Biofilm biomass and nutrient uptake at Smith Creek - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 1
About This Presentation
Title:

Biofilm biomass and nutrient uptake at Smith Creek

Description:

Biofilm biomass on rocks was quantified as chlorophyll a (an indicator of algal ... biofilm biomass was determined as an autotrophic index (AI, the ratio of AFDM to ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:43
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 2
Provided by: kevin357
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Biofilm biomass and nutrient uptake at Smith Creek


1
Biofilm biomass and nutrient uptake at Smith
Creek Kevin Simon1 and Beth Cheever2 1School of
Integrative Biology and Ecology, University of
Maine, ksimon_at_maine.edu 2Department of Biology,
Virginia Tech
1. Background
3. Biofilm Biomass
One of the most common results of agricultural
landuse is the increased input of nutrients to
streams . Increased nutrient delivery to streams
can stimulate productivity, but excessive
nutrient enrichment degrades water quality and
habitat, both locally and in downstream systems,
especially lakes and estuaries. We measured the
biomass of biofilms on rocks in multiple reaches
of Smith Creek as a rough indicator of
productivity. We also measured nutrient uptake
at the reach scale in 3 reaches of the Smith
Creek drainage. In general, agricultural landuse
is expected to increase biofilm biomass,
particularly the non-algal component of it.
Agricultural landuse generally leads to increased
rate of nutrient uptake as nutrient availability
increases, but reduced nutrient retention and
nutrient uptake efficiency.
Algal biomass was lowest in the shaded reach of
Mountain Run and in the Spring Run feeding Smith
Creek. Algal biomass was about twice as high in
the mixed use zone than in the shaded reach.
Algal biomass was highest in Bruce Farm reaches.
mg cm-2
Total biofilm biomass was similar in the shaded
reach, mixed use zone and spring run. In
Mountain Run on the Bruce Farm total biomass was
generally higher than at the other sites.
mg cm-2
  • 2. Methods
  • Biofilm Biomass
  • Rocks were collected from each site during
    invertebrate sampling. For each sample, a single
    rock (n6 per site) was collected, placed into a
    plastic bag, and frozen until analysis.
  • Biofilm biomass on rocks was quantified as
    chlorophyll a (an indicator of algal biomass) and
    Ash Free Dry Mass (AFDM, the total amount of
    organic matter on the rock, algal and otherwise).
    For analysis, biofilm on the rocks was scrubbed
    and filtered onto glass fiber filters.
    Chlorophyll a on the filters was extracted using
    hot ethanol and measured spectrophotometrically.
    AFDM was calculated by drying the filters,
    weighing them, combusting the organic matter on
    the filters at 500C and then reweighing the
    filters. The relative contribution of algae to
    biofilm biomass was determined as an autotrophic
    index (AI, the ratio of AFDM to chlorophyll a).
  • Nutrient Uptake
  • Uptake of 3 nutrients (NH4, NO3- and PO43-)
    in reaches of the stream in the mixed use zone
    and the upper and lower segments of Smith Creek
    on the Bruce Farm were measured by adding the
    nutrients and a conservative tracer (Cl-, used to
    account for groundwater influx to the reaches) to
    250 m reaches of the streams. The longitudinal
    decline in nutrients along the reaches was used
    to calculate three metrics of nutrient uptake
  • Uptake Length the average distance a nutrient
    travels downstream before it is taken up on the
    streambed. Long uptake lengths low nutrient
    retention. Note that uptake length is strongly
    influenced by stream size (larger streams
    generally have longer uptake lengths because they
    are deeper and faster).
  • Uptake Rate the rate of removal of nutrients
    from the water column per unit are of streambed.
  • Uptake Velocity the ratio of uptake rate to
    nutrient concentration in the stream. This is an
    indicator of uptake efficiency (i.e. how large is
    uptake rate relative to nutrient availability?).

There were no strong patterns in the relative
contribution of algal to biofilm biomass among
sites.
4. Nutrient Uptake
NO3 concentration was an order of magnitude
higher on the Bruce Farm than in the mixed use
zone. NO3 retention was low in all 3 sites (NO3
traveled 5-10km on average before uptake). NO3
uptake was more efficient in the mixed use and
Bruce Upper reaches.
NH4 concentration was reasonably low and similar
among reaches. NH4 uptake was generally similar
among reaches.
PO4 concentration was elevated in all reaches
compared to that in the forested reaches of
Mountain Run. Uptake efficiency was highest in
the Bruce Lower reach.
5. Conclusions
Higher nutrient availability and light have
likely led to higher biofilm biomass in the lower
reaches of the Smith Creek drainage. Most of the
biofilms are composed of dead organic matter
rather than algal films. Nitrate uptake
parameters are typical of a stream system that is
being saturated with nitrogen, with low retention
and uptake efficiency of nutrients. Despite
having some riparian vegetation, the mixed use
zone is not extremely different from the lower
reaches of Smith Creek in terms of nutrient
uptake, although biofilm biomass is more similar
to that expected for a forested system.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com