
7Disk As Tape What format?
- Today I send NTFS/SQL disks.
- But that is not a good format for Linux.
- Solution Ship NFS/CIFS/ODBC servers (not disks)
- Plug disk into LAN.
- DHCP then file or DB server via standard
interface. - Web Service in long term