A New Estimate of the Milky Way - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

A New Estimate of the Milky Way

Description:

Milky Way properties scale with halo mass. Mstar /Mhalo cooled baryon fraction ... Imply (high) 40% of baryons end up as stars. LMC and other satellites ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:18
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: lovef
Category:
Tags: baryon | estimate | milky | new | way

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A New Estimate of the Milky Way


1
A New Estimate of the Milky Ways Dark Halo Mass
  • Motivation
  • Methods
  • Results
  • Xiangxiang Xue
  • Hans-Walter Rix , G. Zhao, P. Re Fiorentin, T.
    Naab, M. Steinmetz, E. F. Bell, F. C. van den
    Bosch, T. C. Beers, R. Wilhelm, Y. S. Lee,
    C. Rockosi, B. Yanny,
  • H. Newberg, X. Kang, M. C. Smith, D. P.
    Schneider

Dec 3 2008 KIAA-Cambridge Joint Workshop
2
Why to estimate the MW halo mass?
  • Milky Way properties scale with halo mass
  • Mstar /Mhalo ? cooled baryon fraction
  • Number of expected sub-halos
  • The poorly known Galactic parameter
  • Recent lit. values 0.82.5 x 1012 M?
  • Are all satellites bound?

3
How to estimate the MW halo mass?
  • Basic approach
  • Assemble a large and well defined set of distant
    kinematic tracers from SDSS DR6
  • blue Horizontal Branch Stars with
  • 5 distances to D60 kpc
  • dv 10 km/s Fe/H estimates
  • Compare to kinematics in simulated halos that
    have been scaled to different halo mass
  • derive p(vlos) at different rgc
  • model it to get vcir(r)

4
Selection of the clean BHB sample
  • Pre-selected by color (Yanny et al 2000)
  • Measure Balmer line profile parameters
  • (cf Sirko et al 2004, Xue, Rix et al 2008)
  • identification gt90
  • Distances 5-10
  • Stars are metal poor

5
Spatial, velocity and Fe/H distributions of
BHBs
6
How to estimate the MW halo mass?
  • Modelling the BHB kinematics with simulations
  • make mock observations from within the
    output of the cosmological (Milky Way-like)
    galaxy simulations, and then match P(Vlos
    /Vcirr) to give Vcir,obs(r), and ultimately Mvir
  • use simulations from two different groups
    (Steinmetz, Naab)
  • same volume as SDSS DR6
  • derive P(Vlos/Vcir, r) for simulated halo stars
  • get P(Vlos/Vcir, r) for observed halo BHB stars
  • matching the distributions gives estimate of
    Vcir,obs(r)
  • also use good ole Jean Eq.

7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
Comparison of P(Vl.o.s/Vcir) in radial bin
15.0,20.0 kpc
Psim(Vlos, / Vcir),
? Construct estimate of Vcir (r)
Pobs(Vl.o.s,/Vcir) if vcir(obs)180km/s
P(Vlos/Vcir, obs) P(Vlos/Vcir, sim)
10
  • Vcir(r) derived by Jeans Equation

11
Estimate the DM halo mass
  • NFW DM halo Hernquist bulge exponential
    disk
  • Rotation curve matches
  • Both contracted and uncontracted halos match
  • Mvir 1.0 0.3 1012 M?

12
Result
  • Robust measurement (2simsJeans Eq.)
  • M (rlt60 kpc) 4.00.71011 M?
  • Vcirc(R) is not constant but gently falling, and
    matches either contracted or uncontracted NFW
    profile
  • If DM halo is NFW then
  • Mvir (275kpc) 1.0 0.3 1012 M?
  • consistent with previous estimates,
    but more precise
  • Imply (high) 40 of baryons end up as stars
  • LMC and other satellites marginally bound

13
Thank You
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com