FORUM: Design for Maintainability CII Construction Project Improvement Conference September 11-13, 2005 Austin, Texas - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

FORUM: Design for Maintainability CII Construction Project Improvement Conference September 11-13, 2005 Austin, Texas

Description:

Chevron Pre-Operations Impact to Asset Performance. CII Research Project ... Chevron's Application. Post ... For Chevron, D for M is not a standalone effort ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:99
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: RustyH3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: FORUM: Design for Maintainability CII Construction Project Improvement Conference September 11-13, 2005 Austin, Texas


1
FORUMDesign for MaintainabilityCII
Construction Project Improvement
ConferenceSeptember 11-13, 2005Austin, Texas
George Conner Richard Danks Robert Post
2
Presentation Agenda
  • Making the Case Concept Overview
  • NASA Implementation
  • D for M Implementation Model
  • Chevron Texaco Implementation
  • Benefits of D for M
  • Rohm Haas Implementation

3
Design for MaintainabilityMaking the Case
Concept Overview
Richard A. Danks Deputy Chief, Facilities
Division NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH
4
The Case for Design for Maintainability

5
Life Cycle Cost 30 Year Period
The Case for Design for Maintainability
Operation Maintenance 60 - 85
Land Acquisition, Planning, Renewal,
Revitalization, Disposal 5-35
Design Construction 5-10
Source Stewardship of Federal Facilities, 1998
6
Landscape of Interrelationships
Chevron Pre-Operations Impact to Asset
Performance
7
CII Research Project
  • D for M research project 1997 - 1999
  • CII Guidebook - 1999
  • CII Education module - 2002

8
Research Results
  • Defined levels of implementation
  • Common approaches to implementation
  • Common attributes of success
  • Model implementation process

9
Maintainability Principles
  • Reduce or eliminate wrench time
  • Optimize Safety, Accessibility, Ergonomics
  • Reduce Complexity or Task Difficulty
  • Optimize Standardization, Interchangeability, and
    Modularization

10
Process Characteristics
  • Integrates downstream knowledge early in
  • design process
  • Model process provides implementation
  • structure
  • Long-term perspective
  • Reduces life cycle costs
  • Short term perspective
  • Integration into existing processes
  • Alignment
  • Start up



11
D for M Process Highlights
  • Early implementation Greatest impact
  • Suite of tools to expedite implementation
  • Continuous improvement carries
  • over to future projects

12
NASA Implementation
  • Engineering Construction Innovation Committee
  • D for M selected as best practice for
    implementation
  • Development of week-long course
  • Presented at Field Centers
  • D for M material presented in Sustainability
    course
  • Centers implementing sustainable projects

13
NASA Implementation
  • Interdependent concepts
  • D for M integrated with
  • Sustainable (Green) design
  • Commissioning
  • Safety security
  • Supports other NASA programs
  • Reliability-centered Maintenance
  • Reliability based equipment acceptance

14
ImplementingDesign for Maintainability
George Conner Staff Reliability Engineer Chevron
Corporation Houston, Texas
15
Approaches to Implementation
  • Standard design practice
  • Contract specification
  • Cross functional participation
  • Pilot program
  • Integration into existing programs
  • Formal maintainability program
  • Comprehensive tracking


16
Model Process
Source CII Implementation Resource 142-2 Page 16
17
Model Process Elements
  • Milestones
  • Milestones are achieved through
  • maintainability practices
  • Practices
  • Maintainability practices are
  • implemented using tools
  • Tools
  • Tools basically document process
  • steps in a checklist format

18
Implementing D for M
  • Assemble cross-functional proj team
  • Formal maintainability reviews
  • Design to project maint. strategy
  • Consider maintenance staff skills and
  • training requirements

19
Implementation Resources
  • Implementation guidebook
  • 22 Maintainability Practices
  • 16 Implementation tools
  • Implementation suggestions
  • Establish a champion
  • Pilot program if a new start


20
Chevrons Application
  • Post Startup Performance unacceptable
  • Developed Operations Assurance Process
  • Team approach to selecting, developing, assessing
    and executing specific pre-operations activities,
    throughout the course of a project, that impact
    asset performance.
  • Project development and execution is based on a
    structured phase gate approach
  • Identify, Select, Develop, Execute, Operate
  • Maintainability is part of the Operations
    Assurance (OA) process.

21
Chevrons ApplicationOA Foundational Philosophies
Human Factors Assmt Maintenance
Strategy Mobilization Delays Resources
Competency Shift/Spares Constraints Mechanical
Handling Plan
BID Specifications Qualified Vendors Standardizati
on Reliability Modeling RCM Performance Indicators
Production / Utilization Operations
Strategy Resources Competency Operational
Flexibility Work Environment
22
Implementation Summary
  • CII has developed a robust D for M process.
  • Milestones Practices Tools
  • Early commitment / implementation is critical
  • The implementation can be customized based on
    current state and ultimate goals.
  • For Chevron, D for M is not a standalone effort
  • Specific D for M applications adapted for the OA
    process generally reference
  • Milestone 4 Plan Maintainability Implementation
  • Milestone 5 Implement Maintainability Process

23
Design for MaintainabilityBenefits
Robert Post Technical Fellow Project
Engineer Rohm and Haas Company Bristol, PA
24
Project Benefits
  • Smoother project startup
  • Less project rework
  • Less costly maintenance
  • Lower life cycle costs
  • Metrics Continuous Improvement
  • Supports CII Best Practices




25
Long Term Benefits
  • Eliminate the need for maintenance
  • Increased task efficiency
  • Reduced accidents
  • Decreased downtime
  • Access ergonomics
  • Standardization/modularization
  • Task simplification

26
Experience at Rohm Haas
  • Domestic US Projects
  • Reliability Design
  • Functional focus
  • Looks at reliability issues first
  • Minimize failures and maintenance
  • Identify/Resolve maintainability issues
  • Mostly done prior to execution



27
Experience at Rohm Haas
  • Domestic US Projects but.
  • Superior FEL definition yields faster/cheaper
  • execution
  • Everyone knows this, but
  • Getting Front End schedule time resources
  • Actual results vary
  • US work is limited these days anyway



28
Experience at Rohm Haas
  • Overseas Projects difficulties
  • Engineering Processes Vary
  • Owner processes
  • Contractor processes
  • OM processes
  • Cultural Viewpoint / Values differences
  • Language
  • Safety
  • Quality
  • What does Yes REALLY mean?



29
Benefits Summary
  • The know-how exists!
  • Domestic Must get commitment of
  • management and engineers
  • Overseas Much steeper learning curve


30
Want to Know More?
  • CII Publication
  • Design for Maintainability
  • Improving Project
  • Return on Investment
  • CII Research Reports
  • A Model Process
  • for Maintainability Implementation
  • State-of-Practice in
  • Maintainability Seven Case Studies
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com